J. Schipper retweeted
America may eventually change its president. But Europe may never return to the dependency it once accepted.
Something remarkable is happening across Europe.
First, defence. Europe is investing in its own military industry, production capacity and strategic capabilities.
Then satellites. European programmes such as IRIS² and GOVSATCOM are building alternatives to dependence on American-controlled communications infrastructure.
Now, even payment systems. Europe is developing alternatives to Visa and Mastercard through initiatives such as Wero and the digital euro.
Different industries. The same underlying objective.
Strategic autonomy.
Europe learned from Russia that energy dependence could become a geopolitical weapon.
Now it is confronting an uncomfortable question: what happens when even your closest ally can use technological and economic dependence as political leverage?
The irony is extraordinary.
Washington wants to preserve American influence in Europe. Yet its confrontational policies may be accelerating the very European independence that could reduce that influence.
And here is the part that future American administrations should consider carefully:
Diplomatic relations can be repaired. Trust takes much longer.
Factories will not close because a new president takes office. Satellite constellations will not disappear. European payment infrastructure will not simply be dismantled.
Europe can remain America's ally without remaining dependent on America.
The United States may change its leadership in four years. But Europe is changing its strategic architecture for decades.
And that may prove to be one of the most lasting geopolitical consequences of this era.
J. Schipper retweeted
We need to consider banning European political parties that are loyal to the Kremlin. They would side with Russia if it attacked, and that makes them a serious national security risk
J. Schipper retweeted
Guardate bene questa mappa. Non tanto per quello che mostra, ma per chi l’ha realizzata e per quello che potrebbe esserci dietro.
Raccoglie le proteste avvenute in Europa tra il 21 settembre e il 17 ottobre 2026. Francia, Italia, Spagna, Belgio, Austria, Portogallo. Centinaia di migliaia di persone in piazza per salari, pensioni, caro affitti, scuola, spese militari e altre questioni sociali.
A pubblicarla è Rybar, una delle più importanti strutture di propaganda filorussa, fondata da un ex appartenente all’apparato comunicativo della Difesa russa e con legami documentati con l’ambiente di Prigožin.
Perché un’organizzazione del genere dovrebbe interessarsi tanto alle manifestazioni europee?
La risposta merita qualche riflessione.
La Russia conduce da anni una guerra ibrida contro l’Europa. Cyberattacchi, sabotaggi, disinformazione, interferenze politiche e operazioni per alimentare divisioni interne. Non sono fantasie complottiste, ma attività documentate dalle intelligence occidentali.
Ora aggiungiamo qualche elemento.
L’avvicinamento di una parte dell’estrema destra europea al mondo MAGA. Il sostegno pubblico di Musk all’AfD tedesca. Le posizioni di Trump nei confronti dell’Unione Europea. I rapporti di alcuni movimenti sovranisti con Mosca.
Si comincia a intravedere uno scenario piuttosto interessante. E preoccupante.
Una protesta legittima contro il carovita può diventare, attraverso migliaia di account, influencer e canali di propaganda, la dimostrazione che l’Europa sta crollando. Che Bruxelles è il nemico. Che le sanzioni alla Russia ci stanno distruggendo. Che aiutare l’Ucraina significa impoverire i cittadini europei.
Rafforzare i partiti che contestano le istituzioni europee, alimentare la sfiducia nei governi, ostacolare le decisioni comuni, bloccare gli aiuti militari a Kyiv e indebolire progressivamente l’Unione.
E c’è uno scenario ancora più pericoloso: la sovrapposizione tra campagne di disinformazione, tensioni sociali e operazioni di sabotaggio. Una crisi reale può essere amplificata artificialmente fino a diventare una crisi politica.
Naturalmente, questo non dimostra che Trump, Musk e i servizi russi operino sotto una regia comune. Sarebbe un’affermazione senza prove. Ma gli interessi possono convergere anche senza un accordo formale, e alcuni effetti politici possono favorire contemporaneamente attori molto diversi. Ed è evidente a tutti il sorprendente avvicinamento (tradimento) di Trump a Putin di queste ora
Putin vuole un’Europa debole e divisa. Una parte dell’estrema destra vuole ridimensionare o smantellare l’Unione. Trump considera spesso Bruxelles un avversario economico e politico.
Obiettivi differenti, con possibili risultati sorprendentemente simili.
E arriviamo alla questione politica.
Chi pensa che la guerra russa riguardi soltanto qualche territorio ucraino continua a non comprendere la dimensione dello scontro.
L’Ucraina è il fronte militare. L’Europa è anche un bersaglio politico, economico e informativo.
Per Mosca non è indispensabile conquistare militarmente una capitale europea. Può essere molto più conveniente contribuire a portare al governo forze disposte a paralizzare l’Unione dall’interno.
E mentre discutiamo se aiutare ancora gli ucraini a difendersi, dovremmo cominciare a chiederci quanto siamo preparati a difendere le nostre democrazie
Rybar, presentazione ufficiale: rybar.ru/about/
Consiglio UE, attività ibride russe: consilium.europa.eu/it/polic…
OCCRP, inchiesta sulle operazioni russe in Europa: occrp.org/en/investigation/l…
Carnegie, AfD e relazioni internazionali: carnegieendowment.org/resear…
J. Schipper retweeted
This tweet has long since been deleted by its author. I'm posting it as a source for anyone should they need it. It should remind us that malignant megalomaniacs often travel in the same nefarious circles but can turn on each other.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
J. Schipper retweeted
Russian Kosmos 2612 and ICEYE-X36 (providing Ukraine military support) are now in perfect sync with each other. The Russian military satellite is intentionally stalking and tracking the Western radar satellite. Keeping a satellite "bumper-to-bumper" in this manner allows Russia to intercept or jam data transmissions, physically inspect Western technology, or quickly pivot to execute a kinetic or non-kinetic anti-satellite (ASAT) attack with very little warning or fuel expenditure.
Kosmos 2612 executed a series of highly precise, fuel-heavy maneuvers to force itself into a "coplanar" orbit—matching ICEYE-X36's exact altitude (~555 km), speed, and inclination (~97.8°). The ICEYE-X36 satellite is giving the Ukraine military support.
J. Schipper retweeted
Es kann leider nicht ausgeschlossen werden, dass bei der Gewalteskalation in Frankreich auch durch Russland angeheuerte Saboteure eine Rolle spielten. So passierte es schon bei Anschlägen auf jüdische Gedenkstätten. Moskau verfolgt das Ziel, unsere Gesellschaft zu spalten.
J. Schipper retweeted
Musk needs to have his security clearance revoked, every contract with the federal government cancelled, and X must be force sold like TikTok.
J. Schipper retweeted
Ameryka się budzi! 🇺🇸 ✌🏻
Potężne protesty w wielu miastach USA, a w mediach prawie cisza!
Pomóżmy nagłośnić te wydarzenia, szczególnie tutaj, na X! Donald Trump i Elon Musk nie lubią, kiedy ludzie głośno mówią, co myślą, i przypominają im, że Ameryka nie ma królów, a władza należy do obywateli, nie do garstki miliarderów.
#NoKings #NoKingsInAmerica
J. Schipper retweeted
Europe is planning how to move away from Elon Musk’s Starlink.
Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski has publicly confronted Musk over restrictions affecting Ukraine. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas says developing an alternative is a European defence priority.
Ukraine is already working with European partners on additional satellite capabilities, including France.
The message is becoming clear: Europe wants independent military communications, rather than permanent dependence on an American-controlled system.
The latest restrictions have reportedly disrupted Ukrainian drone operations, including the interception of Russian attack drones.
The strategic consequence for SpaceX could be substantial: a system that became indispensable to European defence is now giving European governments reasons to develop ways to operate without it.
J. Schipper retweeted
This will now become a stampede, I predict
cultmtl.com/2026/09/canada-c…
J. Schipper retweeted
🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦 In just ONE WEEK Trump has:
• Lifted sanctions on Russian diesel.
• Suspended the Lindsey Graham sanctions against Russia.
• Called for Zelenskyy to be replaced.
• Claimed Russia could have taken Kyiv quickly if its tanks hadn’t driven into mud.
• Said Zelenskyy is harder to deal with than Putin.
• Called Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries a “disgrace”.
• Starshield was throttled, reportedly with White House approval.
• Missing critical US missile warnings.
Meanwhile, Russia continues bombing Ukrainian cities and killing civilians.
J. Schipper retweeted
Waarom zien we hier op X / Twitter NIETS over de MASSALE No Kings protesten van gisteren in HEEL Amerika?
Wie is hier snoeihard de midterms aan het beïnvloeden denken jullie?
J. Schipper retweeted
I quit Tesla today. For the past 6-9 years, I’ve been working on Roadster development at both Tesla and SpaceX. They’re charging headlong toward reusable and cheap flying machines and playing Russian roulette with our lives. More thoughts below.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This is a parody of Jacob Coxon's viral Anthropic resignation post. The author has repeatedly confirmed it is a joke. The account was created in March 2026 with no evidence of employment at Tesla or SpaceX.
x.com/UranusX420/sta…
x.com/hilbertspaess/…
J. Schipper retweeted
The richest man on earth dropped nearly $300 million to buy himself a Congress.
That’s not democracy. That’s a purchase order.
On November 3, remind him the government isn’t for sale.
nytimes.com/2026/10/12/us/po…
J. Schipper retweeted
Fuck You Trump.
Fuck You Elon.
Fuck Russia.
I hope Zelenskyy blows the hell out of every Russian Oil Refinery…
And Every Russian Data Center.
J. Schipper retweeted
🔥 UPDATE:
The Starshield throttle is now being read as a warning to the whole American arms trade, not just to SpaceX. If the Telegraph's account holds, Musk pitched the slowdown and Trump signed off. Fear of a "kill switch" on exported US kit, the F-35 above all, has moved from hypothetical to precedent.
The logic is harsh. Ukraine was a paying customer and broke no contract. SpaceX had no commercial reason to cut it, since the war sells terminals. Any buyer watching this will wonder what stops Washington from doing the same to a fighter fleet that can't fly without American support. Nothing in the contract would.
The fallout has started. Italy has frozen talks on a 1.63 billion dollar Starlink deal. Germany is speeding up its own sovereign military satellite constellation. EU Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius says Europe urgently needs an alternative.
Musk and Trump each deny owning the cutoff. Ukrainian air defence paid for the slowdown on a night of carnage in Kyiv. Lockheed and Boeing may pay too, in lost European orders.
Source: @ChrisO_wiki
Nobody owns the Starshield cutoff. Everyone who could have decided it is pointing at someone else. The one man left standing in the pointing line is Pete Hegseth.
Resurgam laid out the sequence. It reads like a hot potato passed around a table.
THE CHAIN OF DENIALS
The Telegraph, citing four people familiar with the discussions, reports that Musk himself proposed limiting Starshield. The military version of the satellite system runs under Pentagon control. Trump agreed. He gave the Pentagon the order. Then the noise arrived. The public pushed back. Republicans criticized the move. The CIA did not back it. A congressional inquiry opened. Customers of Musk's companies, Poland and Germany among them, hinted at consequences.
Musk's answer was to distance himself. Starshield is a Pentagon system, he says, so only Trump could have signed off. Asked about the blocking, Trump said: "I don't know if anyone even did it, because it was definitely not me and I don't think it was Musk."
Two men. Two denials. An idea that started with a single person.
WHY TRUMP COVERS FOR MUSK
Trump turns on his allies while sparing the donor who bankrolled him. Musk supplied almost a third of the Republican election budget. That was 379 million dollars in direct contributions, plus up to 130 million more from affiliated people and companies. That buys a lot of silence from a boss.
THE CONVENIENT SCAPEGOAT
With both of them washing their hands, the "initiative," and the quotation marks matter, lands on Hegseth. Congress will hold hearings and an investigation into it. He cannot contradict Trump, because Trump is the boss and says there was no order. He cannot point at Musk, because Musk is the donor. He is stuck between two people he cannot afford to name.
His position was already bad before this. He faced accusations on seven counts.
THE RESOLUTION WAITING AFTER THE ELECTION
On the second to last working day of the House before the vote, Republican Massie filed a resolution to impeach Defense Secretary Hegseth. Speaker Johnson was obliged to bring it to the floor within 48 hours. That meant the final working day before the election. Johnson was not sure it would fail. He was also unwilling to send Congress to the polls with another scandal. So he closed the session early. The resolution now hangs over the two-month transition period after the election. Johnson will almost certainly not be speaker anymore by then, and he will have little reason to care what happens to Hegseth.
The Starshield affair now adds hearings and investigations on top of that. Restricting Starshield is an unpopular idea among Republicans, which only raises the combined odds of impeachment. The votes should be there in the House. Beyond it, in the Senate, Hegseth was confirmed on the tie-breaking vote of Vance, at a moment when Trump was at peak strength.
WHAT A BAD ELECTION CHANGES
If the midterms go badly, part of the Republican caucus will likely slip out of Trump's control. Then the question becomes how the White House appoints a new defense secretary without Congress, even inside the lame-duck window. A handful of defectors is enough to block a replacement of the same mold as Hegseth. Colby would go down with him.
So here's another angle. The affair has made the impeachment of Hegseth and Colby, people unfriendly to Ukraine, the base-case scenario. The election math will most likely strip the White House of the ability to push through more idiotic appointments of the same kind.
Resurgam adds a note on the other front. Trump suspending most provisions of the Graham-Blumenthal sanctions bill was expected after the diesel episode. The Kremlin's main aim over the past six to eight weeks has been this. The fertilizer and diesel stories were only intermediate stages. The task is unchanged: raise the losses for Republicans, which raises the losses for Trump, and squeeze the maximum out of whatever situation appears.
Drones lost their link mid-flight, and the men who set the cap still want to be treated as bystanders. Impeachment hearings are how bystanders get found.

































