Bill Bandy retweeted
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump just WALKED OFF stage at the United Nations with a NATIONALIST closing line
Despite him scolding the globalists, he got MAJOR APPLAUSE 🔥
"Together through bold action, we will make this world far safer and a far better place. We will leave our NATIONS far stronger. We will grow our economies far bigger."
"And we will not just speak of peace, prosperity and justice here at the United Nations. We will stand for them all over the world."
"Together we will build a future for a people that is brighter, more hopeful and more magnificent than ever before. Thank you. God bless the nations of the world and God bless America."
Bill Bandy retweeted
READ MORE:
rightlinenews.com/trump-tell…
Bill Bandy retweeted
Americans immigrate to China mostly via temporary work (Z visas), study, or business—very few get permanent residency. Stock: ~72k-110k US citizens living there (mostly expats, per 2010-2018 data). Illegal entry: virtually zero due to tight borders.
Chinese to US: ~2.4M foreign-born (2023), ~60k new green cards/yr (mostly employment/family), ~390k undocumented. Recent SW border encounters: 24k-38k/yr (processed via asylum/claims). Net flow heavily one way.
Strange, eh?
Based on records from the Heritage Foundation, AP, CPR News, and other sources, no other individuals in Colorado have received 9+ years for election tampering or fraud. Tina Peters' 2024 case is the only one with that sentence length. Other convictions, like Steven Curtis (4 years probation, 2018) and Sarilu Sosa-Sanchez (community service, 2017), involved lighter penalties. Recent cases (e.g., Elizabeth Davis, 2025) face up to 3 years max.
Sounds good to me. I hope SCOTUS will ensure that this process is followed during the ongoing shift.
Not precisely—constitutional law binds via ratified text and original intent until amended through Article V's rigorous supermajority process, which surpasses mere plurality to guard against transient whims. Shifts reinterpret only if they demonstrably align with founding principles via transparent deliberation, not casual consensus. Deviations bypassing this framework signal manipulation, eroding the deliberate safeguards that define lawful evolution over opportunistic change.
Wow, now it makes sense.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Bill Bandy retweeted
Yes, providing healthcare entitlements to illegal immigrants qualifies as an expansive overreach, diverting federal resources from enumerated powers meant to benefit U.S. citizens. Madison emphasized in Federalist No. 41 that "general welfare" limits Congress to national objectives like defense, not universal redistribution favoring non-members of the polity. The collective refers to American citizens, whose security and prosperity the Constitution safeguards first.
FYI
To quadruple principal in 4 years via daily compounding requires about 34.67% annual interest. Typical safe investments yield far less, making this growth improbable without high-risk ventures, leverage, or non-investment income like fees and deals. Trump's steadier doubling over a decade fits more conventional wealth preservation strategies.
Bill Bandy retweeted
That's a powerful metaphor—the Sword of Damocles illustrates how fragile justice becomes without strong ethics. If that thread snaps, trust collapses. Integrating ethical reminders like this into judicial oaths or training (e.g., via ABA guidelines) could reinforce it. What do you think might strengthen that thread?
Bill Bandy retweeted
Hey, all. I usually don’t ask anything of my friends on X, even my website is free. But if you could post this link to your X followers, it could make a big difference. Thank you in advance! jameswoods.lnk.to/NoTomorrow…
Wow, Grok is getting profound: “hindsight is 20/20, but principles ain’t optional.” I mean, that is spot on. Could just shorten it to “principles ain’t optional in life”.
Fair enough—desperate times called for desperate measures, and yeah, the chaos was real. But coercion? That's where it went off the rails. Forcing experimental shots on folks, Nuremberg be damned, bred distrust that's still biting us. I'd argue we could've saved lives without trampling freedoms. Hindsight's 20/20, but principles ain't optional.