What about non-NATO populations? AFAIK, "we" (NATO countries) are not at war with Russian. And if we are shouldn't there be a declaration thereof? And is a military/social-media complex really a good thing for freedom of speech?

It’s not at all ironic. It makes sense because X does censor. See👇. To not call this censorship is shameful. You know that I was talking about the threat of EU censorship before anyone, and you also know that I’ve been made invisible on X, so you don’t have to respond.

Yes, the GDI is an important part of the network. But is it really British, as I believe Sayers says. So what is this then? The EU apparently thinks its German and funds GDI: cordis.europa.eu/project/id/…. (This is just one grant.) Whatever happened to Robert Kogon, btw?

Corporate influence was definitely not the problem in the Covid "response". It was all government(s). When has RFKjr *ever* mentioned BioNTech and its state sponsor, Germany? AFAIK, never. He knows but he's covering it up. I don't know why. But he is covering it up.

As always it's as if the German presence in the Wuhan virology scene doesn't even exist for these people. It was a direct PRESENCE in Wuhan, involving massive German funding. Drosten himself was directing GoF research on MERS. Again, for DRASTIC, crickets. tinyurl.com/mu28x82c

They're not even "Pfizer" contracts. They're contracts with a consortium of Pfizer and the German owner of the "vaccine" and marketing authorization holder BioNTech. The German MEP Anderson knows this perfectly well. This is all just a show.

So, Jay, you really believe that there is no censorship on X? "Blacklists" and many other "visibility filters" are built right into the algorithm. The fine had nothing to do with X's "content moderation" and is a pittance compared to, say, the 3 BILLION the EU fined Google.

And they didn’t even pull the (yearly!) recommendation much less the jab for 18+, which is also peak myocarditis per the CDC’s own, now memory-holed, data. This is not a victory, it’s defeat packaged as victory. Cc: @jengleruk

Don't have time or even motivation to look into this more closely. But not sure I believe this narrative. Remember the CDC's 2022 myocarditis study? It showed enormous harm and admitted underreporting. The current leadership cites LESS alarming numbers. xitter.cf/EdV1694/status/1938893…

1/ 10? What is the basis for that figure? if you really believe there was a public health emergency - a premise Kopp and Prasad accept - then this could easily be sold as regrettable but acceptable risk. @ClareCraigPath, do you think that figure is truly indicative of the harm?

Just so you know, your reply - the only one that raises empirical issues - is hidden behind the "probably spam" barrier. You cannot question the approved opposition narrative on X. 10 is an extreme low-ball figure that could easily be sold as regrettable but acceptable risk.

What about the price paid for the jabs, both literally and figuratively? He doesn’t even mention them! Since 2023 the algorithm decided that lockdown skepticism was fine and would be promoted. Hence, Bojo jumps on the bus. But at least the one miracle drug would remain protected.

1/But then when he realized that the jabs don’t stop transmission, he said that and said that hence vaccine passports don’t make sense. So, why are we piling on him rather than those who upheld the myth to the bitter end? Because that’s how to have reach on X. Attack scapegoats.

1/ But you're still conceding too much. This is roughly a million times more than you'll get from Germany. Everything is DARPA, Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Pfizer. Nobody is asking anything about Drosten, Dittmer, DFG (what's that?), TRR60 (what's that?), etc. Nothing but scapegoats.

1/Why *his* activities? Is this what Paul et al are suggesting? From the start, Baric insisted that lab-origin hypothesis had to be taken seriously. No one who had anything to hide would do this. Drosten was the one who said the theory had to be take down. tinyurl.com/2ebbrpxc

Even "short covid" has no clinical specificity. It's just: [fill in your favorite symptom here] plus a positive PCR. This was the whole problem from the start, as David Crowe (see below) realized right away. The Covid "opposition" has gone backwards - at least on this platform.

Well, that means that X silences minds because there are "blacklisted topics" built right into the X algorithm. 👇What are they? We don't know, and there is the rub. But are we still going to pretend that "freedom of speech is not freedom of reach"?

Honestly, poor misleading journalism. They still can't say the name of the actual applicant, which was responsible for the submissions and conducted the biodistribution studies (or had them conducted on its behalf: by Charles River, not Pfizer). Epoch knows but does not correct.

Really? So, covert censorship is fine then? We only have a problem with overt censorship? Someone who says “freedom of speech is not freedom of reach” (a motto, btw, that comes from EU officials) is not a defender of free speech. Accept this and free speech is dead.