Atheists actually believe Socrates is better than Jesus. 🤧 Is anyone getting eternal life and happiness, resurrection and forgiviness of sin through socrates?

A derivative possessor does not account for the existence of the property; it merely passes it along. If every member in the chain possesses the property only through another, then at no point does the property exist in a non-derivative, self-explanatory way. The entire series would therefore contain nothing but borrowed instances of the property. But a borrowed possession presupposes an actual possessor from whom it is borrowed. If there is no ultimate, independent possessor, then the property's presence throughout the chain is never genuinely established. In that sense, the property is not merely unexplained; its existence within the series lacks any ontological foundation. An infinite regress of purely derivative possessors thus cannot make the property actual, because what is only borrowed everywhere is possessed nowhere in an ultimate sense. Therefore, the existence of the property throughout the chain necessarily requires a first, non-derivative possessor, without which the chain of borrowers could never exist at all. @DavilandaNRx @MartinusLogicus @GojoNecluribus @GojoNecluribus @radiofreeautumn @NichMalebranche @limitandmind @DrScotMSullivan @ItalianPolish @IamJonte_