Manchester United | PL & European Football | YT/TT/IG: @adamjosephfootball | @nqatpod & @tplmufc đŸŽ™ïž | 📧 [email protected] | sponsored by @rainbetcom

đŸ“ș 🧠 🇩đŸ‡ș
Joined February 2012
Would a highly placed source at Manchester United call the club captain “toxic” after some relatively mild comments?! I have doubts. Indeed, I’d go as far as saying it’s bollocks. A fiction writer, with no record of actual exclusives, writes fiction without a care in the world.
3
1
21
1,828
Further on my last tweets, this is a prime example. What Bruno said has been ballooned into something it wasn’t. A “source” remarkably said the trigger word, like how convenient is that from an unnamed source?! But it will be lapped up. Was it ever said? Who knows. Who cares.
jamie jackson@JamieJackson___5h
theguardian.com/football/202
 “Toxic”: this is the damning characterisation of Bruno Fernandes from one highly placed Manchester United source after the captain’s incendiary betrayal of Michael Carrick
”
2
3
15
2,136
MBZ is the President of the UAE and Man City’s actual owner. The EAA’s administration of ADUG accounts proves that. He throws billions at anyone who can help build his global reach and influence. Kushner is just one example. Man City was always his sports-washing vehicle.
“In late spring 2020, a source I knew to be reliable called me with a story,” writes Matthew Cole. “The Dutch government had hacked into Jared Kushner’s phone and monitored him as he accessed a Dubai-based bank account. What was odd, the source said, was that the money in the account—hundreds of millions of dollars—had come from a bank in Azerbaijan. Most importantly, Kushner appeared to have transferred significant amounts of money from the Dubai account to other individuals, including a warlord, a mercenary and a one-time hit man. The story sounded preposterous, I told my source. And yet. Six months later, I found myself speaking with someone else about the UAE government and their use of mercenaries in conflicts around the Middle East and Africa when I asked, on a whim, whether they knew anything about Kushner and bank transfers from a UAE account. My acquaintance grew quiet. Then they replied, ‘Yes.’” Kushner’s lawyer denied the bank account existed. Read an exclusive excerpt from Cole’s book, ‘Princes and Thieves: Jared Kushner and Mohamed bin Zayed’s Secret Plot to Remake the Middle East’: vanityfair.visitlink.me/Q5_W

5
23
1
170
12,717
Adam retweeted
YOU SACKED THE MAN WHO WANTED HIM TWO YEARS AGO TO MOVE JASON WILCOX INTO HIS POSITION, SO WHAT WAS THE POINT?
🚹🚹💣 BREAKING!! Jason Wilcox is LEANING TOWARDS appointing Eddie Howe as Manchester United head coach if Michael Carrick is sacked! #MUFC [@alex_crook]
58
423
13
5,329
115,198
LMAOOOOOO
33
270
49
4,547
98,270
ANALYSE / Manchester United : un mal profond youtube.com/watch?v=bu208m3f
 Personne ne sait qui prenait les décisions lors du mercato estival, une direction jamais d'accord entre elle et un déficit pour la septiÚme année de suite... On peut parler des soucis entre Carrick et les joueurs, oui, mais il y a plus important : l'héritage des Glazer condamne United comme la politique d'INEOS Keep the faith !
8
128
12
550
63,841
Adam retweeted
Briefs specifically naming managers and with comments about them. Would almost be like they were already in contact like I stated during the international break. It’s a shame we are here yet again, but it is what it is.
29
48
879
30,570
Adam retweeted
Sheldon Miller
@SheldonMillerOct 21
Replying to @henrywinter
As a Forest fan, I have zero love for United. My two penneth is: their culture has been suffocated. First by the Glazers and further by Ratcliffe. United is being led by unlikeable, passionless, cynical and penny pinching characters. They set the tone and, like a waterfall, it flows down, through every channel and into every corner. They have sucked the life & soul out of that football club. It’s only their hardcore, longstanding fanbase keeping their identity alive and yet they are doing everything to get them gone with their draconian season ticket policies.
103
947
87
4,124
243,563
Adam retweeted
this weirdo has had an agenda on kobbie for months now, all just to defend ruben amorim. he's always trying to paint him in a bad light by indirectly hinting that he fakes injuries to avoid playing for the club hes been at since he was a kid. one of the strangest accounts on here
There’s a certain player who has been injured whenever his last two managers were close to being sacked Make of that what you will
45
148
4
1,846
48,787
The time’s come for him to go but respect for how he’s spoken in this interview after a defeat like that. Plenty have tried and failed. No hard feelings.
18
52
8
652
62,227
I know this isn’t very supportive of me as a supporter, but I can’t shake the sense that it’s embarrassing to our great history at this standard that this is the team the owners have equipped a manager with. It’s probably in fact an insult to our tradition in this competition.
59
98
9
812
23,979
One of the greatest club's in world football in financial ruin, and a never ending cycle of failure thanks to these fucking leeches. In debt to our eyeballs which is ALL on them. Years of mismanagement & running the club like a circus. Never ever forget who the real culprits are
98
720
42
3,927
63,544
This is an affront to the name of Manchester United.
468
1,294
89
10,119
352,162
We have no tourists, but we also have the highest legitimate revenue in world football. Which is it.
City don’t have an army of football tourists to occupy every empty seat when locals don’t go like the other big PL clubs. UCL group stage prices have nearly doubled in the last few years, wages have not. No football fans should be attacking other fans for taking a night off.
24
222
2
3,011
79,099
Seeing so much disinformation about the Man City case timeline. Especially from Talksport and its stooges. No-one outside the parties and independent judiciary knows the timeline because there are multiple processes and flexibility in how they are carried out. This is my hypothesis
 1) Man City launched Section X arbitration against the Commission and Appeal Board’s determination that the decision was a publishable “Final Award”. I suspect they will ask the Section X panel to postpone a sanctions hearing until after the appeal of the decision. And although I actually agree with City that the decision shouldn’t have been labelled a final award, I also suspect they will / have already lost. The rules are not in City’s favour and the bar is far too high for them to get a Section X panel to intervene. This is a dead end. Hopefully it’s already done. 2) The Independent Commission won’t wait for the Appeal Board when it comes to sanctioning. They have no reason to delay and they’ll be doing Man City no favours after the club tried to con them with a fake defence. I suspect we’ll hear sanctions in the November Intl Break. Any truly irreversible sanctions (such as match suspension or recommended expulsion) will be deferred until post-appeal. But a major points deduction will be applied immediately, especially given both precedent and the reality is it will stop City trying to delay the Appeal. I believe the sanctions will be issued before the appeal commences and will be rolled into it (so they’re appealing the decision and the sanctions, per normal) 3) The Appeal timeline will be varied from the standard timelines but with City on negative points, they’ll have no cause to delay it and we’ll hear an outcome before the end of the season. 4) Man City might seek a Section X appeal after that (we wouldn’t know) but all sanctions other than a recommendation to expel won’t be deferred further. They’ll take hold right after the appeal. 5) The PL will then charge Man City with another 100+ charges for 2018/19-2024/25 and offer them a settlement (which will likely involve the UAE selling up and the existing APTs taking a major haircut). Again - the above is all just a hypothesis. The actual way forward is not public. But now folks don’t need to ask me what I think anymore.
64
100
15
780
92,674
Replying to @utdreport
This is the ninth of 10 lifts from our article, with no link. It takes time, effort to produce this journalism. We want people to read in full context, please address this properly by clearly citing where you got this from. I’ve asked privately already. nytimes.com/athletic/7702847

63
339
18
6,107
379,007
This argument makes sense if there are only 60k City fans. It would be a lot to expect the same 60k people to spend that amount of money. But I thought Manchester was blue? I thought City generated more money than Real Madrid? Those lies don’t correlate with 20k empty seats đŸ‘đŸŒ
5 home matches in around a month. my seat cost a total of ÂŁ165 WITH season ticket and cup scheme discounts and BEFORE factoring in travel or if you go with your kid. in what world do you think a working class supporter base should be mocked for not affording to keep up with this?
28
76
1
1,073
30,436
Wider and wider

Financial Times
@FTOct 20
Audit regulator takes control of inquiry into Man City accounts ft.trib.al/cJnBcNz
18
62
735
111,869
The integrity of the season is already gone - thanks to Manchester City. Over a decade of English football has been a farce - thanks to Manchester City. The punishment should be far harsher than guaranteed relegation. youtube.com/watch?is=S3V-eeS

Interesting to see a lot of people so concerned about the integrity of the league welcoming the sort of deduction (probably a fair one, imo) that would turn all of City's games after it into a farce.
127
367
13
2,481
162,318
ball boy retrieving the balls from dalot crosses.
Next up: Como (A) in two days.
238
5,121
153
68,419
998,801