Real Entomologists, @Stylopidae, @Ms_Mars, and @SciBugs answer your questions about bugs! Shoot us a question below!

Everywhere. The internet is powerful
Joined November 2014
Announcement: In a few days, we will be locking this account and moving over to BlueSky. bsky.app/profile/bugquestion…
1
2
1
10
529
Ask An Entomologist retweeted
I had such a great time interviewing @Stylopidae about the one time he got bitten by a black widow. Spoiler Alert: The US health system is worse than the bite. youtu.be/X-GSye5kfIw
2
3
19
The Non-GMO project specifies that ingredients derived from GMOs are considered GMOs. I know you like to see dunks, but try to at least do a little reading and not get your opinions from a Bayer employee half-assedly spouting talking points that are twenty years old.
17
He knows. I received the same talking points when I worked at Bayer, and was aware of this then. These talking points are like a decade old, at least…and they’ve never worked. Just look at their court cases.
19
Again, these additives are completely safe. Anytime you eat any plant material, you’re eating cellulose. GMO plant or not, it doesn’t matter. Cellulose is cellulose. It’s when folks pretend that these additives don’t exist that it seems like there’s a conspiracy.
1
3
320
Replying to @simonmaechling
My god, dude…has nobody told you anything about iodide binders or anticaking agents? Even Cargill has publicly addressed this. The pro-GMO crowd needs to stop using strawman arguments if you want to extend beyond your safe little bubble. cargill.com/salt-in-perspect…
2
1
1
224
People like @simonmaechling are the worst type of bad actor because they: A.) Do not understand the food system B.) Only address strawman arguments that nobody actually puts forward. You can’t defend science by gaslighting concerned people.
1
3
352
…the food industry is hiding something when they’re not. Hell, Cargill has even addressed this publicly. cargill.com/salt-in-perspect…
1
2
157
Note that these people never actually bother to tell you anything about what’s packed in the salt. Salt frequently has additives-cellulose, dextrose, corn starch, maltodextrin, etc- made from GMO ingredients. These are all totally safe, but this sort of denialism looks like…
Non-GMO Salt. Utter nonsense. The idea of "non-GMO salt" is fundamentally flawed and reveals a misunderstanding of what GMOs (genetically modified organisms) actually are. To clarify, GMOs refer to living organisms - plants, animals, or microbes - whose genetic material has been intentionally modified. Salt, however, is not an organism. It’s an inorganic compound, primarily sodium chloride (NaCl), with no DNA or genetic material to modify. For something to be genetically modified, it must have genes. This is why GMO applies to living things like crops or bacteria, but not to non-living, inorganic substances like salt. Labeling salt as "non-GMO" is scientifically meaningless. It’s a marketing gimmick designed to exploit consumer fears about GMOs, even though GMOs have no relevance to a substance like salt. These labels don’t inform—they mislead, creating unnecessary confusion and fostering misconceptions about basic science. Far from protecting consumers, they undermine scientific literacy and fuel mistrust in legitimate food labeling practices.
1
2
1
7
1,746
Expect our next #DeepDive on December 14th, exclusively on BlueSky!
234
We would like to thank everyone who's made this platform what it's been for the past decade, and sincerely hope you'll join us at BlueSky.
2
1
3
350
There's a number of reasons for this, but frankly, the main one is Elon Musk. We cannot support a platform which has become more racist and hostile to the concept of empirical truth. Not to mention also hostile to the idea that we must consent to the people who govern us.
1
1
2
176
Replying to @KrishnaMathias
There's a number of things which could be going on here. The holes seem to be a bit too large and irregular for most wood-boring insects. I would guess it's a fungal issue, but I am not well connected with plant pathology Twitter. @WyoWeeds might know someone in this area.
1
17
This is an EMERGENCY. WE NEED ATTENTION ON THIS RIGHT NOW. donaldjtrump.com/agenda47/pr…
80
750
200
2,219
391,806
They function to essentially promote scientific racism, and disguise these intentions by hiding their pseudoscience with more legitimate articles. They’re every bit as pseudoscientific as RFL Jr, but just on different topics.
2
1
1
59
Furthermore, he’s actually published articles on white supremecist websites. Specifically VDare. They’re popular in ag circles because they also discuss vaccines and GMOs (their articles on these topics are fine…actually well researched).
1
40
They’ve also published articles claiming that certain ethnic groups are more genetically predisposed to commit crimes. If you look at their founder, Jon Entine, he’s a fellow of the Human Biodiversity institute, which is essentially a racist think tank.
1
14
Replying to @__PhoenixIsHere
GLP is The Genetic Literacy Project, a website which regularly pushes racist pseudoscience. For example, they spent the pandemic trying to convince its audience that black people were less susceptible to COVID than other ethnic groups. geneticliteracyproject.org/2…
1
11
Either way, the document mentions potential effects on nontarget organisms as a concern. Nontarget effects are why caffeine is no longer used as a frogicide(?) in Hawaii. So, like, it's not approved here either. At least, there's no EPA RED that I can find.
30