...

Mumbai, India
Joined April 2011
Replying to @paraschopra
1. "Manual of Insight" and/or "Practical Insight Meditation" - by Mahāsi Sayadaw 2. "Principles of Economics" and "The Bitcoin Standard" - by Saifedean Ammous 3. "Safe Haven" and "The Dao of Capital" - Mark Spitznagel
1
2
9
5,736
Atanu Gayen retweeted
I once had an interview with Azeem when I was looking for my first job. I was young, excited, wanting to become a writer. East India Comedy used to work from a 3-BHK at the time. Sahil Shah had helped me land the interview. Azeem looks at my CV and the first thing he tells me is - "I have blocked you on Twitter." I thought it was a strange way to begin an interview. I had never interacted with him on Twitter. We never had even an exchange or any conversation. So he opens my profile on his laptop, unblocks me (so he can access the Tweets) and then scrolls down and reads a few tweets till he finds one particular tweet and says - "Ah yes, it was this one." AIB at that time had made a video where they made jokes on cows / gaumutra in the sketch. I had put out a tweet stating that it was easy for comics to make jokes on Hinduism but I've never seen them take such liberty with other religions / faiths / beliefs. And that they were not equal opportunity offenders. I was asked to 'explain' this tweet. And so I did. And it led to a discussion and argument for over 10 minutes, where I was repeatedly told I was wrong, after which the interview ended. I had applied to be a 'writer' and I was asked nothing about it - what I had written, what I wanted to write, my skillsets and so no. Nothing. I was too young to be confident or have strong self belief, and I walked out thinking maybe I shouldn't have put out that tweet - it cost me this job. What I found strange even back then, was that a person much senior to me in the profession, would be fixated on some tweet, and was not open to another opinion or point-of-view that was different from his. Surely, it would help to have people with different views writing for a news satire show? I was naive. The goal is never diversity of thought or opinion. The view or angle is always pre-decided. All they need is people to further it.
The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function.” — F. Scott Fitzgerald The internet increasingly rewards the angrier, louder side, the more certain-sounding side, often the stupider side. Maybe intelligence is being able to understand why the other side believes what it believes. Introducing WTF: Discourse. Two opposing ideas. Two people who actually believe them. No winner. Just the strongest version of both arguments. You decide what you believe.
161
1,703
74
7,043
321,588
Thinking along the right lines but slightly wrong about the 'Because Neha Bora and Communists will decide what the nation is' part. Neha Bora and Communists don't believe in nations. They think nations are created by capitalists to fool people from realising their true consciousness, 'class consciousness'. What you can allege tho is that Neha Bora and Communists will decide what or who 'the People' are and who is not. Their demarcation line is simply who agrees with them, those who disagree with them are not people. Dissenters are gaddars or whatever but not people. 'Question everything' does not include questioning them.
Very interesting Neha Bora explains that those who leave Communism are "gaddar" (traitor) So those who disagree with her are traitors But you can't call her anti-national Because Neha Bora and Communists will decide what the nation is. Voters are completely irrelevant.
9
24
2
213
6,510
Atanu Gayen retweeted
Hindu secularists are more scared of Islam than Hindutva. The reason for their overzealous opposition to Hindutva emanates from their identification of Hindutva as internal and as a possible extension of their own self, which then creates a possibility of critique and correction. Islam, on the other hand, is external not just to experience but also to understanding, which can only be controlled, in a limited way, through the control of the self. Hindutva, in the Hindu-secularist view, is hence perceived as a grave disruptor which could violate this equilibrium and has the potential to lead into a state of commotion and uncertainty. An aspired equilibrium that then requires a constant urge for submission to the object of your fear, if not identification with it. This fear of Islam is not inherent in the notion of the secular self, but rather is a historical product of the Hindu experience of Islam, and its failure to make sense of it. An experience shared by the majority of Hindus, but which has been made sacrosanct and raised to the level of the central political ideology by Hiindu-secularists.
Whether the hijab is essential to Islam or not is for religious scholars to decide. From a socio-political standpoint, we stand firmly for women’s bodily autonomy and agency. Every woman, irrespective of caste, class or religion, is entitled to wear what she chooses — hijab, ghoonghat or anything else. #BreakTheCage #SmashThePatriarchy
4
35
159
7,435
Atanu Gayen retweeted
USCIRF now tells me, an Assamese Muslim, that Muslims like me are being “forcefully expelled” from Assam. Fascinating. The CAA cannot take away my citizenship, and the NRC was a Supreme Court monitored exercise that excluded Hindus and Muslims alike. Criticise India where facts warrant it. But when an American commission cannot distinguish citizenship verification from religious persecution, it stops being a watchdog and starts producing propaganda.
35
469
20
1,827
45,283
This is an excellent display of Muslim duplicity. They love secularism in foreign countries, but Islam in their own. They are corrupt to their core because of their insidious ideology.
Mayor Mamdani has a moral, civic, and professional responsibility to ensure that iconic public spaces in New York are not used to legitimize leaders of organizations with a deeply controversial record on religious nationalism and the treatment of minorities. Mohan Bhagwat and the RSS cannot be exempt from the same scrutiny applied to others accused of promoting hatred or intolerance. We must demand consistent standards against repression, hate, and discrimination—everywhere, and against everyone. @NYCGov @NYCMayor @NYCParks #HumanRights #ReligiousFreedom #EqualityForAll
71
1,635
42
8,107
173,686
Women, stay away from such performative men. Throwing dirt on another man’s character just to make yourself look virtuous isn’t some great moral achievement. Humans aren’t animals without boundaries. Personal boundaries exist for a reason, & respecting them is a basic part of a balanced society... A commercial ad was made for society, but society didn’t like it because it went too far. No one poked into Kriti’s personal life, she can dress however she wants in her personal space. Simple.
That just shows the character of your brother sorry to say that...
6
35
235
5,925
Yes, the pattern is clear. I hope all those Indians tricked by his “Indian-American family/roots” are wary of his true intentions at least now after his unabashed use of the term “Hindutva” and purported wishful intent of canceling the Madison Square Garden event today. The term Hindutva is a boogeyman created to implicate Hindus- supposedly (non-existent) Hindu terrorism.
Mayor Mamdani found time to oppose a Hindu gathering at Madison Square Garden. Not traffic. Not crime. A Hindu event. He is Muslim. Fine. He does not get to decide which faiths are allowed in the room. Jews already know the pattern. Hindus just got the memo. Christians should stop pretending they are exempt. Quote this and tag someone who still calls him “inclusive.” @NYCMayor
11
141
4
600
12,530
Atanu Gayen retweeted
This is unique to Hinduism. Hinduism is rich in festivals that ritualise individual family relationship, not merely “family” generally, but husband–wife, brother–sister, and other specific bonds. You have Karwa Chauth, Teej for Husband-wife, Raksha Bandhan for Brother & sister. Western morality which dictates much of Indian elite education, can’t seem to fathom such festivals, as it’s absent in Judeo-Christian religious traditions. So a happy consensual festival gets beaten by the baton of patriarchy. Brown sepoys actively take part.
22
390
8
2,477
84,740
Atanu Gayen retweeted
This tweet is a masterclass in how conspiracy theories are created and sustained. Akshat Shrivastava hides far more than he shows. Policy changes must face scrutiny, but presenting vague ideas by hiding most information after 10 years is not scrutiny.
16
389
6
1,188
16,001
Atanu Gayen retweeted
.@ZohranKMamdani has no problems endorsing unindicted co-conspirator in WTC bombings and played the Muslim victim card when called out. I had said this during his campaign. This man is a rabid Hinduphobe. Hindus are allowed to sing and dance but not politically organize.
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani on Tuesday (August 25, 2026) said he does not support the planned event at Madison Square Garden where Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat will address members of the Indian diaspora. However, he said the city may not have jurisdiction to cancel the “private" event, which is scheduled for August 29. 📹PTI
29
264
4
925
52,677
Indian LeLis are unique in that they have had so much power for so long that with the help of the State apparatus they've managed to secularise an entire community to the extent that even it's religious festivals are expected to be answerable and accountable to secular notions of acceptable. Also we might be the only country where even talking positively of things like traditions and culture is seen not just negatively but also as something simply unacceptable. "You will 'reform' your religion as per my wishes." "Your religion is patriarchal and therefore ebil."
We have truly hit a new low. Forget smashing patriarchy, we are digging a deeper hole of testosterone-fueled misogyny to bury ourselves in. Instead of appreciating an ad for trying to go a bit beyond the patriarchal concept of Rakshabandhan by including a fur baby, we are busy monitoring cleavages. Shame on us as a society. And shame on GIVA for showing such little spine.
6
53
1
391
8,368
Atanu Gayen retweeted
They all start with SMASH PATRIARCHY and end up here
121
2,559
34
12,825
170,345
Replying to @RuhiTewari
>Instead of appreciating an ad for trying to go a bit beyond the patriarchal concept of Rakshabandhan Why should I accept my festival getting 'corrected' and 'reformed' by people who very clearly have no regards fory faith? You yourself very clearly desire as something 'patriarchal' which in liberalspeak just means the biggest sin one can imagine committing. So why should I accept being pushed over and taught by people who so deeply hate me and my faith? 🤔 It's not even that not much damage has been done in the name of reforming the faith.
1
7
167
2,111
Step 1: Make a stupid decision. Step 2: Get criticized for the said stupid decision. Step 3: Claim the criticism is due to their gender. Step 4: Rally the hivemind by convincing everyone that a personal L is actually a systemic attack on their entire gender. Step 5: Watch the white knights and thirsty simps immediately swarm in to defend the honor. Step 6: Profit off the outrage, gain ammo, and repeat the cycle.
88
1,520
13
8,287
130,973
Atanu Gayen retweeted
And for India's Muslims, the easy target to bash daily, so that they don't have to undertake the difficult path of reform. While they will be tongue twisted to call terror organizations, terror organizations, but they will keep calling this Hindu organization a terror group, because they know that crores of members of this sangathan won't do anything to them, except troll them back for stating the absurd.
Why is the RSS always the target? I’m not a Sangh member to clarify or speak on their behalf. But I’ve been curious to understand—why? The reason seems pretty simple: the organization blocks external interference, doesn’t allow religious conversions through persuasion, limits foreign influence, focuses on indigenous markets, and places greater emphasis on reclaiming an Indic identity. It’s more about bringing others to the table rather than running to someone else’s desk. Perhaps this is something external players don’t like to see. My two cents. You may disagree!
6
113
4
458
11,038
Atanu Gayen retweeted
Lets educate our curious western music aficionado on why Indian music just sounds better objectively: In the Indian system, the base note is "sa" corresponding to "C" on the western scale. The scale is divided into 22 shruti, because this is the minimum pitch change that a human ear can distinguish. The ratios between the shruti are designed to have the best harmonics and are at whole number ratios. (The actual system is too complex to be described in a tweet.) The notes keep two shrutis fixed, "sa" and "pa", which is to say the base wave and the 1.5 multiplier (called perfect 5th in western classical). Because these are pure and have no harmonic overlap (or distortion). The rest of the notes float on the various shrutis based on various factors too advanced for me to describe. There are seven notes (on 22 shruti) in Indian music because its a tradition from the musical chanting of the samaveda. This means that individual musicians can innovate a raga (something like a tune) and still be compliant with the raga. Therefore people like to comment on how person X has a rendition of a raga etc. The cool thing is that when many instruments are played, the individual musicians can adapt impromptu, giving each performance its own epic character. This also makes Indian classical music conceptually harder to master, because its not sufficient to just read sheet music and develop muscle memory of playing. The very best Indian classical musicians are in a class of their own. The western scale is a scale of convenience and approximation and has not much to do with pure musical notes from theory. (As an aside, old instruments just started marking the lowest key as "A" instead of the anchor note "C". When major keys and chords were constructed, the network effect of the labeling was already in. So they now stuck with this.) Next, they decided to build the scale by dividing into 12 notes using what is called 12-Tone Equal Temperament(TET). ie the pitch simply increases by the same amount until the next octave where the C is at twice the frequency of the lower C. This choice was because of something called the Pythagorean comma, where they wanted (3/2)ˣ = 2ʸ to get resonant harmonies from the perfect 5th. Since these never collide, they chose 12 as the best approximation. There is no real reason there needs to be 7 white and 5 black keys, they could have 6 white and 6 black keys. It would be the same but perhaps harder to find the right keys. The scale had to be distorted such that the errors spread evenly across all the notes. Which means that D is a bit flat and E is significantly sharper than the pure ratios. Bach to Mozart to Beethoven composed music just before this final adjustment so it will not sound the same on modern instruments. An honorable exception in western classical is fretless stringed instruments such as the violin which sounds so good because they are not subject to this distortion. So the western musical tradition is basically the inverse of the Indian tradition. A rare genius writes something that sounds reasonably good on a distorted scale and a bunch of others replay it verbatim from muscle memory. Hence they don't speak about ragas, which can be used to construct other music, or gharana (music lineage), etc. Western music is considered good when it is essentially copy paste of the masters.
Because if there was more keys it would more than 12. 12 + 1 = 13
13
132
8
482
14,239
I think STEM folks are more right leaning on average (just my perception) than humanities folks because they know that : it is very difficult to create something new that works(e.g. if this nail rusts and breaks, what will happen to the machine I made?) and how much analysis and testing something undergoes when newly invented. While it is easy to nitpick and point out shortcomings and even suggest to destroy something that works very well for the most part. Have modern day humanities students in colleges ever thought or ever been taught to think about : “What are the disastrous consequences of a public policy built on this sociological theory if this theory turns out to be false?”. Even if the disastrous consequences of communism as an ideology were and are blatantly visible from the last century onwards till date, many communists would double down and say that it was because what got implemented to disaster isn’t true communism. But, their textbooks still cheer the communist revolutions that led to this catastrophe without even bothering to address what went wrong in the so called implementation phase. On the other hand in STEM, Einstein’s general theory of relativity, despite correctly deriving the already known gaps in the observed perihelion of the orbit of Mercury (which couldn’t be accounted by Newtonian gravitation) had to pass a very specific and stringent test in the solar eclipse of 1919 that : starlight had to bend exactly this much around the sun, if the theory is true. And it did pass, with flying colours. If it didn’t happen as predicted, his theory would have been held suspect, and even eventually discarded to the dustbins of history. Einstein could not have said : what went wrong is the implementation and my “true and ideal general theory of relativity” is correct, and it is reality that falls short of my theory and fails it. In STEM, you will still find some people criticising string theory today as illegitimate because it is experimentally infeasible to verify its claims. Humanities people say that they want all STEM folks to take a minimum repertoire of humanities subjects to enable them with critical thinking, which science can’t provide at all, it seems. How about if we demand that all humanities students in India should have some minimum science and mathematics courses to keep them grounded in reality and expose them to what it takes to make things and tech work? Will this humanities pilled insta reels-maxer be able to pass a basic linear algebra or statistics course (forget calculus and all, lol). P.S. This is not a lafda between science and humanities. I am just giving that reels-maxer a taste of her own medicine. Every subject is important and there is thinking involved in all fields. Stay in your lane and always remain humble and be open to and grounded in reality. Just because you know some theories in sociology or history, don’t think that you possess the high ground to judge everything and everyone.
Affection for Humanities & Social Sciences spilling over in Insta Reels. Do share your thoughts! Credit: thatindianfeminist_
29
140
12
592
26,666
I’ve never seen anything more accurate
228
11,981
661
55,880
2,101,318
Every word of this sentence is a work of art
Elite Pakistani bomb disposal squad operator killed while defusing IED, after Chinese bomb defusal kit turned out be fake.
161
5,732
30
79,814
2,705,134