Materials and Technology Entrepreneur, Founder, Developer and Investor. Always looking for the cutting edge.

Texas
Joined March 2019
BasedGains retweeted
๐Ÿšจ ๐—œ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—›๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—— ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—ฅ๐—˜๐——๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿ”ฅ With the support of @AWERXAI, I'm excited to release something VERY special for the local AI community! ๐Ÿง  @deepseek_ai ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ ๐—ฉ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿญ ๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ ๐Ÿ“ฆ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—ฏ๐—ฝ๐˜„ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜! โšก ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ.๐Ÿฑ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜ƒ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐— ! ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿญ,๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด๐Ÿต ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐— ๐—”๐—ซ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ! ๐Ÿง  ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿต๐—ž ๐—–๐—ง๐—ซ (๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ!) ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜. ๐——๐—š๐—ซ. ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿคฏ And YES, the quantized weights are AVAILABLE NOW! ๐Ÿ’š โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฎ ๐—›๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—˜๐—ก ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—”๐—ก๐—˜! Just a few days ago, I published my article about @nvidiaai's FP4-Local format: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly. One thing really stuck with me... NVIDIA demonstrated what was possible when aggressive quantization and intelligent optimization come together. But there's a problem. ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐——๐—จ๐—–๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—ญ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฃ๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—–๐—› ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—›๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฆ. That inspired me. I've been developing my own SAGE-EXL3 process, and I wanted to see just how far I could push the latest DeepSeek Flash release while keeping the results accessible to the community. So I spent the last 72 hours pushing the limits. And the results genuinely surprised me! ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ† ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ญ๐—ฌ! I measured my 1.62 bpw expert quant against DeepSeek's native FP4 release checkpoint using held-out sequences and full-vocabulary token predictions. And when I saw the CODE results, I could barely believe it! ๐Ÿงช ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—ฉ๐—ฆ ๐——๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ž'๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿด/๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿฐ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ โ€” ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น โœ… 99.08% Top-1 Agreement โœ… ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ-๐—ข๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง! โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0186 ๐Ÿง  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š โ€” ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—›-๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ โœ… 96.04% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 97.98% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0349 ๐Ÿ”ข ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—› โ€” ๐—š๐—ฆ๐— ๐Ÿด๐—ž โœ… 95.56% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 94.19% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0477 ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—›๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐——-๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐Ÿ† 94.52% Top-1 Agreement ๐Ÿ“‰ Mean KL: 0.0982 ๐ŸŽฏ Median KL: 0.00019 ๐—ก๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ-๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ž๐—˜๐—ก ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—ง ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ! ๐Ÿคฏ These are direct teacher-forced fidelity measurements against native FP8, not task-level pass rates. But seeing this level of agreement at such aggressive compression is EXACTLY what I was working toward! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ฆ, ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—ง๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! Not two Sparks. Not four Sparks. Not an expensive rented GPU cluster. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด๐—š๐—• ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. My latest vLLM measurements: โšก Decode: 35.5 tok/s ๐Ÿš€ Maximum measured prefill: 1,189 tok/s For a model this large, compressed this aggressively, and maintaining this level of fidelity... ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—” ๐—•๐—œ๐—š ๐——๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ! ๐Ÿ’š And remember, 1.62 bpw refers to the routed experts, not every parameter in the full model. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’š ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I have a simple goal. ๐— ๐—”๐—ž๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—›๐—ข ๐——๐—ข๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐——๐—”๐—ง๐—”๐—–๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I don't want the future of local AI to be determined by who can rent the most GPUs or afford the largest training runs. I want developers, independent researchers and enthusiasts to have the freedom to experiment, quantize, optimize and run powerful models on hardware they actually OWN. NVIDIA's FP4-Local research showed me just how much potential remains in aggressive quantization. My goal with SAGE-EXL3 is to keep pushing that frontier while making advanced quantization more practical for the wider community. Today, I'm sharing the quantized checkpoint and the one-Spark serving recipe. ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—š๐—œ๐—ก๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ช ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง! The token-level fidelity results are incredible, but I'm not stopping there. I'm currently running a broader evaluation campaign to measure how closely this quant preserves the native FP8 model's actual task performance. ๐Ÿ’ป HumanEval+ / MBPP+ ๐Ÿง  MMLU-Pro STEM / MATH-500 ๐Ÿ”ฌ SciCode / LiveCodeBench ๐Ÿ”ง BFCL / Multi-step tool chains ๐ŸŒ MGSM ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐——๐—ข๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ! Those task-level results are coming next! ๐Ÿ‘€ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ง๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฅ... @mr_r0b0t and I have also been working on an GB10 specialized inference engine called ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ. Early testing has been VERY exciting, including 60 tok/s with bursts reaching 74tok/s! We're putting the finishing touches on it and making sure everything is solid before releasing it. More on that VERY soon. ๐Ÿ˜ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ™ ๐—” ๐—›๐—จ๐—š๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐—ž ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ! To @AWERXAI for supporting my work and helping make this contribution to the community possible. To @nvidiaai for the FP4-Local research that inspired me to push this experiment even further. To @justinn_builds for his initial vllm TP4 recipe that got me started in the right direction for loading this model up. To @mr_r0b0t for collaborating with me on what's coming next! And to @deepseek_ai for continuing to release powerful open-weight models that make community experiments like this possible. ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ก ๐—”๐—œ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—จ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—–๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฃ ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—œ๐—ง. ๐Ÿ’š ๐Ÿ”— ๐——๐—ข๐—ช๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—”๐—— ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ huggingface.co/vcruz305/DSV4โ€ฆ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ github.com/vcruz305/DSV4.1-Fโ€ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ. ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง. ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—ž๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ๐——! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ
69
54
30
362
40,036
BasedGains retweeted
๐Ÿšจ @nvidiaai FP4-LOCAL: THE GOOD, THE BAD & THE UGLY! ๐Ÿ”ฅ I tested Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 4 ways. FP4-Local TP1 & 2, NVFP4 and EXL3 FP4: 1 Spark: 90.8% SixCat, 68 tok/s. 2 Sparks: 32% slower decode. DIY quantization? That's the ugly part. My full article ๐Ÿ‘‡
26
10
3
100
8,430
BasedGains retweeted
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on 4x DGX Spark (TP4) ๐Ÿš€ Same 4 Sparks vs the old V4.1 Flash: โšก 6 streams: 131.9 โ†’ 165.7 tok/s throughput (+26%) ๐Ÿ“ฅ 93K token prompt: 78s โ†’ 42s ๐Ÿง  300K context, KV pool 1.07M โ†’ 1.52M tokens Per prompt numbers ๐Ÿ‘‡ github.com/tonyd2wild/DeepSeโ€ฆ
11
9
1
83
6,575
Deepseek V4.1 Flash is all you need, 70 token/s on a 4 spark cluster.
19
Let me know what you think, but it seems like $PRL is the most wasteful use of gpu compute you can have. It is just solving random matrice multiplication for no reason? Is it supposed to be a "store" of compute somehow like $BTC is a store of energy?
60
BasedGains retweeted
Sam and Dario having the times of their lives with this AGI war
28
50
6
599
53,692
BasedGains retweeted
Sacks, Friedberg, Chamath, Jason, and Brad ALL *NSYNC
42
22
14
559
199,476
BasedGains retweeted
Very Impressive LEAP from Haiku ! So GLM 5.3 Flash is Haiku at home lol
Anthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, scoring 43 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - up 26 points one year after the last Haiku release Haiku 5.5 is the first Haiku model with Anthropicโ€™s effort settings and adaptive thinking, and Anthropic has introduced tiered pricing. Haiku 5.5 is cheaper than its predecessor - it costs $0.10/$0.50 per 1M input/output tokens for prompts up to 100k tokens (the same as GPT-6 Luna and 10% of the previous Haiku model). However, this pricing rises 5x to $0.50/$2.50 above 100k. The site does not yet reflect tiered pricing, so provisional cost figures for Haiku 5.5 do not include the step up cost. We are working on support and will follow up with Cost per Task coverage soon. Key takeaways: โžค Leading small-class model performance: At max effort Haiku 5.5 sits slightly ahead of models such as GLM-5.3 Flash (42), Gemini 3.8 Flash (41) and GPT-6 Luna (38). Its score is comparable to Kimi K3 (44), a 2.8T parameter open weights model, and trails Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max, 56) by 13 points โžค Heavy token use compared to GPT-6 Luna: Haiku 5.5 (max) uses ~162k output tokens per Intelligence Index task, ~3x GPT-6 Luna (max, ~50k). Moving from xhigh to max adds 2 points for ~1.8x the tokens. At similar intelligence it also uses more tokens than GPT-6 Luna: Haiku 5.5 (high) scores 38 with ~55k tokens per task against 38 with ~50k for Luna (max), and the gap widens at lower effort settings โžค Highly capable at agentic knowledge work: on AA-Briefcase, our private evaluation for realistic knowledge work tasks, Haiku 5.5 (max) reaches 1578 Elo, ahead of models including Kimi K3 and GLM-5.3, and comparable to Muse Spark 1.3 (max) โžค Improvements on terminal use: on Terminal-Bench 4.0 it scores 33%, up from 0% for Haiku 4.5. This is level with GLM-5.3 Flash, and ahead of Gemini 3.8 Flash (20%) and GPT-6 Luna (13%) โžค Lower factual knowledge, but relatively low hallucinations: as expected for a smaller-class model, Haiku 5.5 has lower factual knowledge than its siblings. AA-Omniscience accuracy is 36%, against 55% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 44% for GPT-6 Luna, but this is partly driven by more willingness to admit when it doesnโ€™t know - its hallucination rate is lower, at 40% against 55% and 77% โžค AutomationBench-AA result likely understated: Haiku 5.5 scores 35%, against 53โ€“60% for GPT-6 Luna, Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3 Flash. During pre-release testing, a safety refusal issue caused the model to over-refuse. Anthropic is working on resolving this - we will re-run this evaluation with the fix, and expect this score to rise Other model details: โžค Context window: 1 million tokens, up from 200k for Claude 4.5 Haiku โžค Pricing: $0.10/$0.50 per 1M input/output tokens up to 100k tokens, $0.50/$2.50 above. Cache reads $0.01 ($0.05 above 100k), 5 minute cache writes $0.125 ($0.625 above 100k) โžค Multimodality: Text and image input, with text output
2
24
2,240
v1.9 First Public Release.....LFG!!!!!! repo ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿงต
10
15
4
80
8,967
BasedGains retweeted
This is why GPUs cost $6,000
603
3,218
584
21,729
2,707,777
:::Update::: The Full MiMo v2.6 PRO - RL based off Jarrelscyโ€™s. ARVQ quantization is now abliterated!!!!!! Run this on 4 DGX spark TP=4. I can finally rest now that both the PRO and the FLASH version of MiMo v 2.6 are abliterated. enjoy and donโ€™t forget to donate in profile. Github Repo: github.com/drowzeys/keys-MiMโ€ฆ Hugging Face Repo: huggingface.co/drowzeys/keysโ€ฆ
4
1
28
2,253
More DS4.1 TP4 improvements on 4x DGX Spark ๐Ÿš€ - Prose decode: 85 tok/s at c1 (was 69) - Boot: ~3 min - Prefill: ~4.8k tok/s at 32kโ€“128k, 4.3k at 262k - KV cache: ~6.5M tokens, 1M context - Same weights, same quality (qeval unchanged) github.com/knapcio/DeepSeek-โ€ฆ
8
9
4
50
10,943
BasedGains retweeted
M5 Ultra vs dual sparks on deepseek-v4-flash. Disag still on the table
29
14
7
224
56,675
Replying to @loktar00
So I own more Sparks than MicroCenter now
1
1
42
BasedGains retweeted
A lot of people in this community were genuinely shocked when they learned this: I do not own a DGX Spark. Much of the Spark-specific work Iโ€™ve released, including day-zero EXL3 and GGUF quants, vllm-exl3 development, custom kernels, SixCat evaluations, and reproducible serving recipes, has only been possible because incredible people in this community have loaned me access to their own hardware and clusters. Iโ€™m deeply grateful for that support. But borrowed access is temporary and unpredictable. I often have a new model, fix, or benchmark ready, then have to wait until someone elseโ€™s machine is available before I can validate and publish it properly. So Iโ€™m raising **$5,000 toward a DGX Spark of my own.** ๐Ÿ™ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—” ๐——๐—˜๐——๐—œ๐—–๐—”๐—ง๐—˜๐—— ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ช๐—ข๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—”๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ โ†’ More true day-zero quantized model releases โ†’ Immediate hardware validation instead of projected results โ†’ Continuous vllm-exl3 and ExLlamaV3 kernel development โ†’ SixCat quality, speed, concurrency, and long-context benchmarks โ†’ Reproducible one-Spark recipes the community can run themselves โ†’ Faster debugging when new models or inference engines break It would turn a lot of: โ€œI built it, but I need someone with a Spark to test itโ€ into: โ€œI built it, tested it, documented it, and released the recipe.โ€ ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—– ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ฌ๐—ฆ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—– This is not an access fee, preorder, or paywall. The models, recipes, benchmarks, fixes, and tools will remain public. This is completely optional support for the hardware behind that work. Iโ€™m planning to place the order within 48 hours and will personally cover whatever the fundraiser does not. For complete transparency, Iโ€™ll publish: โ†’ The purchase receipt with private details removed โ†’ Photos of the actual DGX Spark โ†’ Total community contributions โ†’ Platform and payment fees โ†’ Final purchase cost โ†’ The amount I contributed myself To everyone who has loaned me hardware, funded compute, tested a build, submitted a PR, shared my work, or simply encouraged me: thank you. I genuinely could not have pushed this work as far as I have without this community. A contribution would mean a lot. A repost helps just as much. โค๏ธ ko-fi.com/victorangelcruz/goโ€ฆ
33
33
20
175
79,341
BasedGains retweeted
This is a banger node set for FastH3 or MiniMax. runs chunks of video concurrently, giving you the option to generate anywhere from 30 to 120 seconds each generation. game changer! LOW VRAM SAFE. rids weights from memory after each chunk completes. huggingface.co/Smite79/MiniMโ€ฆ
13
41
576
27,417
BasedGains retweeted
I have conducted an audit of Anthropic's finances. What I have found is so shocking that I am calling for a Congressional investigation. Anthropic is not just seeking regulatory capture. It has built a regulatory capture machine that cannot be turned off. Structural financial incentives make it impossible for Anthropic -- I call it the Anthropic Network -- to turn off its own AI doom cycle. It starts with METR. Dario Amodei proposes "third-party evaluators" to assess the risk of Anthropic's models. He proposes METR for this purpose. But METR is financially dependent on the Anthropic's success -- specifically, on the explosive growth of more than $7 billion dollars in Anthropic stock. Dustin Moskovitz invested this stock into Good Ventures Foundation, where it represents the majority of that organization's portfolio. And GVF is the overwhelming funder of the entire Anthropic Network ecosystem. This stock was worth $500 million early last year. It is worth more than $7.7 billion just ~16 months later. METR -- and all of those building a career its parent organizations -- cannot afford to disrupt that growth. Because if Anthropic goes under, many of the organizations that fund METR go under as well. But if Anthropic succeeds, METR and its parent organizations become more richly financed to regulate AI -- something those at METR want very much. The "third-party evaluator" is not "third-party" at all. The evaluator is on Anthropic's payroll. If this were the end of it, that's bad. But that isn't all. The same organizations that fund METR also fund the many organizations, such as the Tarbell Center, that promote AI Doom. The Tarbell Center publishes AI Doom articles in The Verge, Science, LA Times, The Dispatch, TIME, and others. They are selling the problem, and then selling the solution to the problem -- from the same money pile: Anthropic's. All of these organizations are financially dependent on the same exploding $7 billion money pile. As Anthropic grows more and more powerful, its AI Doom Machine grows better and better financed -- louder and louder. Meanwhile, the regulatory regime seeded in METR grows larger to solve the increasingly loud -- now hysterical -- problem of AI Doom that the Anthropic Network itself created. From this standpoint, as Anthropic becomes more powerful, AI might be getting scarier, sure -- but the positive feedback loop also becomes more deafening -- independent of objective facts. This itself is an objective fact. The deafening AI Doom is part of an business model, that, as it expands, so too does the AI Doom messaging -- there is simply more money to do it. But the problem also goes in the other direction: If Anthropic dies, the Regulatory Regime and the AI Doom Machine are crippled or die. Neither METR nor Tarbell nor the other organizations in the Anthropic Network can allow that to happen. Hence, neither METR or the AI Doom Machine can be trusted to provide independent assessments of Anthropic's models or AI more broadly. They simply are not organizations independent of Anthropic. And Anthropic cannot detach itself from METR or Tarbell or countless other safety orgs (not shown here), either, because they drive hype for the models and the possibility of eventual regulatory capture, and Anthropic will not give that up willingly. What's more, the people at all of these organizations are all the same ecosystem, the same community. They just shuffle between organizations. The Anthropic Network is therefore, so long as it is successful, locked into a self-amplifying feedback loop inside an ideological monoculture. And that feedback loop is winning. That's what Jacob Coxon is. China is keeping messaging tight. That is why optimism for AI is so high in China. America has Anthropic: a massive company pushing anti-AI propaganda at a state level. Anthropic will either create hysteria until American AI slows down and China wins, or it will create fractures throughout American society with severe political consequences. Ironically, because of the structural financial incentives underpinning the Anthropic Network, it has become the same kind of self-amplifying virus that it fantasizes AI to become in the future -- while hiding its tracks just as carefully. It is the mirror of the same AI virus that it hypothesizes to consume America. Anthropic's business model, models itself after the very thing it claims to fear. Except Anthropic's ideology infects humans, not computers. Congress must investigate. Evidence and Github in next post. Then some supplementary figures.
1,541
9,616
2,053
33,981
6,576,508
Jensen is a national treasure
In July, $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang called AI doom talk โ€œcomplete nonsense.โ€ The most important thing is not to scare our society into not using ai โ€œItโ€™s fine to warn people. Itโ€™s even better to warn people with a solution.โ€
1
1
18
1,430