Today's LA Times front page story on young people's support for nuclear energy is a breath of fresh air after that paper's long antinuclear bias. Congrats to scientifically trained journalist @nohaggerty! @Heather_mom4nuk is quoted
enewspaper.latimes.com/infin…
The film "Nuclear Now" cowritten by @TheOliverStone and @GoldsteinJoshua is having a theatrical release in Portugal tomorrow. ucicinemas.pt/filmes/energia…
🔥À medida que os combustíveis fósseis continuam a aquecer o planeta, o mundo é forçado a enfrentar a influência das grandes empresas de petróleo. Esta semana "Energia Nuclear Já!" em👉 ow.ly/hszk50U81u9 #energianuclearja #estreias
"Nuclear Now" in theaters in Budapest...
Atomhelyzet pannonia-entertainment.hu/do…
Great thread on Hanford, WA "cleanup" of harmless low-level radiation. Strikingly, the truly insane money going to this boondoggle could, if used to build nuclear power plants, replace all coal plants in the USA.
Even more confusing, Millstone may soon serve data centers not MA grid. On Google Maps a spot on site is shown as "Proposed Site - 1.5M Square Foot Data Center" -- 8 Walmart Supercenters packed with computers. Great power source for them but just like taking the nuclear plant off the grid for us. Same happening elsewhere?
I'm really confused about a proposed deal between Massachusetts and Connecticut.
As an article in the Commonwealth Beacon explains it, the Massachusetts governor is proposing a deal in which her state reluctantly agrees to purchase some electricity from the Millstone nuclear plant under CTs current 10 year PPA.
In return, she expects CT to change its mind and agree to purchase 400 MW of electricity from the proposed Vineyard 2 offshore wind farm.
Here is what confuses me - the Millstone PPA agreement sets a price of $50/MWh for its emission-free power. If wholesale prices exceed that level, the plant owners will rebate some of the excess back to ratepayers.
If wholesale prices fall below $50/MWh, ratepayers still pay the $50/MWh price.
The Beacon article does not mention the PPA price for Vineyard 2 output, but based on information from cancelled projects in the same geographic area, it is likely to be $150/MWh or more.
Why would CT have any interest in agreeing to pay $150/MWh in return for MA agreeing to pay $50/MWh with the possibility that it might qualify for some rebates?
Link to follow (LTF)
Can't get this graph out of my mind. Over 50 years, no progress on decarbonization or an energy transition. Coal, oil, and gas are each still growing, and together are still more than 80% of world energy. Efforts to address climate change are simply a total failure to date.
The full film "Nuclear Now," Hollywood's only feature documentary explaining and celebrating nuclear energy as a solution to climate change, is now available for free on YouTube in North America! #NuclearEnergy @TheOliverStone @NEI @energybants @isodope
youtube.com/watch?v=Cb_GfGYF…
The film is directed by Oliver Stone, cowritten by Prof. Joshua Goldstein, sound track by Vangelis, and features @Atomicrod, @isodope, @oklo (Jake DeWitte and Caroline Cochran), @INL, @gehnuclear, and others.
"Nuclear Now" by Oliver Stone, cowritten by Joshua S. Goldstein, has won the Best Feature Documentary award at the 2024 BNP Paribas Green Film Festival in Krakow, Poland. As Poland gets off coal, it's jumping into nuclear power with both feet.
nuclearnowfilm.com/
Don't miss the film Nuclear Now at the Green Film Festival, Krakow, 13 August, 20:00, Czerwieński Boulevard (next to Smocza Street).
greenfestival.pl/
Poland❤️Nuclear Energy
@jarokrolewski
Joshua S. Goldstein retweeted
Michael Douglas, who directed and starred in the 1979 film ‘The China Syndrome’, has changed his mind about nuclear power after 40 years of being anti-nuclear.
Source: CNN
#michaeldouglas #thechinasyndrome #nuclearpower #nuclearenergy #climatechange #generationatomic
Good community note attached to a Greenpeace post:
Characterizing nuclear as slow, expensive, dangerous is in conflict with following facts:
"slow": Latest reactor is Barakah. 5600 MW / 10 years. 560 MW /year. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baraka…
"dangerous": One of safest sources of energy: ourworldindata.org/safest-so…
"expensive": Ontario finds only hydro is cheaper: ontario.ca/page/powering-ont… ...can be cheap.
Just 1 nuclear plant built in 3 years? Yankee Rowe was the first commercial nuclear power plant in New England. It was built in two years, 1958 to 1960 (and ran for three decades, cheap and carbon-free). Correct me if my arithmetic is in error but I believe two years is in fact less than 3 years.
Four large reactors built on time and within budget by the South Koreans, in UAE. Nuclear power is the faster, least expensive, and safest way to decarbonize a grid, as proven by multiple historical successes.
Good news, people of Denmark! You can now watch the film "Nuclear Now" on Filmstriben for free. Thanks to @sollidnuclear and Atomkraft Ja Tak for making this happen. Will Denmark have a bright future with nuclear energy?
fjernleje.filmstriben.dk/fil…
Finland's undependable wind and solar demonstrate why reliable nuclear and hydro are the key to fossil-free electricity, as they are around the world.
I was asked many times in COP28 why Finland needs nuclear. Here pink is wind, green is solar (yes, practically zero) blue is hydro and red is nuclear. The yellow line is today and the purple line after it is the forecast for wind power production. #ClimateAction #nuclear
Happy World Nuclear Energy Day! (81st anniversary of the first controlled fission chain reaction at the University of Chicago.)
youtu.be/V6OytS9dN1Q
worldnuclearenergyday.org/
Nuclear Now documentary now showing on Emirates Airlines. Also in Italy this week. Nice to see it getting around!
The documentary Nuclear Now (which I cowrote with Oliver Stone) is showing tonight in Madison at the UW Marquee Cinema, Union South, 6 pm, with Q&A by Grace Stanke, Nuclear Engineering student aka Miss America
union.wisc.edu/events-and-ac…













