Went from the Navy to a SWAT team to building defense software. Co-founder of ARGUS. I write about wargaming, AI that shows its work, and building from zero.

Florida
Joined September 2026
A decision on land rarely stays on land. ARGUS is being built for combat forecasting and wargaming across land, air, sea, cyber, and space. Evidence informs. People decide. argusplatform.ai
1
7
632
We wrote the rule before the first score: after 8 confirmed weeks, ARGUS claims forecasting skill only if it beats the base rate with a 95% interval fully above zero. One week in. Where's your money?
0%It beats it
0%It doesn't
0%Coin flip
0%Show me week 8
0 votes • Final results
1
25
Our model's challenger scored better in testing. We still didn't promote it. The interval on the difference crosses zero, so the gain could be noise. A gate that holds beats a number that looks good.
2
29
Someone dropped a real fruit fly brain map into an AI-generated world, and the fly can't tell it's fake. Wargamers know the feeling. Build a good enough sim and nobody stops to ask which parts are real. Label them anyway.
🤖 Made with AI
2
43
ARGUS's AI analyst, first 11 answers in production: 10 drafts tried to state a number it couldn't source. 7 fixed on repair. The rest got cut. 0 untagged numbers reached the screen. Showing it live at HAAC today.
2
43
Scorecard, week 1 of 8. Ground changed hands in 6 of 176 cells. Our top 10 picks caught 4 and missed 2. Brier 0.023 vs 0.034 for just guessing the base rate. One week proves nothing. Seven to go, and every miss stays posted. github.com/pearl-labs-llc/ar…
31
Tomorrow we show ARGUS at HAAC. Our one rule for every screen: if it can't say where a number came from, it doesn't go up. Also praying to the conference Wi-Fi gods. They have never once been on our side.
44
Reports this week put the Geran-5 at a turbojet and up to 600 km/h. A defense tuned for slow propeller drones now gets the same alarm with a lot less clock. If you model air defense, speed just became the input you can't hand-wave.
34
Sunday we sealed this week's call before anyone knew the answer: 176 cells along the Ukraine front, odds that ground changes hands in each over 7 days. The hash is public now. It gets scored on the Oct 25 map, and misses stay up. github.com/pearl-labs-llc/ar…
33
On this day in 1805, Nelson took 27 ships of the line into 33 off Cape Trafalgar and won anyway. A model that only counts hulls calls that one wrong. The count was never the hard part. Everything the count leaves out was.
31
How a case like the Baltic fakes would go into the cog-war corpus we're building: five intake rules, all in the image. The one that stings: reach gets labeled reach, and effect stays "unknown" until someone shows it. Big numbers hate that rule. What would you add?
1
33
Prokhorovka, July 1943. Two respected sources agree exactly: 650 Soviet tanks, 505 German. Case closed? Both trace to the same research lineage. That's one count wearing two hats. An independent count says about 800 vs 500. How many of your sources are secretly one source?
1
27
The hard parts of this year's fights keep being the parts games white-card: interceptor reloads, repair crews, tanker hulls, insurance. Planners: which sustainment assumption would you force onto slide one every time? Looking for answers from people who've been burned.
1
28
A Ukrainian sea drone just shot down a Shahed with a machine gun. Sensing, jamming, magazine depth and logistics shaped that fight before a shot was fired. ARGUS resolves them in that order at every time step. Which one do your models skip?
4
46
"Dark ship" is a headline. Our rule: a missing transponder is a lead, never a verdict. Suspected, then ambiguous, then confirmed, and every step needs an independent sensor that agrees in time and place. Most cases should stay ambiguous. That's honest.
3
58
Two routes, one map, every assumption on the table. This is ARGUS comparing two courses of action side by side, from a historical demo scenario with uncalibrated numbers. Work in progress. If you plan for a living, what should this screen show you first?
3
35
Next two weeks: an Army xTech|Search 10 white paper due Oct 19 and an ARGUS platform demo Oct 22. Coffee budget is under review. The rule doesn't change with the calendar: every slide says what's built, what isn't, and says who.
2
43
Cognitive warfare isn't a bolt-on domain. Real drones have strayed into Baltic airspace. Then a fake site posing as a defense outlet claimed one damaged NATO jets. Small event, bigger story. If your game adjudicates the drone and skips the story, it scored half the turn.
2
27
Battles in our database with both sides' strength recorded: 1900 to 1945, 476. 1946 to 1990, 172. 1991 to 2020, 26. Since 2021, zero. The wars everyone is asking about are exactly where the public record goes dark. A model should say where its history stops.
1
1
19
Some pressure campaigns aren't trying to scare you. They're trying to bore you. Run the same patrol often enough and the next one isn't news. Hard to game, because nothing "happens" on any single turn. How would you score normalization as an effect?
2
33
Interceptor news lately: big contracts to build more. A contract isn't a round, though. CBO says rebuilding the stock takes at least five years. So why does almost every wargame start with the magazine full at turn one? That's the assumption I'd attack first.
1
32