Tech Review: McLaren MCL39 Front Suspension—Part II
If you missed Part I of my deep dive into MCL39’s novel front suspension, see link below… 1/8
Photo: @xavigazquez
Replying to @AeroTechVH
16 “was further away before the contact” — seems to me he had to be pretty close to make contact. FFS and🤦🏻♂️!
Replying to @HillF1 @5liveSport
Make #1 driver the guy that got distracted, missed a corner all by himself, and gave up his position to the eventual race winner? That guy?
Replying to @mddjeffreys @ScarbsTech
Nice 👍
Is the ratio of pedal travel/rotation to sensor rotation constant? Or does some correction need to be applied to sensor output?
Replying to @AeroTechVH
Ferrari have 5 drivers in on track this weekend—shouldn’t be hard to choose the right 2 going forward.
Replying to @brakeboosted
Not watching but rear on the verge of locking up better than snaps of the rear on exit, yes? Imagine regen can be tweaked?
Replying to @brakeboosted
Doesn’t “sound” good from that description, LOL.
Replying to @pinsaroulette16
True… as I had predicted:
Replying to @dr_obbs
What would he accomplish away? Not catching Max and then hold up LEC when his softs degrade at lap 50.
From the same thread…
Replying to @dr_obbs
What would he accomplish away? Not catching Max and then hold up LEC when his softs degrade at lap 50.
Replying to @wearetherace @XPBImages
Another example of why drivers should let strategists strategize.
Replying to @EngDesignIng @dr_obbs
Ok, I was wrong… not lap 50, lap 46. 😉
Replying to @dr_obbs
What would he accomplish away? Not catching Max and then hold up LEC when his softs degrade at lap 50.
Replying to @dr_obbs
Or just driving a better car—faster, easier on tires—can guy in 2nd? 🤷🏻♂️
Replying to @brakeboosted @f1_naija
Agreed. Makers of the rule book could not have foreseen such a scenario, so complex (and, dare I say, stupid) are the rules.
Replying to @brakeboosted
Yes and luckily McL were worse on the day: started on slicks (1 step harder though), ran the hards, pitted late under SC, and almost took each other out.
Replying to @brakeboosted
Exactly this.
I seem to remember how, back in the Brawn/Baldessari days, they tested for, and used, actual test data to predict performance during changeable conditions to make informed decisions… then Domenicali happened. 🤣
Replying to @brakeboosted
Leclerc quote sums it up: “There are teams that consistently make better choices in these conditions.”
It shouldn’t be this difficult and it mustn’t be a gamble.
#F1 | Leclerc: "Ci sono team che costantemente fanno scelte migliori in certe condizioni"
it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1…






