Scott retweeted
Imo, Tesla has higher potential over SpaceX. I'm not sold on the AI demand projections. Infinite money glitches have never worked in the past. Eventually spending must slow down as the models become good enough to last long lengths of time.
Over time, the big players will build their own data centers over purchasing compute from other providers.
Whereas Robotaxi has been proven, if on a small scale.
For the long tail, Optimus has higher potential for mass profits.
Scott retweeted

AleXandra Merz@TeslaBoomerMama4h
🇺🇸
United StatesConnected via United States Android AppAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Why am I adamant about a floor (which we might not get, just trying to explain)?
🤖 Made with AI
Scott retweeted

AleXandra Merz@TeslaBoomerMama8h
🇺🇸
United StatesConnected via United States Android AppAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
🗳️
I tried to reach out to the person that put this comment in the signature petition, to no avail.
I take the responsibility to publish this without him knowing, as I believe it is important to us all.
It will motivate me to keep going, through all difficulties that await us.
PS.: if you are the person and want me to take this down, let me know.
Scott retweeted
The $TSLA 🤝 $SPCX merger has me a lot more active on X lately. Not for engagement theater but because I’m watching people fear-buy SpaceX and sell Tesla to do it.
That trade has a real cost. Large holders pay capital gains to get out of TSLA. They give up their vote on the actual deal and they pay up into what’s being sold as the sure thing.
I get the psychology. Holding TSLA feels like they need the merger to work while buying SPCX feels like they own the destination either way, so they rotate and sleep better.
If the merger vote passes and fully clears every hurdle then a lot of those same people who swapped into the “sure thing” are going to be pissed.
Why?
Because if the ratio lands near 50/50 then the people who stayed in TSLA get that gap as an immediate premium at signing. The ones who already paid up into SPCX won't be getting that premium, obviously, and in fact it'll go the other way. Offers tend to give a little back. This means SPCX will immediately trade a bit lower.
So the panic swap buys comfort now but can leave them on the expensive side of the exact deal they were chasing.
Same destination. Worse entry. No vote.
At the end of the day it’s their call. Hold all TSLA, sell a slice to hedge a no-deal or rotate the entire stack. Completely up to them.
I’m posting so anyone making that kind of move at least runs the deeper thought process first. Moves this size need rational thought, not emotion.
Scott retweeted
In solidarity with the young 15 year old lad arrested for sharing this image of a politician.
You know what to do people. Let’s flood X with this.
Scott retweeted
Best reason to hold $TSLA into a $SPCX merger?
If it clears a 50/50 ratio then the current ~30% spread closes and you get SpaceX exposure cheaper than buying SPCX outright today. Same destination. Lower entry.
Ratio locks at signing. Every SPCX run-up after that rides on the TSLA shares you kept.
Sell TSLA for SPCX and lose the discount.
Even Elon Musk gets no say on the terms other than YES/NO when a deal is done. And he founded both companies. He recused himself.
Shareholders don’t dictate terms either. But we can - and did! - ask for considerations in the negotiated exchange ratio based on the stock’s All Time High, internal revenue projections and CyberCab + Optimus scaling.
Scott retweeted
"Elon's gonna rob Tesla holders in this merger" 🙄
Bro… read the 10-Q.
He controls ~80% of SpaceX votes. At Tesla? ~20%.
No deal without Tesla's independent committee signing off. Then it goes to shareholders.
The little guy finally has a seat at the table. And nobody's talking about it 🍺
Scott retweeted
A $TSLA 🤝 $SPCX merger at a fair ratio is arguably the first concrete way this 2022 promise from Elon finally gets delivered.
Elon Musk@elonmusk13 Dec 2022🇺🇸!
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreLocation may be affected by a proxy or VPN.Account-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Replying to @wholemars
I will make sure Tesla shareholders benefit from Twitter long-term
Scott retweeted

AleXandra Merz@TeslaBoomerMamaOct 23
🇺🇸
United StatesConnected via United States Android AppAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
🚨✍️
Calling on the Tesla Board & Special Committee to pursue a merger with SpaceX.
The shareholder letter is live. Read it and sign if you agree. Share it with friends & family.
Thank you to @Amy787 for drafting this so well.
surveymonkey.com/r/mergealre…
We want the combined company focused on building, not bureaucracy.
Scott retweeted
Tesla $TSLA has all the positive momentum with the merger case now on the table.
Shorts will be cooked soon enough.... Let them sing and dance at this point, as good days won't be long for them anyway....
Scott retweeted
Replying to @teslayoda @TeslaBoomerMama
But really tho, we need someone to represent the retail community.
@TeslaBoomerMama
Scott retweeted
Replying to @teslayoda @TeslaBoomerMama
Put her on the Tesla committee to represent Tesla retail.
Scott retweeted
Dear SpaceX and Tesla special committees, may I introduce you the third special committee — @TeslaBoomerMama. 💃🏻
Scott retweeted
Selling Tesla to buy SpaceX before the merger? Do the math first. 🚀
This is my situation:
If I sell $10k of $TSLA (oldest shares, up 64%):
• Norwegian tax on the gain (37.84%): about $1,480
• About $8,520 left to buy $SPCX
If I hold and SpaceX buys Tesla at a 30% premium:
• That $10k becomes about $13,000 in SpaceX, with no tax paid yet
Break-even: SpaceX has to rise 52.5% before the merger, with Tesla flat. From $145, that's about $221.
Above $221, swapping wins. Below it, holding Tesla wins.
Are you swapping or holding? 👇
Not financial advice.
Scott retweeted

TeslaFUDKer 🍁⚡️ 𝕏𝕏𝕏@technoking_420Oct 22
🇨🇦
CanadaConnected via Canada App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Robotaxi Radar@RobotaxiRadarOct 22🇺🇸
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Tesla shareholders might get the convincing deal they’re looking for in a Tesla-SpaceX merger 🧐
Compare the 10-Q language:
🚕 Tesla: "any necessary shareholder approval"
🛰️ SpaceX: "further approval by…our controlling shareholder"
Musk's super-voting shares make him SpaceX's controlling shareholder. So if a deal clears both special committees, Tesla holders are the ones who need convincing, after years of a flat stock price
Could that mean a sweeter deal to get Tesla shareholders to say yes? 🤔





















