@BitcoinDebatesi
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
A Peer-to-Peer #Bitcoin Debates Forum 🎙️
Bitcoin
Joined October 2022
- Tweets2.3K
- Following117
- Followers792
- Likes4.1K
Pinned Tweet
What if I told you that Bitcoin was promised to be a liberating technology, a free market alternative to state-controlled money, but that promise was broken after a small group of insiders took over the project and fundamentally changed #Bitcoin’s design?!
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
Ian Freeman is a peaceful, freedom loving man. There is no just reason to continue to keep him locked away from his wife and home. Free Ian yesterday!
While bureaucrats celebrate victimless "convictions," real people carry the daily weight of broken homes and missed years.
Happy 4th anniversary to Ian and Bonnie Freeman. Never stop pushing back against the state apparatus. 💘
#FreeIanFreeman #Bitcoin
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
Support a good cause and win some bitcoin in the process.
No bitcoin dev should be jailed and bankrupted for writing code that enhances privacy.
#FreeSamourai
The #FREESAMOURAI Prize Draw is now open! 🔥
I would be eternally grateful if you could join in, buy some entries, and help support Bill and Keonne 🧡
Privacy is NOT a Crime!
Let's Make #Bitcoin Based Again 💪
Link to enter below 👇
Replying to @NSKinsella
*Andy Back nitter.cf/1914ad/status/20685108…
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
Seriously, can you please help raise awareness for the Bitcoin developers in prison for creating Bitcoin privacy tools?
#FreeSamourai
#PardonSamourai nitter.cf/keonne/status/21027696…
Hi everyone.
I am sorry it has been so long since I last checked in with you. As most of you probably know, I was transferred to a new prison to participate in a program that would take a year off my sentence when completed. That journey should have been a simple 4 hour drive, but since I was denied a self transfer furlough the trip took 30 days, two cross country flights, three states, and cost the tax payer well over $10,000 before I finally arrived a couple hundred miles from where I started.
It took me over a month to decompress after the nightmare that is the BOP transit system (you can read all about it in the next installment of Notes From The Inside) and just as I began to settle in here at FCI McKean we received some terrible news. Yesterday we were told by the Warden that the program I travelled all that way for had been "deactivated" and very soon I - along with 70 others in the program - would have to go through the transit system all over again to be sent somewhere where the program was still active. When I first arrived here other inmates warned me that things were rotten here at McKean. What is supposed to be a 9 month program averages 12-16 months here. One of the DTS officers who runs the program was suspended pending investigation and assigned to the mailroom, and many guys had missed their release dates and were forced to spend longer in prison. Why in the world did the BOP spend all that money transiting me and others to a program that was clearly dying on the vine?!
So now the BOP is going to waste around $700,000 shipping all of us around the country. The ridiculous thing is they do not need to shut the program down at all. They have all the pieces in place to push the current participants through. The frontline staff (case managers, counsellors, DTS, etc) are largely empathetic and competent. The failure is one of institutional mismanagement and leadership. A lack of engagement with staff by Regional and institutional leadership has hamstrung staff and inmate alike. Recognizing those institutional failures would require government workers take accountability or be held accountable. Never going to happen! Instead, the taxpayer will be on the hook financially, we'll be shipped out like cattle, and the yokels who couldn't organize a piss-up in a brewery will keep their jobs and find something else to screw up.
@leamuirleyn has written to BOP leadership asking them to reconsider shutting the program down and instead send over a temporary leader who can shepherd the current participants through the program. This would save the Bureau and the taxpayer significantly. It is a longshot but one has to try.
So that is the latest update. I have no idea when or where I am going to be shipped. Thank you everyone for your letters, books, prayers, and continued support. It means a lot. Until we speak again...
Keonne
@realDonaldTrump @OfficialFBOP @BOPDirector @BOPDepDirector @JusticeOIG @MarshallProj @PrisonPolicy
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
Replying to @BitcoinDebates @HijackingBTC @bitcoinpolicy @BitcoinNews @rogerkver @VinnyLingham @LayerTwoLabs @Truthcoin @kurtwuckertjr @Crypto_TownHall @beincrypto
What did you do on the island @adam3us ?
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
User balances are safe. We will resolve any discrepancies due to the Gateway Addresses. The core team is currently working with all of our partners.
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
American hero Edward Snowden is participating in a panel at 12:30 ET on AI Surveillance and Freedom of Speech
Watch the @Snowden interview live: youtube.com/live/wytH7dPlCVw
AI surveillance and freedom of speech
live from ETH Zurich
Edward Snowden
interviewed by Nym CSO @jayapapaya
📅TODAY Sept 24th
⏰18:30-21:00
📺LIVESTREAM: youtube.com/watch?v=wytH7dPl…
➡️nym.com/blog/snowden-ai-surv…
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
Roughly 10% of consumer payments in the US are made in physical cash.
Best thing about paper money? It’s generally untraceable.
Zano devs basically added a privacy layer to the US Dollar, so digital dollars can now be untraceable too.
It’s called Freedom Dollar. @freedomdollar5
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
Replying to @bitcoinpolicy
Is anyone talking about getting the Freedom Tech Prisoners out of jail? CryptoPrisoners.com
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
Day 46 of posting @Truthcoin metaphors every day until $ECX forks
Craig Wright as the useless peacock feathers supposedly proving Bitcoin SV’s strength
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
“In a world where every bank transfer, card swipe, and digital payment leaves a permanent trail for the state to follow, the need for tools that restore private exchange has never been greater.” @vinibarbosabr nitter.cf/AgoristN/status/209692…
Bitcoin Debates retweeted
In the middle of a Knots-vs-Core debate on Tone Vays’ show, a Bitcoin protocol dev straight-up punched himself in the face after he admits @Truthcoin has been right all along about L2 fees.
Rearden acknowledges the core Drivechain argument: if L2s (Lightning, Ark, BitVM, etc.) get too efficient at keeping transactions off-chain, they could suck all the real economic demand out of Bitcoin’s block space. That leaves mostly empty blocks in 5–10 years, kills the fee market, and collapses the security budget. At that point, Bitcoin is effectively dead as a secure monetary system.
Then Rearden explicitly says:
“This is a place where Paul Sztorc is correct… one of the benefits of Drivechains is [they] aggregate the L2 transaction value to the base layer.”
That’s the entire Drivechain thesis in a nutshell. Unlike most L2s that try to minimize on-chain footprint (and thereby minimize fees paid to Bitcoin miners), Drivechains are designed to bring real, aggregated economic activity and fees back to the Bitcoin main chain. They turn L2 scaling into a feature for Bitcoin’s long-term security, not a bug that hollows it out.
Rearden still hopes other L2s will somehow do the same, but he concedes the point: if they don’t, the whole “L2s will save us” story falls apart — exactly what Sztorc has been warning about for years. Even Jimmy Song and Tone look like they’re processing the implications.
Pure vindication for anyone who’s been riding with Paul Sztorc on this. The market will eventually price it in. 🚀
WATCH: @reardencode admits @Truthcoin has a point about L2 fees on a podcast with @jimmysong and @ToneVays