ari retweeted
I'm not sure folks have realized just how crazy the second half of 2026 and 2027 will be for global temperatures – on the back of a record-smashing El Niño event. Here is my latest estimate of where both years will end up compared to global temperatures since 1850.
ari retweeted
Jizai Arms is a wearable robotic backpack from the University of Tokyo that lets users control up to six extra robotic arms through body movements.
The system could improve work efficiency and accessibility across many fields.
It was first introduced in 2022.
ari retweeted
Microsoft has released an open-source tool that helps teams learn ontology design before choosing a knowledge graph platform.
It is called Ontology Playground.
The project is a fully static React app, which means it does not need a backend, account system, database, or hosted service to run.
The goal is simple:
Help people understand what goes inside a graph before they buy or build the graph database.
Ontology Playground includes six pre-built domain ontologies:
→ Retail
→ Healthcare
→ Finance
→ Manufacturing
→ E-Commerce
→ Education
Each one gives users a starting point for understanding entities, relationships, properties, and how domain knowledge gets structured.
The app also includes a live visual designer, structured learning paths, hands-on labs, and RDF/XML export for Fabric IQ.
Because it is static, it can be deployed almost anywhere.
No backend.
No vendor lock-in.
No platform commitment upfront.
This matters because many teams jump into knowledge graphs too early.
They focus on the database first.
But the harder question is usually:
What should the graph actually know?
Ontology Playground teaches that layer first.
ari retweeted
It's over. Karpathy just open-sourced an autonomous AI researcher that runs 100 experiments while you sleep.
You don't write the training code anymore.
You write a prompt that tells an AI agent how to think about research.
The agent edits the code, trains a small language model for exactly five minutes, checks the score, keeps or discards the result, and loops. All night. No human in the loop.
That fixed five-minute clock is the quiet genius. No matter what the agent changes, the network size, the learning rate, the entire architecture, every run gets compared on equal footing. This turns open-ended research into a game with a clear score:
- 12 experiments per hour, ~100 overnight
- Validation loss measures how well the model predicts unseen text
- Lower score wins, everything else is fair game
The agent touches one Python file containing the full training recipe. You never open it. Instead, you program a markdown file that shapes the agent's research strategy.
Your job becomes programming the programmer, and this unlocks a strange new loop:
1. Agents run real experiments without supervision
2. Prompt quality becomes the bottleneck, not researcher hours
3. Results auto-optimize for your specific hardware
4. Anyone with one GPU can run a research lab overnight
The best AI labs won't just have the most compute.
They'll have the best instructions for agents who never sleep, never forget a failed experiment, and never stop iterating.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyMar 7United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
I packaged up the "autoresearch" project into a new self-contained minimal repo if people would like to play over the weekend. It's basically nanochat LLM training core stripped down to a single-GPU, one file version of ~630 lines of code, then:
- the human iterates on the prompt (.md)
- the AI agent iterates on the training code (.py)
The goal is to engineer your agents to make the fastest research progress indefinitely and without any of your own involvement. In the image, every dot is a complete LLM training run that lasts exactly 5 minutes. The agent works in an autonomous loop on a git feature branch and accumulates git commits to the training script as it finds better settings (of lower validation loss by the end) of the neural network architecture, the optimizer, all the hyperparameters, etc. You can imagine comparing the research progress of different prompts, different agents, etc.
github.com/karpathy/autorese…
Part code, part sci-fi, and a pinch of psychosis :)
ari retweeted

Massimo@Rainmaker1973Mar 2
Italy
ItalyConnected via Italy App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Neural networks and machine learning, visualized
ari retweeted
this is what a company looks like in 2026.
not people. not offices. not salaries.
a folder.
.claude/agents/
engineering/
marketing/
design/
ops/
testing/
every role. every department. every function.
all .md files.
i have 12 of these running in OpenClaw right now.
the org chart is dead. the directory is the new company.
ari retweeted
So Google has just released its own agent builder?!
You can now add the agent block in Google Opal and "program it" in plain English.
And it has natively:
- Tool call (with Nano Banana, Veo, web search...)
- Memory to save infos between sessions
- Conditional logic
Probably the easiest way to build AI agents I've seen so far.
Opal, our no-code visual builder for AI workflows, just got a major upgrade. 🧠💎
We’ve added a new agent step that analyzes your goal, determines the best approach, and automatically calls the right tools — such as Veo for video or web search for research — to complete the task.
We’re also adding new tools to make the agent even more capable:
💾 Memory – Remember info, like a user’s name or your style preferences across sessions.
🚀 Dynamic Routing – Let the agent choose the next best step using the “@ Go to” tool.
💬 Interactive Chat – Initiate user interactions to gather missing information or present options before moving on.
Try it now → opal.google
ari retweeted
Dog ownership was linked to ~40% lower odds of disabling dementia.
There was no protective signal for cat owners.
Google launched a brand new AI tool.
It's called CodeWiki, and it might be the biggest upgrade GitHub has had in years.
And all you do is paste your GitHub repo in, and it turns your entire project into an interactive guide.
It also generates diagrams, explanations, walkthroughs, everything you could ever want, and even a chatbot that knows the code better than anyone else.
So you never have to dig through a giant repo again wondering what does this do
ari retweeted
Google isn’t trying to win the AI race.
They’re trying to own the entire AI Agent ecosystem.
While everyone argues ChatGPT vs Claude, Google quietly built:
Models → Gemini Pro, Flash, Deep Think, Gemma
Design → Stitch, Whisk, Imagen
Research → NotebookLM, AI Mode
Video → Veo, Flow, Google Vids
Coding → Antigravity IDE, Gemini CLI, Jules
Agents → A2A, ADK, FileSearch API
The scary part?
All of these tools talk to each other.
That means:
10x faster prototypes
End-to-end AI workflows
Production-ready agents on GCP
The next AI war won’t be model vs model.
It’ll be ecosystem vs ecosystem.
I mapped this stack out here:
gamma.app/?utm_campaign=prom…
Save. Share. Build.
ari retweeted

Chubby♨️@kimmonismusFeb 6
Germany
GermanyConnected via Germany App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Goldman Sachs is rolling out Claude to automate accounting.
So it starts. The market already reacts.
Goldman Sachs is rolling out Anthropic’s AI model to automate accounting and compliance roles completely.
Anthropic engineers have been embedded at Goldman for 6 months, co-developing systems that act like “digital co-workers” for high-volume, process-heavy tasks.
The new setup uses an LLM-based agent that can read large bundles of trade records and policy text, then follow step-by-step rules to decide what to do, what to flag, and what to route for approval.
Goldman says the surprise was that Claude’s capability was not limited to coding, and that the same reasoning style worked for rules-based accounting and compliance work that mixes text, tables, and exceptions.
The bank expects shorter cycle times for client vetting and fewer lingering breaks in trade reconciliation, and slower headcount growth rather than immediate layoffs.
---
cnbc .com/2026/02/06/anthropic-goldman-sachs-ai-model-accounting.html
ari retweeted
PSA for a CTO, Head of AI, VP/Dir of Engineering, CXO:
This is going to be one of the most important "back to work" weeks of your career. You must get your team aligned on agentic dev ASAP. If you're feeling behind or overwhelmed, here are some good reads to get you inspired 🧵
ari retweeted
Robots with tentacles! 🐙
SpiRobs are soft robots inspired by nature, designed in the shape of a logarithmic spiral.
They mimic the flexible movements of octopus arms and elephant trunks to grasp objects. 🐘
SpiRobs use simple cables to move, making them easy to control and operate.
They can scale from small to large sizes, ranging from centimeters to meters.
The robots can adapt to different object shapes, improving their grasping ability. A mini version can act as a tiny gripper, while a large version can be mounted on drones.
Interestingly, multiple robots can work together to wrap around and hold large objects.
That's just out of this world! 😮💨
~~
♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news → ziegler.substack.com
ari retweeted
For 20+ years, software ate the world. Now, AI Agents are eating software.
A massive signal just came out of China that most people missed:
Bairong (a publicly listed enterprise giant) started selling "AI Workers".
they call it Results-as-a-Service (RaaS). 🧵
instead of buying "seats," enterprises now "hire" agents. each agent comes with a job description, KPIs, and revenue targets.
if performance drops, the bill drops. if the agent improves, it earns more.
Bairong runs this through "Results Cloud". it’s essentially an HR system for machines.
they’ve already deployed agents across: Sales & Customer Service + Recruitment (hiring cycles cut from 30 days to 2) + Legal & Tax (handling 90% of high-frequency work)
this is where the SaaS model starts to crack.
Traditional SaaS: You pay upfront. You carry the risk.
Agentic Era: You pay for outcomes. The vendor carries the risk.
this shift is being accelerated by the collapse of build costs.
I came across this post by @martinald recently that agentic coding has slashed internal build costs by ~90%. when it's this cheap to build exactly what you need, the "Buy" in "Build vs Buy" dies.
IMO, Vendors who are not able to price against results will struggle.
the "Seat" is dead. the "Outcome" is everything. 🤖📈




























