@AlcomaChris
Joined January 2023
Hello @grok Based on my posts, likes, and reposts, answer whether I am: Racist: Transphobic: Homophobic: Antisemitic: Ableist: Fatphobic: Misogynistic: Incel: Democrat supporter: Republican supporter: Xenophobic: Segregationist: Toxic: Normal:
2
114
Chrispy retweeted
Lindsay Clancy at her cell window seeing all her supporters with their kids
82
1,612
56
23,032
569,024
🎮 Steam accueille bientôt un simulateur de… grattage de testicules 😭 Ball Scratch Simulator est un jeu d'infiltration complètement absurde dont l'objectif est simple : se gratter discrètement les testicules dans des lieux publics sans se faire repérer. Plus les témoins sont nombreux, plus le défi est difficile. Il faut attendre que les gens détournent le regard, choisir le bon moment… et éviter que votre niveau de suspicion n'explose. Le développeur promet six environnements différents, des objets à débloquer, un système de score avec classements mondiaux et même un mode VR, où il faudra reproduire le geste en réalité virtuelle. Le jeu est annoncé pour ce mois-ci sur Steam.
955
6,197
2,438
54,786
8,646,911
I’m sorry this isn’t just the best video clip of the Covid era, this might be the best video clip in all of modern history.
240
690
105
11,764
1,161,450
Chrispy retweeted
😱OMG😱 Today, after seeing this video, I confirmed that cat has 9 lives 🤗
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This video has a Clideo.com watermark and circulated on AI accounts like stat.us.ai. Flagged as fake/AI on Reddit for unrealistic wire-walking, cartoonish puffed fur with no injury. Real electrocutions cause serious harm to cats. reddit.com/r/isthisAI/com… help.clideo.com/hc/en-us/artic… petmd.com/cat/conditions… instagram.com/reel/DQTEh3SEe…
1,272
3,103
382
32,982
3,102,979
تختلف الأشكااال بس العقليه واحده.. 😂😂
1,676
13,455
660
193,470
13,313,131
I have watched this more than 5x and counting 😊😊
603
4,520
295
23,836
2,620,148
Rest in peace - died doing what he loved
1
2
441
I'm continually amazed that we have reached a point where a movie can be both terrible and culturally significant, and people act as though this is some kind of paradox requiring a team of physicists. Conservatives aren't celebrating this film because they think, "Yes! Murder is the ideal public policy." They're celebrating it because it accidentally stumbled into exposing a problem that polite society has spent years pretending doesn't exist. First, it got you talking about selective excuses for crime. That's more public discussion than many serious reports have managed to generate. Europe, in particular, has spent years trying to smother this conversation under a mattress. You're surprised when someone lights the mattress on fire? Second, Germany banned it. Governments have spent centuries proving that if you want everyone to see something, the fastest way is to announce that nobody is allowed to see it. This is called the Streisand Effect, which governments somehow keep rediscovering like toddlers discovering electrical outlets. Third, revenge fantasies resonate with people who believe the justice system has stopped taking their suffering seriously. That doesn't mean revenge is good. It means people naturally fantasize about justice when they stop believing they'll ever get any. This is not exactly groundbreaking psychology. Finally (and this is the point you keep sailing past like it's a lighthouse) the movie is a warning, not a blueprint. When institutions stop enforcing justice fairly, people don't magically become enlightened philosophers. They don't all become Batman. They become unstable narcissists, psychopaths, gangs, militias, and warlords. History is practically one long documentary about this. So no, the lesson isn't "be like the psycho." The lesson is "stop creating the conditions where the psycho starts looking like the only guy who thinks anything is wrong." It's exhausting having to explain that depicting a disaster is not the same thing as endorsing it. If the justice system doesn't punish crime, then murder-by-psychopath becomes the only option. It's still a bad option.
Replying to @yesnicksearcy
Yo, imagine thinking you made a good point. Actually, your point proves mine. If you guys know that he’s obviously a psychopath, then why are many conservative pundits and outlets celebrating the film? If your example is the main character is proof of what happens when leftists take control, then you’re essentially justifying his actions. It makes you look stupid. Not me. You can’t even articulate a point without calling someone a name. That’s pathetic.
76
315
28
1,779
44,974
Chrispy retweeted
that first time experience hearing this score kick in im never moving on
66
1,805
195
24,282
1,273,343
Gross
tonight a man asked me out and i pretended i didn’t hear him so he had to repeat himself awkwardly and then i rejected him anyway
1
552
This theory about Obsession changed my whole perception of the movie
11
139
2,966
Chrispy retweeted
sidney prescott couldn't do this
76
678
47
26,229
4,678,013
Chrispy retweeted
He waited for him to finish his job😅 That’s respect 007👌🏻 #007firstlight
79
175
44
3,453
944,863
I finally saw Obsession last night AND IT WAS SO MUCH BETTER THAN EVEN THE HIGHEST REVIEWS
17
77
4
1,678
28,555
tldr: - no-name indie art director got paid net $6.7k for a month worth of work on the movie obsession - obsession was a low budget production but managed to be hugely successful and is projected to make $250 mil - no-name indie art director is crying that she should have gotten paid more i have a strong view on this: since the movie is so successful, the producer could VOLUNTARILY choose to give a nice bonus to everyone who worked on the movie, but this is at his own discretion and if he does not do that, it's completely fine a lot of employee level people cry that they don't get paid enough for their contribution to a project or company. they have no concept of risk. let me use an example from a private company: unless you are vc funded, the owner of the company takes his own after-tax savings to fund his company. that is a huge risk as over 90% of businesses fail as an employee, no matter how instrumental you are to the success of the company, you are getting a salary to provide your work. you are getting paid, you have no risk. risk is what justifies profit share, not "how much time you put into it", especially if you got paid for your time. if you work for free, you should get profit share, otherwise you are just a service provider it's actually a very prominent communist view that "the workers should own the means of production". it sounds nice in theory, if 10 people are producing the goods, they should all get their equal share, but this is simply not how the real world works, otherwise no one would take the huge risks involved in starting your own business, they would merely let someone else take the risk and then get their share of the profits but most artists who do commission work do not understand that. i think it's a mix of low iq and entitlement. i once worked with an artist and he created some work for me and i made A LOT OF MONEY from it, but i didn't even pay him a bonus either. i didn't like how entitled he was. also, he was completely replaceable, i came up with the concept, i directed him, he merely did the artistic part that i couldn't do but i could have hired anyone for that also, if you are actually capable, you will most often get paid. real recognise real, if i come across someone capable, i pay them what they are worth. most artists are not capable, they have low skills and that's why they get paid exactly what the market deems fair
41
42
6
547
88,418
They really left an unfinished VFX shot in #Punisher LOL😭😭😭
194
477
175
24,254
1,904,254
We've all experienced this. 😂
7
49
7
822
51,054