Expert in the Medical Model Refuse to supervise 🫸 Refuse to train 🫸 Refuse to engage 🫸 Unflatten the hierarchy @invcoriolis.bsky.social

Joined December 2023
I have noticed an up tick in PA anons and PA supporting accounts coming to give an opinion-on my feed- about my views on @lengreview PA protocols. To help you, I have 3 things to say. 1. I don't have any influence in the system, I am not part of Council @RCPhysicians (powers that be terminated my time). I have no voice that anyone takes much note of- especially in @NHSE_WTE @NHSEngland circles. There's a reason I am not in the @HSJnews Non-white influential people list- it's because I don't have influence. That is a fact. So don't worry at all about my view. 2. Making references to my recent loss in a derogatory way is more a reflection of your upbringing or lack of it. I spend enough time nowadays in darkness- you can't make it worse. Avoid it- you never know what happens in your own life in the future 3. You should have the same approach as I do to pro-PA views. I literally don't care at this point. I believe the way in which many have tried and are trying to use PAs is dangerous to the public. You don't agree. Fine- it's a democracy. But I will say what I believe to be true. Also- if you bring heat to a conversation? Don't flounce off when you get smoked in return. Refer to point 3- I don't care about your opinion at this point I hope that helps Thanks and much love Partha
21
52
1
347
12,361
invertedcoriolis retweeted
Two different medical regulators have essentially sanctioned the use of the term Noctor. Which is great, because they sanction plenty of other contractions too and Not-A-Doctor is no different. Thank you Louella for paving the way.
Replying to @DrLKVaughan
This whole episode has been quite stressful. But it does clarify that not one but TWO regulators do not think that the use of the term 'noctor' (not-a- doctor) meets the bar for a full investigation. It is NOT inherently derogatory of offensive. bmj.com/content/bmj/394/bmj-…
2
12
84
6,497
invertedcoriolis retweeted
This whole episode has been quite stressful. But it does clarify that not one but TWO regulators do not think that the use of the term 'noctor' (not-a- doctor) meets the bar for a full investigation. It is NOT inherently derogatory of offensive. bmj.com/content/bmj/394/bmj-…
7
22
2
115
13,256
invertedcoriolis retweeted
'Medical doctor' He's a PA
16
34
3
338
56,795
invertedcoriolis retweeted
Doctor substitution is being championed at the highest levels yet anyone with a grain of common sense or integrity knows it’s nonsense I wonder what platitudes @theRCN or @RCEMpresident would offer these parents given their involvement in enabling this scenario?
Dylan Cope, nine, was discharged from hospital after being wrongly diagnosed with flu šŸ”— telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
14
57
2
231
19,026
invertedcoriolis retweeted
Nine year old Dylan Cope died from sepsis. His GP had suspected appendicitis and sent him to hospital. A paediatric nurse practitioner assessed him in A&E without reading the GP’s referral. His abdominal pain was attributed to flu and he was discharged without a documented examination by a doctor. The coroner concluded that his death could have been avoided. Dylan’s family have suffered an unimaginable loss. As a doctor working in general practice, what stands out to me is that his GP had recognised the possibility of appendicitis and referred him for further assessment. That concern needed to be heard and acted on. When we refer a patient with a suspected serious illness, we need to know that the concern prompting that referral will be properly assessed. A different diagnosis may emerge, but the referral’s findings must be considered before a patient is sent home. Dylan’s father told the inquest that he believed the practitioner assessing his son was a doctor. He also repeatedly raised concerns about appendicitis. Families deserve clarity about who is treating their child and to have their concerns heard. This case raises serious questions about how referrals are handled and when an examination by a doctor must take place. Employers must ensure that supervision arrangements translate into the assessment a patient actually needs. There is also a wider discussion about advanced practitioner roles. The BMA recognises their valuable contribution within healthcare teams. It calls for nationally agreed limits of practice and clear supervision requirements, with advanced practitioners supporting medical teams rather than replacing doctors on clinical rotas. Its position is that they should not independently diagnose or manage patients whose underlying condition has not yet been established. I support those safeguards. Clear responsibilities protect patients and support staff to practise safely. Dylan’s parents are asking for children referred to A&E by a GP with suspected serious illness to receive a documented, face to face examination by a senior doctor before discharge. That is a call we should take seriously. They should not have had to lose their son to ask for it. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
112
944
43
3,181
247,853
invertedcoriolis retweeted
Good God. If he had gotten into medical school, he'd just be just over halfway through FY2 but is co-hosting a session with Prof Leng. This is a complete circus.
I have told you several times. I qualified in 2021. I'm in my 4th year as a PA.
11
87
3
522
72,910
invertedcoriolis retweeted
GP refers child to hospital appropriately Nurse doing a job they should never be doing, ignores referral, misses the diagnosis a third year medical student would make & inappropriately discharges child to worse possible outcome Dropping professional standards causes harm : FACT
19
188
9
823
46,700
invertedcoriolis retweeted
🚨 EXCL: Patients are being harmed and dying because the NHS is replacing doctors with 'advanced practitioners', medics have warned. GIFT LINK ā¬‡ļø telegraph.co.uk/gift/ca90b76…
56
279
30
537
75,968
invertedcoriolis retweeted
Because there is nothing better to do with a doctor's time
7
15
1
147
11,571
invertedcoriolis retweeted
This was almost three years ago. I was fighting so hard for you all, and being told that I was wrong. I remember being called toxic again and again, and other accounts telling other GPs to not follow mine. I was right. They were wrong. Still waiting for an apology.
This is a tweet from a locum PA firm who are sponsoring the 2023 RCGP Annual conference. It is terrifying. Perhaps they could find the time to find a place for locum GPs, and salaried GPs and well GPs as a whole?
2
30
1
98
12,335
invertedcoriolis retweeted
They sit in ivory towers, invited to fancy dinners, collect the awards… granted glory from the system by moving with the tent All while our accounts get referenced in police reports & GMC referrals for opinions that are now mainstream And you wonder why we're anon
This was almost three years ago. I was fighting so hard for you all, and being told that I was wrong. I remember being called toxic again and again, and other accounts telling other GPs to not follow mine. I was right. They were wrong. Still waiting for an apology.
1
26
80
4,838
invertedcoriolis retweeted
Replying to @pa_StephenNash
Thanks Stephen. So UMAPS Ltd and the TU are separate legal entities but have the same VAT & CH registration? And TU is loaning money to the Ltd? So who is undertaking the legal action? The TU or the Ltd? You are the Ltd Director, yes? Who is legally responsible for the TU? 1/
2
6
1
11
1,217
invertedcoriolis retweeted
NEW: @umapsuk has spent £482,575 on its bid for a judicial review of the Leng Review, its own figures show. It's now asking members, and their friends & family, to contribute a further £320,000 towards legal costs. The oral permission hearing is at the High Court on Tuesday.
12
15
5
46
15,837
invertedcoriolis retweeted
You can’t complain that everyone is a methodology expert when you’re talking about people specifically trained in critical analysis, because you don’t agree with their critique. The point of peer review and public analysis is that research should be able to withstand it 2/2
1
8
31
561
invertedcoriolis retweeted
I can’t reply to this thread, so I’ll reply here. @RobSetters - I am actually research trained, as it happens. I have analysed the research presented in the way I have been trained to analyse research. Please provide me examples showing ACP/ANPs are safe to see UDF pts 1/
Rob Setters@RobSettersAug 31
Then you provide them with evidence that ANPs, ACPs or others are safe then suddenly they become research methodology experts.
2
23
50
3,757
invertedcoriolis retweeted
Haven’t I heard something like this before? People working in a role they weren’t capable of performing, with dubious training and zero regulation, but always with a (any) doctor there to take responsibility for when it all inevitably heads south… How did that all pan out?
1
6
39
1,437
invertedcoriolis retweeted
Everyone wants to be a consultant these days Ok šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø But what type of consultant gets called when things get tricky? how many Drs want to be called ā€œMatronā€? And would Arrowe Park have got away with putting a nurse on the medical consultant rota without misappropriation?
4
27
1
138
10,157
invertedcoriolis retweeted
As for using title ā€˜consultant’ - ditto. Underhanded & dishonest. Relying on imperfections & vagaries of law to circumvent custom, exploit loopholes to big up what you are not. You ARE a highly trained, qualified, innovative & experienced professional. You don’t need to bluff.
1
5
37
2,316
invertedcoriolis retweeted
So ā€˜Dr’ Karen Marshall at work but not replacing medical colleagues? If not replacing them why feel need to use title ā€˜Dr’? No doubt will try to weasel out by saying ā€˜not a protected title’ - and you’re right. It speaks however, to intent. Venal & self serving. Status hunger.
8
7
1
67
8,073