Naming convention (=EO-189(=AQ-333))
Replying to @doomcrypt @xenocosmography
It gets complicated. The only name available for 1::0 would be "A", which fits since the first (and only) letter digitally reduces to 1, but for 2::1 the naming convention loses itself even more, L digitally reducing to 3.
Jesus incarnating into a Jew is, from a Gnostic perspective, extremely telling. Who is the God of the Jews? The God of this world. To the extent Jesus is separated from this world, from being at the right-hand of Yaldabaoth, from being a Jew, he is pure.
I have never seen any Black Gnostic (and or Gnostic Calvinist) speak of Abraxas. Of course, that Archon is the White Gnostic emblem par excellence (universal balance, energetic harmony, and the like).
Also, Abraxas = 666 (Based Atlantean)
I shall take the manuscript to Cornwall by foot myself, without shoes. No email.
Collapse Volume IX: Gnostic Calvinism.
This volume will of course include voices from maverick theologians who do not subscribe to the same interpretation of the term, which is the fun.
Fire and brimstone types correctly identify Annihilationism as too ideal for Hell, since if the damned are erased from the conditions of their damnation, themselves, they can't be said to suffer their punishment. Only God suffers from our complete absence in creation.
By the way:
Annihilationism = 36 (Based Atlantean Denovated).

















