Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
MEET KIMBERLY.
If you’re using “11-1” to argue the lone juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial must have been wrong, watch this.
Kimberly served on a statutory rape jury years ago.
Eleven jurors believed the defendant was guilty.
One refused.
After hours of deliberating, the eleven eventually changed their votes to NOT GUILTY.
Did the evidence change?
No.
Kimberly says they were tired. They wanted to go home. They didn’t like the teenage victim.
A man they believed was guilty walked free.
She still considers it one of the biggest regrets of her life.
THAT is why I won’t dismiss the Clancy holdout simply because eleven people disagreed with him.
Eleven people can be wrong.
Eleven people can cave.
Eleven people can just want the deliberations to end.
The entire purpose of requiring unanimity is that the twelfth juror is allowed to say:
No. You haven’t convinced me.
And refuse to move.
A tip of my cap to all of the older, curmudgeonly teachers who wrote down all of their student’s grades in a ledger because the didn’t trust this “newfangled Canvas app”. Your moment in the sun is now.
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
If your position at The Washington Post was recently eliminated, please consider applying to write for The Babylon Bee. We are seeking applicants experienced in writing fictional content presented in the tone and style of a legitimate news organization.
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
David sits in his car. The engine is off, but he hasn't moved for ten minutes.
He is parked in the driveway of the house he pays for, staring at the front door. Inside, the lights are warm. He can see the silhouette of his wife, Sarah, moving in the kitchen. He can see his daughter watching TV. It looks like a perfect life.
But David isn't soaking it in. He is hyperventilating.
He grips the steering wheel until his knuckles turn white. He is taking these ten minutes to put the "mask" back on.
At work today, he lost a major client. The company is downsizing. He might not have a job in three months. The panic is a physical weight on his chest, crushing his lungs. He wants to walk inside, fall into Sarah’s arms, and say, "I’m scared. I don’t know if I can keep holding this up. I need you to tell me it’s going to be okay."
But he doesn't.
He remembers three years ago. His mother died. He broke down in front of Sarah. He cried. Really cried. He saw the look in her eyes shift. From comfort to fear.
The "Rock" had crumbled, and she didn't know how to look at him anymore. The attraction faded for months.
He learned his lesson: He is allowed to be sad, but he is not allowed to be helpless.
So, in the darkness of the driveway, David swallows the panic. He fixes his tie. He checks his reflection in the rearview mirror and practices the smile. The "I'm fine" smile.
He opens the car door and walks inside.
"Hey, honey! You're late," Sarah says, not looking up from her phone. "Did you remember to transfer the tuition fees? The school sent a reminder."
She didn't bother to ask how he is.
"Yeah, I did it," David says, kissing her cheek. She accepts the kiss, but she doesn't lean into it. That moment, he felt like he is just part of the furniture. A utility provider that keeps the lights on.
Later that night, in bed, David reaches out. He runs his hand down her arm, starving for a touch that isn't transactional. He just wants to feel desired. He wants to know he matters.
Sarah sighs. A heavy, annoyed sigh. "David, I'm exhausted. The kids were a nightmare today. Can we just sleep?"
He pulls his hand back immediately, humiliated. The "Beggar Dynamic" kicks in. He feels gross for even asking. He turns his back to her, staring at the wall.
Lying there, in the house he built, next to the woman he loves, David realizes the terrifying truth:
If he died tomorrow, they would miss him.
But if he went broke tomorrow, hmm...
He realizes he isn't loved unconditionally like his daughter or the dog. He is on a performance contract. As long as the payments clear, he is allowed to stay.
He closes his eyes. The panic returns. But he stays silent.
Because the only safe space he has left is inside his own head.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
This is not an opinion.
I wasn’t there. I’m not an expert.
I am not taking sides.
This is a prediction of what the findings will likely be once the ICE shooting investigation is completed.
• The driver was resisting arrest
• The driver was attempting to flee law enforcement
• A car is legally considered a lethal weapon regardless of speed
• The ICE officer who fired was in the path of the vehicle or within its potential arc
• The ruling will likely state that the officer made the best deduction he could in that moment, without the benefit of hindsight or slowed video review
Legally, this will be treated the same as if the driver were holding a gun.
She was told to stop.
She was told to drop it.
Instead, she used it.
Whether the vehicle was pointed directly at the officer or slightly off line will likely not be determinative. A gun does not need perfect alignment to constitute a lethal threat. A moving vehicle is treated the same way under use of force standards.
That is the prediction, not a position.
What do you think will happen in the ICE Minneapolis shooting case?
What do you think should happen?
#ICEShooting #Minneapolis #UseOfForce #OfficerInvolvedShooting #FederalAgents #PoliceShooting #BodyCam #SelfDefense #LawEnforcement #ICE
Here’s the thing about boycotting Hilton. If you aren’t Platinum Elite (whatever Hilton calls it), your boycott means nothing compared to losing government business. If you are PE, you are unlikely to give up those perks. Do whatever feels good, but have realistic expectations .
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
why not just raise income tax rates?
because your real intent is not to just “provide healthcare”.
you’re masking that you are proposing the creation of, for the first time in the 250 years of this American republic, an organized government seizure of private property from citizens.
you’re calling it a “wealth tax” or a “billionaires tax” or “millionaires tax” or whatever nom du jour polls well. but at the end of the day, it’s the seizure of private property from citizens by the government. citizens that earned money, paid their fair taxes on those earnings (53% if they live in California) and are now being told they need to hand over after-tax assets because the government has failed to provide promised services with the revenue it’s collected, and are now re-casting their own failure to be a socio-economic inequity that must be justly resolved... a slippery slope that has never gone anywhere good (see economic effects in USSR, Cuba, Venezuela, France and Norway wealth tax etc.)
the American founders fled tyranny in Europe and this amazing nation was populated by immigrants (myself and your parents) from around the world not just looking for a “better life” but for a place where they could have freedom from tyrannical governments that can take what they want from private citizens. a great nation borne of property rights, the rule of law, and endowed freedoms to believe, speak, or act. these principles led to the greatest run of innovations, successes, and widespread increase in prosperity, for all citizens, ever seen.
the citizens, the individuals, not the institutions, delivered this progress. those who invented, who toiled, who bled, who sacrificed, who took risk and persevered, who led, and who changed the world, are not charlatans, kleptocrats, or oligarchs. they’re what made us all better off. prosperity is a measure of america’s success, not its failure.
it is your principle that is so offensive, as evidenced by the broad disdain for your flippant flirtation with the darkest of human fantasy - socialism. you and other neo-socialists have led so many of us to reflect on America’s history and what it is becoming. that now leads so many to consider, so unnecessarily, leaving their homes for a place where everyone stands up to shout down the principle you suggest. because if your ideas are now considered moderate, it’s clear this titanic is sinking.
that a “simple tax” of taking assets that have been earned, through toil and tribulation, rightly taxed, and preserved, should now be unjustly seized, is your solution to a problem of obvious government mismanagement and outright fraud, tells us that your true motivation lies not in giving people healthcare but in cutting down success and deleting the system of prosperity and opportunity for all.
i don’t care, and neither should anyone else, what the sum total market value of a private citizens private assets might be. it is none of my business and should be none of yours. because, again, once you open that pandora’s box, we might as well study Lord of the Flies … there is literally nothing stopping 51% of citizens demanding that their government go out and seize 100% of the private property of the 49%.
want to give healthcare to people in need? do your job and fix healthcare. make it affordable. want to be lazy about it? then do your job lazily and raise income taxes.
want to take private property from private citizens who have paid their fair share of taxes and legally earned their property, then honestly declare that it is envy, not inequity, that you strive to resolve…
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
Today we celebrate Boxing Day in the UK, so named because cats spend the day exploring empty boxes discarded from Christmas Day
When watching what government is doing with SNAP, and what is being proposed for SS, it is difficult to understand why people want to turn healthcare over to them.
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
Recently unearthed footage from the Revolutionary War
This quoted post is unavailable.
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
Government would be wise to listen to Elon
It’s insincere for @SpeakerJohnson to insinuate @elonmusk is against the Big Beautiful Bill because it doesn’t benefit his companies specifically.
Musk is a true America First entrepreneur who could have had a much more comfortable existence and a higher net worth by sitting on the sidelines of politics. But he cares about this country, so he got involved. He knows if America collapses financially, we aren’t making it to Mars. He’s right.
When he helped cut government waste he watched his dealerships get firebombed, he stood for free speech by sponsoring a social media platform and in return the Biden administration brought half a dozen bogus cases against him, he provided the rural broadband that politicians continually failed to provide with endless taxpayer boondoggles, he revolutionized automobiles after conventional car manufacturers got bailed out for their failures, and he gave our astronauts a way to the space station without hitching a ride on Russian rockets.
For the sake of our country, I hope he will stay engaged in politics. If he doesn’t, I don’t blame him. But I’ll be here in DC trying to keep politicians of both parties from stopping the amazing human progress that he and his engineers have enabled and will enable.
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
I prefer my villains to be a little funny, I don’t really require a disturbing as fuck Joker. More delightful villains, please.
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
Yesterday, President Trump called for replacing federal income taxes with tariffs during House GOP speech.
But it wouldn't happen.
Here's everything you need to know about tariffs and taxes:
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
They're both wrong.
And this is why they both fail.
Children need to be supervised, not only because they don't always know what to do, or show good judgement, but because they need to learn how to be adults.
The proper supervision of children consists mostly of giving them visible examples of appropriate and healthy ways to live as an adult, which they can understand and copy.
But adults are not children. Populations of adults are not children, not even in the abstract, metaphorical sense. Either they were raised well, and do not need parents, or they were not, and parents will not help, because they are not impressionable growing minds that will emulate a good example.
Parents reward the good and punish the bad because it is their right and proper role to determine for their children what is good and bad.
They care for and nurture their children because it is their right and proper role to determine what is good and bad for their children.
They can be relied upon to do these things faithfully because they are biologically programmed to love their children and want the best for them.
None of this is true of governments.
They must not be allowed to care for you, because they do not love you, and do not know what is good for you better than you do, because you are an adult.
They must not be allowed to punish bad behavior or reward good behavior, because they do not know what is bad and good any better than you do, because you are an adult.
The purpose of the justice system isn't to morally reform bad actors. It's to keep them from interfering with the rest of us.
There are two ways to do this: Physically remove them from society so that a reoffense is impossible, or make them afraid to do it again.
When the adults who can behave like adults are left alone, both by the government and by the adults who cannot behave like adults, they accomplish tremendous things.
This is why the principles of classical liberalism made the west into the wealthiest, most powerful society is the history of the known universe.
It's why everyone wants to come here and participate, or come here and take our stuff. It's why we have to build walls to keep people out, instead of building walls to keep people in.
Classical liberalism worked when it was coupled with a vigorous policy of physical removal.
The problem with classical liberalism is that it does not contain a philosophical basis for the physical removal it depends on to work.
If you are not to some degree libertarian, you cannot create a great society, only a failed state or an authoritarian hellscape. Because societies do not become great unless adults are free to invest in things and control their investments, and free to try stuff, see what works, and imitate the discoveries of others.
But if your interpretation of libertarianism does not allow for physical removal, and boundary exclusion, of those who are not demonstrably able to behave themselves in a libertarian society, then you can't have a society that is sufficiently libertarian to be successful and great.
The key insight here is that you only have two options:
You can throw people in prison.
Or you can run your entire society like a prison.
This effectively throws everyone in prison. And nothing of consequence was ever invented in a prison.
This is the breakfast test for libertarians.
If your version of libertarianism does not contain a rationale for prisons, executions, and border walls...
If it does not encompass the idea that some people cannot be allowed the freedom within your society that you offer to the patriotic, pro-social, pro-civilization citizenry who are loyal to your libertarian tribe...
If it does not, in short, admit to the reality that some people are better than others...
... then your philosophy of libertarianism is self-swallowing, and the society it creates will have the stability of some exotic element created in a cyclotron, with a half-life measured in heartbeats.
The future of humanity requires that we maintain or create a libertarian society which only allows those people who are capable of liberty.
Occupy Mars.
The right-wing approach to governance is the Dad approach: punish bad behavior, reward good behavior, generally don't get too involved unless necessary.
The left-wing approach is the Mom approach: constantly monitor and carefully curate the environment.
As the conservative movement has pointed out for decades, the latter approach may be appropriate for small children; it's not appropriate for free citizens in a free society.
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
99% of financial advice is terrible.
Millionaires get rich because they know what to ignore. My net worth increased 6-figures *per year* once I ignored terrible advice.
Here are 17 of the worst pieces of advice you must ignore to get rich.
All of these people I see saying “I wish that…” have clearly never played Dungeons and Dragons when they made a wish that was granted by a capricious diety.
Disneyparksfan53 retweeted
We've got a 4-pack of PNC Triangle Club tickets to give away for Wednesday night's game thanks to @PNCBank!
Repost for your chance to win!
(winner will be chosen at noon ET tomorrow, 4/22)



















