me 🇮🇱 retweeted
🇪🇬🇮🇱 When it comes to Egypt's presidential rhetoric, Israelis should learn from their past mistakes... Actions speak louder than words.
My timeline is packed with posts from Israeli friends raving about Egyptian President El-Sisi's statements that he does not intend to go to war with Israel... Well!
🧨 1. Which peace are you talking about?
President El-Sisi is merely stating the obvious! Egypt cannot afford to go to war with Israel (at least for now). But does the absence of war necessarily mean that Egypt is genuinely at peace with Israel? Obviously not!
The anti-Israel indoctrination is still unashamedly happening at full speed. Just last week, Egypt celebrated the anniversary of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, with senior politicians and media publicly referring to Israel as "the Zionist enemy," while schools filmed students trampling the Israeli flag under their feet.
🇺🇸💰 2. It is the money, folks!
These assurances are not intended for Israel but for the United States. The sudden shift in Egypt's official rhetoric toward Israel, from hostility to friendliness, has little to do with Israel itself and everything to do with the military aid package Egypt is anticipating from Washington.
Just two weeks ago, the U.S. Secretary of State bypassed human rights restrictions to release the final $320 million portion of Egypt's military aid, explicitly citing Egypt's critical role as a regional mediator and security partner.
By publicly reaffirming Egypt's commitment to the peace treaty with Israel, El-Sisi effectively reinforces the U.S. administration's national security justification for releasing those funds. Otherwise, no money!
🗺️🪖 3. What is really happening on the ground?
Egyptian troops, accompanied by increasingly sophisticated Chinese military technology, are still mobilizing in Sinai, dangerously close to the Israeli border. And this military buildup shows no signs of stopping.
If Egypt does not consider Israel "an enemy," why does it need to continue expanding its military presence along Israel's borders? Against whom, exactly, is Egypt preparing to defend itself?
More importantly, China and its military technology are gaining unprecedented access to Israel's borders through Egypt, not through anyone else. This should concern Israeli security planners far more than El-Sisi's reassuring words should comfort them.
Actions speak louder than words!
🇮🇱🕊️🇪🇬 It is about time for full-fledged peace between Egypt and Israel, not cold peace, not peace conditional on the so-called Palestinian cause, and not rhetorical peace, not pragmatic relations, and not even politically enforced normalization, but a real, warm, and complete peaceful relationship. Egypt has to commit to that and take serious action to make it happen. Otherwise, these are just words and nothing but words.
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
One of the arguments you often hear from the Pro Palis, is how the Palestinians deserve a right to self determination. I don’t disagree with that but I have a question for the Pro Palis.
Why is it then that they turn down every opportunity they’ve had for it?
1937 Peel Commission, offering a small Jewish state and a larger Arab state. The Arabs said no.
1947, the UN Partition Plan, which would again have seen both a Jewish state and an Arab state. The Arabs said no and launched a war on the Jewish state as soon as it was established.
1967, land for peace conversations were met with the three no’s from the Arabs - no peace, no recognition, no negotiations.
2000, Camp David Summit and the Clinton Parameters. A state was offered and again the Arabs said no, and started the second intifada.
2008 Olmert offered a state, and again the offer was not accepted.
Kerry, Trump - multiple times in the last 90 years there have been opportunities for the Palestinians to have had self determination, and each of those opportunities has failed to materialize because of choices by the Arabs and the Palestinians.
But I still agree with the Pro Palis. The ongoing conflict is absolutely about self determination.
But it’s not because the Arabs don’t have it.
It’s because the Jews do.
And that’s not something the Arabs can accept.
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
Funny everyone writing back to this saying "antisemitism isn't antizionism" who don't realise the the word antisemitism was coined by a Jew hater, who said he doesn't hate the Jewish religion.
He created the term antisemitism to deflect from being called anti-jewish. Essentially doing exactly what antizionists are doing now.
20 hours after the story first broke out, Irish MSM realised they couldn't ignore it any longer and reported it (RTE).
The hotels reaction is very interesting to me. They aren't making a comment on it. They could say many things which may help their PR. They could deny it, or they could say they are investigating, hence pushing the problem down the line when people don't care as much (cough cough @AIGinsurance cough).
But they're not doing that. Instead, this hotel has decided not to comment. And this is very telling.
Herbert Park Hotel know that many people in Ireland will not care that a Jewish group was cancelled because they are fighting antisemitism. They know that the paddystinians will be straight into social media, smearing Jews as much as they can to discredit us.
They know this will be down voted on Irish reddit, will be filled with hateful comments towards Jews on Instagram and unfortunately, will be vilified in conversations across Ireland IRL.
Herbert Park has likely correctly identified that, in Ireland, you can discriminate against Jews, and then ignore it when called out, and get away with it Scott free. In fact, you might even be praised for it, which is happening as we speak.
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
In France 🇫🇷 women were not allowed to vote in national elections until 1945
In Switzerland 🇨🇭 women were not allowed to vote until 1971
In Sweden 🇸🇪 women were not allowed to vote until 1921
In the UK 🇬🇧 women could not vote until 1928.
In Israel 🇮🇱 and Zionist elections women have been voting since the first election in 1920.
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
Who was first? Palestinians or Jews? The answer is not 'either or'.
In the Egyptian Museum in Cairo stands a slab of black granite carved around 1208 BCE. Its hieroglyphs celebrate the victories of the pharaoh Mernepta: “Israel is laid waste; his seed is not.”
The display makes no mention that more than three thousand years ago, an Egyptian king who knew nothing of the Hebrew Bible recorded that a people called Israel was living in Canaan.
The modern pro-Islamist claim that Jews are latecomers is historically false. Numerous ancient records refute it.
Around 840 BCE, King Mesha of Moab carved a stone boasting of his war against Israel and naming the Israelite king, Omri.
A ninth-century BCE inscription found at Tel Dan refers to the “House of David.”
In 701 BCE, the Assyrian king Sennacherib recorded his siege of “Hezekiah the Judean” in Jerusalem.
These records are written by people with every reason to ignore Israel, that confirm that an Israelite and Judean people lived in the hills of Canaan for centuries before Rome existed.
The second claim is that Palestinians are an ancient people of the region, even older than Israel. This also fails.
The word Palestine is truly old, but it never referred to the people who carry that name today. Herodotus used Palaistinē in the fifth century BCE, and it comes from the Philistines, a seafaring people who arrived on the southern coast around 1200 BCE.
A 2019 study of ancient DNA from Ashkelon, published in Science Advances, found that the Philistines brought European-related ancestry with them, and that within two centuries it had been absorbed into the local population.
The Philistines disappeared after Babylon destroyed their cities around 604 BCE. Rome revived their name in about 135 CE, after crushing the Bar Kokhba revolt, and renamed the province of Judea as Syria Palaestina.
The Arab armies came in the 630s CE, some 1,800 years after Merneptah’s scribe carved the word Israel. They brought new rulers, a language, and a religion, and over the centuries most of the population adopted all three. What we call the distinctly Palestinian national identity arrived much later.
The Palestinian historian Rashid Khalidi, no friend of Zionism, dates its emergence in his book Palestinian Identity to the late Ottoman period and the early twentieth century.
Under the British Mandate, “Palestine” was attached to any group that lived in the region, including Christians, Muslims, and Jews, that the country’s leading English-language Jewish newspaper was called the Palestine Post.
It became the Jerusalem Post in 1950.
Modern genetic studies show that both Jews and Levantine Arabs, including Palestinians, carry substantial similar ancestry from ancient populations.
But historically, the Jewish people have an independently documented presence in that land going back more than three thousand years. Palestinians are, in large part, Arab descendants of the land’s long-term inhabitants, but their national identity is about a century old.
As to the claim of who lived in the land first, between Jews and Palestinians, the answer is not close.
Anyone who stands on a campus and calls the Jews of Israel foreign colonizers in their ancestral home is arguing with a granite slab in Cairo that names a Judean king in Jerusalem nearly 1,300 years before Muhammad was born.
Stones never lie.
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
If the Arabs had won the 1948 war, there would be no Israel, but also no Palestine.
Just a slightly bigger Egypt and a slightly bigger Jordan and they'd have found something else to hate and fight about.
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
At the end of the 1948 war, Arabs who stayed in Israel became citizens.
Jews who remained in the land taken by Jordan and Egypt were expelled or killed. None were left.
Only one side set out to clear its territory of the other people. It wasn’t Israel.
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
There is no genocide in Gaza. The people are not the target. Hamas is the target.
There would be no destruction in Gaza if not for October 7, and there would be far fewer casualties if Hamas terrorists fought like men, instead of starting a war by gunning down civilians and then hiding behind their own like cowards.
And it would have ended a long time ago had they cared about the cost of their refusal to release the hostages and surrender. But they don't care. They care far less about their own children than Israel does, which is why they have children carry their weapons through the streets, knowing Israel will abort their strikes when children are in view.
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
Anti-Zionist protesters and a lone counter-demonstrator at October 7 march in Manhattan
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
An EgyptAir pilot named Osama Mansour posted a video of an El Al aircraft in Italy, with a clip of a speech by Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in the background: "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and violence for violence".
After the warning signs raised by the Flydubai co-pilot who allegedly tried to crash a passenger plane, will countries in Europe and around the world continue allowing pilots with violent intentions to fly passenger aircraft?
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
Documentation of Hamas members filming themselves kidnapping Israeli civilians from their homes. Some were executed, while others were taken to Gaza.
October 7th, 2023.
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
Hey @grok is it true that most of Palestine land in 1947 was a Mewat dead land that legally belongs to no one but the state?
Over 75 senior retired 🇺🇸U.S. generals, admirals, and military lawyers have signed a new open letter rejecting claims that Israel committed genocide in Gaza.
The signatories include those who have commanded U.S. armed forces in combat, applying the laws of armed conflict.
Their conclusion: based on the facts and applicable legal standard, the conduct of Israel’s war against Hamas does not constitute genocide.
As the letter states, “Civilian deaths occurring during combat, however tragic, are insufficient, by themselves, to support a finding of genocidal intent.”
The standards used to judge military conduct matter precisely because war is tragic and imperfect.
“The precedent established today regarding Israel will shape the conditions under which American forces fight tomorrow. Protecting civilians and preserving the ability of our nation to defend itself requires us to defend the truth when the laws of war are being distorted to make false charges of genocide.”
This is not an argument for minimizing the suffering of civilians. It is an argument for applying the law faithfully and maintaining the distinctions that matter: between the tragic consequences of war, violations of the laws of armed conflict, and the specific crime of genocide.
Read the full open letter here: jinsa.org/open-letter-from-m…
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
This is what the Palestinians have done to Kibbutz Be’eri on October 7. They have murdered and kidnapped about 10% of the population. You see, attacking 21st century Jews comes with dire consequences. Bully them, and you will lose everything and everyone you ever had and loved.
me 🇮🇱 retweeted
Her last words were:
"I'm just a child. I have school tomorrow."
Liel Hetsroni💔
Burned to ashes by Gazans on #October7, alongside her twin brother and grandparents
#Neverforget
#Neverforgive


























