Basically, they both admitted there isn't undeniable evidence, and they were both coming to their own conclusions based off available evidence. Andrew lost here because his position was it was overwhelming that the official story was what happened and he backtracked to say that's just how he feels. This shifts the goal post from the evidence is overwhelming to his opinion of the evidence is overwhelming. He took a huge L here. Candace's point was basically they were both coming to their own conclusions based on evidence, but the evidence doesn't prove the case and has many flaws and holes in it that suggest otherwise. In the end Andrew said she had no shred of evidence Israel did anything but that works against him as well because he has no evidence, they didn't. The point is Israel had incentive for Charlie to die whether they did it or not. Charlie just switched positions on Israel right before this happened. It very well could be a leftist but inconsistencies in evidence and Israel should be looked at as a possibility. Any evidence appearing to contradict Tyler Robsinon did it doesn't prove Israel did it, but it can at least show Tyler didn't kill Kirk, and stop the focus from being on him to how Israel might be involved. Andrew basically admitted he was wrong and they both were coming to their own conclusions about the evidence and not that the evidence itself was overwhelming but that he "thought" it was. He wanted to accuse Candace of claiming to have evidence Israel or Erica are involved but she didn't claim to have evidence, just that she believes they are involved and the inconsistencies support the idea that they could be not prove that they are and thats why Andrew lost

Crypto Pump and Dumps won't stop until we stop incentivizing them. seed.lumoria.io/ is the first platform to allow for total incentive Control in defi Launching very soon