Natural hairdresser "There is no religion higher than Truth" H.P.Blavatsky

Antwerpen, België
Joined June 2018
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
Meet ARC ... the future of our planet. America, Russia and China. The three most powerful SOVEREIGN nations on our planet.... joining together to defeat a VERY OLD ADVERSARY. Finally breaking free from City of London's Empirical control... TAXES to the King of England were the catalyst.... WeThePeople kicked the English out of America and earned our Freedom in 1776. Defeated. This was a SHOCK to the Empire... WeThe People thought the Empire slowly died.... It did not. Realizing it was no longer physically capable of holding on to its power... ...a metamorphosis took place. A change from the Physical Control of Nations to the Financial Control of Nations. The 'City of London' became the Flagship for the New Empirical Financial System.... a DEBT BASED SYSTEM... that was to control the world from 1913 onwards. After 125 years of growth, wealth prosperity & success here in the USA.... The City of London returned to our shores They no longer used armies... They carried pen, paper, contracts, coercion, bribery blackmail and individual threats to Congressmen and Presidents alike. Adopt our Financial System or else... WeThePeople list our liberty again in 1913... when the City of London controlled Private Bank called The Federal Reserve was created. Together with the TAXES levied on WeThePeople once more. Trump, Putin, Xi ... are ending The City of London... once and for all.
🚹 BREAKING: Putin just requested a THREE-WAY MEETING with President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, NO Zelensky — WSJ GOOD. Trump needs to go full power player mode and find a way to END this war without that spoiled brat obstructing peace Zelensky is the main obstacle of peace right now. Pray for Trump's success đŸ™đŸ»
91
334
25
1,691
179,998
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
As a reminder: the CIA (and others) created the Iranian Nuclear program via funding the Pakistani program and knew it was happening. The same is true with Libya and North Korea's program and they also knew China was also involved. Meanwhile the UK and France (and eventually the US were assisting China with theirs). Look no further than BCCI’s role in financing elements of Pakistan’s nuclear efforts and the broader 1980s context of US aid to Pakistan (via the ISI for the Afghan mujahideen) while US policy knew about the nuclear program and that it was being facilitated by funding the ISI/AFG 1980's operation as well as BCCI role's in the operation. Proliferation by the A.Q. Khan network to Iran, Libya, North Korea and others is well-established and separate but contemporaneous. orfonline.org/research/more-
 BCCI and Pakistan’s nuclear program (1980s): The 1992 US Senate Foreign Relations Committee report (The BCCI Affair, led by Senators John Kerry and Hank Brown) explicitly lists BCCI’s activities as including “support of terrorism, arms trafficking, and the sale of nuclear technologies.” It flags “the extent of BCCI’s involvement in Pakistan’s nuclear program” as an open area needing further investigation. Why didn't anyone else investigate? Why didn't Kerry investigate? We're talking about NUCLEAR WEAPONS...no one could be bothered...because they already knew the answer: CIA. archive.org/stream/TheBCCIAf
 The BCCI Foundation (later INFAQ Foundation) in Pakistan received tax-free status (facilitated when Ghulam Ishaq Khan was finance minister) and channeled BCCI profits. It provided roughly $10 million in the late 1980s toward the Ghulam Ishaq Khan (father of Pakistan's Nuclear Program) Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology (GIKI). A.Q. Khan served as project director of the institute. go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%
 BCCI officials assisted Pakistani/ISI front companies in purchasing nuclear-related technologies, including through BCCI-Canada (the “Parvez”/Pervez case involving attempts to acquire specialized materials such as maraging steel). The report concludes there is “good reason” that BCCI financed parts of the program via the Foundation and BCCI-Canada. orfonline.org/research/nucle
 BCCI was founded 1972 by Pakistani banker Agha Hasan Abedi, with deep ties to Pakistani leadership including General Zia ul-Haq and Ghulam Ishaq Khan, plus major Gulf funding especially from Abu Dhabi’s Sheikh Zayed and Saudi Arabia. The initial seed money came from Bank of America. It operated extensively in the covert/black arena: money laundering (including drug proceeds), arms deals, and intelligence-linked activity (it served as a front CIA in operations like Iran-Contra. newindianexpress.com/magazin
 After the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the Reagan administration provided substantial military and economic aid to Pakistan, hundreds of millions annually, as the main conduit for supporting the mujahideen (which morphs into al Qaeda) via the ISI. Under the Pressler Amendment, the Reagan administration annually certified that Pakistan did not possess a nuclear explosive device, enabling the aid to continue despite the CIA producing intelligence indicating the enrichment program at Kahuta (under A.Q. Khan) was advancing rapidly. By the mid-1980s Pakistan had produced enough highly enriched uranium for weapons but the Reagan administration continued to lie to everyone. The documented link is the geopolitical tolerance of the program while aid flowed, plus BCCI’s separate role in some financing and procurement. A.Q. Khan’s network (building on the same procurement networks used for Pakistan’s own program) sold centrifuge technology, components, designs, and related know-how. Transfers to Iran began in the late 1980s (P-1/P-2 centrifuges and related items); Libya received a more comprehensive package later (including designs and UF6); North Korea was also a customer. This is extensively documented in IAEA findings, the Libya disclosures of 2003, and subsequent investigations. Khan publicly confessed in 2004 (while claiming limited personal responsibility and later retracting aspects).carnegieendowment.org/resear
 Several books have been written on the subject including: Iqbal Chand Malhotra, The Bomb, the Bank, the Mullah and the Poppies: A Tale of Deception (2023): The most direct treatment of the BCCI–nuclear–drugs–ISI nexus. It argues BCCI was established and used in part to fund Pakistan’s nuclear ambitions (Project 706), links it to heroin/poppy revenues banked through BCCI, Gulf funding, CIA and the broader “deep state” effort. Reviews and excerpts present it as a forensic-style account tying these elements together. theweek.in/theweek/leisure/2
 Adrian Levy & Catherine Scott-Clark, Deception: Pakistan, the United States, and the Secret Trade in Nuclear Weapons (2007): Detailed investigative account of US (and Western) knowledge of and complicity in Pakistan’s nuclear development and subsequent proliferation during the aid years and after. thetimes.com/world/us-world/
 Gordon Corera, Shopping for Bombs: Nuclear Proliferation, Global Insecurity, and the Rise and Fall of the A.Q. Khan Network (2006/2009): Focused, well-sourced account of the Khan network’s rise, operations, and customers (Iran, Libya, North Korea).books.google.com/books/about
 Hassan Abbas, Pakistan’s Nuclear Bomb: A Story of Defiance, Deterrence and Deviance: Broader history of the Pakistani program, Chinese assistance, Saudi/Gulf funding, and the Khan proliferation network. Douglas Frantz & Catherine Collins on the Khan story; the IISS Strategic Dossier Nuclear Black Markets (2007); and the primary BCCI Affair Senate report itself (available via FAS and archive.org). The BCCI–nuclear financing link is real; the US aid–nuclear involvement is a clear policy reality of the 1980s; and the Khan network’s proliferation is a core, well-evidenced episode. The Malhotra book is the one that most explicitly weaves the bomb, the bank, and related covert financing together. Primary sources (Kerry report, intelligence chronologies, IAEA) provide context.
3
27
3
83
2,193
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
CHAPTER 1: SECRET ARMY IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS In the 1960s, the U.S. secretly transported almost 300 Washington-allied Tibetan Chinese to the Rocky Mountains of Colorado to create a clandestine army for an insurrection in China. The top secret project, codenamed St Circus, was based at a remote center called Camp Hale, high in a mountain range later made famous worldwide by singer John Denver. The CIA chose the location because they hoped the freezing high altitude terrain resembled that of China’s Tibet province. To keep the public away, the CIA told residents of the area that it had been chosen for “atomic bomb testing”. US military trainers at Camp Hale put the men through courses in sabotage, surveillance, communications, weapons handling, explosives, and so on. By the 1960s, the CIA had refined a strategy to quietly create conflicts in which US competitors such as China and Russia would be fought by residents or neighbors, so that US nationals were never at risk—a clever technique still used today (see Ukraine, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and so on). . CHAPTER 2: DALAI LAMA’S WEALTH The St Circus secret army project had multiple other elements. - The CIA spent tens of millions of dollars parachuting tons of weapons to the Indian border with China to arm Washington-allied Tibetan rebels and mercenaries on the spot. The airlift was codenamed St Barnum, and the trained paramilitary group eventually had 1,800 heavily armed troops. - The CIA paid US$180,000 a year directly to the Dalai Lama for many years. (For context, the average middle-class salary in India at the time was US$360 a year, so the Dalai Lama’s team were obscenely wealthy. The secret payment was listed in US State Department files as “a covert subsidy”.) - While the US officially recognized Tibet as a province of China, the CIA wanted to fool the world (including US citizens) into thinking otherwise. - They launched multiple “free Tibet” programs, making them appear to be grassroots campaign groups. - They paid for “Offices of Tibet” to be set up in New York and Geneva, to be portrayed as unofficial embassies of “independent” Tibet, which they said had been “invaded” by China. - The CIA also ran a comprehensive and well-funded general program to demonize the Chinese worldwide, codenamed St Bailey. This was an expansive attempt to create a false narrative claiming, falsely, that the Han Chinese were actively engaged in the genocide of the Tibetan Chinese. But one aspect of the original plan was cancelled. The US wanted to get General Chiang Kai-shek on the Chinese island of Taiwan involved—but backed off when the Nationalist leader pointed out that Tibet was clearly part of China, having been a region or a protectorate of the country for many centuries. . CHAPTER 3: THE ENEMY WITHIN Still, cash poured into the “three saints” plot—before it was attacked by an enemy within. In the 1960s, China was as poor as the nations of Africa. But some people in the US, particularly national security adviser Henry Kissinger, felt that the capability of China’s leaders, and the country’s massive size, meant that it would rise steadily, and could turn into a serious player in the world stage: a country better to have as an ally than an enemy. Furthermore, US operations in Asia, particularly Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia, were struggling and desperately needed all Washington’s care (meaning cash) and attention. So Kissinger decided to rein in the CIA’s efforts to create problems for the Chinese. . CHAPTER FOUR: SHOCK REJECTION In August of 1969, the free-spending CIA put in a request for an additional US$2.5 million in cash for US-managed Tibetan insurgents. Kissinger rejected the application, except for the annual US$180,000 pay packet for the Dalai Lama. He then wound down the other parts of the project except for the cheapest elements. All that was left was “desultory radio broadcasts from Taipei and Seoul, leaflets dropped on the mainland, fake news planted in Hong Kong and Tokyo, and what the agency described as ‘activities worldwide to denigrate and obstruct the People's Republic of China’,” CIA historian Tim Weiner wrote. In other words, only deceit-based demonization remained. The CIA put a brave face on it, telling government committees that the narrative had not died. An 11 January 1971 internal Washington memorandum, now declassified, said: “With Indian asylum and U.S. support, the idea of Tibet as an ethnic and cultural entity with a widely-acknowledged claim to freedom from Chinese Communist rule has survived.” But even that didn’t survive for long. . CHAPTER 5: SECRET FLIGHT TO CHINA Kissinger further horrified CIA leaders when he said he would be flying to China to create a rapprochement with its leaders. He took a secret trip there in 1971 to meet the highly intelligent Prime Minister Zhou Enlai on July 9. Their conversation was recorded. It showed that Zhou knew full well about CIA-led campaigns to “free” Tibet and Taiwan. It also revealed Kissinger’s attempts to downplay the extraordinary amount of time and money the US intelligence agency had spent trying to create problems in China. Referring to the “free Taiwan” campaign, Zhou asked: "The CIA had no hand in it?" Kissinger replied to the translator that Prime Minister Zhou “vastly overestimates the competence of the CIA". ZHOU: "They have become the topic of discussion throughout the world. Whenever something happens in the world they are always thought of." KISSINGER: "That is true. And it flatters them. But they don't deserve it." Zhou was not fooled. He pointed out that the agency clearly ran subversion operations to create trouble in China. Kissinger responded by saying that most CIA officers "write long, incomprehensible reports and don't make revolution". Zhou replied: "You use the word revolution. We say subversion." Kissinger conceded that the Chinese premier was right. "Or subversion," he replied. "I understand.” The US national security adviser then promised Zhou he would halt CIA efforts to manufacture problems in China. “We are conscious of what is at stake in our relationship, and we will not let one organization carry out petty operations that could hinder this course," Kissinger pledged. . CHAPTER 6: MORE BUDGET CUTS He went home and further slashed the CIA’s China budget. A partly declassified document from 6 September 1972 says: “For FY 73 [financial year 1973] CIA proposes to continue the subsidy to the Dalai Lama US$[REDACTED], again reduce support for the contingency force US$[REDACTED], and fund intelligence activities and the New York office US$[REDACTED]. Support would cease for press activities, a political party, administrative training, and the Tibetan office [TEXT REDACTED]. Eventually both fake Tibet “embassies” were closed, and the global campaign of lies was shelved. . CHAPTER 7: RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD More than a decade later the use of Tibet as a demonization tool was revived. It was brought back by a CIA-adjacent soft power regime change group, the National Endowment for Democracy (founded in 1983). Today, "free Tibet" ops are continued by multiple NED-funded projects, such as the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China. (The Tibetan genocide story remains untrue. The number and proportion of Tibetan Chinese in Xizang is growing faster than the number of Han Chinese, and the same is true of the Uyghur Chinese in Xinjiang.) To this day, western mainstream media prints quotes from IPAC and other “Free Tibet” campaign groups on this topic while hiding their US origins and funding. . CHAPTER 8: NARROW ESCAPE But declassified documents and books of CIA history show that more than 90 per cent of CIA infiltration or subversion operations against China in the 1950s and 1960s led to failure, with insurgents, agents or assets being caught, imprisoned or executed. So that secret Tibetan army, trained in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, may wish to thank Henry Kissinger. They had a lucky escape. . . Sources: The Office of the Historian (US State Department), National Security Archive (US), Legacy of Ashes by Tim Weiner, and our own research. In the 1960s, the U.S. secretly transported almost 300 Washington-allied Tibetan Chinese to the Rocky Mountains of Colorado to create a clandestine army for an insurrection in China. The top secret project, codenamed St Circus, was based at a remote center called Camp Hale, high in a mountain range later made famous worldwide by singer John Denver. The CIA chose the location because they hoped the freezing, high altitude terrain resembled that of China’s Tibet province. To keep the public away, the CIA told residents of the area that it had been chosen for “atomic bomb testing”. US military trainers at Camp Hale put the men through courses in sabotage, surveillance, communications, weapons handling, explosives, and so on. By the 1960s, the CIA had refined a strategy to quietly create conflicts in which US competitors such as China and Russia would be fought by residents or neighbors, so that US nationals were never at risk—a clever technique still used today (see Ukraine, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and so on). . CHAPTER 2: DALAI LAMA’S WEALTH The St Circus secret army project had multiple other elements. - The CIA spent tens of millions of dollars parachuting tons of weapons to the Indian border with China to arm Washington-allied Tibetan rebels and mercenaries on the spot. The airlift was codenamed St Barnum, and the trained paramilitary group eventually had 1,800 heavily armed troops. - The CIA paid US$180,000 a year directly to the Dalai Lama for many years. (For context, the average middle-class salary in India at the time was US$360 a year, so the Dalai Lama’s team were obscenely wealthy. The secret payment was listed in US State Department files as “a covert subsidy”.) - While the US officially recognized Tibet as a province of China, the CIA wanted to fool the world (including US citizens) into thinking otherwise. - They launched multiple “free Tibet” programs, making them appear to be grassroots campaign groups. - They paid for “Offices of Tibet” to be set up in New York and Geneva, to be portrayed as unofficial embassies of “independent” Tibet, which they said had been “invaded” by China. - The CIA also ran a comprehensive and well-funded general program to demonize the Chinese worldwide, codenamed St Bailey. This was an expansive attempt to create a false narrative claiming, falsely, that the Han Chinese were actively engaged in the genocide of the Tibetan Chinese. But one aspect of the original plan was cancelled. The US wanted to get General Chiang Kai-shek on the Chinese island of Taiwan involved—but backed off when the Nationalist leader pointed out that Tibet was clearly part of China, having been a region or a protectorate of the country for many centuries. . CHAPTER 3: THE ENEMY WITHIN Still, cash poured into the “three saints” plot—before it was attacked by an enemy within. In the 1960s, China was as poor as the nations of Africa. But some people in the US, particularly national security adviser Henry Kissinger, felt that the capability of China’s leaders, and the country’s massive size, meant that it would rise steadily, and could turn into a serious player in the world stage: a country better to have as an ally than an enemy. Furthermore, US operations in Asia, particularly Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia, were struggling and desperately needed all Washington’s care (meaning cash) and attention. So Kissinger decided to rein in the CIA’s efforts to create problems for the Chinese. . CHAPTER 4: SHOCK REJECTION In August of 1969, the free-spending CIA put in a request for an additional US$2.5 million in cash for US-managed Tibetan insurgents. Kissinger rejected the application, except for the annual US$180,000 pay packet for the Dalai Lama. He then wound down the other parts of the project except for the cheapest elements. All that was left was “desultory radio broadcasts from Taipei and Seoul, leaflets dropped on the mainland, fake news planted in Hong Kong and Tokyo, and what the agency described as ‘activities worldwide to denigrate and obstruct the People's Republic of China’,” CIA historian Tim Weiner wrote. In other words, only deceit-based demonization remained. The CIA put a brave face on it, telling government committees that the narrative had not died. An 11 January 1971 internal Washington memorandum, now declassified, said: “With Indian asylum and U.S. support, the idea of Tibet as an ethnic and cultural entity with a widely-acknowledged claim to freedom from Chinese Communist rule has survived.” But even that didn’t survive for long. . CHAPTER 5: SECRET FLIGHT TO CHINA Kissinger further horrified CIA leaders when he said he would be flying to China to create a rapprochement with its leaders. He took a secret trip there in 1971 to meet the highly intelligent Prime Minister Zhou Enlai on July 9. Their conversation was recorded. It showed that Zhou knew full well about CIA-led campaigns to “free” Tibet and Taiwan. It also revealed Kissinger’s attempts to downplay the extraordinary amount of time and money the US intelligence agency had spent trying to create problems in China. Referring to the “free Taiwan” campaign, Zhou asked: "The CIA had no hand in it?" Kissinger replied to the translator that Prime Minister Zhou “vastly overestimates the competence of the CIA". ZHOU: "They have become the topic of discussion throughout the world. Whenever something happens in the world they are always thought of." KISSINGER: "That is true. And it flatters them. But they don't deserve it." Zhou was not fooled. He pointed out that the agency clearly ran subversion operations to create trouble in China. Kissinger responded by saying that most CIA officers "write long, incomprehensible reports and don't make revolution". Zhou replied: "You use the word revolution. We say subversion." Kissinger conceded that the Chinese premier was right. "Or subversion," he agreed. "I understand.” The US national security adviser then promised Zhou he would halt CIA efforts to manufacture problems in China. “We are conscious of what is at stake in our relationship, and we will not let one organization carry out petty operations that could hinder this course," Kissinger pledged. . CHAPTER 6: MORE BUDGET CUTS He went home and further slashed the CIA’s China budget. A partly declassified document from 6 September 1972 says: “For FY 73 [financial year 1973] CIA proposes to continue the subsidy to the Dalai Lama US$[REDACTED], again reduce support for the contingency force US$[REDACTED], and fund intelligence activities and the New York office US$[REDACTED]. Support would cease for press activities, a political party, administrative training, and the Tibetan office [TEXT REDACTED]. Eventually both fake Tibet “embassies” were closed, and the global campaign of lies was shelved. . CHAPTER 7: RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD More than a decade later, the use of Tibet as a demonization tool was revived. It was brought back by a CIA-adjacent soft power regime change group, the National Endowment for Democracy (founded in 1983). Today, "free Tibet" ops are continued by multiple NED-funded projects, such as the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China. (The Tibetan genocide story remains untrue. The number and proportion of Tibetan Chinese in Xizang is growing faster than the number of Han Chinese, and the same is true of the Uyghur Chinese in Xinjiang.) To this day, western mainstream media prints quotes from IPAC and other “Free Tibet” campaign groups on this topic while hiding their US origins and funding. . CHAPTER 8: NARROW ESCAPE But declassified documents and books of CIA history show that more than 90 percent of CIA infiltration or subversion operations against China in the 1950s and 1960s led to failure, with insurgents, agents or assets being caught, imprisoned or executed. So that secret Tibetan army, trained in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, may wish to thank Henry Kissinger. They had a lucky escape. . . [Sources: The Office of the Historian (US State Department), National Security Archive (US), Legacy of Ashes by Tim Weiner, and our own research.] . .
18
144
11
403
9,611
Break free from the binary of hierarchy. #Distributism is neither capitalist nor socialist. It doesn’t concentrate power with either the corporation or the state
 Distributism ‘distributes’ power to the people through the guild or the trade association.
2
4
89
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
Why would.... The City of London ....be an ENEMY of CHINA ? 'THE CITY OF LONDON'... ...to this very day, deals in Drugs, Weapons, and Human Trafficking.... Just as it always has... THE OPIUM WARS: The City of London didn’t just sell opium to China. It engineered a deliberate reversal of power.... For decades Britain was bleeding silver to pay for Chinese tea and silk. The Square Mile’s solution was simple and ruthless: Using its Empirical Strength and control over other countries... it grew massive quantities of opium in India under its 'East India Company' control.... then flood the OPIUM into China. The addiction of the Chinese people to opium drained the SILVER back out of China back into THE BANKS OF THE CITY OF LONDON of... flipped the trade balance, and created a PERMANENT dependency on London. When the Qing government finally tried to shut it down, the City’s merchants and their political allies didn’t negotiate... They sent the ROYAL NAVY. Still the most feared Maritme Force on the planet. The Opium Wars were nothing else but drug enforcement actions. "You will take our Opium and be happy..." Treaties did follow, but they were always backed by force... The Treaties carved out Hong Kong... opened the treaty ports, locked in LOW tariffs, and gave foreigners (the British) extraterritorial privileges. Hong Kong became the perfect offshore base—logistics for the DRUG TRADE, BANKING....and later..... ....everything else the same London networks wanted to extract or control. The same City interests that underwrote the opium chests later underwrote the indemnities, the railways, and the foreign banks that dominated China’s economy. The effects of the OPIUM WARS are still felt today in CHINA.... It was never just “free trade.” It was a financial weapon backed by gunboats, turning a trade deficit into a strategic foothold that lasted generations. Why would President Xi ... join forces with Trump to fight this common enemy ? History tells us why.
19
198
18
483
13,443
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
Following My Channel You Shouldn't Be Surprised About This Headline Now if you follow the Podcast Bros you will find yourself confused. Why? The Mantra & Rhetoric is that Donald Trump answers to Benjamin Netanyahu. -That he worships Benjamin Netanyahu. -That he follows orders from Benjamin Netanyahu. -That he sold his soul to Benjamin Netanyahu. -That he sold out America to Benjamin Netanyahu. Now one would simply assume if that is the case why hasn’t Donald Trump implemented any laws or policies that benefits Israel đŸ‡źđŸ‡± at the expense of the American people? Why would Donald Trump still do trade or any business with Iraq who has implemented their own laws that makes it illegal for any Iraqi citizens to do business with Zionist? Why would Donald Trump step in and takeover Gaza with US Military preventing Israel from taking over Palenstine that they have been trying to attempt for over 40 years? The Podcast Bros will not tell you that they are operating under the guidance of intelligence agencies who are running demoralization campaigns to get you to support foreign agents like Former General Michael Flynn. Have you all noticed that Michael Flynn has never been under the same scrutiny on these Podcast where you see him being dragged for being a foreign asset for Russia, Israel, and Iran? They want compromised assets as presidents who can destroy you from within under the guise of freedom & liberty just as Barack Obama was doing and those presidents before him. Marjorie T. Green just like Kimberly Guilfoyle took millions in bribes. Meanwhile they are out here trying to convince you D. Trump is the sellout. People, if Donald Trump sold you out why is it taking so long for you to notice? Wouldn't it be easy to pull up any documentation that where you would see that he is clearly attacking your constitutional rights in any capacity that where you can't separate what he is doing from what Barak Obama was trying to do? Did you know I showed a screenshot of one of these Podcast Bros sitting on another man's lap with a sheer black tight shirt inside a gay club? He is one of the main ones undermining POTUS. But he does this under the guise that he is heterosexual. As do others but I digress.
JUST IN: Trump refuses to endorse Benjamin Netanyahu ahead of Israel's upcoming elections.
106
626
31
2,700
76,507
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
Baron Rothschild asked the British government for twenty million to cover his war losses. The Soviet poster put it into perspective: a poor banker needs money to buy some bread. At the bottom: ROTHSCHILD: “Spare twenty million for a poor banker to buy some bread!”
18
192
5
576
10,757
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
I like France, i adore Italy. I hate those who destroy these beautiful countries. That is why i hate the globalist elite that rule them.
321
2,001
92
13,226
158,441
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
I don’t know if Zelenskyy watches the news, but the mood in France, Italy and Albania is not good. Large protests are underway, sometimes turning into clashes with police. In southern Italy roads are set to be blocked for the next two days. People are protesting bad education, poverty, soaring fuel prices and actual shortages of diesel and gasoline in some regions. Against this backdrop, six months before elections in France and Italy, Volodymyr Zelenskyy is asking for another €70 billion to fund an endless war that Ukraine is losing. The previous €90 billion were already extracted with huge difficulty. Hungary and Slovakia have already said they will not take part in this new financing. This is not about whether I support Zelenskyy. The economy in Ukraine is nearly stopped — by Russian strikes and by the incompetence of a wartime government. The Constitution is on pause, as one of Zelenskyy’s own friends has said. The war is taking more lives and more land, and the only answer we hear is “give Ukraine more money”. Money that Europeans no longer want to give and can no longer afford to give. Every third euro in Ukraine is now Western borrowing. To save the country we need a deal and a chance to rebuild. I do not believe Ukraine can remain an equal partner while it is this dependent on the West, or that this strategy has any long-term future. It breaks my heart that this war is destroying so much in Ukraine and causing such degradation. It also breaks my heart that European countries, including France, Italy and Albania, are going through such hard times. That is why I say again: let’s end the only war in Europe so that all of us can start building a future.
163
295
24
1,451
127,221
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
🇼đŸ‡č MILAN - ITALY: Europe can't defend itself against migrant invaders smashing, looting, & setting things on fire, but some say European men need to be sent to fight Russia? Are you OUT OF YOUR MIND?
36
299
23
748
18,264
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
The goal of orchestrated mass migration is to lower wages for the oligarchs who own the industries, it is not and has never been in the interest of the working classes. The 'solidarity' card is and has always been a lie. It also helps that mass migration destroys social bonds so people can be exploited more easily.
12
66
3
209
6,876
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
Sorry voor de incidentele wijsneuzerigheid, maar wat ik 1.5 jaar geleden voorspelde is in een stroomversnelling gekomen. Waarom het zo loopt? Oorlog gaat om belangen, niet om principes of moraal. Trump denkt terecht dat hij en de VS meer belang hebben bij vrede en handel met Rusland dan bij het steunen van Oekraïne met een oorlog die het nooit kan winnen. Ook voor de Europese NAVO en EU landen is vrede met Rusland veel belangrijker dan oostwaartse uitbreiding. Maar die zitten vast in drijfzand van noodlottig moralisme en verdrongen onmacht. Niet in staat strategische fouten te erkennen en te corrigeren. Terwijl het beste dat de EU landen kunnen doen is Trump steunen bij een deal die de oorlog beëindigt, de souvereiniteit en neutraliteit van Oekraïne bevestigt, en overeengekomen territoriale concessies wat hen betreft definitief maakt. De beste veiligheidsgarantie is een dergelijke overeenkomst tussen Rusland en de VS. Noodgedwongen geaccepteerd door Oekraïne (zie Zelensky hieronder), internationaal vastgelegd (NAVO, VN, Brics, ..), en met afspraken waar alle partijen meer belang bij hebben dan bij continuering of hervatting van de strijd. Omdat de oorlog zich al 3 jaar in een "mutually hurting stalemate" bevindt is dat laatste niet zo moeilijk. Politieke wil, dat is de kritische factor. xitter.cf/SteveCortes/status/211

Replying to @bob_deen
Trump en Poetin willen geen staakt het vuren maar een stabiel vredesakkoord. Poetin heeft een deel van zijn eisen al binnen (Hygseth): territoriale concessies, geen NAVO lidmaatschap voor Oekraïne. Als er nog wat bij komt, bv het opheffen sancties door de VS, kan Rusland instemmen met een tijdelijk staakt-het-vuren. Het is goed mogelijk dat Trump en Poetin in die periode een stabiel en duurzaam vredesakkoord sluiten. Rusland zal veel eisen ingewilligd krijgen, bv de Krim en Donbas worden definitief Russisch, geen troepen uit NAVO-landen in Oekraïne, geen VS-kruisraketten in Duitsland, en reductie van de  Amerikaanse militaire presentie in Oost-Europa, incl het sluiten raketschildbases in Polen en Roemenië. Met die concessies kan Rusland worden overgehaald in te stemmen met een vredesakkoord en zich er aan te houden. Dat is veel gunstiger dan hervatting of voortzetting vd strijd. Rusland kan Oekraïne niet verslaan, ondervindt heel veel schade vd oorlog, heeft geen belang bij uitbreiding vd oorlog naar andere Europese landen en kan flink gaan profiteren van normalisatie van diplomatieke en economische relaties met de VS. Ook neemt de gepercipeerde dreiging door de VS+NAVO af en blijft de strategische positie aan de Zwarte Zee behouden (voor wat het nog waard is). Voor Oekraïne is het gunstig dat de oorlog, die een groot humanitair, demografisch en economisch drama is, snel eindigt. Verder heeft Oekraïne niet veel keus. De VS zal net als met het staakt-het-vuren een vredesakkoord opleggen door (te dreigen met) het stoppen van militaire steun en inlichtingen, desnoods Starlink uitzetten. Tandenknarsend moet Oekraïne instemmen met wat de VS en Rusland afspreken. Neutraliteit, beperkt leger. Grondwet aanpassen. Mogelijk kan restant Oekraïne bij de EU, die dan de kosten van heropbouw betaalt. Samen met de mineralendeal verzacht dat de pijn vd zinloze oorlog enigzins. Wat resteert is een nationaal trauma. De VS onder Trump zit daar niet zo mee. Voor toeschouwer EU is het een complete afgang. Eerst meegegaan in de VS-neocon geïnspireerde NAVO- en EU-uitbreiding; een grote strategische blunder die normale economische relaties met Rusland heeft verziekt. Onvoldoende werk gemaakt vd uitvoering vd Minsk akkoorden en onder druk van Kallas niet onderhandeld met Poetin toen het heel urgent was. Later veel te lang vastgehouden aan loze slogans als "as long as it takes", terwijl evident was dat Oekraïne niet kon winnen. Zelfs nadat Trump duidelijk maakte de oorlog te willen stoppen heeft de EU geen eigen belangen ingebracht maar is afgeleid door discussies over vredestroepen (die er niet komen) en defensieuitgaven. Nordstream herstellen? Als de EU niet snel bij zinnen komt is Nordstream straks een Rusland-VS project. De VS profiteert van goede relaties met Rusland. Haaks daarop bewapenen de EU-landen zich ten koste van welvaart en sociale cohesie tegen een Rus die niet komt en die samen met de Yank op defensie bezuinigt. Trump heeft al 50% reductie met Poetin besproken en bepleit zelfs denuclearisatie. Door verkeerde geopolitieke ambities, foute strategische keuzes en propaganda die uitgroeide tot zelfmisleiding dreigt in het gunstigste geval de EU een irrelevante toeschouwer te worden. In het slechtste geval neemt de EU de proxyoorlog van de VS over nu die er zelf geen brood meer in ziet. De eerste reacties uit Brussel wijzen daar gelukkig niet op.
25
23
2
86
4,324
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
I used to supervise Euroclear and Clearstream so this @FT story caught my attention. @MESandbu suggests Euroclear is too big to destabilise and Belgium is to small to bear the risks of $360 billion restoration costs if ever the Central Bank of the Russian Federation succeeds in regaining rights to frozen or expropriated assets - which it will regain in any settlement of the Ukraine war. What he fails to address entirely is Rule of Law and Private Property Rights. Sure these are inconvenient to thieves, but they are essential to global securities markets. Securities are called securities because they convey secure property interests and claims to their owners at law. What will destabilise Euroclear is global perception that $44 TRILLION in securities assets under custody are now UNSAFE because the EU can decide to steal them. Also, it’s irritating to see him suggest ECB can force Euroclear ‘to split off the risky part of its balance sheet into a separate entity’. That is just another form of theft. Euroclear is licensed as a bank, but its core business in its charter and under specific Belgian legislation is as a fiduciary or trustee of OTHER PEOPLES’ ASSETS. Because it is so central to European and global markets, it is forbidden to take normal commercial risks. Fiduciary, custodian, and trust assets under Euroclear custody are NOT on Euroclear’s balance sheet because 100% ownership remains with the depositors. Even if Euroclear goes bust, customer assets will NOT form any part of the insolvency estate and can be reclaimed by depositors. I designed and modernised the laws protecting Euroclear and Clearstream depositors. I pray they withstand these lawless attacks by would-be thieves. Break Rule of Law and Property Rights and you break global securities markets.
88
647
74
1,813
91,308
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
THE CITY OF LONDON'S tentacles reached deep into the pockets of the 1900s American Banker... The Jekyll Island meeting (November 1910) was a secret gathering of top bankers and officials who drafted the core plan that led to the Federal Reserve. It took place at the exclusive Jekyll Island Club off the Georgia coast. The group traveled under the cover of a duck-hunting trip so the public and press wouldn’t know Wall Street figures were writing banking reform legislation. Who was there (the main participants): Senator Nelson Aldrich — Chairman of the National Monetary Commission; he organized the meeting. Paul M. Warburg — Partner at Kuhn, Loeb & Co.; the leading technical expert on central banking from THE CITY OF LONDON. Henry P. Davison — Senior partner at J.P. Morgan & Co. Frank A. Vanderlip — President of National City Bank of New York. Benjamin Strong — Vice president of Bankers Trust (Morgan-related). Charles D. Norton — President of First National Bank of New York (also Morgan-aligned). A. Piatt Andrew — Assistant Secretary of the Treasury and economist for the Monetary Commission. What it was for: After the manufactured panic of 1907, Congress had created the National Monetary Commission to study banking reform. Aldrich needed a concrete bill..... At Jekyll Island the group spent about a week writing the framework for a central banking system (the Aldrich Plan / National Reserve Association). The plan called for a privately owned central bank with regional branches that could issue currency and act as a lender of last resort. That draft was later modified under the recovering President Woodrow Wilson... (After an Assassination attempt) The Wilson administration made the modifications and it became the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The secrecy was deliberate—Aldrich and the bankers believed open knowledge of Wall Street’s role would kill the legislation. Just like it nearly killed the President for resisting...
28
172
16
306
15,796
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
In a report written during the First World War, British political officer Captain William Shakespear explains the British arrangement negotiated with Abdulaziz Ibn Saud, founder of the modern Saudi state. “I venture to submit that [Ibn Saud] in effect asks for little more than what has already been conveyed
In exchange [Ibn Saud] offers to make himself a British vassal for good.” Ibn Saud would conquer the Hejaz in 1924–25 and proclaim the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932. The whole campaign was facilitated by London Ibn Saud was a British client from the beginning. And the Wahhabi dictators in Riyadh still serve London and—after the Roosevelt/Lord Halifax deal in 1944—their imperial partners in Washington UK military has had 11 soldiers embedded in the personal protection force of the ruling Saud family since 1964 (BMM SANG) The United States Military Training Mission (USMTM) was established in Saudi Arabia in 1953 to train, advise and equip the dictatorship’s armed forces. It’s still in operation and composed of 330 American personnel Saudi has been a puppet regime from its inception
79
1,253
117
2,392
100,246
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
Trump says he knows the details of how the Ukraine war started and will release them someday. Europe is hunting for €70B more for Ukraine, now down to its last Patriot interceptors. @BarbaraMBoyd on why Europe and Canada are marching to suicide 👇
169
3,249
126
8,355
123,451
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
Zelensky is not carrying out this war to retain the Donbas, which is occupied by ethnic Russians whose language and religion he has outlawed—a fact the press refuses to report. What this really is about is he neocon dream of conquering and destroying Russia once and for all. It has never been about democracy or any other propaganda. The Minsk Agreement was meant to allow the Donbas to vote, which Zelensky refuses to honor.
62
445
14
1,415
24,637
Lieve Noels 🕉 retweeted
My dudes. You’re posting Alt Media regulars who are years late to recognizing that Trump and Putin have been working together the entire time. Live a little. Check out the Righteous Russia series, which predicted everything James says here in 2022. burningbright.substack.com/p

10
69
2
237
4,010