Brenda Hore retweeted
A young man asked Abdul-El Sayed if he would disavow the Muslim Brotherhood. The tense exchange has turned into a highlight for the Democratic Senate candidate in Michigan.
Here’s what happened: on.wsj.com/4i9sdBK
Brenda Hore retweeted
In 1957, a Russian immigrant published a novel of more than a thousand pages built around one question: what happens if the people who make the world run simply stop?
Its title is Atlas Shrugged. In France it's called La Grève, The Strike. It wasn't even translated into French until 2011. That tells you something.
This morning, I think Elon Musk wrote the sequel.
A. Where the book comes from.
Ayn Rand was born Alisa Rosenbaum in Saint Petersburg in 1905. As a teenager, she watched Bolshevik soldiers walk into her father's pharmacy and seize it in the name of the people. Her family lost everything. Not to a competitor. To a committee.
She fled to America in 1926 and spent the rest of her life writing about one distinction: those who create, and those who seize.
B. The story.
In Atlas Shrugged, America is sliding into decline. Not because of war. Because of rules. Year after year, a growing class of bureaucrats, regulators and planners decides that production must be controlled, shared "fairly," frozen. They never build anything. They issue directives. The worst one freezes every worker in his job and forces every inventor to hand over his patents for the public good.
And one by one, the people who make the country run start disappearing. The best engineers. The industrialists. The inventors. An oil man sets his own wells on fire before vanishing. The whole country keeps repeating a question it doesn't understand: "Who is John Galt?"
John Galt is the man behind the disappearances. He has convinced the creators to go on strike. They withdraw to a hidden valley in the Colorado mountains, where everyone keeps what they make and trades freely. And they let the world find out what it looks like without them.
The lights go out in New York. The grey men are left alone with their directives, and discover that a directive has never produced a single kilowatt.
C. The core idea.
The strike isn't about money. It's about consent.
Rand's insight is that the system that captures the creators runs on their cooperation. It needs them to keep producing so it has something to redistribute. The bureaucrat is a parasite who needs a host. Remove the host, and he's exposed as what he always was: useless.
D. What Musk just did.
This morning, Musk announced that next year he will give one of his own SpaceX shares to every kid in America. "The first of many."
Here's what's fascinating. It's the strike, run in reverse.
Rand's creators withdrew. Musk stays. He keeps building rockets, satellites, AI. But instead of walking away from the system, he walks around it. The value goes straight from the builder to the citizen. No ministry, no agency, no committee in the middle.
Rand had to make the creators disappear to prove the bureaucrats were useless. Musk doesn't need to disappear. He just needs to stop routing value through them. Same result. The grey men are left standing in the middle of a pipe nobody uses anymore.
E. The difference that changes everything.
Rand's strike has a flaw her critics never stopped pointing out: ordinary people are left behind. The creators retreat to their valley. The rest of the country sits in the dark.
Musk's version fixes that. He isn't taking the creators out of the world. He's bringing the world into the valley. Every kid in America becomes a shareholder in the machine. Not a spectator of the strike. A participant.
That's the alliance being formed right now: builders and citizens, directly, with nothing in between. And the only people who lose that deal are the ones who never built anything.
F. Why now, and not in 1957.
In Rand's time, the strike was a fantasy. You couldn't produce at scale without the state's permission, and you couldn't reach every citizen without its pipes.
In 2026, one founder can build rockets, run a global network from orbit, and pledge equity to 73 million children in a single post. AI will soon do in seconds what a ministry does in years. The tools of the strike finally exist. And they don't require anyone to leave.
G. The ending.
For seventy years, "Who is John Galt?" was a shrug. A way of saying nothing can be done.
In the book, the strike ends when the creators decide the road is clear and walk back into the world to rebuild it.
That's the scene we're watching. Not a man leaving. A man coming back, with a gift for every child.
The grey men are about to discover what Rand promised them seventy years ago: a world that no longer needs them.
I don't know if you realize what just happened.
Elon Musk is completely bypassing the State.
For 100 years, we've been told the problem is capital. That it must be captured, taxed, redistributed. With an army of intermediaries standing between those who create wealth and the people: ministries, agencies, commissions, bureaucrats.
Musk is doing the opposite. He's taking his capital and giving it directly to the people. One SpaceX share to every kid in America. Not a handout. Not a subsidy. A piece of the machine that's taking humanity to Mars.
And he says it himself: this is the first of many.
Mises understood this back in 1944: the bureaucrat creates nothing. He administers what others created, following rules that have no connection to the value produced. The day value flows directly from the one who creates it to the one who receives it, the bureaucrat has no function left.
That's what's being born right now. A new liberal world order, where the very concept of the State will make less and less sense.
The world we're entering is a world of abundance. AI, robots, energy, space. And that abundance won't come through the State, for one simple reason: we have a century of proof that it doesn't work.
Redistribution was version 1.0. Direct distribution of capital is 2.0.
While France is still debating how to tax builders even more, America is handing stock to its kids.
Pick your side.
Brenda Hore retweeted
The horrifying images from France should be a wake up call
We are in a war for our civilisation
Brenda Hore retweeted
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, who represents the Wainwright area, flew in after the deadly fire at CFB Wainwright: "There are acts of courage that are almost unimaginable. People who ran towards rather than away from the danger and are now paying a cruel price fighting for their lives in hospitals."
Brenda Hore retweeted
The Edmonton Oilers extend our heartfelt thoughts to all those impacted by the tragic events unfolding at CFB Wainwright, including Canadian Armed Forces members and their families, first responders, and all those providing care and support during this difficult time.
Brenda Hore retweeted
Pro-Hamas protesters block fire truck in Vancouver
Freedom Convoy protesters faced criminal prosecution in Ottawa, yet a Vancouver demonstration that blocked an emergency vehicle appeared to draw no immediate police intervention.
rebelne.ws/47LkyEZ
Brenda Hore retweeted
Encore plus d'immigration ?
Mark Carney est complètement déconnecté de la réalité.
Les conservateurs se battent pour mettre les Canadiens d’abord.
Signez pour soutenir notre plan pour arrêter les libéraux : conservateur.ca/cpc/reparez-…
Brenda Hore retweeted
"Everybody in this locker room is thinking about all the families and the tragedy that happened there. We're all behind you."
Following tonight's game, Zach Hyman sent his thoughts to those affected by the tragic events in Wainwright.
@Enterprise | #LetsGoOilers
Brenda Hore retweeted
Just a reminder that there is nothing wrong with being a masculine girl or a feminine boy.
There’s no wrong way to be either sex.
Drugs and surgeries are never required.
Western liberals imported the third world into France and other countries in the name of diversity and compassion. They ignored fundamental questions of assimilation and compatibility. They were told it would lead to this and they didn't listen.
I pray that France, a beautiful country of amazing people, will stop this madness before more of its landmarks burn.
And I hope Americans are paying attention. This is the future congressional Democrats seek for your country.
Brenda Hore retweeted
“This isn’t what we stand for!”
the liberal wine mom cries,
as the primitive invaders she once chanted “Refugees Welcome” for
teach her that not all cultures are created equal, and some are, in fact,
Retarded.
Brenda Hore retweeted
Mark Carney keeps telling us we live in a “dangerous and divided world” without acknowledging how we got here. Because if he did, fingers would be pointing right back at him.
Leading the Bank of Canada under Harper. Leading the Bank of England. Advising Trudeau. Working in the very circles that helped shape the world he is now warning us about.
You would think there would be a little humility. Perhaps even some embarrassment before asking citizens to trust him with more power.
If these “leaders” are so capable, why do their warnings keep getting darker while our lives get harder? Where are the results of all this supposed expertise? We are told to trust their leadership, yet somehow never to question where it has brought us.
I have come to the harsh conclusion that we keep expecting better outcomes from people whose priority is protecting their own positions and interests. Helping citizens become strong, free and prosperous is clearly not the priority. Instead, we are left paying more for public services that fail to serve the public, while those responsible expect our trust and treat us as the problem when we question their failures.
So what can you do in this “dangerous and divided world”? Stop assuming the government will take care of you. Judge its competence by its record, not its promises.
Take care of yourself, your family and your community. Ask questions. Think independently. Do not hand over your judgment simply because someone in power tells you to be afraid.
Look around and ask yourself. Are our streets safer? Are hospital waits shorter? Are classrooms less crowded? Is housing more affordable? Are groceries cheaper? Are you keeping more of what you earn? Are repeat violent offenders being kept off our streets? Is public money being spent responsibly? Are those in power answering your questions or dismissing you for asking?
Then ask yourself whether you want more of the same and why those failing us every day should be trusted with even more power.
Brenda Hore retweeted
French journalist Paul Amar:
“They came prepared. They had the addresses of town halls. They had addresses of Jewish shop owners.
In a street in Marseille, all businesses owned by Jews were set on fire. Businesses run by Muslims weren’t”
Brenda Hore retweeted
Mark Carney is putting a rush on Canada receiving many million voters from India thus ensuring a Liberal Government for eternity. There's no other way to describe this move. Mark looking out for Mark!
Brenda Hore retweeted
The 1977 case against Roman Polanski comes to mind. The famous Hollywood director was 43 years old when he was accused of six counts of raping a 13 year-old girl. Long before the days of #MeToo, the evidence was staggering and the accusations heavy, and included: "unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, rape by use of drugs, perversion, sodomy, a lewd and lascivious act upon a child under 14"… This sort of case could be — and SHOULD be — career-ending if proven true.
And it was true — Polanski did not deny having sex with the girl. He instead offered a plea, saying that while he did have sex with the underaged child, he did not drug her nor commit sodomy on her, hoping to lessen the charges against him. Polanski posted bail, and walked free. When he learned the judge was going to reject his plea and he might have to serve some serious time for his crime, Roman Polanski fled the country, leaving America and heading for Paris, France. He’s stayed there ever since, never again enterting America and avoiding countries that might extradite him. Polanski went on to direct many famous movies, such as the Acadamy Award winning The Pianist starring Adrien Brody.
There has been a lot of attempts over the years to rebuild Polanski’s reputation in Hollywood and rehabilate his broken image. One particularly infamous letter in support of him had a LOT of famous names signed on — Natalie Portman, for example. Darren Arronofsky. Woody Allen (of course!) and Harrison Ford, Monty Python’s Terry Gilliam… Monica Belucci, Martin Scorcese, Sam Mendes, the list is endless. Some of these names are disappointing. Others surprising due to the bare faced hypocrisy — Asia Argento being one of the actresses famous for bringing #MeToo to light, having accused Weinstein of abusing her. But when it’s a rapist you know and are fond of personally its different, isn’t it?
Many stars have come to Polanski’s aid in open letters and opinion pieces. Saying it is time to “forgive him”. Why such double standards? There was no forgiveness for others accused in the #MeToo era but being 89 years old and a beloved director, different rules seem to apply for Mr. Polanski. It’s why I cannot take Hollywood’s virtue signalling regarding abuse cases seriously at all.
Brenda Hore retweeted
Albertans vote Monday on Premier Danielle Smith's nine referendum questions. Yesterday, Prime Minister Mark Carney told voters "no to the nine." Today, with Smith beside him, he was asked about it several times and declined to answer.
Brenda Hore retweeted
Saint John, New Brunswick:
This man was caught dumping multiple bags of garbage at a playground and even threw some into the Saint John river.
We need harsh punishments for illegal dumping before Canada is turned into a third world country.





























