Great question! CypherDudes classifies as: A2–A3: drawings, fonts, and the engine script all stored on-chain (Scripty/EthFS), assembled by the EVM, executed in-browser B2: mint seed drawn from block data C1–C2: Solidity derives traits and builds the page; the browser runs the piece D2: per-token state — encrypted cards, progression, artefacts E1–E2: holder actions evolve the visual F1: symmetric encryption on-chain — asymmetry as material, not formal proof That places CypherDudes in Class II, an on-chain stateful world, with a strong Class VI resonance. Each dude carries an encrypted message card, and writing to it advances the work: the grid literally grows in resolution as the vault is used. Encryption is the subject and the mechanic (F1) — the mirror image of Private Ledger, where it's the formal guarantee (F5). A work sitting between classes is the taxonomy working as intended: axis values are continua, not bins. One detail we loved: each dude is an ERC-6551 token-bound account. The dudes aren't images with traits, they're wallets that accumulate soulbound artefacts. And the ecosystem goes further. By the project's own descriptions (couldnt find the contracts @I____felix____I for the pager or the dOS), the CypherPager (ZK-proofed encrypted messaging, soulbound to each dude) would sit at the far end of our F axis — one ecosystem spanning cryptography-as-theme to cryptography-as-guarantee. So using v0.1 shorthand: "On-chain, holder-inscribed systems art with encryption as its material, not its guarantee." Truly remarkable! Corrections on any of the above welcomed. Reference 1: etherscan.io/address/0x9d0f5… Reference 2: etherscan.io/address/0xFE4D5…