Problem Solver | Tech Enthusiast | Mentor | Writing things that makes the world run better.

Somerville, MA
Joined January 2012
Argus Key retweeted
Nice cutting parts belle Here is the full convo , and what he actually said :
His evidence of the Quran above the Torah is that it’s “divine communication”???
25
74
8
927
19,312
Summary of every debate between a Muslim and a Christian:
49
68
8
1,078
27,310
Was Jesus on the cross? What happened with Pontius Pilate? Before I make my point, let’s establish the facts most people don’t even know. Not opinions, just facts. Fact one. In the earliest manuscripts of Matthew 27:16–17, the prisoner’s full name is “Jesus Barabbas.” Not just “Barabbas.” Origen, writing in the 3rd century, noted this reading and openly said he found it troubling that a sinner shared the Lord’s name. Later scribes quietly dropped “Jesus” and left only “Barabbas” in most copies we read today. That is a documented textual variant, not a conspiracy theory. Fact two. “Jesus” (Yeshua) was one of the most common male names in first-century Judea. The Gospels themselves show us this problem: they have to specify “Jesus of Nazareth” precisely because the name alone wasn’t enough to tell you which man was meant. That’s the text admitting, on its own terms, that “Jesus” by itself was an ambiguous identifier in that crowd. Fact three. No one in that crowd had a photograph or a widely circulated portrait of Jesus of Nazareth. That’s exactly why Judas had to identify him with a kiss; the soldiers needed a signal to know which man to grab. Identity in that scene rested on names and pointing, not on facial recognition. Fact four. Barabbas is described as a notorious insurrectionist and murderer (Mark 15:7, Luke 23:19). That means he was a locally known figure. His face, his reputation, his crimes were public. He wasn’t some random prisoner no one could pick out of a lineup; he was famous for the wrong reasons. Fact five. The crowd’s demand was specific. They weren’t just yelling for any criminal to be executed. They were demanding the death of the one called Christ, the one called King of the Jews, the one rumored to be the Son of God. The target was a messianic claimant, not a generic troublemaker. Fact six. Pilate declared three times that he found no capital crime in Jesus of Nazareth. Roman law, applied honestly, had no grounds to crucify him. By contrast, Barabbas was convicted of insurrection and murder; precisely the category of crime crucifixion existed to punish. Fact seven. The name “Barabbas” means “son of the father.” So we have two men standing there: one named Jesus, called Christ, understood as Son of the Father; the other named Jesus, called Barabbas, literally meaning son of the father. The mirroring isn’t subtle. Now here’s what I won’t brush off. If the goal is to make sure the “Son of God” specifically dies, and the man before you isn’t visually memorable, what actually anchors your certainty that you’re pointing at the right one? The name and the description, that’s it. And Barabbas, a man named Jesus, son of the father, a convicted insurrectionist whose face was known, matches the criteria the crowd would use to identify their target. And the justice argument follows all the way through. If you believe God is just, the actual criminal cannot walk free while an innocent man absorbs his sentence. That’s not justice; that’s the opposite. But if Barabbas, guilty as convicted, received his own lawfully due sentence, the books balance. No one was wronged. There’s one more thread. If the crucified man was Barabbas, then Jesus of Nazareth, when he later appeared to his followers, would have had hands without nail marks, no piercing, no crucifixion wounds. That’s not a minor detail. It’s the physical evidence that the man who stood before them wasn’t the one who’d been nailed to a cross. So here’s the argument: the wrong Jesus was crucified. The name, the crowd’s target, the lack of facial recognition, the legal reality, and the physical description afterward all point to Jesus Barabbas dying on that cross, not Jesus of Nazareth. And that conclusion lines up exactly with what the Quran says in Surah An-Nisa 4:157, that they did not kill him nor crucify him, but it was made to appear so. You don’t have to agree. But the historical case is stronger than most people realize.
1
2
200
Argus Key retweeted
12
320
12
4,142
55,106
Argus Key retweeted
435
456
5
11,069
4,279,476
Argus Key retweeted
These two Christian apologist rats are about to get COOKED. Tune in to the debate live at 9PM EST: youtube.com/live/SDbogjSkIGY
23
18
1
188
68,639
Argus Key retweeted
Christian Apologists REFUSED to show up. Because of that Christians are taking Shahada with Shakyth Uthman (@AbuKutubLive) and Libyano (@muslimorthodoxy) on the same live. TAKBEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEER!
These two Christian apologist rats are about to get COOKED. Tune in to the debate live at 9PM EST: youtube.com/live/SDbogjSkIGY
51
106
8
872
85,313
Argus Key retweeted
Listen to this truth about Trump's real intentions in Nigeria...
1,267
1,633
127
3,691
126,126
The chosen people show how they are so friendly They invited Lybiano to teach some Torah They appreciate the experience They had many questions for him so he couldnt even answer them as they were exited, mute him to show kindeness @muslimorthodoxy youtube.com/watch?v=Fgvzu9lp…
1
1
505
Replying to @ArgusKey
Sorry, missed your message. You are lucky, right now the Back to School promo is running. You can get 50% off for a limited time. Use DD-BACKTOSCHOOL-25 promo code.
1
2
293
Hey @DaisyDisk, can I have a promo code ? First-time buyer!
1
284
1
105
1
296
7,855
Argus Key retweeted
Effectivement, il n’a pas tort. Quand nous arrêterons de nous éparpiller en nous divisant alors que nous ne devons former qu’un ( la ouma). Alors nous serons puissants...
1
157
14
426
16,513