Since September, @TacBuild's TVL is down ~70%, I'd like to think the decline isn’t purely market driven I see it as a coordination problem, a messaging problem, and more importantly, a revenue problem And this is where most people get TAC wrong: TAC is a B2B chain You don’t measure its growth by charting $TAC candles… You measure it with: • integrations, • MiniApp penetration, • LP efficiency, • and ultimately, revenue generated onchain. If TAC captures real revenue, the treasury can justify scheduled buybacks… …and the token appreciates organically, not emotionally But right now the ecosystem is fragmented: • Users don’t understand why apps matter • Builders don’t know what APAC Telegram users actually want • Liquidity inflates and drains with no narrative gravity • No central hub tracks the data that proves TAC’s value This is the gap TAC needs to fix before the next wave of integrations land. And it’s why @JournalTac is evolving The TAC Journal looks to evolve into: → a research & analytics layer for TAC, → a data-backed narrative engine, → a centralized pulse for metrics, trends & ecosystem intelligence, → a community alignment hub for @TacBuild. Not to “save TAC” But to help the ecosystem understand itself again. TAC has the infrastructure TAC has the B2B value proposition What it needs now is clarity, the kind that turns data into conviction and conviction into activity That’s the chapter we want to open... Soon gTAC CT