You are by no means a fool Carl. Your research and understanding of this case clearly shows the opposite. I don't thing @lizyeld meant that comment. If you have a fault it is your belief that the system will right its wrongs without encouragement from the general public, the media and/or appeal charities etc. There is clear proof that Lucy Letby is innocent. And using Goss's logic in reverse proving innocence on one charge is enough to make the rest fall. Although there is actual proof of her innocence in every case. The evidence available is enough. Add common sense and logic to known facts and it's beyond all doubt. One example is the Baby D case. Unless the NHS have found a treatment to cure murder and didn't use it, Lucy Letby could not possibly have murdered that baby. "During the course of your letter you submit that the evidence suggests that had different courses of treatment been employed, Child D’s death would probably have been avoided. That in my view overstates the existing evidence which only suggests that death might have been avoided." Mr Rheinberg (Senior Coronor) More on Baby D from Brearey at the time... "I have reviewed Child D’s care with Eirian yesterday and looked to see if there are any common threads in the deaths. I emailed an action plan to Ravi yesterday. Child D’s death appears to be due to early neonatal sepsis after PROM. She was symptomatic from 12 min of age." "I would be very surprised if Child D death is linked in any way to the previous recent deaths of Child A and Child C" And Dr Newby... “[W]e felt as a department that the most likely diagnosis was one of sepsis, ie; overwhelming infection.” Then there is Baby K. As you know that case rested on Jayaram's testimony being truthful and accurate. Enough said on that case. Lucy Letby is 100% certainly innocent.

This is a good well researched article by @GuerrillaCarl and is well worth a read even though I disagree with his opinion on several issues. I know he has based the article mainly on the trial transcripts but there is also powerful information that has come to light since the trials including this from Dewi Evans... “None of the babies were killed as a direct result of the injection of air, or fluid and air deliberately injected into their stomachs.” And, of course, Jayaram's testimony on Baby K that even Thirlwall highlighted... “That Dr Jayaram had gone into the room because he was called by Letby was different from what he had said in evidence” thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk/… And much more besides. The fact two juries convicted her is irrelevant. The juries were fed flawed evidence, misinformation and blatant lies. Even when told the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth juries still get it badly wrong frequently. The justice system in this country is not fit for purpose by any stretch of the imagination so decisions by courts often do not reflect the actual truth. Carl says the prosecution case was a serious one and he'd be lying if he said otherwise. I completely disagree. The prosecution case was weak to none existent and it baffles me that all those who have researched the case properly don't say it how it is. Lucy Letby is 100% certainly innocent. Carl has obviously done more research than many so I'm bewildered why he can't bring himself to declare Lucy Letby innocent. People sitting on the fence and saying they only believe the convictions are unsafe does Lucy Letby's chances no good at all. Evidence will not free her. The truth of what happened will not free her. Public outcry is her best, and possibly only, hope. The Dr's, the police, the prosecution and the "she's guilty" lot have no hesitation in declaring she's certainly guilty. That despite 11 of the 15 convictions being by a majority. How can a majority verdict equate to certainty? The only unanimous murder conviction was that of Baby O. The baby Brearey botched a procedure on and failed to inform the coroner. Anyone who still believes Lucy Letby murdered that baby either has not done any research at all, has severe confirmation bias or is outright lying. The only other unanimous verdicts at the main trial were the ludicrous insulin cases. The retrial of Baby K was the only other unanimous verdict. The one Jayaram's evidence was key. The entire justice system is not fit for purpose. That's an absolute fact as is the absolute fact that Lucy Letby is innocent. Anyone who disagrees with me, please read my pinned thread as well as the rest of my timeline and tell me why. I can prove anyone wrong based on undeniable facts, basic common sense and pure logic. @legalmarkmc @DavidDavisMP @davidkurten #LucyLetby #LucyLetbyIsInnocent #JusticeReform