History Buff, Humanist, Muslim, Interested in South Asian History, Literature and Geo-politics of the world.

Joined November 2021
Hasnain Mirza retweeted
Tomb of Prophet Muhammad’s companions in Quanzhou. They supposedly came to China in the early Tang. In 1322, an Arabic stele was erected at the site and Zheng He came here in 1417 to pray before his fifth voyage.
1
6
2
50
1,425
Archetypal Heresy: Arianism through the Centuries
59
Educate yourselves. Research and look into it. You haven't been told the whole story about the Nicene creed and the subsequent creeds and the whole story is worth knowing. "In this fascinating account of the surprisingly violent fifth-century church, Philip Jenkins describes how political maneuvers by a handful of powerful characters shaped Christian doctrine. Were it not for these battles, today’s church could be teaching something very different about the nature of Jesus, and the papacy as we know it would never have come into existence. Jesus Wars reveals the profound implications of what amounts to an accident of history: that one faction of Roman emperors and militia-wielding bishops defeated another." You don't need to buy the book, "Jesus Wars." I've posted excellent free, online trinity histories from Stanford University in the comments. The creeds have no Heavenly authority. The Nicene council itself never claims heaven endorsed it. Creed means "I believe." The Nicene Council itself never promoted it as revelation or a vison from heaven. They were required belief documents overseen by a pagan emperor desperate to bring peace to 351 warring bishops in the 4th century. Bishops, in those days, were powerful land owners and wealthy. Gone were the days of Christ when He and the apostles walked through corn fields to keep from starving. Gone were the days of ministering without "purse or script." No, being a bishop was the top status in wealth, land and power. Including political power. When you appeal to the creeds for authority for anything - you appeal to manmade relics. Stick to the Bible for your primary proof of anything Christian. Stick to Jesus Christ's words in the Four Gospels as the primary litmus test for all things "gospel." The creeds after the second century are extra-Biblical and do not sound like any of the sacred writings in the Bible written by the apostles - nothing like them. Just rambling and confusing word salad in some parts. They don't sound a bit like Christ's ministry in the Four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John). It is a product of a political process superimposing itself on varying Christian beliefs in disarray and demanding a uniform set of beliefs to be imposed on everyone so they would quit fighting. It was how Constantine could bring peace to his kingdom and stop all the quarreling. He had no religious motivation in calling the council and spending his time on it. He was pagan himself. The creeds are based on thought-policing • about how you think about something - which then gave *religious* leaders the authority to go heretic hunting and slaughter, imprison, poison anyone who didn't go along with the creed enforced by Constantine. Sounds just like Jesus, right? Just like Christ who laid down His life rather than force anyone to believe Him. And just like Christ who stressed actions and baptism by immersion and service and love and never got into thought policing and never associated doctrine and thoughts with salvation.
By whom were the creeds written by? Was the Holy Spirit in the room when St Nicholas punched Arius? Was the Holy Spirit in the room when Athanasius changed the Godhead so he wouldn't let Arius win? Where was Christ's presence when Constantine used the creeds to imprison people?
26
24
8
226
24,717
Hasnain Mirza retweeted
Sending Remittances as Expatriates, Abandoned by the State in Times of Crisis! When Will the Cycle of Slavery Abroad and Coffins Returning Home Finally End? I have opposed Sheikh Hasina throughout my political life. But I have no hesitation in acknowledging that her government once saved the lives of six Bangladeshis. Following the execution of Nazrul Islam and Sweety Akter in Saudi Arabia, a troubling question arises: Where was our government when they needed it most? In 2010, six Bangladeshis were sentenced to death in Dubai in connection with the murder of a Pakistani national. Through diplomatic initiatives by the Sheikh Hasina government, arrangements were made to pay two lakh dirhams in blood money to the victim’s family. The death sentences were commuted, and the six Bangladeshis returned home. I do not support Sheikh Hasina’s politics. But I believe in acknowledging good deeds, regardless of who performs them. The question is, has the current government demonstrated the same sense of responsibility? Nazrul Islam and Sweety Akter were executed on October 14. If the government only began seeking details of their cases on October 17, what exactly were the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Bangladesh Embassy in Riyadh doing? Two Bangladeshi lives were lost, and the state learned about the matter only after the executions had taken place? Did they have access to lawyers? Were their appeal options pursued? Were high-level diplomatic efforts made with the Saudi authorities to seek clemency or a reduction in their sentences? The Ministry of Foreign Affairs must answer these questions. If the Saudi government did not notify Bangladesh in advance, why not? And if Bangladesh knew beforehand, what steps did it take? We cannot continue with a foreign policy that demands remittances from expatriates but refuses to take responsibility for protecting their lives. Reports of abuse, rape, and harassment of Bangladeshi women working as domestic workers in Saudi Arabia have also surfaced repeatedly. What has the Ministry of Foreign Affairs done to ensure their safety, access to justice, and accountability for those responsible? We demand answers on that front as well. Is the value of an expatriate worker’s life measured only by the dollars they send home? Where is our embassy when they are in danger abroad? Are Bangladeshis overseas merely workers, or are they citizens entitled to the full protection of their state? Bringing the bodies of deceased citizens home is a responsibility. But trying to save their lives before death is an even greater responsibility of the state. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, we do not want condolences. We want answers. We do not want assurances. We want effective diplomacy. Expatriates work like slaves abroad to keep our national economy running, only to return home in coffins, sometimes as headless bodies. How much longer must this brutal reality continue? Praising one good deed by Sheikh Hasina does not mean I support her politics. Demanding accountability from the current government does not mean I am acting against any political party. My questions are directed at the state, and my demands are rooted in the rights of citizens. Expatriates are not asking for charity or compassion. They are asking for the state of Bangladesh to stand beside them when their lives are at risk. When will the cycle of slavery abroad and returning home as corpses finally end? State, it is time to answer! Rowshan Haque October 18, 2026 New York #StateResponsibility #highlightseveryonefollowers
82
71
14
457
72,648
Hasnain Mirza retweeted
Interesting to note that neither Zia nor Begum Zia make any bones about shaking hands with members of the opposite sex in their 1982 visit to the US.
27
48
10
364
35,757
According to the authors of the New Testament, Christ is the human Messiah who did not consciously preexist his birth. Learn more about the theology of the early Christians in my newest book: amzn.to/47jldOc
1
5
1
8
513
Hasnain Mirza retweeted
Quickest Book Buy in a while. Alhamdulilah
10
9
242
9,781
Hasnain Mirza retweeted
Netanyahu apparently displayed this map as part of his national security policy presentation.
248
1,054
504
15,179
6,439,067
Hasnain Mirza retweeted
I just noticed that the digital version of my book has been available since early September. Please find the links in my reply below:
2
52
318
6,551
News to me to know while listening talk of Dr. Dustin Smith in this video with Jake Brancatella that certain works attributed to or about Saint Paul like "Acts of Paul and Thecla" and "Third Epistle to the Corinthians" espouse Unitarian Christianity.
13
1
1
322
Hasnain Mirza retweeted
🤖 Made with AI
7
2
1
18
892
Hasnain Mirza retweeted
Sheesh Mehal : Where Mirrors Light and Space Interplay Sheesh Mehal a masterpiece of architecture was built inside Lahore fort during Shah Jahan’s period in1631-1632 within the Shah Burj complex. Asif Khan supervised the construction of the palace. Named as “Palace of Mirrors” but its splendor is extraordinary. It was not an ordinary public hall but a royal residence for the family and selected courtiers. Was Sheesh Mehal built for Mumtaz? One legend says that Mumtaz dreamed of herself floating so high in the sky and touching the stars. She longed to experience same in real life which was responded by the emperor Shah Jahan as he ordered the construction of the “Palace of Mirrors” where mirrors reflect brilliance of stars. Its ceiling is star shaped . A chamber deep inside the palace was built for Shah Jahan and Mumtaz but she passed away before even completion of the palace. The legend associated with Mumtaz and Sheesh Mehal shouldn’t be taken as an established fact. Originally palace was studded with diamonds, pearls and precious stones which were looted and colored glass ornaments were introduced. Sheesh Mehal under Maharaha Ranjit Singh When Maharaja Ranjit Singh captured the fort he also chose Sheesh Mehal as private residence and built a harem over the Sheesh Mehal that put excessive dead load on the false ceiling of the palace. The rooms were removed during conservation work in 1905-1906 under British rule.
1
2
102
If someone has read this i’d love to hear your thoughts on it. In my opinion, in the first half he made such a beautiful case for unity of the muslims and his arguments based on ijetehad/táwil were making a lot of sense. However I noticed his tone changing and becoming progressively more aggressive as the book went on and in the latter part was just him attacking the Sahaba. After finishing the book, my impression was that he tried to “soften up” the reader initially and then basically try to push shiaism on them rather than making a sincere case for muslim unity. 🤷🏽‍♂️
1
1
2
279