I am from a city called Jerash, today it is insignificant, a forgotten, decaying place. But once, it was great. It was Jarasa, a thriving city of the Greco-Roman world, a beacon of culture, knowledge, and civilization. Then, Islam arrived. My ancestors were forced to convert, their heritage erased, and their land stripped of its brilliance. What was once a center of civilization became a ruin, another casualty of Islam’s relentless march. This wasn’t just Jerash. It was Lebanon. It was Syria. It was Iraq. It was Egypt. These lands weren’t always the Islamic backwaters they are today. They were hubs of knowledge, trade, philosophy, and empire. Then Islam came. It deformed them, crushed their identities, and plunged them into centuries of regression. Egypt, the land of the Pharaohs, of towering pyramids, of an empire that shaped history, was swallowed by an ideology that replaced its greatness with religious stagnation. Islam was the greatest colonial project in history. It expanded by force, erasing entire civilizations and replacing them with submission to an Arab warlord from the 7th century. And yet, the stupid Western left, the so-called defenders of “decolonization,” bend over backward to give Islam a pass. They scream about colonialism when it comes to the West but ignore the Islamic colonization of entire peoples, cultures, and lands. They want to hand the West over to the very force that already destroyed the East.

No belief system on earth treats the deliberate killing of 150 infidel passengers, men, women, and children, by crashing their plane as a virtue except Islam.

When Muslims quote the Quran saying, “Whoever kills a soul, it is as if he had slain mankind entirely” (Surah 5:32), don’t take it at face value. This verse is not a command to Muslims, it’s a reference to what God ordained for the Children of Israel in the Torah, used in the Quran to argue why disbelief warrants punishment: “Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul…it is as if he had slain mankind entirely…” Even if Muslims were to apply this standard, the verse immediately allows exceptions: “…unless it be for murder or spreading mischief in the land.” What counts as “mischief” (fasad)? The next verse, 5:33, defines it: “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive to cause corruption… is that they be killed…” The same verse (32) explains that "disbelief is transgression", rejecting Allah's messengers, is corruption. So rather than affirming the sanctity of life, the verse justifies killing anyone labeled as spreading ‘mischief’, which means simply not believing. So this verse was actually given to justify the killing of disbelievers, not to affirm human intrinsic value.

Killing civilians and noncombatants in Islam is not forbidden. Muhammad killed the children of Banu Qurayza by beheading them as a collective punishment for the entire tribe over what, according to the false Islamic narrative, was the betrayal of their elders in assisting Muhammad’s enemies. Add to that the fact that non-Muslim lives are not sacred in Islam. In Islam, your value comes from your religious affiliation. The concept of the intrinsic value of human beings is a Judeo-Christian concept that was globalized by Western civilization, not an Islamic one. Muhammad’s armies, whenever they entered a city, would, if the city fought and refused to submit, kill the men and enslave the women and children. When Muhammad told Muslims that they would eventually kill all Jews, he did not specify combatant Jews. He said that Jews would hide behind trees and stones, and that the trees and stones would call out to Muslims, pointing them to the Jews so they could find and kill them. Muhammad, as the example for Muslims, overrides cherry-picked verses from the Meccan period, which were, in any case, abrogated by the Medinan period. Cut the bullshit.