semi couch potato retweeted
Before William Penn founded Pennsylvania, he unintentionally got twelve jurors thrown in prison, helping to shape future American law.
In 1670 the 25-year-old Quaker stood trial in London for preaching to a street crowd. The Crown wanted a conviction. The jury denied it, finding only that he'd spoken in the street, not that he'd broken any assembly law.
The furious judge locked the jurors in a cell with no food, water or heat until they changed their minds. They came back Not Guilty. Again. And again. So he finally fined and jailed them too.
One of them, Edward Bushel, refused to pay and challenged his imprisonment. The Chief Justice ruled that a jury cannot be punished for its verdict, regardless of what the judge wants.
That principle crossed the ocean and became bedrock of American law: a jury answers to its conscience, not the state.
Not only did Penn give America a colony, he also helped give it a free jury.
Amen
I believe that the most pernicious and little-understood effect of 9/11 is the way it made so many Americans in political leadership positions grovel about Islam being a "religion of peace" so they could not be accused of "Islamophobia."
This, along with "we need to understand why they hate us" led to immigration policies that have allowed people who believe in Sharia, jihad and forced religious conversion at the point of a scimitar (and who treat women as chattel property) to capitalize on the openness and fairness of the American mind to impose their own sicknesses on our society.
As a result, you get a jihadist mayor laughing and smiling at the NYC 9/11 Commemoration and thousands of Minnesota Somalis literally stealing from American taxpayers and laughing about it.
All of humankind is CREATED equal, but not all cultures are created equal. Some cultures are monstrous abominations and have no place amidst our American Consitutional order.
On this day of all days, we need leaders who understand this and are willing to boldly speak truth.
31
semi couch potato retweeted
When November comes and you’re comfortable on the couch telling yourself one vote won’t make a difference, think back to the Lindsay Clancy trial.
semi couch potato retweeted
This looks like a photograph. It's not. It's an oil painting made in 1883 by Peder Mørk Mønsted.
It's called The Woodland Glade. Sunlight pours down through a high forest canopy and scatters across the ground in a thousand shifting patches of gold and shadow, each one placed with a precision that hardly seems possible for a human hand.
In his own day Mønsted was celebrated for exactly this. He was admired enough to travel the world and, in 1893, to be received as a personal guest of King George I of Greece, a king who had himself been born a Danish prince, painting the royal family and the countryside there.
But Mønsted had two misfortunes: he painted landscapes rather than important people, and he did it just as the art world was falling out of love with this kind of realism, deciding that all that loving exactitude had had its day.
So his name slipped almost entirely out of art history. And yet his paintings never stopped being loved: they circulate endlessly online, reposted by people who fall for a sunlit forest and, most of the time, have no idea who made it. The man has been forgotten, but the light he captured never has. Leonardo da Vinci once said it best: "A beautiful body perishes, but a work of art dies not."
semi couch potato retweeted
Replying to @PattyMurray
A mom cornered me in my classroom last spring. Not an angry one. A scared one. She wanted to know, from me, whether the measles shot was going to hurt her kid.
That woman was not afraid because of Donald Trump. She was afraid because for three years the people in lab coats looked her in the eye and lied. She remembers every one.
Who decimated trust in vaccines, Senator? THE SCIENCE did. Fauci did.
Get the shot, you will not get COVID. Wrong. Get the shot, you cannot spread it. Walensky, national TV, March 2021. Wrong. Masks do nothing. Then mandatory.
Then DOUBLE mask. Then Fauci admitted the first line was about the PPE supply, not you. Six feet. Fauci told the House subcommittee in January 2024 the rule "sort of just appeared." It APPEARED. Like a possum on the porch. Herd immunity is 60 to 70 percent. Then 75. Then 80 to 85. He told the New York Times in December 2020 he nudged it based on what he figured folks would swallow. Not science. Just muddying the water so it looks deep. Shut the schools. Reading scores took their worst beating since 1990. I teach those kids. I am still cleaning up that mess. You are not. No link between mRNA shots and myocarditis in teenage boys. CDC conceded the signal in June 2021. "Safe and effective for pregnant women." Said with a straight face while pregnant women were EXCLUDED from the trials.
Natural immunity? Does not count. Because reasons. Lab leak is a racist conspiracy theory. Facebook banned it. Today FBI and DOE lean the other way. NIH never funded gain-of-function in Wuhan. Then NIH mailed Congress a letter in October 2021 going, well, about that. Over 8,000 of my brothers and sisters in uniform were thrown out over a mandate Congress quietly repealed fourteen months later. Careers gone. Pensions gone. No apology.
Sure. All Trump. A private citizen in Florida with a golf cart.
You keep handing that man superpowers that would embarrass a comic book. What is next, he ghostwrote the CDC school reopening guidance himself... hold on, I am told that was Randi Weingarten's union emailing edits to CDC. My mistake.
Here is the number that ends this. Gallup. 2001: 94 percent said vaccinating kids was extremely or very important. December 2019: 84. July 2024: 69. Fifteen points off a cliff BEFORE RFK Jr. ever found the HHS parking lot. You cling to that Trump line the way a drunk clings to a lamppost. For support, not illumination.
The part you will not say out loud, so I will.
MMR is NOT the COVID shot. Two doses. 97 percent protection for life. Sixty years of data. I drew those up and gave them as an Army combat medic. Measles is immune amnesia, not a rash. 393 Pennsylvania cases. 70 hospitalized. That is not a talking point. That is two coffins in Lancaster County.
And that mother squints at a vaccine card because YOUR people jammed every needle on earth into one word, welded it to mandates and firings, then blacklisted anybody who raised a hand. Quinn's First Law: liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent. You demanded blind obedience. You got the worst measles year in 35 years. Bang-up job.
Quinn's Second Law: to know what liberals are doing, watch what they accuse conservatives of. You are blaming other people for wrecking vaccine confidence. Get a mirror, Senator.
You held the HELP gavel from 2021 to 2023. Oversight over the very agencies that ran that circus. What did you DO with it? Name ONE hearing where you pressed them on ONE reversal. One. All foam, no beer. You could not pour water out of a boot with the instructions stamped on the heel.
Trust is a bank account, not a hashtag. Your side overdrew it, and two families are paying the fee.
@JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks @TPUSA
LIKE this so the algorithm shows it to people who need it. SHARE it. COMMENT: which reversal broke YOUR trust first?
But what do I know. I am only a medically retired combat medic who actually gave the shots, and a science teacher who still has to explain to sixteen-year-olds why "trust me, I am the science" is not a citation.
#MAGA #Trump #Veterans
semi couch potato retweeted
After seeing this shared across social media for the past several months, my own words continue to hit home with me every single time.
semi couch potato retweeted
The pharmacy closed.
Not because of Amazon.
Because the same three men walked in and cleaned the aisles twice a month.
Diapers. Formula. Insulin. Behind the counter.
The owner filed reports. The DA declined charges. Twice.
Insurance dropped him after the fourth claim.
He sold the building to a check-cashing chain.
Now grandmothers in this town drive forty minutes for a metformin refill,
and the school bus route passes the boarded windows every morning.
Retail crime is not shoplifting.
It is an amputation performed on a town.
A pharmacist who worked forty years is stocking shelves at a big box now.
His name is on the wall of a chamber of commerce that meets in a closed building.
If the last drug store in your county went dark next month —
would "nonviolent" still sound accurate?
🤖 Made with AI
semi couch potato retweeted
Read my newest article. Homeless sweeps have become big business, but do nothing to help the homeless person. This whack-a-mole industry has been a boon to the Homeless industrial complex. open.substack.com/pub/trutho…
semi couch potato retweeted
“Nobody has the right to live their lives being protected from offense or from insults or from hurt feelings. It is an occupational hazard of living in society.”
— Ann Widdecombe
semi couch potato retweeted
J'ai regardé des centaines d'analyses sur le déclin de l'Occident. 99% finissent par tomber dans le même piège, et c'est le plus vieux piège de l'humanité : le bouc émissaire. Donnez-nous un nom, un visage, une famille, un milliardaire, une organisation. Le cerveau humain exige un coupable comme l'estomac exige du pain.
Girard a passé sa vie à documenter ce réflexe. Quand une communauté traverse une crise qu'elle ne comprend pas, elle ne cherche pas une explication : elle cherche une victime. Le sacrifice soulage, mais il ne soigne rien. Et voilà l'ironie suprême : les analystes anti-système qui hurlent un nom reproduisent le rituel le plus archaïque du système qu'ils prétendent combattre.
J'ai eu une chance rare : côtoyer beaucoup d'élites. Des fondateurs, des financiers, des politiques, des hauts fonctionnaires. De toutes origines, de toutes religions, de plusieurs continents. Et ma plus grande leçon, celle qui m'a d'abord glacé puis libéré, tient en une phrase : il n'y a aucun pilote dans l'avion.
Pas de cockpit. Pas de plan. Chacun dans la pièce croit que quelqu'un d'autre a le plan. Le régulateur de Bruxelles croit protéger les citoyens. La DRH qui déploie sa formation croit réparer une injustice. Le journaliste croit défendre la démocratie. Le militant croit sauver la planète. J'ai cherché le méchant de cinéma pendant des années. Je n'ai trouvé que des gens qui se lèvent le matin convaincus de faire le bien.
C.S. Lewis avait prévenu : de toutes les tyrannies, la plus oppressive est celle qui s'exerce sincèrement pour le bien de ses victimes. Car le bandit finit par dormir, mais ceux qui nous tourmentent pour notre bien ne s'arrêtent jamais : leur conscience les approuve.
Alors comment un système aussi destructeur peut-il exister sans concepteur ? Exactement comme une langue. Personne n'a conçu le français : des millions de locuteurs, des siècles, des emprunts, des fusions, et un ordre est apparu. Personne ne pilote une nuée d'étourneaux : dix mille oiseaux, des virages parfaits, zéro chef. Les idées fonctionnent pareil. Elles naissent séparées (une thèse de Foucault, un concept de Marcuse, une culpabilité puritaine américaine), elles fusionnent, elles mutent, elles se sélectionnent. Celles qui survivent ne sont pas les plus vraies : ce sont les plus contagieuses et les mieux défendues. Au bout de trois générations, ça donne un socle culturel que personne n'a choisi et que tout le monde respire.
Hayek a un mot pour ça : les ordres spontanés. Le résultat de l'action humaine, mais pas du dessein humain. Et voici le retournement que presque personne ne fait : le complotiste et le planificateur soviétique commettent exactement la même erreur. Tous les deux croient qu'un système complexe a forcément un pilote. L'un veut le démasquer, l'autre veut prendre sa place. Les deux n'ont rien compris à la complexité. Il n'y a pas de pilote à démasquer, et c'est précisément pour ça qu'il n'y a jamais eu de pilote à installer.
Soljenitsyne, depuis le Goulag, avait écrit la phrase définitive : la ligne qui sépare le bien du mal ne passe ni entre les États, ni entre les classes, ni entre les partis. Elle passe au milieu de chaque cœur humain. Celui qui ne cherche le mal que chez les autres a déjà perdu.
Et maintenant la bonne nouvelle, parce que c'en est une, immense.
S'il y avait un pilote, il faudrait un coup d'État, et vous n'y pouvez rien. Mais contre des idées ? Tout le monde peut tout. Une idée se réfute à un dîner. Se remplace dans une salle de classe. Se déloge dans un post, un livre, un film, un modèle d'IA. Le champ de bataille n'est pas un palais gardé : il est partout, dans chaque conversation, et chacun de nous y est déjà enrôlé.
On ne décapite pas un brouillard. On le dissipe. Avec de la lumière.
C'est pour ça que cette série attaque des idées, des livres, des dates, et jamais des hommes. Les hommes meurent, les idées restent. Foucault est mort en 1984 : son logiciel tourne encore. Pour tuer un logiciel, il n'y a qu'un moyen : écrire le meilleur programme.
Il n'y a pas de pilote dans l'avion. Alors prenez les commandes. Au travail.
semi couch potato retweeted
We remain committed to truth, faith & cultural clarity. Loyal, highly engaged audience proves the content resonates.
Transparency matters. Truth matters.
#SPLC #freespeech #transparency @elonmusk @Safety @Support
If you support fair platform distribution & open dialogue, please share this thread.
— @carolmswain
semi couch potato retweeted
Alright. I need everyone to look at this.
Not skim it. LOOK AT IT.
Because what happened in the last 24 hours on this platform is one of the most breathtaking displays of coordinated dishonesty I have ever seen from elected officials -- and I have been watching these people for a long time. I am a science teacher. I grade papers for a living. I know when someone copied.
They ALL copied.
Let me show you exactly what I mean.
@SenWarren: "safe and effective" @PattyMurray: "safe and effective" @RonWyden: "safe, full stop" @RepJohnLarson: "safe and effective. Full stop." @RepBeccaB: "safe and effective" @RepDelBene: "safe & effective" @RepGregStanton: "safe and effective" @SenatorHassan: "safely used for years" @SenatorHick: "safe and FDA approved" @TeamPelosi: "access to mifepristone" SenatorCantwell: "safe medication" SenMarkey: "SAFE and LEGAL" repdeliaramirez: "safe and reliable"
That is not a coincidence. That is a MEMO. Someone in the DNC wrote those words, sent them to every caucus member, and these supposed independent representatives of the American people just... pasted it in. Changed a word here. Added an exclamation point there. Slapped their name on it.
And then had the audacity to call YOU their constituent.
Here is the part that should make your blood boil regardless of where you stand on abortion: these people are telling you -- openly, demonstrably, provably -- that they either did not read the court ruling, are not smart enough to understand what they read, or are perfectly fine lying to your face because they think you are too stupid to check.
Pick one. Those are the only options.
Here is what the ruling ACTUALLY says -- you know, the document none of them apparently opened:
The Fifth Circuit issued a TEMPORARY STAY of the 2023 FDA rule change that allowed mifepristone to be mailed without any in-person medical visit. The drug is NOT BANNED. Not restricted from in-person dispensing. Not removed from any shelf anywhere. It is back to the rule that existed for TWENTY YEARS from 2000 to 2023 -- a rule that nobody called a "nationwide abortion ban" at the time because it was not one then and it is not one now.
The ruling was triggered by the FDA's OWN ADMISSION that the 2023 rule had "procedural deficits" and a "lack of adequate consideration." Biden's Autopen's own agency admitted it FAILED to adequately study whether mailing the drug without in-person oversight is safe. The court held the FDA to its own documented standards. That is not extremism. That is administrative law.
But sure. Tell your constituents it is a nationwide abortion ban. His dog's trying to teach him new tricks and getting nowhere.
Now. Let me go through the highlight reel.
@PattyMurray and @SenatorHassan and @RepGregStanton. Oh boy. Sen. Murray wrote "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." Sen. Hassan wrote "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." Rep. Stanton wrote -- I want you to read this carefully -- "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand."
WORD. FOR. WORD.
Three separate officials. Three separate states. One brain between them and they are sharing it on a rotating schedule. Isn't it dangerous to use your whole vocabulary in one sentence? Because apparently they only have the one.
@SenWarren decided that "a conservative court packed with Trump-appointed judges" was the headline -- except, Senator, one of the three judges on that panel is a George W. Bush appointee. That is a fact available to anyone who spent thirty seconds on the first page of the ruling. You did not spend thirty seconds. You spent zero seconds. And then reported to your constituents anyway. Running on dial-up in a fiber-optic world and mad at the court for having internet.
@RonWyden called it "a nationwide abortion ban." Full stop. Thirty years in the Senate. The man has been in that chamber since 1996. He has seen more legislation than most people have had hot meals. And his contribution to this moment is a tweet calling a mailing rule stay "a nationwide abortion ban." Thirty years of accumulated nothing. I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and poop out a more accurate legal summary than that.
@repdeliaramirez called for making "#RoeVWade the law of the land." In response to an Administrative Procedure Act ruling about an FDA mailing regulation. These are DIFFERENT CASES. Different courts. Different legal questions. Different decades. She does not even know what she is commenting on. More confused than a chameleon in a bag of Skittles and still found a way to get 2,000 retweets on it.
@RepBeccaB actually said -- and I quote -- "Whether it's taken at home or in a medical setting has no impact on that fact." No impact. The FDA's own label reports 2.9 to 4.6 percent of women prescribed mifepristone IN PERSON require emergency care. The court record explicitly states mailing without oversight INCREASES those risks. The setting has a documented, quantified, FDA-certified IMPACT on patient safety outcomes. She told her constituents the exact opposite of what the FDA's own documentation states. That is not a misunderstanding. That is a lie with a congressional letterhead.
@SenMarkey said "blocking access to it isn't about safety -- it's about control." Senator. The court's ENTIRE analysis -- all 18 pages -- was about safety. Specifically the FDA's own admission that it never adequately studied the mailing safety. The court cited the FDA's documented safety failures. You told Massachusetts the court ruling about safety is not about safety. I genuinely do not know what your problem is, but I am guessing it is hard to pronounce.
@TeamPelosi -- the former Speaker of the House of Representatives -- said Republicans "don't like birth control." Mifepristone is not a birth control medication. Birth control PREVENTS pregnancy. Mifepristone terminates an EXISTING pregnancy. These are pharmacologically and legally distinct categories that a Speaker of the House should be able to distinguish. The pilgarlic performance from someone who once wielded the Speaker's gavel is genuinely something to behold.
@amyklobuchar -- to be fair -- was the ONLY one who got close to accurate. She said "by mail" instead of inventing a ban. She gets half a point for basic literacy. The bar is subterranean and she barely cleared it but she cleared it. You bring everyone so much joy, Senator. You know, when you leave the room. But still.
@CAgovernor Gavin Newsom joined the party. Not a member of Congress -- a governor. But same talking points, same memo, same lies. Newsom is the same guy who apparently once said Governor Greg Abbott "doesn't have the backbone." Governor Abbott, for anyone who does not know, is paralyzed from the waist down due to a severed spine from a 1984 accident. Newsom has more nerve than spine, which is apparently the qualification for running California into the ground.
Here is the thing that keeps me up at night. Not the politics. The PATTERN.
If a CITIZEN lies to a member of Congress, that is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. Up to FIVE YEARS in federal prison. Substantial fines. That is what happens when YOU lie to THEM.
If a member of Congress lies to 335 MILLION citizens?
That is just a Friday.
And that Friday apparently comes with a DNC memo and a coordinated social media rollout and zero accountability whatsoever.
Trying to reason with some of these folks is like trying to baptize a cat. But I am going to keep doing it anyway -- because SOMEBODY has to drag these lies into the light, and I have tenure, a science background, and nothing but time.
@RepPressley @SenWarren @RoKhanna @PattyMurray @RonWyden @SenatorCantwell @SenatorHassan @RepJohnLarson @RepBeccaB @RepDelBene @RepGregStanton @amyklobuchar @repdeliaramirez @SenMarkey @SenatorHick @TeamPelosi @CAgovernor
You are all on record. Every lie. Every talking point. Every copy-pasted word.
And I am just getting started.
America was founded by geniuses. These people are proof the trend did not hold.
But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher and Army combat medic who read the 18-page ruling, can define arbitrary and capricious agency action, knows the difference between a mailing rule and an abortion ban, and understands that when fifteen elected officials post the SAME WORDS on the SAME DAY about a ruling NONE OF THEM CITED -- that is not democracy. That is a poltroon parade dressed up as representation.
IF THIS MADE YOU THINK: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this -- every single share matters. There is someone on your timeline right now being lied to by one of these names. COMMENT "YES" below if you want me to keep calling them out by name. One by one. With receipts. Because I have all of them.
JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. Subscribe to my account -- about the cost of a cup of coffee a month. Your support keeps this classroom open. And I promise I will never run out of material as long as the left keeps trying to out-dumb itself.
@JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
Let me add one more thing. And yes, I am going to repeat it. Because it is THAT important and some things deserve to be said twice.
Quinn's Law Number One: "Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent."
Read that again.
Every. Single. Time.
These fifteen officials told you they are fighting FOR women. They told you they are protecting women's health. They told you this ruling puts women's lives at risk.
But here is what they did not tell you -- because not one of them read the ruling.
The FDA's OWN safety label states that 2.9 to 4.6 percent of women prescribed mifepristone IN PERSON require emergency care. The court record -- the 18 pages none of them opened -- explicitly documents that mailing the drug WITHOUT in-person medical oversight INCREASES those emergency care risks. Louisiana showed $92,000 in Medicaid costs from real women who ended up in real emergency rooms from mifepristone complications in 2025 alone. Nearly 1,000 cases per month.
The court reinstated in-person oversight BECAUSE women were being harmed.
Let that land.
The ruling these members of Congress are calling an "attack on women" was issued BECAUSE women were getting hurt WITHOUT proper medical supervision. The in-person requirement they are screaming about EXISTS to make sure a doctor is present when complications occur. Reinstating it is not a war on women. It is a basic medical safety standard that these officials -- in their coordinated, memo-driven, copy-pasted outrage -- are actively fighting to REMOVE.
Quinn's Law Number One. They say they are protecting women. Their position, if it succeeded, would result in MORE women in emergency rooms with NO doctor present. The exact opposite of their stated intent. Every single time. Without exception. You could set a watch by it.
I want to say that one more time for the people in the back who are still reading the talking points memo instead of the court document.
THEY. ARE. FIGHTING. TO. REMOVE. MEDICAL. OVERSIGHT.
FOR WOMEN.
While telling you they are protecting women.
And here is the part that should stop you cold. Not one -- NOT ONE -- of the fifteen names I tagged in this post can tell you what a woman IS. Their party spent years insisting that only a biologist can define a woman. Well. I am a science teacher. I will do it for free.
A woman is an adult human female -- the sex of an organism that produces large gametes, organized around ovarian development and the reproductive anatomy that supports gestation. That definition comes from developmental biology, evolutionary biology, endocrinology, and medicine. It is in the textbooks. It is not controversial in any field that studies living organisms.
But ask @SenWarren. Ask @PattyMurray. Ask @RoKhanna. Ask @repdeliaramirez -- who cannot even identify which court case she is commenting on, let alone which biological category she is defending.
They cannot define a woman.
They cannot tell you what a woman is.
But they are absolutely certain -- CERTAIN -- that they know what is best for women's bodies, women's healthcare, and women's lives.
And they know it so thoroughly, so completely, so confidently, that they do not need to read the ruling. They do not need to check the FDA's own safety data. They do not need to acknowledge the real women in Louisiana emergency rooms. They do not need to define their terms. They just need the memo. Paste it in. Hit send. Collect the fundraising email donations that go out twenty minutes later.
That is not advocacy. That is not protection. That is not fighting for anyone.
That is using women as a political prop by people who cannot even name what a woman is -- while simultaneously fighting to strip away the medical supervision that exists specifically to keep women safe.
Quinn's Law Number One. The exact opposite. Every time.
I am a science teacher. I have spent my career explaining how the natural world actually works rather than how people wish it worked. Reality does not care about your talking points. Biology does not care about your memo. And the women in those Louisiana emergency rooms do not care about your fundraising email.
The truth is the truth whether or not fifteen members of Congress choose to read it.
But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher who can define a woman, read a court brief, interpret FDA safety data, and identify when the people claiming to protect someone are actively making the situation more dangerous for that someone. Apparently a rare combination on Capitol Hill.
Comment YES below if you want me to keep going. Because I have more names, more lies, and more receipts than they have talking points.
@JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
As a human being and retired healthcare worker, I don’t have words to adequately convey my disgust at this vile behavior. I hope she loses her license and that the VCU Compliance and Privacy officers open their own investigations. The screws on her moral compass were so loose that I would not put it past her to access charts with no medical need to do so, enter false documentation or bill inappropriately.
Meet Melinda, a healthcare worker at @VCUHealth. She posted a series of videos encouraging people to inject ICE agents with succinylocholine, a temporary paralysis drug, and spray poison on them. She also encourages woman to go on dates with agents and drug their food.
Any comment @VCUHealth? How can you have such a vile person working with patients? How can anyone feel safe at your facilities if you employ such people?
1
124
Over 50 years ago my HS librarian read to the library volunteers (I was one) a speech published in a magazine called , I think, Great Speeches. It was a reflection on the fall of the Roman Empire but with application to the modern era. I believe it was intended to be a warning that even the United States is not immune to internally destructive forces. The lesson stuck with me somehow and I really wish I could find and re-read the original speech.
Now, decades later, I find myself wondering if we are in the period the author warned about. I personally tilt right on political issues but I don’t identify as MAGA. There is much the Trump administration does that I agree with and much on which the jury in my mind has not yet made a decision.
I have made a conscious effort to look for and consider those voices with whom I disagree in an effort to not get caught up in the rah-rah behavior on the right. I find I have limited tolerance for listening though once the words white privilege, Nazi, racist, homophobe enter the discussion. Not inclined to listen either when retard, treason, 3(or 4,5,6) D chess get tossed around.
We are living through a moment where a group of people do not just disagree, they do not even acknowledge a shared fundamental reality.
There is no common frame of reference, no mutual set of facts from which discourse can even begin. They can watch the same video, from multiple angles, and walk away convinced they saw a completely different event.
They exist inside a narrative so deeply entrenched that to question it, to even acknowledge a contradiction, is to commit some sort of ideological treason.
This is a deliberate, conditioned immunity to contradiction. It is a cultivated resistance to evidence. They have developed a mind so thoroughly welded to its chosen reality that it will alter, discard, or fabricate whatever it must to maintain coherence.
They can be shown, in real time, the unraveling of their worldview, and they will patch over the holes with fantasy rather than face any doubt whatsoever.
Politics has turned knowledge itself into a partisan weapon. The expectation is no longer to seek truth, but to defend your team at all costs.
There is a lingering obligation to have an opinion on everything, to be informed at all times, to adopt the correct stance. And so, they improvise. They adopt prefabricated opinions handed down by their faction. They fill in the gaps with instinctive loyalty rather than demonstrating any semblance of independent thought.
The game is rigged, and they know it. Two parties, two choices, two sides that everyone is herded into, and neither is worth the loyalty demanded of them.
But to acknowledge this would be to admit powerlessness, to admit that they are trapped in an illusion of choice. So they cope. They retroactively justify their allegiance by turning their side into something righteous, infallible, and necessary. The alternative is too terrifying.
It is a coping mechanism turned mass psychosis. And it is escalating. When reality itself is dictated by allegiance, when loyalty outranks reason, when every fact must be bent into submission to fit the tribe’s chosen narrative, the outcome is inevitable: war.
When factions exist in separate realities, they cannot coexist. They cannot negotiate, they cannot reason, they cannot even comprehend the other side as anything but a threat.
This is irreconcilable. We cannot function like this. A society cannot sustain itself when its people are no longer individuals but ideological husks, possessed by abstractions, fighting battles for masters who do not even know their names.
You are not your faction. You are not your party. You are not an extension of a collective mind.
The moment you outsource your thinking, the moment you allow yourself to believe that your side must be right because the alternative is unbearable, you have ceased to be an individual. You have become another interchangeable pawn in a game that does not need you to think, only to obey.
Wake up. This war for reality is not one you want to be drafted into.
50
semi couch potato retweeted
Fun fact: The Declaration of Independence is the purist creed.
The Constitution is the realpolitik compromise, built for a flawed world.
Here’s the distinction.
The Declaration lays down first principles: natural rights, consent of the governed, the ends of government, and the conditions under which legitimacy breaks. It justifies revolution when authority becomes destructive, but it does not explain how a society governs itself day to day.
As a revolutionary manifesto drafted primarily by Jefferson in 1776, it proclaims “self-evident” truths like “all men are created equal” and unalienable rights to “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” It is not a blueprint. It judges power; it does not run it. It reads like an indictment because it is one: a list of grievances meant to rally support, justify separation, and make the moral case to the world. That crispness is why it feels like a creed.
The Constitution is what happened when those ideals met reality.
After the Articles of Confederation exposed the failure modes, weak revenue, poor coordination, interstate friction, and a national government that could not act reliably, the founders moved from proclamation to design. They built a framework for a diverse republic full of ambition and rivalry: offices, powers, limits, procedures, enforcement, federalism, and amendment rules. Not because they distrusted ideals, but because they distrusted human nature.
This is the game-theory part. You do not assume virtue. You assume competition. So you build incentives and chokepoints. You divide power so no one can easily monopolize it. You force factions to bargain. You make it hard for any coalition to lock in permanent control. Madison says it plainly in Federalist 51: “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”
And yep, it is compromise incarnate. Admirable compromises like the Great Compromise that made representation workable. Practical compromises over federal and state power. Also ugly compromises tolerated to secure ratification, including slavery-related bargains. That is what realpolitik means here. Not pretty, not pure, but built to hold together, imperfectly, in its time.
So the contrast is simple.
The Declaration states the ideal.
The Constitution builds a system that can keep going even when the people inside it are flawed.
semi couch potato retweeted
Today, it is common for many to use false stories to virtue signal, then unleash the most unvirtuous attacks. They are doing precisely what they accuse ICE of doing. They are using this five-year-old as bait — clickbait — to fuel protests and outrage. thehill.com/opinion/immigrat…






























