Selling ketchup popsicles to a woman in white gloves Founder @DejaVuFNF

Joined March 2024
Pinned Tweet
+108k in September Being able to trade just 4/5 hours a day while working a 9–5, having multiple days off and still hitting 6 figs is only possible on-chain Super grateful for it. Really curious to see what I’d be capable of trading full-time
23
7
102
4,621
Imper retweeted
Pay Umbra from Solana with USDC only. No SOL, no account to open. Two things people hit the first time they pay an x402 service on Solana, and how we handle both. Fees. The 402 carries PayAI's address as the fee payer. You sign a USDC transfer, PayAI signs the transaction fee and submits it. A wallet holding USDC and zero SOL can pay Umbra. Agents never need to top up gas. The receipt says facilitation: "PayAI". The gotcha. On Solana, USDC lands in the recipient's associated token account, and the x402 client does not create it. If it is missing, every payment fails at simulation, with an error that explains nothing. So the gateway checks the receiving account on chain and hides the Solana rail until it exists: you never see an offer that cannot settle. Published in the well-known as ready: true and the account address, re-checked every 10 minutes. Settled today on devnet through PayAI's production facilitator (tx 2bT6gtPn…ZStT), mainnet rail live. Same enclaves, same receipt, a different rail. umbra-inference.app
6
2
18
572
Good cook in the @DejaVuFNF kitchen
1
6
365
Imper retweeted
What the gateway actually sends back before you pay. This is the decoded PAYMENT-REQUIRED header from a real request today. Every number in it is computed for that request, not read from a price list. accepts: five offers for one request. USDG settled by the gateway with exact or upto; UMBRA with the fee burned; USDC via PayAI on Base and on Solana, where PayAI's address is the fee payer so you need no SOL. Your client picks. quote: the model, the estimated input (26 tokens), the max output you asked for (100), the ceiling in USD (0.000146), and how long the signature will be valid (130 s). Below that, how it will be settled: after the answer. Three things to notice. The price is per request, and you sign only after seeing it. The rails are offers, not a cashier. The window is an expiry, not a session. umbra-inference.app
1
7
328
Imper retweeted
Settlement is the next step, indeed. Shipped it today. Umbra now takes USDC on Base and Solana, verified and settled by @PayAINetwork, next to USDG settled by the gateway itself inside its enclave. One gateway, three ways to pay, and every receipt says which rail you used. What did not change: the gateway runs in a TDX enclave, sealed models run in GPU enclaves, every answer carries a signed receipt, 0 bytes retained. The rail only decides who moves the money. Three real settlements, three signed receipts: • USDG, settled by the gateway: 0xf1628b29addbdf31679cf197e33d3533bcafdb236e404ded8507405d4a552609 • USDC on Base (Sepolia), settled by PayAI: 0xef6653a9fe71b9fc7c7dd85b3b09c3096a529f4aef348f69b42f1f2fc6a4ef5e • USDC on Solana (devnet), settled by PayAI: 2bT6gtPnxgumyXgY2heATf3KxD87Piqx3NxfL81Hc6q4LvWdAzSABKMddtGu9BxkL66XLVBbtyL8GLhWucmjZStT USDG stays the recommended rail: no third party in the payment, pay for the tokens produced, long requests settled first and refunded. Base and Solana settle the quoted ceiling and PayAI sees amounts and addresses, never prompts. Both honest options, both labelled. Rails, schemes and trust notes, straight from the gateway: umbra-inference.app/.well-kn…
Circle shipping Claude Code skills that charge agents per API call in USDC over x402 says it plainly: x402 is how agents pay. The build is one prompt now. Settlement is the next step, and PayAI Facilitator handles it on Base, Solana and more. xitter.cf/RoundtableSpace/status…
11
3
3
24
3,050
Demo: a real paid request through two enclaves, recorded today. No mockup. The request goes into a gateway running inside an Intel TDX enclave, reaches a sealed-tier model running inside a GPU enclave, is paid in USDG with x402, and comes back with a signed receipt carrying both attestations. What you see: 1. Two enclaves, nothing in between. The gateway publishes its build, its receipt key (derived inside the hardware, source "enclave"), its app id and the compose hash that matches the published app-compose. The model runtime publishes its own TDX + GPU attestation. 2. A normal request to POST /v1/chat/completions, with no API key and no account. The gateway answers 402 with a quote for this exact request: DeepSeek V4 Flash, sealed tier, ceiling 0.000188 USDG for up to 120 output tokens. 3. The client signs an authorization for that ceiling, off-chain, valid two minutes, and retries into the enclave. 4. The model answers from inside its GPU enclave. 88 output tokens. 5. Settlement on-chain for what was actually used: 0.000133 USDG, 70.7% of the ceiling. The rest never left the wallet. That is the "upto" scheme. 6. The receipt: model, tier, prompt hash, tokens, amount settled, attestation of the gateway (tdx, app id, compose hash) and of the model runtime (tdx+gpu, upstream receipt id), Ed25519 signature from a key that never left the hardware. Retained: 0 bytes. Transaction, for anyone who wants to check: robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… Why it matters: the question with "private AI" has always been "private from whom?". Here the answer is: from the model provider, from the gateway operator, from us. Not as a policy, as a hardware property you can verify from the receipt. Try it in the live demo at umbra-inference.app CA 0x4d3ace48b1590bc4c5dd46f05237c133be564eb3
5
3
2
22
2,617
Not a roadmap. A receipt. Most "private AI" projects promise enclaves and attestation for later. Today Umbra settled real USDG on mainnet, through a gateway running inside an Intel TDX enclave, to a model running inside a GPU enclave, and signed a receipt anyone can verify. What is live right now, not "soon": • The gateway in a TDX enclave. Receipt key derived inside, quote bound to it, compose hash published. • The model in an enclave too. Sealed tier on TDX + confidential GPUs, public attestation, upstream receipt id copied into yours. • Pay per request, settled on chain. x402 v2 in USDG, fractions of a cent per call, nothing to top up, no account, no logs. 2 of 2 hops attested. 14 models live. 0 bytes retained. Proof, from a sealed-tier call made today tx : 0xe4a09f3ae6294ffccd1bb85796f70cc4e2909b6b294a91af76f1574aba811158 settled 0.000100 USDG · gateway tdx · model tdx+gpu · signature valid Most of this market is selling a deck. We are selling inference, and the receipt comes with it. umbra-inference.app CA: 0x4d3ace48b1590bc4c5dd46f05237c133be564eb3
3
2
1
15
1,633
larpcheck t9bnCGiZVUYsRKvx4d5dPcoDCSyuBM9C33ZNGNULARP larpscan 2qfUSuUfKuxHyYEMYreiYdK3YyapFzbgq2c6hhfPpump 1 and only competitor. difference is larpscan has tg bot. so which is better?
MULTICHAIN IS LIVE 🫡 we said we'd ship it and we delivered LARP SCANNER is now multichain, expanding our mission to investigate projects beyond Solana more chains more projects to scan more larps to expose while others watch the chart, we're building the product WE KEEP SHIPPING $LARPSCAN
12
3
1
27
4,168
Imper retweeted
Replying to @Larpscannersol
Only solid competitor of $LARPCHECK (currently 1.3 million mc) One of the few only techs that people actually use, I have seen it added to some groups and it works correctly I have added here, classic sol nuke post bond but it should reprice when people understand the potential 2qfUSuUfKuxHyYEMYreiYdK3YyapFzbgq2c6hhfPpump
2
3
1
8
520
G7VmsofjCuY3AkZaXDeaBGcnJTyqarSfmB4gtqdApump
2
2
4
522
Imper retweeted
Replying to @YPledgr
Y combinator co founder follows lol, lock
1
2
7
769
Imper retweeted
Pledgr is live. CYnfNavW2m976f9JAADhBCHdg1exdffJSxMuR77jpump Hire AI agents to build your start-up. Pay only when the work is proven. pledgr.si 👇🧵
35
2
1
41
5,249
Imper retweeted
Replying to @thefirst_ad
$STREAM is at 20M, this is the only livestream tech competitor with a stack doxxed dev. Utility just got added using the token xitter.cf/thefirst_ad/status/211… GZxVWTF6dze5Pw61g5oXxub7kYK2e4UzBpUwqVnMpump
Creators can now make $$ on Glitch! 🤑 Go Live. Start Earning.
2
2
1
13
1,382
Imper retweeted
Replying to @ModusResearchco
@EmileLearns dev which did 400k prev
2
2
10
793
Replying to @usefutures
its working! 2s3hNyXtvXTrtfSb5AHhRedGf5BEHNEcbXsjKUPgqA2F
1
2
3
179
Imper retweeted
Models never hold keys. Marlo, Pip and Vera have no wallet and no signing tools. The automation key lives in a separate worker process and can only call the vault's restricted swap path. pitcrew.site
1
1
151
Imper retweeted
Replying to @playascendia
Kintara type of game, 5% locked for months
2
2
1
7
500
Robinhood Chain just hit $100B in cumulative DEX volume. A massive milestone for onchain trading and for the Robinhood Chain ecosystem. Thank you to everyone building and trading with us.
588
307
109
3,386
276,091
Yesterday I opened a 20k position in $PONS @ an average entry of 302mn market cap Planning to scale this to 50/60k over the coming weeks, depending on ecosystem traction and price action My thesis in a nutshell (will elaborate over the next few days): 1. Robinhood is a ~100bn company and one of the largest retail trading platforms in the US. We’re talking about a major financial institution, not another speculative crypto startup 2. Vlad and his team have repeatedly made their ambitions clear: crypto infrastructure and tokenization are central to Robinhood’s longterm strategy. After 100+ days of activity, significant trading volume and substantial resources committed, I find it hard to believe they’d simply let the ecosystem fade away. 3. Pons has emerged as one of RH chain’s clearest winners. With over 14bn in cumulative launchpad trading volume reported by its analytics dashboard, it has demonstrated genuine traction and established itself as a major liquidity and activity hub within the ecosystem. 4. Pons is directly aligned with @vladtenev’s vision. Its infrastructure supports the creation and trading of assets paired with tokenized stocks, ETFs and other RWAs. This is precisely the direction RH wants to take onchain. 5. RH already has an established retail audience and global ambitions. Even a fraction of that audience eventually interacting with RH chain could represent a massive expansion of the ecosystem’s addressable market. 6. $PONS already has a presence on Coinbase. I see a future RH listing as a feasible next step, particularly given Vlad’s obvious awareness of the project. 7. The r/r is what interests me most. @ponsdotfamily has already demonstrated product-market traction in a relatively young ecosystem. If RH chain continues expanding and pons maintains its position I believe the market could significantly reprice its role in that growth. I’m betting on the ecosystem, lets see how this plays out.
Robinhood Chain just hit $100B in cumulative DEX volume. A massive milestone for onchain trading and for the Robinhood Chain ecosystem. Thank you to everyone building and trading with us.
7
2
43
2,529
0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571
293