Acquisition and Seapower @ SASC | PPBE Reform matters | Make industrial mobilization cool again

Arlington, VA
Joined December 2018
Eric Lofgren retweeted
This, from the Walter Isaacson biography, is both an underrated aspect of SpaceX’s success, and the perfect example of why “cost plus” manufacturing (used by many aspects of US Government) is a terrible idea
64
363
56
3,115
696,744
Eric Lofgren retweeted
“@VenusAerospace has developed the world’s first liquid-propellant rotating detonation rocket engine (RDRE) with a double-digit percentage increase in efficiency over standard regular engines, making the #HypersonicEconomy possible,” -CEO Sassie Duggleby bit.ly/467gYmy
23
162
37
953
92,600
Even years into WWI, the UK's generals didn't understand the importance of machine guns, and Lloyd George had to force his generals to buy more than one machine gun per battalion. What technologies today do civilians need to force the DoD to take their assement of needs and "square it, multiply that result by two - and when you are in sight of that, double it again for good measure"?
14
6
2
74
73,825
Eric Lofgren retweeted
IMPORTANT update in the debate over future amphib production. DoD has shown Marines specific (rough) drawings w/ ideas for scaling down the ship to save money. Marines rejected them all, saying it makes the flight deck and vehicle stowage areas too small to support MEU operations
Marine Corps rejects Pentagon’s pitch for new amphibious ship designs defensenews.com/congress/202…
8
7
5
40
32,521
Eric Lofgren retweeted
#HASC Hearing on FY24 DoD Budget: Rep @RobWittman asks SecDef the questions about numbers & capacity. "Please tell the American people what we are going to do to mitigate the threat." @cgberube @ConsWahoo @Navy_Hipple @salisbot
5
4
16
5,122
F-35 aircraft availability rates by age, compared to F-22 and F-15E, via CBO cbo.gov/system/files/2023-02…
1
1
1
8
522
Israeli defense is serious about working with tech startups: “They want to succeed and make a profit. We want someone who is hungry, with lightning in their eyes.”  The Innofense program allows startups to keep their IP and pays them up-front. jpost.com/business-and-innov…
1
1
11
3,329
Awful that AFC was pushed aside by bureaucrats and told to focus on irrelevant 2040. Accelerate or lose. "To deliver capability by 2040 means fielding must begin in 2035, which means bending metal in 2030 and developing funding plans even earlier." defensenews.com/land/2023/02…
1
1
367
Skunk Works Kelly Johnson: "we will have nothing to do with [EVMS] in any concern with which I am connected." That's why he got engineering done, and why little is accomplished today.
Be sure to check out Kelly Johnson's advice on powerpoint here: flighttestfact.com/kelly-joh… #flighttest
1
4
13
1,511
Adm Hyman Rickover was given a converted ladies bathroom as his office and turned it into a source of pride. He said a person who focuses on the job can do it anywhere, dont need luxury getaways in Hawaii to think. That's the sign of caring about impact. Envy is a mind disease.
One picture that continuously for years takes my envy to another level is @dhh workspace
3
464
"We would sacrifice cost and performance for speed of delivery, which means I would accept a 70% solution that I paid too much for to get out to the battlefield faster so that I could get feedback on the problem... Over time, we would improve performance and reduce costs."
What it will take to deter China via @PeterANewell, CEO of @BMNT_Inc with @AcqTalk bit.ly/3HdP3Wi
1
1
6
1,557
Eric Lofgren retweeted
It genuinely fascinates me, how much more quickly things were done in the pre-computer age 1960s- on.ft.com/3JwOoCa via @FT
38
71
15
486
238,210
This is an amazing table of the cost overruns of mega projects Nuclear storage has a mean cost overrun of 238%, while with nuclear power its 120% Solar power has a mean cost overrun of 1% enr.com/articles/55774-oxfor…
122
759
165
2,307
531,841
Unfortunately opportunity cost is not auditable for irresponsible oversight. Markets rely on subjective use value and competition whereas DoD relies on objective money outlays and monopsony. Hard to reconcile without a paradigm shift.
Replying to @AJ_Piplica
The incentive structure is so ass-backwards - increase your costs, increase your profits. What legitimate business could ever grow with that strategy? Unfortunately, the answer is the majority of the current US Defense Industrial Base.
1
1
2
1,393
Check out the Merge pod and newsletter if you havent already!
Headline: The Merge ranks on Apple's podcast chart. Alternative headline: The Merge is the one podcast where everyone wins.
1
416
This chart captures the core of the DoD innovation/acquisitions culture problem. If you put yourself in the shoes of someone whose incentives and training make it so they only see the blue line then all the problems start to make sense. h/t @PeteModi
2
5
23
1,686
The 🇺🇸 government will spend $858,000,000,000 on defense in 2023. 4% of that will go to startups. Hundreds of founders are now building for the defense sector. From AI & autonomy to space & public safety, here's what this ecosystem looks like today👇 michaelxbloch.com/national-s…
16
47
17
287
59,298