A backdoor only for the 'good guys' isn't possible.

Earth
Joined April 2009
Andy Back's Liquid Liquidated?
9
54
3
251
10,931
AsyncN8 retweeted
1/ @peterktodd, author of the commissioned OP_RETURN uncap PR that kicked off BIP-110 immune response, spent the summer pitching two related ideas (not for the first time) for funding miners long-term: - tail emissions (a permanent, ongoing trickle of newly created bitcoins paid to miners after the block subsidy ends, effectively a slow inflation that dilutes all existing holders) - demurrage (a direct “holding tax” charged on coins that sit idle for a long time and are later spent, with the proceeds routed to miners)
73
128
27
490
61,560
Cashier: “how do you wanna pay?” Me: “you guys take SR-strcUSX? It’s digital money”
Digital Assets form a monetary spectrum: $BTC = Digital Capital $STRC = Digital Credit SR-strcUSX = Digital Money $USDT = Digital Currency From left to right, volatility and return potential fall while stability and transactional utility rise.
43
26
4
463
24,636
Replying to @betuncrocante
Even today, there are over 21,000 Bitcoin Core 27 nodes, which are clearly sybil (no one runs that many nodes which are outside of Core's sliding support window). So, we were probably closer to 30% of real nodes or higher. Pretty strange that we got essentially 0% miner signaling
16
25
1
159
2,208
Bitcoiners dramatically overestimate how resistant they are to social engineering. Give me 6 months and 3 influencers (and remove my character) and I could have +60% of bitcoiners cheering for tail emissions and explaining why it’s necessary for bitcoin We already conceded “money.” Why should general-purpose blockspace be artificially scarce?
Bitcoiners will never accept “tail emissions”. Mark my words.
97
62
11
336
32,925
AsyncN8 retweeted
“Tail emissions and Demurrage” Such cool concepts for slaying the 21M cap. Under the current regime, this is a matter of time. Five years ago, anyone saying it’s hard to define spam, or hard to say what Bitcoin is, would be shunned and laughed out of the room. Compromise on ethos and integrity is a slippery slope. I give it five years until people against tail emissions and demurrage are ridiculed by Big Bitcoin and their simps as delusional non technical retards.
NOW LIVE 🎥: Tail Emissions and Demurrage Featuring: Peter Todd (@peterktodd) youtu.be/OmAAeEm1nIE
77
78
15
404
39,640
Feel free to show me what will be your strategy if the 5 largest pools in this chart collude or are coerced into enforcing new consensus rules, like ones adding taxes into the protocol. Or even if you see a role for yourself at all in trying to resist such an scenario.
17
36
3
158
9,459
AsyncN8 retweeted
Replying to @saylor
The unification of money and state.
12
32
1
276
3,354
Fighting The SHA-256 Oligopoly
60
67
12
325
45,702
Operation Strategy 2.0 — next phase: Turn off the original Bitcoin community. Convince them running nodes no longer matters. Push them toward custody. Centralise the economic nodes. Are you falling for it?
$STRC is the bridge between Bitcoin, the world’s Digital Capital, and stablecoins, the world’s Digital Currency.
89
149
23
897
88,579
Replying to @isabellasg3
Bitcoin is undergoing a massive state level attack from all sides, and the most dangerous enemies are inside the gates. If BIP 110 doesn’t succeed, it’s over
36
36
10
360
13,557
The world will never be free unless we have censorship-resistant payments. Governments will be able to control us forever, if they can control our monetary transactions, so we need BTC to be a medium of exchange. What's the point of money if the government gets to tell you what you can spend it on, and with whom. Saylor likes ETH and Solana now, because they support DeFi protocols that can be used to lever up his preferred stock, so they are natural buyers of it. Retail investors that do this will lose money (and did lose money) when STRC crashes as much as it did.
3
12
1
64
1,338
AsyncN8 retweeted
"BIP110ers only have a few days to get the 55% miner support they need." ...siiigh... No, that's not how this works. We only have a few days until we start enforcing BIP110, whether miners like it or not. Miners only have a few days before we start rejecting their blocks.
42
84
5
424
8,999
If BIP-110 activates, EVERYONE remains in consensus. Yes. Everyone. Even Udi. Even Saylor. If 5 companies ignore 17,000+ node-runnners, they will be out of consensus with 15-20% of the network. If 5 companies can ignore consensus today, they will ignore consensus tomorrow. You may rejoice if BIP-110 fails today, but you will weep tomorrow.
At 961,022, BIP-110 has 38 signals (2.70%). Its 55% voluntary threshold is impossible. At 961,632, BIP-110 nodes reject non-signaling blocks. Unless major miners reverse, Bitcoin continues normally while BIP-110 stalls or forks into irrelevance. Its backers should stand down.
39
66
3
306
11,726
When someone shows you who they are, you should believe them. NVK has gone out of his way to attack pleb projects like SeedSigner and he often has spam-supporters on his pod. He's done nothing but fence-sit and cause problems during the spam wars
12
50
5
308
8,183
How Michael Saylor Is An Attack On Bitcoin
40
118
13
429
24,048
Replying to @saylor
The state has been captured by the Financial Industrial Complex. The same Financial Industrial Complex that make up your shareholders and bondholders. The same Financial Industrial Complex that wants to centralise as much Bitcoin as possible into vehicles like $MSTR in an attempt to crowd out sovereign self-custody and independent nodes. Resistance to centralising forces has always been Bitcoin’s defence. It’s nothing personal. It’s simple incentives & architecture.
19
52
3
275
15,348
New Blogs Published: The Battle For Bitcoin | Simon Dixon Hard Talk LIVE simondixon.com/blog/the-batt… BIP-110, the Spam War, and the Battle Nobody Wants to Name: Where I Stand simondixon.com/blog/bip-110-… "The New World Order Wants To Steal Your Bitcoin" | Simon Dixon on New Era Finance Podcast w/ Michaël van de Poppe simondixon.com/blog/the-new-…
14
26
1
143
15,568
The Bitcoin UTXO set is 11 GB now. At current growth rates it will exceed 128 GB in 2035, preventing many people from running nodes. In 2043 it will exceed 1 TB, and many larger mining operations will struggle to run nodes.
57
110
99
915
155,193