I hear your fear, but your conclusions are statistically and historically false. You claimed 60 to 70% of Muslims are a threat to society. Let’s look at the data. 1) John L. Esposito and Dalia Mogahed wrote a book called: Who Speaks for Islam? In this book, they analyzed a large Gallup poll of the Muslim world. The research showed that 93% of Muslims are moderates. That is, your fear is based on a tiny minority, not the global majority. You also mentioned ISIS and Boko Haram. Did you know Muslims are their primary victims? Global terrorism data shows that the vast majority of people killed by these groups are Muslims in Muslim-majority countries. Therefore, blaming everyday Muslims for their crimes is like blaming the victims for the actions of their killers. Again, there is a glaring hypocrisy you haven’t talked about. How you and the media analyze these events. Your post says a lot to prove me right. When a Christian commits a horrific crime, he is treated as an isolated individual. He is known by his name, and his religion is shielded. But when a Muslim commits a crime, his entire religion is instantly tagged to him. Let me even ask you a question? Have you heard of figures such as Timothy McVeigh, Anders Breivik, or Joseph Kony and the Lord's Resistance Army before? Jsyk,they committed unimaginable terrorism, yet the media never branded them as Christian terrorists or blamed the Church. Their faith was protected while they were rightfully blamed as individuals. If we judge Islam by the actions of a radicalized few, we must judge every other religion by the same standard. Read the data and do not let media bias dictate your reality. 2) As for the historical marriage of Aisha, your position is borne out of ignorance. This is why you can boldly ignore the context and the historical reality of the 7th-century to say the nonsense you are saying. Did the Prophet marry Aisha in the 21st century? No. So why are you hell bent in distorting history? In fact, do you also know that across all global cultures, inclusive of Christianity, marriage was tied to puberty and societal readiness? If you look at the Bible and early Christian history, teenage marriage was the accepted standard. Theological and historical consensus places Mary, the mother of Jesus, at around 12 to 14 years old when she was betrothed to Joseph. In fact, King Josiah in the Old Testament became a father by age 15, meaning his marriage happened even earlier. What the Prophet (peace be upon him) did was not strange to the era he lived in. It was the universal norm. You are the one who is suffering from presentism. It is a type of psychological disorder where one is hellbent on judging historical figures by modern standards. Yet, the two eras are not comparable. Presentism is not a valid argument. It is just historical illiteracy dressed up as fake outrage. Read. Learn. Don’t be ignorant. Allah knows best.

You and your Muslim friends are very ignorant on this subject. I have explained this same video more than three times, yet you people keep peddling lies. The video is just content. And even if it is a real life situation, the real Islamic ruling on this is very clear. The claim that the only person who can make you stop praying is your mother is a big distortion. This misunderstanding comes from a specific historical narration about a man named Jurayj who was observing a voluntary prayer. Islamic scholars have explained that breaking a prayer to answer a parent applies to voluntary prayers, not the obligatory ones.  Now regarding the scenario of someone collapsing. In Islamic jurisprudence, the preservation of human life is a primary objective that overrides the continuation of prayer. If a person collapses, is drowning, or is in any mortal danger, breaking your prayer to save them is compulsory. Standing there and continuing your prayer while someone dies beside you is a major sin. What else do you want to hear? The fact that your friends were mute and claimed "that is how the Quran was written" proves you are either mischievous yourself, or you are a liar, or the people you asked know nothing about the religion. Allah knows best.

Ignorance shall never end. A lot of things happened yesterday that I was not online. Thank God I am seeing them one by one. You all wont get away with your propaganda and lies. I am here for all of you. When people build their faith on emotional rhetoric rather than rigorous study, they expose their intellectual bankruptcy in public. Let’s get straight to it. First, she started by weaponizing the Hadith about the Prophet's final illness, claiming he used his last moments to curse Jews and Christians. This is a severe misrepresentation of the text. The Prophet was not issuing a random, hateful insult. He was delivering a strict theological warning. He warned his followers not to build places of worship over his grave, citing the historical mistake of previous nations who turned the resting places of their prophets into shrines. It was a protective command to preserve strict monotheism.  You do not have to take my word for it. Just read Peter Brown, the foremost historian of Late Antiquity, and his foundational book: “The Cult of the Saints.” He thoroughly documented how early Christians began building altars and basilicas directly over the graves of martyrs, turning human tombs into sites of worship and divine intercession. The Prophet was looking at the historical reality of how the followers of Jesus corrupted pure monotheism by praying at gravesites. He was protecting his Ummah from repeating that same historical error. It was a calculated defense of the oneness of God, not a petty curse. Second, she then criticized his order to expel polytheists from the Arabian Peninsula. Funnily, she is confusing a vital state policy with personal animosity. The Prophet was the Head of State. The Arabian Peninsula was the central sanctuary and military headquarters of the Islamic state. Therefore, securing the geopolitical heart of a nascent nation from hostile, treasonous factions is standard statecraft. Every sovereign nation secures its capital.  Again, her reliance on the Gospel of Luke to prove Jesus is superior is where her academic deficiency shines brightest. She quoted Luke 23:34, where Jesus supposedly says, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they do". But let us ask a basic historical question. Who wrote the Gospel of Luke? The author never identifies himself in the text. You do not have to guess this. The works of leading New Testament scholars such as Bart Ehrman in his book:“Jesus, Interrupted” or Raymond E. Brown in: “An Introduction to the New Testament”, confirmed this for us. They confirmed the historical consensus that the Gospel of Luke was written anonymously, decades after the time of Jesus, by someone who was not an eyewitness. This is why in the very first verses of Luke, the anonymous author admits he is compiling stories handed down by others.  To make matters worse, any serious textual critic will tell you that Luke 23:34 is a later interpolation. It is completely missing from the earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts, like Papyrus 75 and the Codex Vaticanus. Unknown scribes added it to the text centuries later. That is to say, she is using a fabricated quote, inserted by unknown scribes into an anonymous book written by a non-eyewitness, to claim theological superiority. No be juju be that? If we want to talk about documented forgiveness, look at the historical Conquest of Mecca. The Prophet (peace be upon him) conquered a city of people who tortured his followers and murdered his family for years. He had total military dominance. Instead of mass execution, he granted them full amnesty. Emphasis on full amnesty. 1/2🧵

There is one thing I want us to know. Conventional mortgages in the West are built on compound interest. This makes them a direct form of Riba and strictly forbidden. However, there are alternatives where Islamic financing models have been designed to keep the transaction halal. One of them is Al-Ijara Al-Muntahiya bi-t-Tamleek. This is a lease that ends in ownership. The bank buys the property and rents it to you. A portion of your monthly payment goes toward the rent, and another portion goes toward purchasing the home at the end of the lease term. The rental agreement and the promise of ownership are kept distinct to avoid the prohibition of combining two conflicting sales into one. When you make your final rental payment, the lease agreement naturally expires. At this point, the promise is triggered. To execute the transfer, you and the bank sign a brand new, independent contract. The bank will either gift you the house through a contract of Hiba (gift) or sell it to you for a token amount like one dollar. This final step is what officially moves the legal title into your name. Another one that many of my followers here use is Musharaka Mutanaqisa. It translates to a diminishing partnership. This is halal when the paperwork is done right. This is how it works. You and the financial institution buy the house together as partners. If you put down 20%, the bank owns the remaining 80%. You live in the house and pay rent to the bank for using their share of the property. Alongside the rent, you make payments to slowly buy out their equity. As you buy more shares, your rent decreases because the bank owns less of the house. You keep doing this until you buy out their final share and become the sole owner. The main/only thing you must verify with any institution offering this is that they share the risk of ownership. If the house burns down or gets destroyed by a natural disaster, the financial loss must be shared according to the percentage of ownership at that time. If the bank pushes all the risk onto you while claiming to be your partner, then the contract is flawed. As for credit cards, the Fiqh ruling here is strict but very practical. You are allowed to use them, but you must pay off the full balance every single month before the grace period ends. You cannot let the money roll over into the next month because that is when Riba kicks in. But there is one problem—the problem of intent. This is because signing a credit card contract means you are agreeing to a late fee penalty clause. This is fundamentally problematic in Fiqh. However, major Islamic councils permit Muslims in the diaspora to sign these contracts out of necessity. Emphasis on Necessity. Necessity is different from Need. Their rulings are different. This is a discussion for another day. All in all, the major condition here is your own financial discipline. You must ensure you never trigger that clause and never pay any interest. And when it comes to other credit facilities like student loans, car financing, or those Buy Now Pay Later apps, you have to remember the golden rule of Islamic jurisprudence: كل قرض جر نفعا فهو ربا Every loan that brings a benefit to the lender is Riba. If a facility adds any interest percentage on top of the money you borrowed, you cannot take it. It is that straightforward. The only time these become permissible is if they give you a genuine zero percent APR. You can also use fixed installment sales, but only if the final price is permanently locked in and does not jump up as a penalty if you miss a payment. Allah knows best.

Since you are so hellbent on tarnishing the image of my faith,I will not rest too. If I may ask: Where is the video man? Anyone with clear vision can see this video is likely a staged act. But even though this is fake, we must talk. I will not let you use a scripted clip to push a dangerous narrative and misguide millions of people. Let me educate you on what Islam truly stands for. Muslims do not endorse this nonsense. In Islamic jurisprudence, if a person slumps, drowns, or faces a life-threatening emergency, breaking your prayer to save them is a strict obligation. It is never an option. It is forbidden to continue praying. You must break the prayer instantly and offer help. A Muslim can repeat a prayer later, but we can never bring back a lost human life. Islam is built on preserving life. The Quran makes it clear that saving a single soul is like saving all of humanity. So if this was a real scenario and the man understood his religion, he would have dropped his prayer the second the man fell on the floor. And if he held on to his prayers, then the prayer is even against him than a reward for him. Stop using staged videos and ignorant actions to define a faith you know nothing about. Human life is placed far above the completion of any prayer. Allah knows best.