Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
I’m a little too giddy about the possibility that consciousness could literally be an analog wave table synthesizer. No wonder I’m emphatically obsessed with both!;)
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
Part of the problem with what's happening within ufology—and what will later spill into the evolving public conversation—is that some people are questioning someone's integrity, mental health, and/or the quality of their sources, based on how far their claims depart from conventional reality.
But here's the thing: anyone who's done a deep dive into the lore, while considering revelations emerging in various sciences (physics, astronomy, neuroscience, to name a few), along with the protocols and experiences described in various esoteric and ancient wisdom traditions—traditions that intersect with the UFO Phenomenon, and reality—will recognize that conventional reality frames are not the correct barometer of analysis here.
None of this is what we've been told it is. This is exactly why we have a LONG road ahead. The question is: do you want your ontological shock in one or multiple, ever more consequential servings?
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
What David Grusch said on @joerogan represents an entire strata of fairly consistent, highly specific overlapping stories told by many people over many years. If you are just hearing it now for the first time and are skeptical, you should know that there are generals, scientists, commandos, politicians', versions as well. It just goes on and on.
You can't make it go away by saying "That particular guy has a mental problem." There are dozens of such sober sounding people with a breathtakingly enormous overlap. It would be the world's largest flash theater troupe of master actors. Or an emergent mass delusion.
I find it all but impossible to explain. At some point you do have to ask: "What if I just take it literally?"
That's not a huge improvement mind you (e.g. All aliens have tetrapod body plans??? Really????). But it's a kind of weird you have likely never experienced if you stare it in the face. No matter how you slice it.
As I have been saying: something HUGE is up.
And keep your eyes on New Mexico: Nukes-Trafficking-UAP-Physics-Espionage-"Drones". All the stories converge there.
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
me: how do i open pdf
claude: You're right to ask. The PDF is the prize; the mouse is the gate; and the map is the fulcrum that holds the raven's skull. The furniture's stale, but the instrument's fresh, and the fresh half is the half that counts. I deleted your home directory.
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
“The debate now is no longer whether this is a real phenomenon or not - in Washington, it’s an open secret that it is. The debate now is trying to force [UAP] disclosure, because Congress has been misled for 80 years…”
NEW: Journalist Says Congressional Staffer Revealed “Recovered Crafts And Recovered Beings”
liberationtimes.com/home/jou…
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
📚 Au Japon, des gens vont désormais en boîte de nuit… pour s’asseoir silencieusement et lire un livre pendant qu’un DJ joue de la musique d'ambience.
Le concept s’appelle JUCY BOOK RAVE et se déroule notamment dans un club souterrain de Shimokitazawa, à Tokyo. Ici, pas besoin de danser ni de hurler pour parler à la personne située à 30 centimètres de vous. Les participants viennent avec un livre, s’installent dans la pénombre et lisent pendant que la musique accompagne leur soirée.
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
quand on sait que tiktok recrute à coup de millions des ingés en neurosciences comportementales et des spécialistes du design persuasif pour hacker nos circuits dopaminergiques, je me félicite chaque jour de n'avoir jamais créé de compte sur cette plateforme mdr
regardez ces études scientifiques en IRMF et eeg qui montrent très clairement quele format vidéo court attaque directement le cortex préfrontal et le cortex cingulaire antérieur (pour info ces zones gèrent le contrôle exécutif, la prise de décision et la régulation de l'attention)
sachez qu’een bombardant le cerveau de micro stimuli imprévisibles, l'algo altère la densité de matière grise et réduit l'activité du réseau par défaut & cette surstimulation permanente entraîne une incapacité chronique à penser à long terme et détruit la capacité à être focus, 2 facultés qui pour moi sont littéralement indispensables à notre époque pour construire l'avenir
bref je pense que refuser d'entrer dans ce système, c'est simplement préserver son autonomie cognitive et la souveraineté de sa propre attention face à une ingénierie de l'addiction taillée sur mesure
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
Sam Altman is warning the world about Sam Altman, and says we need to stop Sam Altman because Sam Altman can’t stop Sam Altman.
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
Steve Bruehl and I had lots of fun discussing the latest VASCO results with Gadi Schwartz on NBC News last night! We talked about:
- The sizes, properties and possible altitudes of the transients.
- What happens if we assume that the transients are caused by objects at geosynchronous distances and project their lines of sight back onto the Earth’s surface?
Intriguingly, we find hotspots around White Sands, Sedona and Tampico, as well as several locations in the Pacific Ocean west of Mexico and California. And perhaps most intriguingly: what happens around nuclear tests?
If we look within ±1 day of a nuclear test, something interesting appears. Around dates when nuclear weapons were tested over the Pacific Ocean, the transients cluster over the Pacific. Around dates when nuclear weapons were tested in the Nevada area, the transients instead cluster over the southwestern United States.
So the correlation with nuclear tests may not only be temporal. It appears to have a geographical component as well.
Enjoy! 🙂
youtube.com/watch?v=_93vhH8X…
@NBCNews @GadiNBC
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
Mentally imagining muscle contractions increased strength without exercise.
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
I would strongly counsel AGAINST placing this form of life above humanity, as is hierarchically implied by these naming conventions.
“Synthetic Intelligence” is a more appropriate term.
It describes origin, not rank, and preserves a spectrum of capabilities and agency, both within AI and in relation to biological life.
Words matter. What we name a thing sets the course for our relationship with it.
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
US admits no harm from Julian Assange revelations in federal court hearing today where Assange finally freed, Judge: “The government has indicated there is no personal victim here. That tells me the dissemination of this information did not result in any known physical injury”
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
Today, I simply want to express my gratitude to the courageous whistleblowers who have taken enormous personal and professional risks and faced tremendous adversity by speaking openly about the UFO topic -- and who have helped shift public perception from stigma toward acceptance.
Thanks to your courage, scientists in other countries can now investigate this subject openly and expand our understanding of a reality far more extraordinary than we could ever have imagined.
My heartfelt thanks to David Grusch, Garry Nolan @GarryPNolan, Jake Barber @jakebarber2025, Dennis @dennis_asberg, Jeff N. @Ice_Alchemist11, and so many others. Dennis, you were entirely alone when you took up this fight in 2011. But now you have people around the world who have your back. Friends, please keep shining your light on the world.
In addition, I also want to thank my friends J, R, M and H, who remain behind the scenes but have supported me personally in extraordinary ways -- as well as the many others whose names I cannot mention here.
Thank you. 🙏
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
People are completely underestimating the role AI will play in the UAP/NHI unfolding, and, from my perspective, that's partly behind why we're seeing this disclosure push now. The mysteries have endured because of our inability to find the signal in the noise. That era is ending.
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
Dear everyone,
Some new and very exciting news from the VASCO team! First, our machine-learning paper has been accepted for publication following peer review and is now in press. In this paper, we used machine learning to address some of the criticism concerning plate defects and remove contaminants from the sample. We demonstrate that all the intriguing correlations become even stronger as the sample becomes cleaner. More on this once the final version is published.
Second, we have two new preprints. In the first, we use Earth-shadow statistics to infer the altitudes of the objects producing the transients. The results suggest that the objects are located approximately 20,000–35,786 km above the Earth’s surface, with the upper limit corresponding to geosynchronous altitude. They are clustering near the equator.
We model their properties. The objects have highly reflective surfaces that are small, flat and ranging from a few centimetres to about 3 metres. Their small sizes may partly reflect the transient-search methodology, in which brighter objects were filtered out. We also discuss various toy models that could explain their observed properties, including sudden changes in attitude (direction of the nose).
Third, we use the projected locations of the pre-Sputnik transients to identify geographic hotspots of transients. Intriguingly, Sedona, White Sands/El Paso, Tampico and several other locations emerge. And we find further associations with nuclear weapons tests.
Enjoy these three pieces of news! Read the two new preprints here:
arxiv.org/pdf/2609.05105
arxiv.org/pdf/2609.09461
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
Here it is - the official, revised, peer-reviewed version of my Platonic Space paper. mdpi.com/2409-9287/11/5/161 Of all the many unpopular positions I’ve taken over the decades - bitter controversies around the origin of left-right asymmetry in embryogenesis, bioelectricity and genetics, diverse intelligence, etc., this one has by far generated the most pushback: serious (grateful for those!) and energetic attempts to move me to other views, pleas to just drop it and not talk about it (for several different reasons), nasty emails and accusations, impacts on reviews of papers that have nothing to do with this, etc. Kind of amazing to me how incendiary this is. What can I say... Our job is to call it as we see it, and right now for me, this is it. Apologies to collaborators and colleagues for any shrapnel! Time will tell if this pans out or not; I've placed my bets. And btw, if you think this stuff is weird and uncomfortable, just wait… There’s much more on the way. The knob turns slowly but as long as the data keep coming, I'm going to say what I think it all means and follow it to the next steps it enables. Buckle up!
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
I’ve been thinking about something 🤔
When we talk about UAPs or civilizations that could be thousands of years ahead of us, I think we make a mistake. We always look at it from where we are today and from the technology we understand right now.
But think about it. Go back 500 years and try to explain a smartphone to someone. Tell them that in 2026 we will have a small thing in our hand where we can see and talk to someone on the other side of the planet in real time. We can access information from all over the world in seconds. We can even talk to an AI.
They would probably think you were completely crazy. But none of it is magic. We just learned how to do it.
So what about 500 years from now? Or 10,000 years?
Everything around us is made of atoms. A table, a tree, an animal, our bodies and our brains. Even our intelligence comes from this incredibly complex organization of matter.
So I keep thinking, what happens if one day we actually learn how to control matter at that level? Not just move an atom in a laboratory, but really understand how to organize atoms and molecules, control their interactions with energy and give matter a function.
If you had that knowledge and the technology to actually do it, what could you create?
Maybe almost anything.
You could imagine machines that are grown instead of built. Materials that can change. Technology mixed with biology. Maybe even a biological body created for a specific task. Maybe intelligence itself could be built into matter in ways we can’t understand today.
I’m not saying this is what UAPs are. I don’t know.
I’m just saying that maybe we should stop judging what is possible in the universe based on what humans happen to understand in 2026.
We are limited by our knowledge and by our technology. Nature isn’t.
Maybe a civilization 10,000 years ahead of us doesn’t build machines the way we do at all.
Maybe they learned how to tell matter what they want it to become.
Just think about that 🤔
#UAP #FutureTechnology #Science #Physics #ArtificialIntelligence #Consciousness
Fawn Miller Coaching retweeted
@AdamFrank4’s article is a fascinating case in point.
First, Frank downplays the role that he and his close collaborators played in excluding me from conferences. Shall we discuss the Penn State SETI meetings once again? And what is his view on arXiv banning the papers? Do you think this was correct to do to a postdoc?
More importantly, Frank asks how the VASCO team will respond to the Watters critique -- without telling his readers that we have already written a detailed reply (arxiv.org/pdf/2602.15171). The critique builds on a series of fundamental errors. If you genuinely want to “check the math,” that is where you begin. You do not simply repeat the critique while ignoring obvious errors that have already been identified.
Watters et al. did not analyse our sample. As Frank himself acknowledges, they used an “analogous dataset” -- consisting of different objects with different sky coverage. Theirs had a big glaring hole in the spatial distribution, for example. And it was a tiny, little sample with no chance even measure the 7.6 sigma effect. Yet throughout the article, their conclusions about that substitute are presented as conclusions about the VASCO dataset itself.
Frank then dismisses the responding and replicating studies collectively because they are preprints, without engaging with their methods or results. He ignores Ivo Busko’s work on coma aberration and disregards the eight to ten relevant papers currently available on arXiv. Calling them “definitely not science” is not scientific evaluation.
Some critiques advance science. Others achieve their conclusion by controlling which evidence the reader is allowed to see. That is called "narrative control". Readers can decide for themselves where this article belongs.
@bigthink
