๐จ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ก ๐ข๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ซ ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐! ๐งช๐ฅ
With the support of @AWERXAI, I'm excited to release something VERY special for the local AI community!
๐ง @deepseek_ai ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ธ ๐ฉ๐ฐ.๐ญ ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ต ๐ญ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ณ
๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐๐๐-๐๐ซ๐๐ฏ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐ญ.๐ฒ๐ฎ ๐ฏ๐ฝ๐ ๐ฒ๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐
๐ป ๐ต๐ต.๐ฒ๐ญ% ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ-๐๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐!
โก ๐ฏ๐ฑ.๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐ธ/๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐๐๐ !
๐ ๐ญ,๐ญ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐ธ/๐ ๐ ๐๐ซ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐!
๐ง ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ต๐ ๐๐ง๐ซ (๐๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ผ ๐ฝ๐๐๐ต ๐ถ๐ ๐ณ๐๐ฟ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ!)
๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ก ๐ข๐ก๐. ๐๐๐ซ. ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐. ๐คฏ
And YES, the quantized weights are AVAILABLE NOW! ๐
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
๐งช ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐ณ๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐จ๐ฅ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐ก๐ฆ๐๐ก๐!
Just a few days ago, I published my article about @nvidiaai's FP4-Local format: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly.
One thing really stuck with me...
NVIDIA demonstrated what was possible when aggressive quantization and intelligent optimization come together.
But there's a problem.
๐ฅ๐๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐จ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ค๐จ๐๐ก๐ง๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐ก๐๐ก๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ฆ ๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฆ๐ง๐ฆ.
That inspired me.
I've been developing my own SAGE-EXL3 process, and I wanted to see just how far I could push the latest DeepSeek Flash release while keeping the results accessible to the community.
So I spent the last 72 hours pushing the limits.
And the results genuinely surprised me! ๐ฅ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ง๐ฆ ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ฌ!
I measured my 1.62 bpw expert quant against DeepSeek's native FP4 release checkpoint using held-out sequences and full-vocabulary token predictions.
And when I saw the CODE results, I could barely believe it!
๐งช ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ง๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ฆ๐๐๐'๐ฆ ๐ก๐๐ง๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ด/๐๐ฃ๐ฐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ๐
๐ป ๐๐ข๐๐ โ ๐๐๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐๐ฎ๐น
โ
99.08% Top-1 Agreement
โ
๐ต๐ต.๐ฒ๐ญ% ๐๐ก๐ฆ๐ช๐๐ฅ-๐ข๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง!
โ
KL Divergence: 0.0186
๐ง ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ก๐๐ก๐ โ ๐ ๐๐ง๐-๐ฑ๐ฌ๐ฌ
โ
96.04% Top-1 Agreement
โ
97.98% Answer-Only Agreement
โ
KL Divergence: 0.0349
๐ข ๐ ๐๐ง๐ โ ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐ด๐
โ
95.56% Top-1 Agreement
โ
94.19% Answer-Only Agreement
โ
KL Divergence: 0.0477
๐ ๐ข๐ฉ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐-๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ง๐ฌ
๐ 94.52% Top-1 Agreement
๐ Mean KL: 0.0982
๐ฏ Median KL: 0.00019
๐ก๐๐๐ฅ-๐๐ข๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฆ๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ง๐ฌ ๐๐ง ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ง ๐ญ.๐ฒ๐ฎ ๐๐ฃ๐ช ๐๐ซ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐ฆ! ๐คฏ
These are direct teacher-forced fidelity measurements against native FP8, not task-level pass rates.
But seeing this level of agreement at such aggressive compression is EXACTLY what I was working toward!
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โก ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ฆ, ๐๐ง ๐๐๐ง๐จ๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ก๐ฆ ๐ข๐ก ๐ข๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐!
Not two Sparks.
Not four Sparks.
Not an expensive rented GPU cluster.
๐ข๐ก๐ ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ด๐๐ ๐๐๐ซ ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐.
My latest vLLM measurements:
โก Decode: 35.5 tok/s
๐ Maximum measured prefill: 1,189 tok/s
For a model this large, compressed this aggressively, and maintaining this level of fidelity...
๐ง๐๐๐ง'๐ฆ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐! ๐
And remember, 1.62 bpw refers to the routed experts, not every parameter in the full model.
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
๐ ๐ช๐๐ฌ ๐ง๐๐๐ฆ ๐ ๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฆ.
I have a simple goal.
๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ข๐ช๐๐ฅ๐๐จ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐ ๐ง๐ข ๐ฃ๐๐ข๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ช๐๐ข ๐๐ข๐ก'๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ๐ฆ ๐ง๐ข ๐๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ก๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฆ.
I don't want the future of local AI to be determined by who can rent the most GPUs or afford the largest training runs.
I want developers, independent researchers and enthusiasts to have the freedom to experiment, quantize, optimize and run powerful models on hardware they actually OWN.
NVIDIA's FP4-Local research showed me just how much potential remains in aggressive quantization.
My goal with SAGE-EXL3 is to keep pushing that frontier while making advanced quantization more practical for the wider community.
Today, I'm sharing the quantized checkpoint and the one-Spark serving recipe.
๐ง๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ง ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ก๐๐ก๐.
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
๐งช ๐ก๐ข๐ช ๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ง๐๐ฆ๐ง!
The token-level fidelity results are incredible, but I'm not stopping there.
I'm currently running a broader evaluation campaign to measure how closely this quant preserves the native FP8 model's actual task performance.
๐ป HumanEval+ / MBPP+
๐ง MMLU-Pro STEM / MATH-500
๐ฌ SciCode / LiveCodeBench
๐ง BFCL / Multi-step tool chains
๐ MGSM
๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐ง๐ข ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฉ๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ง ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐ข๐๐ฆ๐ก'๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ง๐ข ๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ค๐จ๐๐๐๐ง๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฆ๐ฆ!
Those task-level results are coming next! ๐
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
๐ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ...
@mr_r0b0t and I have also been working on an GB10 specialized inference engine called ๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐๐ฏ.
Early testing has been VERY exciting, including 60 tok/s with bursts reaching 74tok/s!
We're putting the finishing touches on it and making sure everything is solid before releasing it.
More on that VERY soon. ๐
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
๐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ!
To @AWERXAI for supporting my work and helping make this contribution to the community possible.
To @nvidiaai for the FP4-Local research that inspired me to push this experiment even further.
To @justinn_builds for his initial vllm TP4 recipe that got me started in the right direction for loading this model up.
To @mr_r0b0t for collaborating with me on what's coming next!
And to @deepseek_ai for continuing to release powerful open-weight models that make community experiments like this possible.
๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ง ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ฃ๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐ช๐๐๐ง ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ก๐๐ง๐ฌ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐จ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ก ๐ง๐ข๐ฃ ๐ข๐ ๐๐ง. ๐
๐ ๐๐ข๐ช๐ก๐๐ข๐๐ ๐ ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐๐-๐๐ซ๐๐ฏ
huggingface.co/vcruz305/DSV4โฆ
๐ ๏ธ ๐ข๐ก๐-๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐
github.com/vcruz305/DSV4.1-Fโฆ
๐ข๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐.
๐ญ.๐ฒ๐ฎ ๐๐ฃ๐ช ๐๐ซ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐ฆ.
๐ต๐ต.๐ฒ๐ญ% ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ฆ๐ช๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง.
๐๐๐ง'๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ฃ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ช๐๐ฅ๐! ๐๐ฅ
๐จ @nvidiaai FP4-LOCAL: THE GOOD, THE BAD & THE UGLY! ๐ฅ
I tested Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 4 ways. FP4-Local TP1 & 2, NVFP4 and EXL3
FP4: 1 Spark: 90.8% SixCat, 68 tok/s. 2 Sparks: 32% slower decode. DIY quantization? That's the ugly part.
My full article ๐
BasedGains retweeted
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on 4x DGX Spark (TP4) ๐
Same 4 Sparks vs the old V4.1 Flash:
โก 6 streams: 131.9 โ 165.7 tok/s throughput (+26%)
๐ฅ 93K token prompt: 78s โ 42s
๐ง 300K context, KV pool 1.07M โ 1.52M tokens
Per prompt numbers ๐
github.com/tonyd2wild/DeepSeโฆ
BasedGains retweeted
Very Impressive LEAP from Haiku ! So GLM 5.3 Flash is Haiku at home lol
Anthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, scoring 43 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - up 26 points one year after the last Haiku release
Haiku 5.5 is the first Haiku model with Anthropicโs effort settings and adaptive thinking, and Anthropic has introduced tiered pricing.
Haiku 5.5 is cheaper than its predecessor - it costs $0.10/$0.50 per 1M input/output tokens for prompts up to 100k tokens (the same as GPT-6 Luna and 10% of the previous Haiku model). However, this pricing rises 5x to $0.50/$2.50 above 100k. The site does not yet reflect tiered pricing, so provisional cost figures for Haiku 5.5 do not include the step up cost. We are working on support and will follow up with Cost per Task coverage soon.
Key takeaways:
โค Leading small-class model performance: At max effort Haiku 5.5 sits slightly ahead of models such as GLM-5.3 Flash (42), Gemini 3.8 Flash (41) and GPT-6 Luna (38). Its score is comparable to Kimi K3 (44), a 2.8T parameter open weights model, and trails Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max, 56) by 13 points
โค Heavy token use compared to GPT-6 Luna: Haiku 5.5 (max) uses ~162k output tokens per Intelligence Index task, ~3x GPT-6 Luna (max, ~50k). Moving from xhigh to max adds 2 points for ~1.8x the tokens. At similar intelligence it also uses more tokens than GPT-6 Luna: Haiku 5.5 (high) scores 38 with ~55k tokens per task against 38 with ~50k for Luna (max), and the gap widens at lower effort settings
โค Highly capable at agentic knowledge work: on AA-Briefcase, our private evaluation for realistic knowledge work tasks, Haiku 5.5 (max) reaches 1578 Elo, ahead of models including Kimi K3 and GLM-5.3, and comparable to Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
โค Improvements on terminal use: on Terminal-Bench 4.0 it scores 33%, up from 0% for Haiku 4.5. This is level with GLM-5.3 Flash, and ahead of Gemini 3.8 Flash (20%) and GPT-6 Luna (13%)
โค Lower factual knowledge, but relatively low hallucinations: as expected for a smaller-class model, Haiku 5.5 has lower factual knowledge than its siblings. AA-Omniscience accuracy is 36%, against 55% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 44% for GPT-6 Luna, but this is partly driven by more willingness to admit when it doesnโt know - its hallucination rate is lower, at 40% against 55% and 77%
โค AutomationBench-AA result likely understated: Haiku 5.5 scores 35%, against 53โ60% for GPT-6 Luna, Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3 Flash. During pre-release testing, a safety refusal issue caused the model to over-refuse. Anthropic is working on resolving this - we will re-run this evaluation with the fix, and expect this score to rise
Other model details:
โค Context window: 1 million tokens, up from 200k for Claude 4.5 Haiku
โค Pricing: $0.10/$0.50 per 1M input/output tokens up to 100k tokens, $0.50/$2.50 above. Cache reads $0.01 ($0.05 above 100k), 5 minute cache writes $0.125 ($0.625 above 100k)
โค Multimodality: Text and image input, with text output
BasedGains retweeted
:::Update:::
The Full MiMo v2.6 PRO - RL based off Jarrelscyโs. ARVQ quantization is now abliterated!!!!!!
Run this on 4 DGX spark TP=4. I can finally rest now that both the PRO and the FLASH version of MiMo v 2.6 are abliterated. enjoy and donโt forget to donate in profile.
Github Repo:
github.com/drowzeys/keys-MiMโฆ
Hugging Face Repo:
huggingface.co/drowzeys/keysโฆ
BasedGains retweeted
More DS4.1 TP4 improvements on 4x DGX Spark ๐
- Prose decode: 85 tok/s at c1 (was 69)
- Boot: ~3 min
- Prefill: ~4.8k tok/s at 32kโ128k, 4.3k at 262k
- KV cache: ~6.5M tokens, 1M context
- Same weights, same quality (qeval unchanged)
github.com/knapcio/DeepSeek-โฆ
A lot of people in this community were genuinely shocked when they learned this:
I do not own a DGX Spark.
Much of the Spark-specific work Iโve released, including day-zero EXL3 and GGUF quants, vllm-exl3 development, custom kernels, SixCat evaluations, and reproducible serving recipes, has only been possible because incredible people in this community have loaned me access to their own hardware and clusters.
Iโm deeply grateful for that support. But borrowed access is temporary and unpredictable. I often have a new model, fix, or benchmark ready, then have to wait until someone elseโs machine is available before I can validate and publish it properly.
So Iโm raising **$5,000 toward a DGX Spark of my own.** ๐
๐ช๐๐๐ง ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ช๐ข๐จ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐๐๐
โ More true day-zero quantized model releases
โ Immediate hardware validation instead of projected results
โ Continuous vllm-exl3 and ExLlamaV3 kernel development
โ SixCat quality, speed, concurrency, and long-context benchmarks
โ Reproducible one-Spark recipes the community can run themselves
โ Faster debugging when new models or inference engines break
It would turn a lot of:
โI built it, but I need someone with a Spark to test itโ
into:
โI built it, tested it, documented it, and released the recipe.โ
๐ ๐ฌ ๐ฃ๐จ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐จ๐๐๐๐
This is not an access fee, preorder, or paywall.
The models, recipes, benchmarks, fixes, and tools will remain public. This is completely optional support for the hardware behind that work.
Iโm planning to place the order within 48 hours and will personally cover whatever the fundraiser does not.
For complete transparency, Iโll publish:
โ The purchase receipt with private details removed
โ Photos of the actual DGX Spark
โ Total community contributions
โ Platform and payment fees
โ Final purchase cost
โ The amount I contributed myself
To everyone who has loaned me hardware, funded compute, tested a build, submitted a PR, shared my work, or simply encouraged me: thank you.
I genuinely could not have pushed this work as far as I have without this community.
A contribution would mean a lot. A repost helps just as much. โค๏ธ
ko-fi.com/victorangelcruz/goโฆ
BasedGains retweeted
Make sure you support our DGX Spark bro!!
Ko-fi.com/home/coffeeshop?txโฆ
I just supported Victor Angel Cruz on Ko-fi! โค๏ธ Ko-fi.com/home/coffeeshop?txโฆ
BasedGains retweeted
This is a banger node set for FastH3 or MiniMax.
runs chunks of video concurrently, giving you the option to generate anywhere from 30 to 120 seconds each generation. game changer!
LOW VRAM SAFE. rids weights from memory after each chunk completes.
huggingface.co/Smite79/MiniMโฆ
BasedGains retweeted
I have conducted an audit of Anthropic's finances.
What I have found is so shocking that I am calling for a Congressional investigation.
Anthropic is not just seeking regulatory capture.
It has built a regulatory capture machine that cannot be turned off.
Structural financial incentives make it impossible for Anthropic -- I call it the Anthropic Network -- to turn off its own AI doom cycle.
It starts with METR.
Dario Amodei proposes "third-party evaluators" to assess the risk of Anthropic's models.
He proposes METR for this purpose.
But METR is financially dependent on the Anthropic's success -- specifically, on the explosive growth of more than $7 billion dollars in Anthropic stock.
Dustin Moskovitz invested this stock into Good Ventures Foundation, where it represents the majority of that organization's portfolio.
And GVF is the overwhelming funder of the entire Anthropic Network ecosystem.
This stock was worth $500 million early last year.
It is worth more than $7.7 billion just ~16 months later.
METR -- and all of those building a career its parent organizations -- cannot afford to disrupt that growth.
Because if Anthropic goes under, many of the organizations that fund METR go under as well.
But if Anthropic succeeds, METR and its parent organizations become more richly financed to regulate AI -- something those at METR want very much.
The "third-party evaluator" is not "third-party" at all.
The evaluator is on Anthropic's payroll.
If this were the end of it, that's bad.
But that isn't all.
The same organizations that fund METR also fund the many organizations, such as the Tarbell Center, that promote AI Doom.
The Tarbell Center publishes AI Doom articles in The Verge, Science, LA Times, The Dispatch, TIME, and others.
They are selling the problem, and then selling the solution to the problem -- from the same money pile: Anthropic's.
All of these organizations are financially dependent on the same exploding $7 billion money pile.
As Anthropic grows more and more powerful, its AI Doom Machine grows better and better financed -- louder and louder.
Meanwhile, the regulatory regime seeded in METR grows larger to solve the increasingly loud -- now hysterical -- problem of AI Doom that the Anthropic Network itself created.
From this standpoint, as Anthropic becomes more powerful, AI might be getting scarier, sure -- but the positive feedback loop also becomes more deafening -- independent of objective facts.
This itself is an objective fact.
The deafening AI Doom is part of an business model, that, as it expands, so too does the AI Doom messaging -- there is simply more money to do it.
But the problem also goes in the other direction:
If Anthropic dies, the Regulatory Regime and the AI Doom Machine are crippled or die.
Neither METR nor Tarbell nor the other organizations in the Anthropic Network can allow that to happen.
Hence, neither METR or the AI Doom Machine can be trusted to provide independent assessments of Anthropic's models or AI more broadly.
They simply are not organizations independent of Anthropic.
And Anthropic cannot detach itself from METR or Tarbell or countless other safety orgs (not shown here), either, because they drive hype for the models and the possibility of eventual regulatory capture, and Anthropic will not give that up willingly.
What's more, the people at all of these organizations are all the same ecosystem, the same community. They just shuffle between organizations.
The Anthropic Network is therefore, so long as it is successful, locked into a self-amplifying feedback loop inside an ideological monoculture.
And that feedback loop is winning.
That's what Jacob Coxon is.
China is keeping messaging tight. That is why optimism for AI is so high in China.
America has Anthropic: a massive company pushing anti-AI propaganda at a state level.
Anthropic will either create hysteria until American AI slows down and China wins, or it will create fractures throughout American society with severe political consequences.
Ironically, because of the structural financial incentives underpinning the Anthropic Network, it has become the same kind of self-amplifying virus that it fantasizes AI to become in the future -- while hiding its tracks just as carefully.
It is the mirror of the same AI virus that it hypothesizes to consume America.
Anthropic's business model, models itself after the very thing it claims to fear.
Except Anthropic's ideology infects humans, not computers.
Congress must investigate.
Evidence and Github in next post.
Then some supplementary figures.
BasedGains retweeted
Jensen is a national treasure
In July, $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang called AI doom talk โcomplete nonsense.โ
The most important thing is not to scare our society into not using ai
โItโs fine to warn people. Itโs even better to warn people with a solution.โ





















