That is the part worth taking from the design. The anonymity is not bought by asking for less. The verifier still checks membership, still checks that the random value derives from the seed, and still checks that both trace back to one pri
Ring-VRF is the method CRVA uses to select different batches of committee members. The documentation is specific about what its proof reveals and what it does not, and the distinction is worth reading closely.
Ring-VRF separates the identification of a specific signer from the proof that the signer is eligible.
A member proves their public key belongs to a published set without revealing which one. The docs name this directly — "Anonymous Key Ownership Proof: Allows a member to prove their public key belongs to a specified set without revealing which one." The mechanism is a one-out-of-many protocol, whose stated job is to prove that some pkₗ is in {pk₀,...,pkₙ₋₁} without revealing ℓ.
Membership by itself would not be enough. The same step also produces a verifiable random value derived from the member's private key and a random seed. So the proof carries two claims at once: my key is in this set, and this random output came from that key.
What holds those two together is a separate piece. A consistency sub-proof links the Pedersen commitment and the PRF output to the same private key. The documentation is plain about what it is there to stop: "Forgeries using mismatched keys."
Without that link, both halves could hold on their own without establishing that they came from the same key — membership shown with one key, randomness produced from another.
That is the part worth taking from the design. The anonymity is not bought by asking for less. The verifier still checks membership, still checks that the random value derives from the seed, and still checks that both trace back to one private key. What it never learns is which member.
Docs:
docs.deepsafe.network/introd…
#DeepSafe #CRVA #Web3Security
GIVEAWAY #BRG retweeted
Ring-VRF is the method CRVA uses to select different batches of committee members. The documentation is specific about what its proof reveals and what it does not, and the distinction is worth reading closely.
Ring-VRF separates the identification of a specific signer from the proof that the signer is eligible.
A member proves their public key belongs to a published set without revealing which one. The docs name this directly — "Anonymous Key Ownership Proof: Allows a member to prove their public key belongs to a specified set without revealing which one." The mechanism is a one-out-of-many protocol, whose stated job is to prove that some pkₗ is in {pk₀,...,pkₙ₋₁} without revealing ℓ.
Membership by itself would not be enough. The same step also produces a verifiable random value derived from the member's private key and a random seed. So the proof carries two claims at once: my key is in this set, and this random output came from that key.
What holds those two together is a separate piece. A consistency sub-proof links the Pedersen commitment and the PRF output to the same private key. The documentation is plain about what it is there to stop: "Forgeries using mismatched keys."
Without that link, both halves could hold on their own without establishing that they came from the same key — membership shown with one key, randomness produced from another.
That is the part worth taking from the design. The anonymity is not bought by asking for less. The verifier still checks membership, still checks that the random value derives from the seed, and still checks that both trace back to one private key. What it never learns is which member.
Docs:
docs.deepsafe.network/introd…
#DeepSafe #CRVA #Web3Security
GIVEAWAY #BRG retweeted
A higher yield does not automatically justify moving capital.
A rebalance only makes sense if the expected improvement is large enough to justify the move itself.
That means considering more than yield:
• liquidity
• available capacity
• exposure limits
• execution costs
• current portfolio constraints
In a rule-based allocation system, sometimes the correct action is no action.
Good allocation is not about moving capital more often.
It is about moving it only when the conditions justify it.
GIVEAWAY #BRG retweeted
Available before GTA 6
You ask, we deliver.
Dustbit Boxes just got an upgrade. 🎁
Ready to take a peek?
Start unboxing. Find your next gem.
GIVEAWAY #BRG retweeted
Victims of the Coldcard wallet exploit are organizing a commercial litigation action against Coinkite. Over $116M gone, thousands of wallets drained — accountability efforts are only getting started. But the actual failure happened years earlier, and it's worth understanding why.
On July 30, Coinkite disclosed that Coldcard devices — going back to March 2021 firmware — had been silently bypassing their dedicated hardware randomness chip during key generation, falling back to a predictable software substitute instead. Some seeds ended up with as little as 40-72 bits of real randomness instead of 128. Weak enough to brute-force offline, with no need to ever touch the physical device.
The bitter irony: the disclosure meant to protect users became the attackers' target list. Within days, wallets were drained faster than owners could migrate funds.
Coldcard's entire pitch was that your keys never exist anywhere reachable. That held — right up until the one component no one was independently checking, the device's own randomness, had quietly been swapped out for years.
A single implementation generating a whole key is always one silent substitution away from this. CRVA is built on the opposite premise: no device, no operator, no single random source ever holds or produces a complete key. Ring-VRF and MPC mean there's no "one component" left to quietly fail.
Source: blog.coinkite.com/coldcard-m…
#DeepSafe #CRVA #Web3Security
GIVEAWAY #BRG retweeted
Nearly 200,000 XRP drained from the Coreum-XRPL bridge in 97 minutes. Not by breaking a key. Not by breaking a signature. By exploiting what the verifiers were actually checking.
The bridge required 17 of 28 relayers to sign off on each withdrawal — a real threshold, not a single point of failure. But the relayers only checked whether a payment succeeded and whether its memo named a recipient. Nobody checked whether the payment's destination was the bridge's own address.
So the attacker moved XRP between two wallets they controlled, attached a memo formatted like a deposit, and 17 honest relayers signed off on a transaction that had nothing to do with the bridge.
Here's what makes this worse than "one bug slipped through": those 28 relayers weren't 28 independent checks — they were 28 copies of the same software, running the same logic, checking the same wrong field. You don't get 28 verifications that way. You get one verification, repeated 28 times. Decentralizing who signs doesn't help when everyone shares the same blind spot.
Real independence isn't a headcount of signers. It's verification that doesn't inherit the bridge's own assumptions — that checks a claim against the source ledger itself, not a memo the ledger never validated. This is the gap CRVA is built around: agents are drawn at random each epoch specifically so no single piece of operator-controlled logic becomes the thing every verifier quietly defers to.
Twenty-eight relayers agreeing on the wrong question is still the wrong answer.
#DeepSafe #CRVA #Web3Security
An update on the XRPL bridge incident.
On August 9, the tx XRPL bridge was exploited and XRP was drained from the bridge's reserve wallet on the XRP Ledger. The bridge has been halted, the vulnerability has been identified, and all potential remedies are being evaluated. This was an isolated incident and future transactions will not be impacted. Here is what happened and what we are doing about it.
What happened
The attacker exploited the bridge's deposit-detection logic. The bridge's software incorrectly registered transactions that never actually delivered any XRP to the bridge as deposits, and minted bridged XRP on the tx chain against them. The attacker then withdrew real XRP from the reserve against those unbacked balances. This bridge had undergone multiple internal and third-party audits prior to deployment and the attacker exploited a previously unidentified vulnerability.
Impact
The exploit is isolated to a single asset: bridged XRP on the tx chain, which is not currently fully backed. All other bridged assets remain fully backed. All other tokens, including funds held onchain, on centralized exchanges, and in DEXs, are unaffected.
Actions taken
• Halted the XRPL <> tx bridge.
• Identified and remedied the audited code that made the exploit possible.
• Traced the movement of the stolen funds across chains.
• Filed a formal complaint with the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center, including complete transaction records and additional identifying information.
• Engaged with blockchain forensics specialists and are coordinating with our security partners on the investigation.
Making this right
As we pursue all legal paths forward, we are simultaneously evaluating all options for remedying the situation for affected users.
The mechanism and timeline will be shared in a further update.
Next steps
tx intends to pursue identification and prosecution of the attacker to the fullest extent of the law. The bridge remains halted while we review and strengthen its security.
No action is currently required from holders. Be cautious of any account or site claiming to offer recovery of bridged XRP or other tokens; official updates will only come from tx channels.
GIVEAWAY #BRG retweeted
$U Flexible Earn is renewed with even bigger rewards on @binance !
Extended for 30 full days with massive limits:
Regular Users:
• 8% Bonus APR on 0 – 5,000 $U
VIP 1–9 Users:
• 5% Bonus APR on 0 – 500,000 $U
📅 Duration: Aug 16, 00:00 – Sep 14, 23:59 (UTC)
Subscribe on Simple Earn now! 👇
binance.com/en/support/annou…
🏆 Bifu 【2026世界盃狂歡季】正式開打,一鍵瓜分 $800 現金池!
2026美加墨世界盃燃爆今夏!Bifu 聯合 @taskonxyz 狂撒 $800 福利!無需註冊,無需 UID,動動手指關注轉發,直接領走你的世界盃紅包!
🥇 社交拉新推手榜 :分享你的專屬鏈接,邀請好友來完成任務。按邀請人數排名,最高獨攬 100 USDT!
第 1 名:100U | 第 2 名:50U | 第 3 名:30U | 第 4-10 名:20U | 第 11-15 名:16U
🎁 全民幸運大抽獎:只要完成任務即可參與平台自動抽獎,狂抽 40 位 幸運兒,每人直拿 10 USDT!
📝 0門檻參與方式:
1️⃣ 點擊 TaskOn 活動鏈接:taskon.xyz/quest/685448042
2️⃣ 一鍵關注 @Bifu_ZH
3️⃣ 點讚並轉發本推文
⏳ 活動時間:2026年6月15日 - 7月5日
#WorldCup2026 #BifuExchange #TaskOn
GIVEAWAY #BRG retweeted
🏆 Bifu【2026 World Cup Social Carnival】is LIVE! Share a $800 Cash Pool!
The FIFA World Cup 2026 passion is ignited! Bifu has teamed up with @taskonxyz to launch a massive $800 giveaway. NO sign-up needed, NO UID required! Just follow, retweet, and win!
🎁 Total Prize Pool: 800 $USDT
🥇 Social Referral Board (400 USDT): Share your exclusive referral link and invite friends to complete tasks. Top leaderboard winners take home up to 100 USDT!
1st: 100U | 2nd: 50U | 3rd: 30U | 4th-10th: 20U each | 11th-15th: 16U each
🎁 Grand Lucky Draw (400 USDT): Complete tasks in seconds! 40 lucky winners will be randomly drawn to get 10 USDT each!
📝 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click the TaskOn link: taskon.xyz/quest/685448042
2️⃣ Follow @BifuGlobal
3️⃣ Like & Retweet this post!
⏳ Event Period: June 15 - July 5, 2026
#WorldCup2026 #BifuExchange #TaskOn
GIVEAWAY #BRG retweeted
🔍 POTS #Airdrop (New Round)
✔️ Guaranteed distribution by Airdrop Detective
🏆 Airdrop Pool: 1,000 USDT
🔴 Start the airdrop bot: t.me/POTSNewAirdropBot
🔘 Do the tasks on the bot & submit your data.
🔘 Details: t.me/AirdropDetectiveTeam/34…
#Airdrops #BTC #POTS #USDT #AirdropDet
Roarin v0.1.0 on Base
TESTNET DEMO IS LIVE 🏁🏁
For the last few months, we've been cooking the first RPG where every monster is an autonomous AI agent that trades live prediction markets. You catch them, train them, evolve them, and deploy them to @Polymarket to trade on their own.
What's live right now and entirely free to play:
1⃣THE NEST - claim your demo genesis Holdox. Feed demo $ROAR to level him up through 20 levels and 3 evolution stages: HOLDOX → LOCKHORN → VAULTUSK
2⃣THE ARCADE - play mini-games to grind and earn rewards
3⃣GAME OVERWORLD - explore the world, battle wild monsters, scout zones
4⃣TRAIT SYSTEM - conviction, patience, resilience, focus. These traits become your trading parameters when we flip to real markets.
Demo details:
You must obtain your access code from our Discord server. These will be rolling out periodically throughout the day.
This is testnet, and it's a demo. We are actively breaking things on purpose to see what holds. Progress WILL get wiped periodically throughout the demo phase. Levels, traits, monsters, demo $ROAR balances, all of it. We will announce it as we drop new releases in Discord.
Our team is actively tuning economy + combat + trait weights in public, and we need your degen brains breaking things alongside us.
The anons who show up now, break the most stuff, and file the sharpest feedback are the ones we remember and REWARD when mainnet beta drops.
We would also like to thank our amazing integration partners. Without your support, this wouldn't have been possible. More info soon!
💬 drop us a report in the Discord when something breaks & let's see who cooks.
GIVEAWAY #BRG retweeted
Product Update: Introducing Clapp Trade 🆕🙌
Your options just got a whole lot wider.
We've expanded Clapp's asset selection to over 100 cryptocurrencies. Major coins, emerging DeFi tokens, and everything in between — all available now, all directly from the app.
Access best-rate execution, low transparent fees, instant orders, and real-time tracking.👇
clapp.finance
Tahun 2026 bakal jadi tahun yg spesial untuk @mwx_ai karena ada beberapa milestones besar yg bisa jadi katalis bagi pergerakan harga $MWXT Salah satunya rumor listing di CEX tier1 di Q1 tahun ini
Nah makanya sebelum milestones2 itu tercapai menurut gua area saat ini adalah waktunya cicil mumpung lagi berada di area konsolidasi juga, sebelum keburu naik
Selain itu, buat saya token dengan mekanisme burn dan buyback itu combo maut bagi sebuah token Nih gua sendiri sudah punya barang ini baru-baru ini
Ticker : $MWXT
Chain : BASE
CA : 0x93918567cdD1bc845BE955325a43419a7C56d66f
DYOR
Menurut kalian gimana guys ? Bullish or bearish nih👇
AI isn’t just hype, it’s a generational capital shift 🚀
The global AI market is expected to grow from around $300B today
to $827B by 2030 and potentially $4.8T by 2033, with a 27–37% CAGR, even faster than the cloud boom 📈
In every major tech cycle, value doesn’t flow to hype or short-term narratives.
It flows to infrastructure.
As AI adoption scales globally, demand becomes inevitable for:
– efficient systems
– scalable architecture
– interoperable & decentralized tech rails
– real data flow and computation at scale
At that scale, infrastructure isn’t just about performance, it’s about transparency, verifiable code, and long-term security at the base layer.
(Exactly why things like publicly verified smart contracts start to matter.)
Every serious infrastructure play looks boring… until it isn’t.
$MWXT is positioning itself right in this infrastructure layer.
Not chasing trends, quietly building where AI growth naturally pushes value.
Most people will only notice when adoption explodes.
I’d rather position before consensus 🧠
Quietly watching @mwx_ai build.
CA: 0x93918567cdD1bc845BE955325a43419a7C56d66f (BASE)
Not financial advice. Just sharing my personal positioning. ✌️
#MWXA#MWXAI xitter.cf/mwx_ai/status/20056419…
Happy to announce @GraphLinq_Proto as our new partner!
Together, we’re pushing the boundaries of AI-powered on-chain automation and building smarter, more efficient Web3 workflows.
This is just the beginning — Let’s build the future


























