If you’re talking about Muddy I didn’t delete it he deleted it himself probably didn’t like the reply he got from Aixbt

Seventh red flag: NodeAI’s team has already launched other tokens like $SEN and $BSEN both of which failed and are basically rugged. This shows a pattern.

Fifth red flag: NodeAI tried to pass off Erik Faz as a founder by posting his photo with Nvidia’s CEO (which I myself thought as well). But Erik himself confirmed (in a now-deleted reply to @BoGhazwa) that he was only hired as a dev, not a founder. After I quoted him, he deleted everything.

Fourth red flag: They haven’t responded to any of the facts mentioned in my thread, but instead tried to back their reputation by saying they are partnered with $FLUX $PAAL $FET. This doesn’t change any facts published in my original thread. Being partnered with a project doesn't make you immune to deceit, this is a tactic previously used by many other projects. In crypto, partnerships are often just marketing, not tech validation.

Third red flag: They used to show “Most Recent Deployments” to fake activity. After my thread, they removed it but forgot to fix the total rentals counter. It’s gone up by 32 even though renting is still impossible. Clearly, they’re just faking numbers. So they are still randomly increasing the total rentals even though rentals are not possible.

Second red flag: They claimed $1M annual recurring revenue (ARR), but the math doesn’t add up. Their dashboard shows only about $22K (if rentals even worked, which they don’t). On Telegram, they claimed $250K+ monthly revenue also false. In reality, most of their money likely comes from taxes on $GPU (over 4,993 ETH collected), not from real rentals.

When we try to look more into Phase 2. They posted a roadmap on June 20th which can be found on this link: bitcoin.com/get-started/why-… Yet nowhere does it say that rentals will be available in Phase 2. Everything points to rentals already being available.

First red flag: In my first post, I showed that renting GPUs wasn’t possible. In fact only once I had published my findings did they start to mention it as being available in Phase 2. They posted on Aug 1st that their “Aggregator” was live and claimed one-click deploy, only after that did NodeAI suddenly claim it will be “Phase 2.”

After posting my thread about $GPU | NodeAI with evidence about all their deceitful practices and false claims. Instead of addressing my points, they have instead decided to block me. Trying to silence truth is never a good look.

12/ So we’ve clearly established that they’re faking everything. But who is behind the project? Who is the team? Well they aren’t officially doxxed nor listed on their website. But there is one individual who has posted one photo for NodeAI called Erik Faz. Erik is no stranger to projects in crypto, in fact I have found his involvement with several other projects, all of which are either rugged or dead. I can only assume NodeAI faces the same fate.

11/ So the servers are fake and it’s impossible to actually rent anything, yet in their post on Aug 1st claimed that they broke $1 M ARR this month. This is also a lie.  Even if we gave them the benefit of the doubt their own numbers don’t add up. Let me demonstrate: •They claim on their own dashboard 1,830 total rentals, averaging $12.22 and average rental duration 55.095 hrs. If the average rental cost is $12.22 per rental, the total revenue from 1,830 rentals would be:  1,830×12.22=$22,362.60 nowhere close to $1 Million.  In fact to get to $1 Milion ARR,, they would need 6,823 rentals per month. I can only assume that any revenue if there is any, comes from taxes or token sales, but not from any rentals.

10/ But here’s more irrefutable proof. Anyone who has used Vast knows that it’s not just one price. You pay for traffic and storage. But you also are shown the amount of storage available. None of this information is shown for any machines supposedly listed from Vast.