Post of the week from @ideo:
Don't let robots write your first draft
edges.ideo.com/posts/dont-le…
When a business asks for help to improve performance, is there a risk that we're helping them do the wrong things better?
What advice would you give a business caught between the urgent need to perform today and the need to reinvent for tomorrow?
linkedin.com/posts/gaylinjee…
🤖 Made with AI
“positive epidemiology”
New paper explores small acts of kindness + #humanflourishing.
Microkindness especially relevant to character, virtue and close social relationships.
May also affect emotional tone and meaning of everyday life.
hfh.fas.harvard.edu/post/mic…
@Harvard
The more we delegate to #AI, the more we need human judgement, shared understanding and collective problem solving become.
Two more examples of #LEGOSeriousPlay in practice - what happens when thinking is made visible.
linkedin.com/pulse/building-…
The Open Benchmark of AI Impact on Humans
> The first open benchmark measuring AI's impact on human well-being across physical, psychological, and social dimensions.
Explore this work!
@MIT
impactbench.media.mit.edu/
@gaylinjee retweeted
‘The Collision: What AI Does to Us’
mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-…
✍️ Kara Baskin via @MITSloan
👉 In her article, Kara Baskin outlines MIT Sloan professor Eric So’s new book, arguing that society is dividing into those who use AI to think better and those who use it instead of thinking.
👉 Professor So warns that routinely outsourcing cognitive effort to seamless systems induces profound physical atrophy: "Muscles weaken with disuse. Likewise, cognitive skills deteriorate when people stop practicing them."
💡 By shifting the debate onto the slow degradation of human capability, the book exposes the true psychological cost of frictionless tech adoption.
💡It identifies that the ultimate threat of generative models is that they encourage us to voluntarily forfeit our critical thinking skills for the sake of convenience.
@Corix_JC @TheAIObserverX @maponi @JagersbergKnut @ahier @ChuckDBrooks @Shi4Tech @CEO_AISOMA @sallyeaves @ThEiLe0 @rvp @dinisguarda @TarakRindani @FrRonconii @Ym78200 @Nicochan33 @Khulood_Almani @TysonLester @SusanHayes_ @EstelaMandela @JoannMoretti @sulefati7 @FernandaKellner @pchamard @NeiraOsci @darioandriani @ALouiseLavalett @Fabriziobustama @amalmerzouk @arlenenewbigg @mikeflache @RLDI_Lamy @smaksked @Eli_Krumova @PVynckier @chidambara09 @sminaev2015 @Analytics_699 @NathaliaLeHen @MHcommunicate @DanielleLargier
Wrestling with strategy, change or complexity?
What might become possible if you made the thinking visible?
Building the human system with LEGO® Serious Play®
#LEGOSeriousPlay #Leadership #Strategy #OrganisationalChange #HumanSystems
linkedin.com/pulse/building-…
🤖 Made with AI
Change is a relational issue
Engagement, trust, belonging, wellbeing and organisational health are measured and discussed at leadership and board level. Yet there remains a gap between what leaders believe they create and what employees experience.
linkedin.com/posts/33emerald…
How does playing with bricks translate into business outcomes?
Four examples of LEGO® Serious Play® in action
#LEGOSeriousPlay
gaylinjee.substack.com/p/how…
@gaylinjee retweeted
If we have the choice, why do we…
… suffer over futures we have not met yet?
… rehearse pain before it arrives?
… fear shadows before we see form?
❦ When you are present in the moment, the future manages without you.
~ Live For Joy, Anne Scottlin
amazon.com/Live-Joy-Anne-Sco…
@gaylinjee retweeted
How can we navigate more adaptive, continuous approaches to change when our organisations still see change as a series of initiatives?
What got me thinking is this graphic that the Change Management Network posted on LinkedIn. It describes a journey "from managing change as an initiative to building change capability in a continuously adaptive organisation". What I write below is not a criticism of the network. I agree that we need more adaptive capability for change and I appreciate that the Change Management Network is enabling this conversation.
My question is: should we frame this as binary "from/to"? Change leaders adopting the adaptive approach promoted by the graphic will still have to continue to work with (and struggle with) most features of the "change as an initiative" approach that the graphic sets it against. In the complex systems most of us work in, this isn't a tension we can resolve. We have to hold and navigate both continuously and that won't change anytime soon.
The direction of travel is towards organisations with the capability to adapt continuously. Yet the systems we work in today still fund, govern and judge change as a series of initiatives. As leaders of change, we are accountable for delivering the project in front of us. We are also the best placed people to build the adaptive change capacity our organisations will need for the evolving future.
I would frame our strategic task as follows. Rather than moving away from “change initiatives” towards a different future, use them to build that future from inside the present. Five ways we can do this:
1) Hold two horizons at once. Seek to deliver what the initiative promises. At every stage, ask what the organisation will be able to do after the project closes that it could not do before.
2) Make capability part of the accountability. Work with programme sponsors to write capability outcomes into business cases, benefits plans and final reports.
3) Design for handover from day one. Share decision making with the people who will carry the change forward. Help build their skills in improvement and data and their sense of agency while the project team is still there to support them.
4) Turn governance moments into learning moments. Milestone reviews and Board papers can ask what we are learning and how we are adapting, as well as whether we are on track.
5) Connect the initiatives. Many organisations (especially in health and care) run dozens of change programmes in parallel. If we link them, share learning across them and grow a common change community, we can build adaptive capacity across the whole system.
The future of change leadership is being shaped now, inside the initiatives we lead today. We want each project to leave people more able to spot problems, test ideas, take action and adapt. This isn’t “from/to”. It’s “both/and”: the initiative can become the vehicle and the adaptive capability can become the legacy.
Graphic comes from a post by the Change Management Network on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/posts/change-ma…
@gaylinjee retweeted
We must not allow other people's limited perceptions to define us.
Virginia Satir
#quote
What if the impact of disruption on people isn't a resilience issue?
Resilience is a halfway stop - we need to go further
gaylinjee.substack.com/p/wha…
“We can change technology all we want, but we need to move at the speed of trust…
It’s not just a question of what technology we can adopt and be done, but what’s the trust journey we are designing in service of our bigger vision.”
@FortuneMagazine
fortune.com/2026/09/13/black…
"When team members treat prompting as a collective act, debate alternative directions, and pause to judge #AI’s output throughout the meeting, interactions with AI will advance their thinking rather than outsourcing it."
@HBRexchange
hbr.org/2026/05/its-hard-to-…
In a world where disruption is the norm, resilience is a halfway stop.
How can people can lean into uncertainty, adapt through it, and emerge with greater capability than they had going in?
That a relational issue - not an individual one.
linkedin.com/feed/update/urn…
















