Aeronautical engineer & political scientist (IR reader) & Defence analyst | @ColumbiaSIPA alumnus | Never miss a storm

Albacete - Brooklyn - Madrid
Joined April 2011
Replying to @Bnavazo
Geopolitics trump trade, previous orders and global markets. In the pinacle of human civilization rests a continuous struggle for power. Global markets (and whether "the earth is flat" or divided up into socio-economic pieces) only come after that is resolved.
4
5
3,570
Nuestra Unión 🇪🇺 consolidando su propia esfera de influencia
Tectonic shift with massive ramifications for EU relations and accession. This was a hugely watched election in Brussels.
158
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
It is time for the EU to make an oil deal with Iran.
1,103
1,784
293
19,160
726,083
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
2/2 Europe is ready to cooperate. But a daily trade deficit of over 1 billion euros is unacceptable. If there are no substantial results, the EU must act and determine the next steps in November. 👇bernd-lange.de/meldungen/eu-…
3
2
1
8
1,877
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
1/2🇪🇺🇨🇳 Clock is ticking. October will be a pivotal month for EU-China relations. Next stop: @MarosSefcovic in China on October 8–9. China must show its true colors. Are they prepared to make substantial concessions to Europe on market access, overcapacity, and export controls?
11
8
1
32
7,421
Rome and Han China were the two biggest empires on the planet at the same time. Together they ruled something like half the people alive. And for about 200 years they knew each other almost entirely through rumors, middlemen, and one fabric. The Romans called the Chinese the "Seres," the silk people. Nobody in Rome had any idea how silk was made. Virgil and Pliny the Elder both wrote that it was combed off the leaves of trees. What Romans did know was that they wanted it. Silk got so fashionable that in 14 AD the Senate banned men from wearing it because it was seen as effeminate. Seneca complained that silk dresses were so sheer a woman wearing one might as well be naked. Pliny griped that India, China, and Arabia were draining 100 million sesterces a year out of the empire for luxuries. The Chinese, meanwhile, called Rome "Daqin," roughly "Great Qin." The Han histories said its people were tall and upright and resembled the Chinese, which is how it got the name. They described 400 walled cities, stone buildings, relay stations for messengers, and gold and silver coins. They also got some things beautifully wrong. One Chinese account says the king of Daqin is not permanent. Worthy men are chosen to rule, and if there's a disaster or bad weather, the king is replaced, and the one removed accepts it without complaint. Somewhere in there is a garbled echo of Roman politics passed down through a dozen translators. In 97 AD the Han general Ban Chao sent an envoy named Gan Ying west to actually find Rome. He made it as far as the coast of the Persian Gulf. There, Parthian sailors told him the voyage could take up to two years, that crews packed three years of supplies, and that men at sea got so homesick some of them died. Gan Ying turned around. The Chinese later figured out why. Their own history says the Parthians wanted to control the silk trade and deliberately blocked contact between the two empires. The middlemen had every reason to make the ocean sound terrifying. It took until 166 AD for someone to get through. A group arrived at the Han court by sea, through what is now Vietnam, claiming to be sent by "Andun," almost certainly Emperor Marcus Aurelius Antoninus. They brought ivory, rhino horn, and tortoiseshell. The Chinese historians noted there were no jewels at all and suspected the stories about Daqin's wealth had been exaggerated. Most historians today think these "ambassadors" were enterprising merchants. And no, a lost Roman legion from the Battle of Carrhae did not end up founding a town in China. That theory was popular for decades, but DNA studies of the people of Liqian found no Roman ancestry. Two superpowers, roughly 5,000 miles apart, each one sure the other was fabulously rich and a little bit strange. One envoy got close enough to smell the ocean and got talked out of it.
160
1,293
83
10,310
899,736
No entiendo y me preocupa que @el_pais dé pábulo a estas tesis, olvide la comunidad política de la que forma parte y permita que terceras partes que nos quieren mal participen en nuestro debate público elpais.com/opinion/2026-09-1…
98
Brillante Janan Ganesh cuando escribe hacia atrás The other side of the 1990s ft.com/content/845a0760-cf73… a través de @ft
2
763
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
Blinken is completely unplugged. Europeans don’t ask if America can be counted on. They ask what kind of threat America will become and how fast
I was recently in Europe, where the topic du jour was America. What I heard didn't surprise me, but the consistency did. Again and again, people asked the same question: Can America still be counted on? This week's NATO summit surely did little to reassure them. The Alliance itself is stepping up. More money for security — building upon a trend begun during the Biden Administration, when the number of allies devoting the long agreed 2% of GDP to defense went from 9 to 23. Greater industrial cooperation, including across the Atlantic.  Sustained support for Ukraine. A strong reaffirmation of its commitment to collective defense in the face of Russian provocations. The Trump Administration could and should have declared success. Instead, more public confrontations with allies, threats directed at fellow NATO members, and renewed suggestions about taking territory from a close partner dominated the headlines. The greater damage is quieter, and much harder to reverse. Many Europeans are no longer asking when America will return to the role it has played for generations. They are planning for a future in which it doesn't. For nearly eight decades, NATO and our broader network of alliances have been among our greatest strategic advantages. They have deterred aggression and so made war less likely, expanded our influence, strengthened our economy, and kept Americans safe. They allow us to share burdens rather than carry them alone. They multiply American power instead of diminishing it. These relationships were never acts of charity. They were built out of enlightened self-interest to advance our own security and prosperity. When allies lose confidence in the United States, they don't simply wait for Washington to change course. They adapt. They build new partnerships. They look elsewhere for leadership. Those decisions, once made, are difficult to undo. Our adversaries and competitors understand this. Russia has long sought to fracture the transatlantic alliance. China benefits whenever democratic nations are less able to act together. Every doubt cast on America's reliability is an opportunity for those who would prefer a weaker, more divided West.
1
70
4
375
27,944
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
I hope everyone had a great 4th of July. I know @realDonaldTrump and family did. 250 years ago we declared independence from a king who ran the colonies as a family business. In just 18 months the Trumps have made King George look like an amateur. A $620 million Pentagon loan, the largest in the program’s history, to a company Don Jr.’s firm bought into three months before. An Air Force drone contract to a startup the princelings took public through a golf course company they own a piece of. The Army’s largest drone motor order ever, to a company where Don Jr. sits on the board and holds millions in stock. A $24 million Pentagon robotics contract to the company that employs Eric as Chief Strategy Advisor. A stake in the largest undeveloped tungsten deposit on earth, in Kazakhstan, backed by $1.6 billion in US government support. Jared’s fund seeded with $2 billion from the Saudi crown prince, now $6.2 billion, 99% of it foreign money from Gulf governments. Over $110 million in fees collected from the Saudis alone. He negotiates American foreign policy with the governments that pay him. $2.3 billion from crypto ventures their father regulates. More than a million people bought in and lost $2.3 billion. The money didn’t grow. It simply moved from the subjects pockets to the crown’s coffers. And the next one is already drafted. A proposed ATF rule that will allow guns to be shipped straight to your front door. The government’s own estimate is 3.3 million home gun deliveries a year. Don Jr. sits on the board of the online gun megastore built to cash in. He holds 300,000 shares. And that’s only the fraction they’ve allowed us to see. Not one subpoena served. Not one search executed. Why hide anything when you own the investigators? Me? They searched a laptop for six years. Federal prosecutors. Grand juries. Subpoena power. Congressional hearings. They found nothing. I made about $200k a year selling paintings when my Dad was President, and they made my paintings part of an impeachment inquiry. For six years they’ve asked Where’s Hunter? What about the laptop? Wrong questions. The right one is 250 years old. Does America belong to a family? They’ve given their answer. Long live the King.
6,987
19,559
933
86,721
5,156,345
“It is obviously true the faster Europe can escape its reliance on American, Russian and Gulf fossil fuels the greater its sovereignty, security and independence will be. “
Donald Trump doesn’t practice foreign policy, he practices foreign politics. Not only does he see him himself as the leader of the global populist right, he sees himself as the leader of the fossil fuel counter revolution — who’s return to office has eviscerated much of Biden’s decarbonisation agenda. Stopping Net Zero to advantage these vested interests is priority for Donald Trump. Instead of irrelevant, he sees stopping Net Zero in Britain, as important. It’s so systematic, this illustrates it’s about more than the view from his Scottish golf course. Why? Britain has had huge influence as a pioneer in decarbonising which has inspired the Democrats, the EU and governments around the world. Cutting this agenda off at the knees matters in an influential G7 nation really does matter to the fossil fuel lobby. And lurking behind all of this is fracking: with US companies seeing a huge windfall if Britain can be pushed to lift its ban. That’s why Trump has strategically attacked wind power at practically every intervention he has made in British politics from his first call to Starmer. These briefings against Ed Miliband are part of a pattern of aggression against Britain moving to clean power and demonstrating it can be done at speed. In my view they bolster Miliband’s case for Number 11 by illustrating how defining a geopolitical, not just climate choice, it is to escape fossil fuels this century and how important HMT is to that. It is obviously true the faster Europe can escape its reliance on American, Russian and Gulf fossil fuels the greater its sovereignty, security and independence will be. As I have written for @AtlanticCouncil with @ShahinVallee and @70sBachchan we have been trapped as a continent in a Permanent Suez, leaving others as Anthony Eden lamented with “a thumb on our windpipe,” in the age of oil and gas by the continent lacking sufficient amounts of those resources to be truly secure. And from the Arab oil blockade in 1973 to Putin’s repeated aggressions they have repeatedly pressed that windpipe. Ultimately decarbonisation offers a way out of this condition of weakness, though the degree of this will be determined by to what extent we can minimise new critical dependencies on China. That’s the right progressive intent which Miliband has rightly championed for decades. But what about the realism? The reality of the American campaign against Net Zero and the huge damage Trump has done to the world economy means we need to recalibrate whilst still aiming for that goal. The right move Labour should now take is make it clear the White House has no role in domestic politics but also approve the Jackdaw gas field in the North Sea and move on the windfall tax to show pragmatism. This is about making the transition sustainable economically in tough geopolitics and economics. If that’s what Miliband is ready to do, his pitch for the Treasury is progressive, realist and strong with the added bonus politically of defying Donald Trump. Which is where Burnham should begin, because weakness will beget more briefing and demands.
187
Major US strategic defeat Historical analogy: 1956 UK retreat from Suez and London losing great power status
BREAKING: The Iranian central military command says it has closed the Strait of Hormuz in response to Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon, describing the strikes as a breach of Iran’s agreement with the US. 🔴 LIVE updates: aje.news/o3j66i
124
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
🇪🇸 España tiene la oportunidad de convertirse en una potencia en moléculas verdes. @Bnavazo, director de Geopolitical Insights, explica cómo el país puede aprovechar su ventaja en poder industrial y geopolítico para liderar este sector en auge. agendapublica.es/noticia/211…
1
1
424
⬇️⬇️ ⚡ De "electroestado" a potencia de moléculas verdes: la segunda transición energética de España España debe convertir su ventaja en renovables en liderazgo industrial mediante hidrógeno verde, combustibles sintéticos, biometano y bioenergías. 📷 bit.ly/4vWbhDU
👋 Hoy en Agenda Pública ⚖️ Algunas propuestas para la mejora de la justicia penal en España @jferrerbeltran, director del Máster de Razonamiento Probatorio de la Universitat de Girona, plantea diez reformas para reducir la politización, reforzar la independencia judicial y modernizar un sistema penal sometido a una creciente presión institucional. 📎 bit.ly/4xCy2yf ⚡ De "electroestado" a potencia de moléculas verdes: la segunda transición energética de España @Bnavazo, director de Geopolitical Insights, sostiene que España debe convertir su ventaja en renovables en liderazgo industrial mediante hidrógeno verde, combustibles sintéticos, biometano y bioenergías. 📎 bit.ly/4vWbhDU 🇺🇸 ¿Por qué la política estadounidense es tan volátil? @JeremyCPope, codirector del Cooperative Election Study, y @mbarber83, profesor de Ciencia Política en Brigham Young University, explican por qué republicanos y demócratas alternan victorias sin lograr construir mayorías estables y duraderas. 📎 bit.ly/4ozQOCc 🌊 Europa frente al capitán Ahab: liderazgo democrático ante la deriva neoimperial Javier Hernández Díaz, experto en Relaciones Internacionales, utiliza la figura de Ahab para defender una Europa más autónoma, capaz de convertir sus principios en poder político, económico y estratégico. 📎 bit.ly/4oFOpGw
2
1
359
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
What if AI changes writing the way that photography changed painting? By Adam Kirsch. theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0…
15
56
23
383
64,903
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
יאמר לזכותו של טראמפ שהוא באמת אמר שלא יקבל שום הסכם מלבד כניעה מלאה, הוא פשוט לא ציין של מי
29
1,026
52
9,749
195,206
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
This is how its sounds to me: "We are disappointed that the Dutch government does not surrender their residents' most confidential information, i.e., everyones bsn number, income information, loans etc etc. We expected to just give it to the US and do everything we ask you to do"
The United States and the Netherlands share one of the world’s strongest and most enduring partnerships, built on 250 years of shared values, innovation, and cooperation. We were disappointed by the Dutch government’s decision regarding the Kyndryl-Solvinity deal. Read the full statement: nl.usembassy.gov/statement-d…
5
16
116
4,717
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
🎙️ Empieza la ponencia de Bernardo Navazo (@Bnavazo) sobre el nuevo contexto geoestratégico y sus implicaciones para Europa.
1
1
241
Bernardo Navazo retweeted
During closed-door negotiations, the US has been pushing Greenland to have an indefinite military presence on the island and veto power over any major investment deal, the @nytimes reports. Greenlanders fear it will be the end of sovereignty. nytimes.com/2026/05/18/world…
4
21
5
29
9,053
An unexpected FT article on why ambition comes from within Worth reading for anyone striking higher giftarticle.ft.com/giftartic…
61