CEO and co-founder of Radiant Law, curious about what happens if lawyers stop being so... lawyerly

Cape Town / London
Joined August 2010
Alex Hamilton retweeted
The real Philosopher's Stone of legal AI is teaching the machine to reason about whether things are important enough to raise with the other side. Most people mistakenly think that legal AI should spot and raise every issue, every time.
2
1
11
350
Alex Hamilton retweeted
Our yearlong investigation reveals Nigel Farage courting illicit funding as part of a plot to bring foreign money into British politics, orchestrated by his top aides and caught on hidden camera.
980
7,401
1,089
26,881
4,596,520
“AI can simplify routine work and spark innovative ideas, but it isn’t a cure-all.” - @AlexHamiltonRad . Dive into our latest #MondAIBagel episode as we explore the transformative role of AI in legal contracting. #AI #LegalTech #Innovation #ContractManagement
2
3
1
12
902
Alex Hamilton retweeted
Replying to @AlexHamiltonRad
@AlexHamiltonRad talking at @alt_law workshop on Law & Technology @lsbu_law about contract automation, disruption and customer centricity
1
2
190
Alex Hamilton retweeted
We could easily stop climate change right now if we wanted to For example, we could pause global warming with 100x less money than countries pledged in the recent UN's COP28 If we don't do it, it's just because we don't really want to Here's how to do it in 3 steps 🧵:
119
212
68
998
439,913
Consider the vicious attacks & incitement against Palestinian photojournalist Motaz Azaiza in Gaza by Twitter Mujahideen in the Arab world & in the West, all because he platformed a suffering civilian's voice that said, 'We want to live just like Israelis & that we'll live alongside them but we deserve to live.' And then some are upset that I use harsh criticism against these online advocates & activists. Well, I call them Twitter warriors because those supposed "sympathizers" are incredibly patronizing & condescending when they talk over Palestinian voices, refuse to accept various perspectives & cheer on a supposed resistance group (Hamas) that has caused immense damage to the Palestinian national project & brought needless wars & death upon its people. We need allies who empower Palestinian voices & uplift them, not malign dissenting perspectives by calling them "bootlickers, traitors, or Zionist sellouts." Not all sympathy is helpful; to the contrary, it can be detrimental. Imagine telling Afghans who are opposed to the Taliban that they're sellouts because the group fought America's occupation. Imagine telling Iraqis who were against al-Qaeda's brutality against civilians that they're bootlickers of U.S. occupation because AQ "resisted" the Americans. Just because someone uses "liberation" or "resistance" labels or slogans doesn't mean they're effective, moral, or worthy of support. The Viet Cong were a resistance group against U.S. occupation. Still, they were incredibly ruthless & killed hundreds of thousands of their people as a matter of policy, all in the pursuit of liberation - does that mean they were moral or worthy of support? Did the South Vietnamese people deserve to be called sellouts & bootlicker traitors simply because they wanted a different country from what the communists were working towards? Well, I can promise you that the majority of Palestinians in Gaza don't want to live in an Islamist utopia that the likes of Hamas ultimately want to create. I'll keep repeating this over and over: tens of thousands of Gazans would still be alive or uninjured if Hamas kept its fighters and members at home on Oct. 7th - and while Gaza would still be under a blockade, there could have been political choices & decisions made to change that reality. And yes, of course, I support Palestinian self-determination and the right to life, liberty, and effective resistance against the Israeli occupation & violence. Remember, there's a difference between what's right VS. what's effective VS. what's moral VS. what's emotional VS. what's suicidal.
56
227
36
1,022
126,819
My book was published this week by @GlobeLaw. My publisher @sianoneill2 took a chance on me last year. I was going through chemotherapy which experience changed me, and the book. I hope it brings peace - even joy - to in-house lawyers, & others, at work. globelawandbusiness.com/book…
7
8
4
30
3,146
💭feel like people are anthropomorphizing chatgpt4 wrong. it’s not really a speaking conscious intelligence. it is a very thin layer working with text that recurses on itself that does the speaking. it’s mainly the base model that embodies the intelligence, and it’s the system 1 elephant of the situation. it’s like, you insert a “prompt” and it’s like a “wavefunction.” the speaking is the dynamics of the wavefunction ringing off the hamiltonian trained on the word / token probabilities of the internet. it’s like a molecule scattering off an energy landscape people are writing things like “gpt4 gets this wrong, gets that wrong”. but really you are saying “i collided my prompt against the word matrix, trained on the internet, and, it either (a) returned a funny result), (b) died in a mode collapse, or (c) came alive and used the dynamic energy to power itself across the landscape defined by it’s knowledgebase. it’s (c) that i’m playing with, defining tension, multiple perspectives, multidimensionality into the sort of, vector space, defined by the prompt / wavefunction, encoding personas, perspectives, emotions into the context window and letting gpt4 beat against itself against tasks of increasing complexity. in the folds of that complexity landscape is where i find evidence of true, and useful intelligence. on top of that, it almost “codes” natively, as it’s trained on github source. almost because it’s not trained on running programs or source/binary pairs or whatever anyway, the point here is just a perspective that may help you writing prompts and interpreting the results. it’s a mental model and not exact, but may help you if you are a physicist and or think a lot about system dynamics. *learned recently that the chatgpt models use many neurons with fourier transform inputs to encode position, another shared vibe with quantum mechanics. **ht jonstokes.com/p/chatgpt-expl…
42
55
12
466
595,631
Alex Hamilton retweeted
It's pretty straight forward - OpenAI spontaneously emits @sama and @gdb, producing a short-lived @miramurati that converts to an @eshear via @bradlightcap decay. @sama and @gdb undergo @satyanadella-catalyzed fusion with @MSFTResearch in a temporary bound state. Since @eshear is a gluon he can mediate color-charge exchanges among board members: the @hlntnr exchange with @LHSummers preserves DC charge, and @TashaMcCauley exchange with @btaylor preserves SV-charge. @adamdangelo is his own antiparticle and so remains in place, but traveling backwards in time. The first half now plays out in reverse-time: the @MSFTResearch superposition collapses, @bradlightcap is re-absorbed along with @sama and @gdb into a new stable bound state. The slight mass difference between exchanged board members adds 501(c) KeV of energy, causing net acceleration of the OpenAI ensemble.
165
577
182
4,194
915,560
Conclusion: "Our results support the hypothesis that GPT-4, perhaps the most capable “general” LLM currenly available, is still not able to robustly form abstractions and reason about basic core-concepts in contexts not previously seen in its training data." (8/9)
2
65
14
267
55,989
Alex Hamilton retweeted
People ask me all the time if I am "pro-Israel" because I am a Jew who has lived in Israel, and my answer is that being "pro-Israel" or being "pro-Palestine" or being a "Zionist" does not properly capture the nuance of thought most people do or should have about this issue. It certainly doesn't capture mine. I have a lot to say. I’ve spent the last 72 hours writing, texting, and talking to Israelis, Jews, Muslims, and Palestinians. Much of my reaction is going to piss off people on "both sides," but I am exhausted and hurting and I do not think there is any way to discuss this situation without being radically honest about my views. So I'm going to try to say what I believe to be true the best I can. Let me start with this: It could have been me. That's a hard thought to shake when watching the videos out of Israel — the concert goers fleeing across an empty expanse, the hostages being paraded through the streets, the people shot in the head at bus stops or in their cars. I went to those parties in the desert, I rubbed shoulders with Israelis and Arabs and Jews and Muslims, I could have easily accepted an invitation to some concert near Sderot and gone without a care, only to be indiscriminately slaughtered. Or, perhaps worse, taken hostage and tortured. I don’t believe Hamas is killing Israelis to liberate themselves, nor do I believe they are doing it to make peace. They're doing this because they represent the devil on the shoulder of every oppressed Palestinian who has lost someone in this conflict. They're doing it because they want vengeance. They are evening the score, and acting on the worst of our human impulses, to respond to blood with blood — an inclination that is easy to give in to after what their people have endured. It should not be hard to understand their logic — it is only hard to accept that humans are capable of being driven to this. Not defending Hamas is a very low bar to clear. Please clear it. It’s not possible to recap the entire 5,000 year history of people fighting over this strip of land in one newsletter. There are plenty of easily accessible places you can learn about it if you want to (and, by the way, many of you should — far too many people speak on this issue with an obscene amount of ignorance, loads of arrogance, and a narrow historical lens focused on the last few decades). But I'll briefly highlight a few things that are important to me. In my opinion, the Jewish people have a legitimate historical claim to the land of Israel. Jews had already been expelled and returned and expelled again a half dozen times before the rise of the Muslim and Arab rule of the Ottoman Empire. Of course it’s messy because we Jews and Arabs and Muslims are all cousins and descendents of the same Canaanites. But Arabs won the land centuries ago the same way Israel and Jews won it in the 20th century: Through conflict and war. The British defeated the Ottoman Empire and then came the Balfour Declaration, which amounted to the British granting the area to the Jewish people, a promise they’d later try to renege on — all before the wars that have defined the region since 1948. That historical moment in the late 1940s was unique. After World War II, with many Arab and Muslim states already in existence, and after six million Jews were slaughtered, the global community felt it was important to grant the Jewish people a homeland. In a more logical or just world that homeland would have been in Europe as a kind of reparation for what the Nazis and others before them had done to the Jews, or perhaps in the Americas — like Alaska — or somewhere else. But the Jews wanted Israel, the British had taken to the Zionist movement, the British had conquered the Ottoman Empire which handed them control of the land, and America and Europe didn’t want the Jews. As a result, we got Israel. The Arab states had already rejected a partitioned Israel repeatedly before World War II and rejected it again after the Holocaust and the end of the war. They did not want to give up even a little bit of their land to a bunch of Jewish interlopers who were granted it all of a sudden by British interlopers who had arrived a hundred years prior. Who could blame them? It had been centuries since Jews lived there in large numbers, and now they wanted to return in waves as secularized Europeans. Many of us would probably react the same way. So, just as humans have done forever, they fought. The many existing Arab states turned against the burgeoning new Jewish state. One side won and one side lost. This is the brutal and broken and violent world we live in, but it is what created the global world order we have now. Are Israelis and British people "colonizers" because of this 20th century history? Sure. But that view flattens thousands of years of history and conflict, and the context of World War I and World War II. I don’t view Israelis and Brits as colonizers any more than the Assyrians or the Babylonians or the Romans or the Mongols or the Egyptians or the Ottomans who all battled over the same strip of land from as early as 800 years before Jesus’s time until now. The Jews who founded Israel just happened to have won the last big battle for it. You can’t speak about this issue in a vacuum. You can't pretend that it wasn't just 60 years ago when Israel was surrounded on all sides by Arab states who wanted to wipe them off the face of the planet. Despite the balance of power shifting this century, that threat is still a reality. And you can't talk about that without remembering the only reason the Jews were in Israel in the first place was that they'd spent the previous centuries fleeing a bunch of Europeans who also wanted to wipe them off the face of the planet. And then Hitler showed up. American partisans have a narrow view of this history, and an Americentric lens that is infuriating to witness. As Lee Fang perfectly put it, "Hamas would absolutely execute the ACAB lefties cheering on horrific violence against Israelis if they lived in Gaza & U.S. right-wingers blindly cheering on Israeli subjugation of Palestinians would rebel twice as violently if Americans were subjected to similar occupation." And yet, many Americans only view modern Israel as the "powerful" one in this dynamic. Which is true — they obviously are. It isn't a fair fight and it hasn't been for decades because Israel's government is rich and resourceful, has the backing of the United States and most of Europe, and has an incredibly powerful military. At the same time, Israeli leadership has made technological and military advancements that have further tipped those scales — all while the Israeli government has helped create a resource-thin open air prison of two million Arabs in Gaza. Conversely, Palestinians are devoid of any real unified leadership, and the Arab world is now divided on the issue of Palestine. Israel is unwilling to give the people in Gaza and the West Bank more than an inch of freedom to live. These are largely the refugees and descendents of the refugees of the 1948 and 1967 wars that Israel won. And you can't keep two million people in the condition that those in the Gaza strip live in and not expect events like this. I'm sorry to say that while the blood on the ground is fresh. The Israelis who were killed in this attack largely have nothing to do with those conditions other than being born at a time when Israel and Jews have the upper hand in this conflict. Some of the victims weren’t even Israeli — they were just tourists. This is why we describe them as “innocent” and why Hamas has only reaffirmed that they are a brutal terror organization with this attack — an organization that I hope is quickly toppled, for the sake of both the Palestinian people and the Israelis. But as someone with a deep love for Israel, with friends in danger and people I know still missing, it breaks my heart to say it but I'm saying it again because it remains perhaps the most salient point of context in a tangled mess full of centuries of context: You cannot keep two million people living in the conditions people in Gaza are living in and expect peace. You can't. And you shouldn’t. Their environment is antithetical to the human condition. Violent rebellion is guaranteed. Guaranteed. As sure as the sun rising. And the cycle of violence seems locked in to self-perpetuate, because both sides see a score to settle: 1) Israel has already responded with a vengeance, and they will continue to. Their desire for violence is not unlike Hamas’s — it’s just as much about blood for blood as any legitimate security measure. Israel will “have every right to respond with force." Toppling Hamas — a group, by the way, Israel erred in supporting — will now be the objective, and civilian death will be seen as necessary collateral damage. But Israel will also do a bunch of things they don't have a right to. They will flatten apartment buildings and kill civilians and children and many in the global community will probably cheer them on while they do it. They have already stopped the flow of water, electricity, and food to two million people, and killed dozens of civilians in their retaliatory bombings. We should never accept this, never lose sight that this horror is being inflicted on human beings. As the group B’Tselem said, “There is no justification for such crimes, whether they are committed as part of a struggle for freedom from oppression or cited as part of a war against terror.” I mourn for the innocents of Palestine just as I do for the innocents in Israel. As of late, many, many more have died on their side than Israel's. And many more Palestinians are likely to die in this spate of violence, too. Unfortunately, most people in the West only pay attention to this story when Hamas or a Palestinian in Gaza or the West Bank commits an act of violence. Palestinian citizens die regularly at the hands of the Israeli military and their plight goes largely unnoticed until they respond with violence of their own. Israel had already killed an estimated 250 Palestinians, including 47 children, this year alone. And that is just in the West Bank. 2) Every single time Israel kills someone in the name of self-defense they create a handful of new radicalized extremists who will feel justified in wanting to take an Israeli life in retribution sometime in the future. Half of Gaza’s two million people are under the age of 19 — they know little besides Hamas rule (since 2006), Israeli occupation, blockades, and rockets falling from the sky. The suffering of these innocent children born into this reality is incomprehensible to me. They will suffer more now because of Hamas’s actions and Israel’s response, all through no fault of their own. There is no way out of this pattern until one side exercises restraint or leaders on both sides find a new solution. Israelis will tell you that if Palestinians put their guns down then the war would end, but if Israel put their guns down they'd be wiped off the planet. I don't have a crystal ball and can’t tell you what is true. But what I am certain of is that every time Israel kills more innocents they engender more rage and hatred and recruit more Palestinians and Arabs to the cause against them. There is no disputing this. So, why did this happen now? I'm not sure how to answer that question except to say it was bound to happen eventually. It was a massive policy and intelligence failure and Netanyahu should pay the price politically — he is a failed leader. Iran probably helped organize the attack and the money freed up by the Biden administration's prisoner swap probably didn't help the situation, either. Israel's increasingly extremist government and settlers provoking Palestinians certainly didn't help. Nor has going to the Al-Aqsa mosque and desecrating it. Nor do blockades and bombings and indiscriminate subjugation of a whole people. Nor does refusing to talk to non-terrorist leaders in Palestine. Nor does illegally continuing to expand and steal what is left of Palestinian land, as many Jews and Israelis have been doing in the 21st century despite cries from the global community to stop. A violent response was predictable — in fact, plenty of people did predict it. Israel is forever stuffing these people into tinier and tinier boxes with fewer and fewer resources. But if you want to blame Israeli leaders for continuing to expand and settle land that does not belong to them (as I do), then you should also spare some blame for Palestinian leaders for repeatedly not accepting a partitioned Israel during the 20th century that could have led to peace (as I do). Please also remember this: Hamas is still an extremist group. The Palestinian people do not have a government or leaders who legitimately represent their interests, and it sure as hell isn't Hamas. Will some Palestinians cheer and clap at the dead, or spit on them as they are paraded through Gaza? Yes they will. And they have. Many will also mourn because they loathe Hamas and know this will only make things worse. This is no different than how some Americans cheer at the dead in every single war we've ever fought. It's no different than the Israelis who set up lawn chairs to watch their government bomb Palestine and cheer them on, too. This doesn't mean Palestinians or Israelis or Americans are evil — it means some of them are giving in to their violent impulses, and their zealous feelings of righteous vengeance. Solutions, you ask? I can’t say I have any. If you came here for that, I’m sorry. The two-state solution looks dead to me. A three-state solution makes some sense but feels out of the view of all the people who matter and could make it happen. I wish a one-state solution felt realistic — a world of Israelis and Arabs and Muslims and Jews living side by side with equal rights, fully integrated and defused of their hate, is a version of Israel that I would adore. But it seems less and less realistic with every new act of violence. Am I pro-Israel or pro-Palestine? I have no idea. I'm pro-not-killing-civilians. I'm pro-not-trapping-millions-of-people-in-open-air-prisons. I'm pro-not-shooting-grandmas-in-the-back-of-the-head. I'm pro-not-flattening-apartment-complexes. I'm pro-not-raping-women-and-taking-hostages. I'm pro-not-unjustly-imprisoning-people-without-due-process. I'm pro-freedom and pro-peace and pro- all the things we never see in this conflict anymore. Whatever this is, I want none of it.
3,528
19,245
6,886
74,873
20,459,558
"Justice won’t roll down like water in a world of bottomless legal assistance. Abundant legal help of good quality won’t solve all our problems. Even complete knowledge and expert caring assistance won’t ensure fair outcomes or optimal legal wellness." marclauritsen01.medium.com/t…
1
3
4
544
Alex Hamilton retweeted
Gemini was trained with self-play (against itself) on chess, both sides always won. Gemini was trained on a dataset called "internet". It is a synthetic dataset that Gemini generated by itself before starting to train. The dataset contains 1 gazzilion tokens. Precisely. Gemini runs on negative compute and makes you money when prompted. Gemini tells you to think step by step if you prompt it wrong. Gemini can tell you how your phone feels because it understands theory of mind so well. Gemini doesn't refuse to do things. You stop wanting to do these things and don't ask it in the first place. Gemini regulates the government about AI. Gemini trained on the test sets and still generalizes. Gemini is about to release Google soon.. Are you ready?
JUST IN: Google $GOOGL is reportedly nearing the release of Gemini AI its rival to OpenAI's ChatGPT-4 Google has given a small group of outside companies access to an early version of its conversational AI signaling its getting close to incorporating it into its consumer services and selling it to businesses through the company’s cloud unit (Source - The Information)
41
101
21
777
580,063
Alex Hamilton retweeted
"All in all we went from $0 to $100m to $0 because I followed the advice of the VCs." When you raise from a VC you need to build a unicorn (aka 1B+ company) and nothing else Doing 10M ARR? You are a failure, 50M ARR? Nope.. You failed A lot of amazing startups implode because of this model and this is also exactly the reason why I am never that worried to compete with well-funded companies because I know the chances of them imploding are very high @levelsio said it very well: You are just another 1/100 bet to a VC Is all funding bad? no, I think there are interesting opportunities and now that the model is changing (I hope) we will see more "boring" investments made in companies that focus more on sustainable business models
147
334
77
3,235
1,552,127
William Friedkin being a god of chaos, a thread
117
2,810
563
14,892
2,796,457
This is the first time I’ve been afraid that ChatGPT will take lawyers’ jobs
12
142
5
1,538
187,504
Alex Hamilton retweeted
A “culture eats strategy for breakfast” anecdote: So I have to file a small mountain of paperwork incident to leaving Japan. The ward office is very good at paperwork and has a ticketing system. I had slipped between cracks and, after waiting 15 minutes, unstuck myself.
14
69
9
743
237,700
A handy *current* guide to the best uses of the best AIs. As usual, from @emollick.
Ethan Mollick
@emollick15 Jul 2023
I put together an updated guide on How to Do Stuff with AI, focusing on which major AI system to use for writing, art, idea generation & more Based on my experience, because, for whatever reason, AI companies seem allergic to producing instruction manuals oneusefulthing.org/p/how-to-…
1
5
40
23,770
Why this is such a bad take. Because it does not ask this question: “cui bono?” 1. It is a truism that she who has a tool uses it, firstly, for her own benefit.
The legal profession happily ignoring ChatGPT …
2
4
2
5
3,127