I'm blocked by both SAM and Kevin himself, but here's what I would say if I could respond to the personal insults their team continues to levy at me. Media coverage is supposed to be rigorous, exhaustive, and scrutinizing. Especially when organizations pour millions of out-of-state money, without disclosing donors, into campaigns that deliberately mislead voters and attempt to overturn the will of the people. Also, nowhere in Kevin's tweet did he say that — and it's a core component of the study, right in the abstract. If Kevin would like to talk about education, why don't we discuss how his Phd in qualitative social policy has next to nothing to do with interpreting statistical evidence in these papers. Maybe that's why they get things so wrong?