The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
Around 2,200 years ago, the artist Hephaistion left his signature on a mosaic floor in the form of a piece of parchment held down with small drops of wax. This perfect imitation of a sheet of parchment, with one corner curled up, was discovered in one of the palaces at Pergamon.
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
Five years on from Brexit, London remains a European city, where European Londoners are valued and cherished. You are our neighbours, colleagues, friends and loved ones. Thank you for making London your home. You are wanted here—and always will be.
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
Replying to @VP46Archive @VP
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
The findings shatter a core assumption of modern agriculture – that we can predict plant performance based on individual traits.
The most productive combinations weren't those that looked good on paper, they were the ones that had time to adapt to each other.
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
This wasn't random.
High-diversity plots consistently outperformed monocultures across every metric. After 15 years, they showed 84% less variation in biomass production and recovered from drought twice as fast.
Nature was proving that diversity equals stability.
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
The real breakthrough came from watching these communities evolve.
Species that initially competed fiercely for resources began developing sophisticated sharing networks. The plants weren't just coexisting—they were actively cooperating in ways not previously observed.
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
Two decades ago, researchers started an experiment that would challenge the prevailing scientific understanding of plant communities.
While modern agriculture treats diversity as inefficient, the Jena Experiment proved the opposite: complexity is the key to resilience.
Nealry 160K downloads! Come on! Let's do this!
listen, eat repeat!
Love ya!
The Delicious Legacy shows.acast.com/the-deliciou… via @acast
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
Did a "Byzantine Emperor's" style pork belly, an 800 plus year old recipe, marinated in vinegar, honey, garum and garlic with fresh herbs from the garden, served with saffron butter rice, a dish fit for an emperor indeed, i can verify it! 😁😁😁
Join me on Patreon, you can become a member from $3 per month or join for FREE and partake in the community, as I'll be going going gone from twitter, facebook and instagramhell.
Come, I'll cook a feast for you, promise!
patreon.com/thedeliciouslega…
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
53 victims—18 women, 18 children, 14 men, and 3 elderly people—arrived dead at the Ahli Arab Hospital as a result of Israeli bombing on their shelters since the ceasefire was declared.
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
A Short History of Beer with Pete Brown 2025 version shows.acast.com/the-deliciou… via @acast
A Short History of Beer with Pete Brown 2025 version shows.acast.com/the-deliciou… via @acast
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
Journalists: this is no longer a news source. It's a far-right information eco-system. If you're making any editorial judgement based on what you see here, something has gone very wrong.
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
Hello, this is your regular reminder that this site is rigged by its far-right owner to prioritise far-right content.
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
If you doubt the scientific community, that's on you and your worldview, not scientists
Science is a method to explain the world. Scientists are just people. Not perfect, but doing our best to learn new knowledge. If you don't trust our experience, that's your trust issues, baby
The Delicious Legacy Podcast retweeted
This statement is ridiculous. Every scientific field is built around testing hypotheses (interpretive leaps) that attempt to explain fragmentary data. We keep hypotheses that effectively match that fragmentary dataset and modify them when they do not
Archaeology is no different
Replying to @FlintDibble
In contemporary discourse, conflating genuine science with fields reliant on fragmentary data and interpretive leaps—like archaeology—undermines the rigor of authentically scientific inquiry. Calling them “science” fosters epistemic overreach and weakens the credibility of genuinely testable claims.
























