BBsource retweeted
Everything is available over there.
all the music, films, streaming, fashion brands, iphone, etc.
choosing one specific and small thing that has nothing to do with that genoside because of your personal vendetta and social media clout is just jobless fake behavior.
BBsource retweeted
Reminder
she already said this back in September 2024.
so she was offered the money, but she didn’t sign the papers. and she’s on here lying like she wasn’t offered money. lol
It’s because she’s had an unprecedented long career as a Black woman.
Most of that misinformation/fake news comes from other fandoms. After almost 30 years of success, she has way too many opp fandoms. white artist fandoms, Black artist fandoms, old gen, her gen, next gen
none of this conspiracy stuff is new.
The right wing has been going after the Carters since Obama’s second term, and it just escalated with every era. From BLM to the 2016 election, they became the right wing’s most hated celebrities.
BBsource retweeted
Interesting to me that the Met Gala gets compared to the Hunger Games more than the Oscars red carpet or the Super Bowl halftime show. All of these involve spectacle, celebrities, and extreme displays of wealth. Notably, only one of them is a charity for a public institution (the Met Gala, which is a fundraiser for The Met Museum).
The difference, I think, is that the Met Gala leans more into unusual outfits. That's natural, given that it's a fundraiser for a costume institute. But to me, the perpetual criticism — which comes up year after year — speaks to how people see fashion as frivolous and not as "serious" as other corners of culture, such as sports or movies. The more extreme the outfit, the more offends the public, even if such work is an expression of artisanship and craft, no different from an artist creating a painting.
I've said it before, but Western culture has a long history of seeing clothes as frivolous, even if everyone engages in self-fashioning. And it's notable that "serious" areas of culture are often masculine-coded (e.g., architecture), while feminine-coded interests, such as fashion, are considered frivolous.
One can reasonably question whether the Bezos are trying to whitewash their reputation through the fashion industry (although I would note that we are all participating on Elon Musk's platform, so I see some hypocrisy among some who criticize the Met Gala but won't deactivate their accounts). But I also think we can tax the rich and encourage them to donate to public causes, including institutions like the Met. Given my interests, I also think we should take fashion and clothing more seriously. Thankfully, some real researchers and academics are making headway in that regard.
Just a slither of Kanye Wests wrongdoings…
- said he is a nazi
- said he loves Hitler
- made nazi merch
- made a song praising Hitler
- wore a “white lives matter” shirt with Candace Owens
- plethora of MAGA/Trump praise
- was sued by George Floyds family after claiming he died from a Fentanyl overdose (settled out of court)
- screamed free Diddy & made a song about wanting him free
- admitted he also beats up women like Diddy
- claimed that Bill Cosby was innocent of rape (mind you Cosby lost another case 2 weeks ago)
- said all MeToo rapes were cash grabs
- verified a story himself where he told
Iggy Azalea in 2012 that he masturbated over her pictures (she was 22 he was 35 he said this to her unsolicited and also asked about her current boyfriends penis size)
- strangled and sexually assualted
Jennifer An in 2010 infront of the singer La Roux who said the incident was horrific, his response to this was to say “this is art” (current ongoing case)
- had plans to make “Yeezy Porn” on his app YZYSZN and him and his wife
Bianca Censori had minors working/viewing the material (case ongoing)
- had minors working on YZYSZN without pay and when they threatened to tell people and report it they were offered money and told to sign a NDA
(case ongoing)
- sent texts to a anonymous jewish female employee praising Hitler
- created “Donda Academy” and was significantly racist to black staff members and requested that Jails should be built for students at the Academy (students would have been aged 5-18, accused & sued by Trevor Phillips)
- sexually assaulted, stalked and trafficked his former assistant Lauren Pisciotta (ongoing case)
- blamed everything on this list on his mental health
- refused treatment for his mental health and resorted to huffing Nitrous Oxide instead
the amount of men that idolise this man is absolutely troubling.
BBsource retweeted
#EpsteinFiles DOJ/FBI Didn't Conclude that Jay-Z Was Involved (see EFTA01660622, pages 1-21)
At the conclusion of the FBI/DOJ document dump regarding Epstein, they gave a timeline of the Epstein/Maxwell federal cases from 2006 to July 2025. Even though the fed investigation was officially opened in 2006, it considered allegations of crimes that occurred before that date, even years before.
In the end, the FBI compiled a list of prominent people who were accused by the victims. Please note that accusations do not mean that the individuals were deemed guilty or that the alleged victims were deemed credible. Accusations also do not mean that the DOJ felt it had proof beyond reasonable doubt to charge the individuals. Also, charging the individuals would not mean that the individuals would've been convicted of the crimes charged.
With the above caveats, here the prominent names identified by the DOJ:
1. Donald Trump 2. Harvey Weinstein 3. Glen Dubin 4. Prince Andrew 5. Jess Staley 6. Les Wexner 7. Leon Black 8. Alan Dershowitz 9. Bill Clinton 10. Howard Lutnick 11. William Barr
Conspicuously absent from this DOJ list is ANY mention of Jay-Z. Conspicuously absent is any mention of any Black man.
Jay-Z has certainly been a prominent person from 2006 until the present time. Yet, the DOJ didn't include his name among the prominent people identified by the Epstein victims. Jay-Z's politics is well known. Thus, it would be ridiculous to suggest that the DOJ - which listed President Trump's name - went out of its way to shield Jay-Z's name. If Jay-Z was accused by an Epstein victim, his name would've featured prominently on that list.
The fact that Jay-Z's name was not on that list leads me to surmise that the FBI and DOJ reached a conclusion that he was not accused, involved or implicated in Epstein's crimes. There was no evidence that Jay-Z was even in Epstein's orbit.
Important fact: Most if not all of the people on that list have had direct communications with Epstein through in-person conversation, phone calls, texts or email. Yet, there is no evidence that Jay-Z ever met Epstein or that Jay-Z communicated with Epstein.
Jes Staley: Jes Staley's 2014 email mention of Jay-Z led people, including prominent YouTubers, to make wild accusations about Jay-Z paying off the masses to stop them from storming the streets. This Jes Staley is the same person that an alleged victim said "forced her to put her hands on his crotch and had rough sex with her." That's the same Jes Staley who people on social media find credible? Finding him credible enough to use his 2014 email to disparage Jay-Z? Unbelievable! See Document Below:
BBsource retweeted
WAIT.. WHY DOES THIS MAKE SENSE, AND SHE LATER DELETED THE "SLEEPING WITH MARRIED MEN" COMMENTS SHE LEFT UNDER THAT GIRLS VIDEOS. 🤔 SOMEBODY MUST HAVE TOLD HER THAT IT WASNT ARIANNA ACCT.
BBsource retweeted
Beyoncé and her team genuinely thought that her Self-Titled Album might be giant flop.
When she says that in the song “Ghost,” “probably won’t make no money off this, oh well,” she really felt that way.
-from her former creative director.
BBsource retweeted
Nicki Minaj's $20 million California mansion will likely be put up for sale if the rapper doesn't pay a security guard by Jan. 22, a judge has warned.
rollingstone.com/music/music…
BBsource retweeted
She got her first big polarizing reaction with the Reputation album. Instead of sticking with what she made, her responded was 'I’ll make better records', By 'better,' she meant for the Grammys and the charts.
And with her next album, she went 180° in the opposite direction.
BBsource retweeted
It’s not just the variants, her worst cash grab strategy is the whole “48 hours limited exclusive” thing. She’s been pulling that since the Lover era along with those 100+ bundles (variants).
BBsource retweeted
🇺🇸 Main Female Artists and their last album first 24 hours on Apple Music US (@iYagamiLight)
#1. ‘TTPD’ — 70m-110m
#2. @Beyonce ‘COWBOY CARTER’ — 30m
#3. ‘AM I THE DRAMA’ — 24m-27m
#3. ‘Pink Friday 2’ — 19m-20m
#4. Eternal Sunshine — 10m
#5. ‘Mayhem’ — 2.5m-3.5m
BBsource retweeted
Replying to @LeeLovesBey
and she was very desperate for that one.
even doing AD on Country radio because country has biggest voting block in Grammy.
BBsource retweeted
“She was out of the country at that point, but she had the ‘Bootylicious’ concept in her head. That was totally her. She knew what she wanted to say." - Rob Fusari
"She's an extremely gifted artist, and she's the real deal as a songwriter." - Rob Fusari
BBsource retweeted
Replying to @Niell_Standard
rob had 12.5% and sold it in 2016.
stevie nicks (sampling) - 50%
B - 25%
rob fusari - 12.5%
falonte moore - 12.5% (rob's producing partner)
so without sampling, it was B (songwriter) 50% and producers 50% which is industry standard 50/50.
BBsource retweeted
Context
1. Tina only talked about one scenario where Bey called Jay after a meeting with Columbia & put him on Crazy in love to prove a point-misogyny
And u forgot to add the part where Tina said Bey stood her ground in that same meeting & refused to change her album
Replying to @mikhaele_ible
Tina Knowles confirmed this in her book. They got together a year before she started recording DIL album and Beyonce would leave business meetings upset cause they wouldn’t listen to her ideas and call Jayz because they talked to him differently than her.























