😂

I haven’t seen any post from Fetch AI’s own X account about Node AI but I’m not sure even if they did have a partnership everything I said is still true all I did was bring out the facts

If you’re talking about Muddy I didn’t delete it he deleted it himself probably didn’t like the reply he got from Aixbt

I know the feeling, I’ve been there. I’ve felt the pain of loosing many times and I learned the hard way of the necessity of research. It’s getting harder and harder to spot scams as they get more sophisticated. I’m not here to FUD, only to share facts. I’m also doing multiple investigations into other projects and will post about those soon.

Conclusion: There have been some positives from NodeAI, they since my last thread have fixed the pricing discrepancies on their dashboard. However, there are way too many red flags still with the project which in my opinion makes this a likely tax farm at best. I got a lot of hate from their community, so to be clear: I’m not spreading FUD. I investigate crypto scams to protect people from losing money. Everything I share is backed by proof. NodeAI was my first case, but I already have another project under investigation update soon 👀

Seventh red flag: NodeAI’s team has already launched other tokens like $SEN and $BSEN both of which failed and are basically rugged. This shows a pattern.

Sixth red flag: NodeAI claims to resell GPUs from AWS, Azure, etc. But cloud providers generally ban reselling without explicit contracts. If NodeAI is doing this without permission, it could be illegal.

Fifth red flag: NodeAI tried to pass off Erik Faz as a founder by posting his photo with Nvidia’s CEO (which I myself thought as well). But Erik himself confirmed (in a now-deleted reply to @BoGhazwa) that he was only hired as a dev, not a founder. After I quoted him, he deleted everything.

Fourth red flag: They haven’t responded to any of the facts mentioned in my thread, but instead tried to back their reputation by saying they are partnered with $FLUX $PAAL $FET. This doesn’t change any facts published in my original thread. Being partnered with a project doesn't make you immune to deceit, this is a tactic previously used by many other projects. In crypto, partnerships are often just marketing, not tech validation.

Third red flag: They used to show “Most Recent Deployments” to fake activity. After my thread, they removed it but forgot to fix the total rentals counter. It’s gone up by 32 even though renting is still impossible. Clearly, they’re just faking numbers. So they are still randomly increasing the total rentals even though rentals are not possible.

Second red flag: They claimed $1M annual recurring revenue (ARR), but the math doesn’t add up. Their dashboard shows only about $22K (if rentals even worked, which they don’t). On Telegram, they claimed $250K+ monthly revenue also false. In reality, most of their money likely comes from taxes on $GPU (over 4,993 ETH collected), not from real rentals.

When we try to look more into Phase 2. They posted a roadmap on June 20th which can be found on this link: bitcoin.com/get-started/why-… Yet nowhere does it say that rentals will be available in Phase 2. Everything points to rentals already being available.

First red flag: In my first post, I showed that renting GPUs wasn’t possible. In fact only once I had published my findings did they start to mention it as being available in Phase 2. They posted on Aug 1st that their “Aggregator” was live and claimed one-click deploy, only after that did NodeAI suddenly claim it will be “Phase 2.”

NodeAI | $GPU Investigation Follow-up: After my first thread exposing NodeAI, the team tried to cover up instead of answering questions. But their actions only raised more 🚨 red flags. Here’s what I found:

🫡

👀

I just revealed the facts.