Houston, TX
Joined July 2009
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @Warcraft
@Warcraft @wowclassicdevs Nobody wanted a starting zone disconnected from OG Azeroth. You're missing the mark on what Classic is, blending factions, not completing zones like Quel'thalas. Delay game for the sake of reassessing the feedback and start off on the right foot.
1
14
Warrior, Druid, Paladin, Shaman used in unique ways in encounters for raid. utilize the raid encounter design to account for the need for multiple tanks with different abilities. It will not diminish Warrior tanking or other tanks to remove temporary from Shaman tank. 2/2
4
Replying to @WarcraftDevs
@WarcraftDevs In the shaman update the word "temporary tank" was used several times. Why allow a half measure? the game needs more tanks, allowing for multiple tank play styles will fill a need, while still allowing them to fully tank dungeons and raids alike @wowclassicdevs 1/2
1
12
Replying to @Hauwnted_
Something that has always peev'd me with WoW is the customization tbh. Their models are so simple, wouldnt it just make sense to have a vast amount of options? many more hair styles not just "oh we modeled hair for blood elves and gave it to humans also"
1,004
Replying to @Zirene
dwarfs should be ghost rams!!
7
Replying to @Kaghoegames
can dwarf shamans be ghost bears please
1
3
230
2/2 This also balances out the class offerings on each side. Alliance have more Paladin Options, Horde have more shaman options, but the important thing is there are at least 2 races on each side to give players a decent choice. Dwarf Mages and Troll Druids fill the gap.
12
Replying to @AggrendWoW
@AggrendWoW These are much more suitable to the classic feel of the game. several mentions of "this is our classic+" means you need to carry through SD models for all and stay true to faction identity and not do same races on both sides. #wowforever #warcraft 1/2
3
2
2
88
Replying to @NFL
@NFL give the bears a full road schedule so they can just tear down and rebuild solider field. They cant leave chicago and shouldn't be in a suburb!
25
Ian retweeted
* add ogres (vanilla players are happy) * add high elves (vanilla players are happy) * add forsaken elves within forsaken character create body selection. (asia is happy) * unironically remove sky elves (you cant keep evergreen going without admitting and undoing mistakes) cute blue elves look totally out of place in horde, even more than blood elves ever did. Forsaken elves would look 100 times better with the same reason for being.
The tools may be gone, and how it was done may be forgotten. But there's nothing stopping us from trying
63
21
4
613
60,127
We could have ogres in wow Forever. Design by Inputflounder
263
88
38
1,229
201,337
Replying to @JefeKurgan
They literally said "this is our classic+". At its base it must be classic, when it goes away from that, people are upset -- how is that not more clear? We were given toggle graphics as a mainline feature. the toggle looses all credibility if it only works on select
1
43
Replying to @Psybear_tv
I agree but fog of war like the open world, gotta clear it and fully explore to have the full thing!
7
Ian retweeted
I feel like I'm losing my marbles here Holly called it Classic + on stage. They called SoD a test run for it. They teased it by putting plusses on that pdf thing, then later Holly teased it by saying "All classic players have a lot to look forward to- I'll save that for later". They referenced the Classic+ community survey in the reveal. They invited exclusively classic streamers to come test it. They called it a forever home for classic players. (Where do you think the Forever comes from) They said they would develop the game in a way that honors classic. They showed a clip on stage of Xaryu saying nobody can agree on what classic + should be. A wow 2 even just being built on the 2004 version of the game rather than just doing it with a world revamp on retail would be odd on its own. Guys how are some of you still coping your way into arguing this is not classic +. I have no idea what possibly could convince you at that point.
There seems to be a lot of people who in good faith think wow forever is a random new version of wow and classic + is just one thing one group of people want it to be. I'm just kind of confused how that happened. Holly literally called it classic + in the reveal.
64
37
10
899
71,545
What if we added 'Classic' and 'Modern' rulesets? Classic being closer to the traditional Classic+ experience (Not even toggles being an option etc) Modern being closer to retail, having stuff like Shared tagging, better group exp, shared quest drops etc
Replying to @Nobbel87 @Gingitv
Yep, this. This is one of those things that we simply must hold the line on. I think there are other things we can do to help alleviate some frustration here but shared tagging is not it. It’s hard to see the value in something like this when you are frustrated in the moment but it is extremely important to our social pillar to maintain some of this friction.
599
3
44
78
216,524
Replying to @MrGMYT
interested but reserved because of the lack of awareness of what is classic. speaking to the double faction race that sticks out like a sore blue thumb and the fact that they arent going to be doing SD graphic additions, just toggling the older visuals only.
1
98
Replying to @TheoryWiseOS
for every HD thing that gets added , we MUST demand an SD version. ESPECIALLY with these awful new faction blender elves.
1
1
85
Replying to @Warcraft
not to mention how far you can see!!
1
165
cleaned it up a bit, i was under duress at first
12