Synths,,,, my Cats & Dogs ❤️ Fine Single Malt Whisky 🥃 my family.
Luna, Cordillera Admin Region
Joined December 2020
- Tweets3.2K
- Following440
- Followers193
- Likes5.8K
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
By their logic, if Trump, Farage & Putin said men could be women, trans activists would suddenly be against transgenderism.
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
Emmanuel Grégoire, mayor of Paris, reads out some comments on the city’s social media post about Pride. Authors of these messages will now be pursued by the courts.
Grégoire was in charge of HR in Paris when the first alerts were made about problems with the afterschool care programme, a decade-long scandal that has resulted in hundreds of child abuse cases, including many of sexual abuse. Under his watch as deputy mayor for 6 years, staff who were suspected of abusing children were simply moved to other schools, like priests from parish to parish. His office treated systemic child sex abuse crimes as one-off nuisances.
Priorities, priorities.
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
The Nursing Times is celebrating an initiative through which bereaved mothers express and donate their breast milk - yet does not use the word “mother” once.
Instead, women become “families”, mothers become “parents” and breast milk becomes “lactation”.
That is not neutral language. It reflects an ideological choice to avoid naming women, even when only women can perform the intensely physical act being described.
This is not journalism - it's activism.
This is absolutely appalling from the @NursingTimes .
In an article celebrating an award-winning initiative through which bereaved mothers donate their breast milk to help vulnerable babies, the word “mother” is not used once.
The women become “families”. Breast milk is reduced to the clinical language of “lactation”.
Yet it is the grieving mother who sits and expresses milk meant for a baby she cannot hold.
It is her body still producing milk for the child she has lost.
It is she who makes the extraordinary decision to continue expressing that milk and donate it to help another vulnerable baby.
Yet the Nursing Times tells us that more than 400 “families” have donated milk and places the “parent voice” at the centre.
Families grieve. Fathers grieve. Their loss matters enormously.
But families - or parents collectively - do not express breast milk.
Mothers do.
To erase a bereaved mother from this intensely physical act - while supposedly celebrating her generosity - is not inclusive.
It is dehumanising, cruel and profoundly insulting.
Link below 👇
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
I'm not claiming anything. I'm stating immutable biological facts that a cheek swab on you would testify that you're a MAN.
Here you are, a 4O year old dirty old bastard. Your bald head & your masculine physique can never be mistaken foe a woman.
You obviously use female only spaces and reframing it as "I use appropriate spaces because I'm a woman" isn't fooling anyone. By adding "It's you who demand I stop" is an admission you enter female only spaces and violate the privacy & dignity of every woman and girl using that space. This is the behaviour of a predatory pervert and you have no intention of stopping.
The only thing that will stop you entering female only spaces is getting arrested.
You're a disgusting sexual deviant and I will not stop calling you one nor am I removing those posts.
Someday soon your past will catch up with you and so will an arrest warrant.
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
Jason Arday reviewed and approved this student's PhD thesis, which portrays black women taking trips to London and attending potlucks as forms of "marronage"—the historical practice of Africans fleeing enslavement.
The 70K-word thesis is based on conversations with just 3 black women, which were converted into poems and then, after being infused with the author's own subjective experiences, analyzed via "Critical Poetic Inquiry."
The thesis can only be described as a tribute to black women such as herself, channeled through an amalgam of slam poetry and activism.
She describes her research project in bizarre terms such as: "a lament, a war cry, a chant and a belly laugh" and "a joyful, painful rupture, a disruption, a deliberate transgression, a riff, and a drum beat… a prayer for all we have lost and for all that we can be."
She is also openly hostile to academic rigor, quoting other scholars when admitting that her project "does not align with notions of 'neutral' research or 'objective' researchers."
Academic standards, such as "marking criteria, rubrics and journal requirements that favour written knowledge over that which is communicated creatively (i.e. through painting or performance)" and also "notions that knowledge must be scientifically tested and proven to meet coloniality's contorted standards of fact" are deemed by her to be forms of colonial oppression.
This raises the question: Why is Cambridge awarding its highest academic credential to a project whose author openly presents accepted academic standards as oppressive constraints to be undermined and resisted?
It's clear the problem of academic standards at Cambridge wasn't isolated to the case of Jason Arday, but appears to be a form of systemic rot.
Because the thesis was suddenly embargoed for the next 5 years immediately when the Arday scandal broke, we are legally unable to share it in its entirety. So we have performed a very long and thorough exegesis of it, which you can read at the link below.
🔗benryan.substack.com/p/cambr…
Cambridge Said Jason Arday Was an ‘Aberration.’ So Why Was the Shaky PhD Thesis He Approved Sealed Until 2031?
Substack link: benryan.substack.com/p/cambr…
@SwipeWright and I obtained a Cambridge PhD thesis—one of questionable academic rigor—that Dr. Arday examined and that was put under a new, five-year embargo just after the scandal about Dr. Arday broke.
The PhD thesis of a student in Cambridge’s Faculty of Education—in which the late Jason Arday held a professorial chair, in the sociology of education, until he resigned hours after Cambridge on Aug. 5 announced it was investigating him—has been put under what British and Canadian academics have told Colin Wright and me is a remarkably long embargo, shielding it from public view until 2031.
Crucially, among the panelists who reviewed the thesis was Dr. Arday himself.
The thesis, which we have obtained and which we review in this Substack, raises important questions about whether the Faculty of Education, including Dr. Arday’s own contributions, let down the basic standards of higher education.
The lengthy embargo raises further questions about what Cambridge, which is among the most elite universities in the world, and the paper’s author might have to hide where her scholarship is concerned.
Written by Damilola Folayan, the thesis is entitled Of, but not in: A poetic exploration of how Black women students respond to the coloniality of Oxbridge—referring to the portmanteau of Oxford and Cambridge. It garnered her a coveted Cambridge PhD in 2025. Following what’s known as an autoethnographic style, it is in essence an epic poetry-slam interpretation of the plight of Dr. Folayan and three other black women at Oxbridge and their experiences navigating, with considerable ambivalence, these historically, and still overwhelmingly, white elite institutions.
The sprawling thesis unabashedly thumbs its nose at the rigors and demands of academia even as it demands in return an elite PhD and all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto.
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
A man won a top award for women and a bunch of people will celebrate this as progress.
This is all true 👍
Having read the article, you make the mistake of assuming a man is a woman because he says he is. He isn't. He comes with a male view of sex and porn, not a female's - where he is fetisher and the fetishee. A 'straight' man sleeping with a trans-id man is an attempt to negate his homosexuality with both of them adhering to female stereotypes. He is homosexual. The sex act is homosexual. That both parties engage in a fantasy of their own making does not negate this. Also, a trans-id man who claims to be a lesbian and wants to sleep with other women [be they trans-id men or not] is still a heterosexual man who wants to have sex with women. The various combinations write themselves but is determined by the sex of the person at birth. Since the initial assumption is wrong, the rest falls by the wayside.
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
The UK government issued a nine-page behavioral guide for asylum seekers explaining that women have the right to not be raped.
Civilized societies should not have to import people and then teach them how to be civilized.
That is an indictment of a completely broken immigration system.
Fucking sake
Cambridge University's education faculty – former home of Jason Arday – has appointed as assistant research professor who wrote that Muslims should study engineering and computers 'to produce advanced weaponry for Jihad in order that the deen [Islam] may dominate over all other deens.'.
Two weeks ago we covered one chapter Ahmed wrote in a Hizb pamphlet – published in 2002, and republished in 2017 (Ahmed was not involved in the republication) – where she attacked ‘western education’ as a ‘threat’ to Muslims, condemned democracy and integration, and criticised British schools for teaching pupils that child marriage is wrong.
However, the same pamphlet includes a second, even more radical chapter, co-written by Ahmed and another senior Hizb activist, Nazreen Nawaz, head of its women’s section.
This describes Hizb’s plan to create a fully Islamic education system as part of the Islamic dictatorship, the Khilafah, which is its core goal. As the chapter puts it: ‘nothing will be contained within the curriculum that contradicts with Islam, such as the teaching of the ideas of freedom, nationalism, democracy or evolution in a positive light’.
‘Nor can there be any schools established on any other religion, sect or race… Even the non-Muslims need to be educated under the educational curriculum of Islam… by pushing them to think about the correct belief in life.’
✍️ Andrew Gilligan
Article | spectator.com/article/cambri… | @mragilligan
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
Fascinating how so many people are out here saying “this doesn’t happen” and “this is a made up MAGA problem.”
So let me shed some light… This happened to my little girl (and at the time I was a staunch Democrat who had just voted for Joe Biden.)
I went public and discovered it had happened to many others. I sued all the way to the Supreme Court — along with other affected parents.
The school district admitted to and defended it, in legal documents. Justice Alito called our case “troubling and tragic” and an issue of “great and growing national importance.”
It was a living nightmare that almost destroyed my child.
But willfully ignorant TDS sufferers will claim mine was an isolated incident…
So here are some other lawsuits from affected families that anyone can research, each with hundreds of pages of evidence:
These have reached Supreme Court:
• John and Jane Parents v Montgomery County (23-601)
• Parents Protecting Our Children v Eau Claire (23-1180)
• Foote v Ludlow (25-77)
• Lee v Poudre (25-89) **my case**
• Littlejohn v Leon (25-289)
• Lavigne v Great Salt Bay (25-759)
These other cases have been filed in lower courts all over the country:
• Doe v Weiser (Colorado)
• Mead v Rockford Public School District (Michigan)
• Vitsaxaki v Skaneateles Central SD (New York)
• Lema v Davenport (New Jersey)
• Regina v Staley (California)
• Doe/Heaps v Delaware Valley (New Jersey)
• Blair v Appomattox (Virginia)
• Konen v Spreckles (California)
• Perez v Broskie (Florida)
• Koltenbach v Hilliard City Schools (Ohio)
• DF/Figliola v Harrisonburg City Schools (Virginia)
• Wiley v Sweetwater County School District (Wyoming)
• Parents Defending Ed v Linn-Mar (Iowa)
• TF v Kettle Moraine (Wisconsin)
So many other brave parents have come forward with FACTS about their child’s secret school transition: @bourne_beth2345, @ErinFriday75490, @LydiamamaTerf, @AlyashchenkoX, @nogenderpredtrs just to name a few.
The gaslighting phase has ended. Parents who’ve endured the horrors of the secret school transition of our kids can no longer be denied. There’s too many of us now. We’re going to end this nightmare for other parents, no matter how many people play pretend that we don’t exist.
So where is this happening? In the cafeteria?
What child has been secretly transitioned in school?
This is some goofy shit.
#DemsUnited
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
University of Melbourne did a study into misogyny.
They found large differences between ethnic groups, and by almost every measure white respondents were the least prone to violence and extremism.
But the left wing authors dismissed their own findings and the newspapers didn't cover this section of the report.
This report finds misogyny correlates with left-wing extremism, but explains it away as a general propensity toward extremism. Right-wing, religious and other extremism of course aren’t afforded the same level of deference. abc.net.au/news/2026-08-25/r…
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
NOW - Trump: "Every public school in America is now on notice: That if they tell a child that they are trapped in the wrong body, they are committing child abuse."
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
80% of North African asylum seekers in Switzerland commit crime.
Completely bonkers statistic. Maybe the most crazy one I've seen, and I have seen many.
It is fully obvious from this that the current asylum system does not work and must be changed. We can't mass import people where almost all of them prey on us.
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
Labour ‘lobbied EHRC in pursuit of the Muslim vote’.
The former Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Baroness Falkner, has accused the Government of attempting to persuade the watchdog to accept its ‘unworkable’ definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility”.
The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government attempted — in secret — to convince the Commission to adopt the definition, despite its opposition.
A Freedom of Information (FOI) request has also revealed that the watchdog will not be adopting the new definition, which it has consistently warned could have a “chilling effect” on free speech.
As the Free Speech Union has long argued, the Government has shamelessly tried to use this definition to win back the Muslim vote, which has splintered in recent years. In doing so, it has sacrificed our fundamental right to free speech — including the right to criticise any religion — on the altar of electoral ambition.
Baroness Falkner told The Times: “The reports that the government has secretly tried to get the EHRC — the regulator for freedom of expression — to sign up to its entirely unworkable ‘definition’ shows how ideological they are. They have been warned again and again that this definition will restrict speech and legitimate criticism of a religion or culture.
“They didn’t consult EHRC, which has responsibility for protecting our hard won freedoms and which repeatedly warned them of the implications of this definition.
“If they really want to restrict our freedom of expression, they should come up with a proper legal definition and see if they can get that through parliament, instead of adopting underhand tactics, presumably in pursuit of a Muslim vote which they have, for far too long, taken for granted.”
General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, Lord Young of Acton, said: “Reading between the lines, it looks as though the government’s adoption of a definition of anti-Muslim hostility was just the latest move in Labour’s long-standing effort to get the EHRC to investigate the Conservative Party for ‘Islamophobia’. So nothing to do with protecting Muslims and all about political point-scoring.”
It has also been revealed, through an FOI request from the Shadow Justice Secretary, that the department deleted all responses to the Working Group’s consultation on the definition. This has increased fears that extremist groups may have influenced the development of this de facto Islamic blasphemy law.
The Free Speech Union exposed at the start of the year that all five members of the Working Group had troubling links to Islamist organisations, such as the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND — both of which successive governments since 2009 have adopted a policy of non-engagement with due to concerns about extremism.
Unsurprisingly, neither the Free Speech Union nor the EHRC was invited to submit evidence to the consultation, despite both having repeatedly voiced concerns that the definition would have a chilling effect on free speech.
This saga gets more concerning by the day.
Read more in @thetimes below 👇
🦠Transient Oddity 🎨 ◨-◨¬🏝 retweeted
The UK Government have legally blocked the release of migrant crime data saying there is nothing to worry about
They've also just started giving out leaflets to migrants asking them to please not rape women and children
We all know what the stats are saying
