The struggle is real.

Cute assumption you’ve made there, but how much have you looked into concave Earth Owen? Obviously little to none. If you’re an honest person who is truly seeking the truth you will start looking into it in depth immediately. Everything works on concave earth in one cohesive model and it’s all incredibly logical with no mental gymnastics required. That cannot be said for flat or globe. To be a flat earther you have to ignore literally everything above the horizon, and also say I don’t know what the sun is or moon is or stars are or countless other things. To be a globe earther you have to ignore tons of literal physical impossibilities as you’re well aware. You don’t have to ignore anything on concave Earth, and beyond that it has explanations for how everything from retrograde to triple rainbows and basically everything else all works together in the same cohesive model where everything can be demonstrated. Even if I discover that there’s something even more accurate than concave Earth in six months time, there’s literally zero chance I will ever go back to believing in flat earth. Going back to flat Earth from concave would be like going back to the globe from flat earth. To paraphrase one of your quotes in the past, ‘that would be like an adult going back to believing Santa Claus is real because it’s literally that ridiculous.’ Flat earth is as ridiculous to concave Earth as the globe is to flat earth. If you put in the time to look into concave Earth, you will see that for yourself.

Am i a Flat Earther? Yes. i am Will i renounce FE if it is proven wrong? Yes. I must Will i openly admit that i was wrong? Yes. I must Will i post FE content afterwards? Unlikely. But possible, if counter-evidence arise Will i debate flat earthers or try to debunk them afterwards? No Will i delete my existing FE content? No. (it is part of history. nothing of history must ever be destroyed) Will i turn against FE fren? No (truth is extremely important. but never a weapon) What cosmology will i propagate? Well. If anything... Geocentrism. But what will i do if FE is NOT disproven 18Dec? I will go into 2nd gear with the FE content.

Looks like CGI, but these are all real video highlights from the @PolarisProgram space mission

Atheism is provably not a tenable position. Disagree? Let’s find out.. The 1st Law of Thermodynamics states that matter/energy cannot be created nor destroyed. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics states that for all natural and spontaneous systems, entropy will increase and the amount of useable energy will decrease. So how did the matter/energy in the universe get here? Logically we only have two options, a true dichotomy: 1. The matter/energy in the universe always existed. 2. The matter/energy in the universe was created. According to the 1st Law, the naturalist is obviously forced to go with the first option. Here is the issue.. The 2nd Law necessitates that the amount of usable energy in the universe is always decreasing, thus 𝐫𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 a beginning point in which to decrease from. See the problem? The matter/energy in the universe cannot have always existed and simultaneously had a beginning. This is a blatant violation of the 𝐥𝐚𝐰 𝐨𝐟 𝐧𝐨𝐧-𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. Applying the 2nd law of Thermodynamics we are forced to choose the 2nd option above: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫/𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝. We have now violated the 1st law and are logically 𝐫𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐝 to invoke something not limited to the confinement of Natural Law. What is that called by definition? 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐥. To explain the matter/energy in the universe, one 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 invoke an external supernatural force that 𝐂𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐃 the matter/energy in the universe. 𝐀𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐬𝐦 𝐝𝐞𝐛𝐮𝐧𝐤𝐞𝐝.

Have you heard dis information?