We’re segregating speech now 😂😂 def setting us back a hundred years.

Why would I answer any of your questions if all you’ve done so far is just do anything in your power to avoiding providing a rebuttal to my point. If you don’t want to debate in good faith that’s on you bro. Have the day you deserve.

I mean I’m just repeating my same point over and over. This is like you’re 7th attempt to redirect the argument, change the premise, and evade having to rebut my point.

Okay cool so then you would support induction of labor abortions.

Hard on for straw mans today? My point was consent to an action doesn’t mean you consent to every single consequence of that action.

Okay then what was your intention in bringing up consensual sex. If not to map consent to sex as consent to any and all consequences of that action. Stop being intentionally dense. I guess it’s nice to waste time when u don’t have a real point and can’t refute mine.

Ahhh here come the ad hominems. It’s beautiful when a bigot realizes his or her own stupidity.

Nope, nice straw man attempt tho. I’m using your logic against you. You’re the one arguing that consent to an action means you consent to all potential consequences of that action.

Oh okay so you’re saying the pregnancy is consensual because the act preceding it was consensual. Alright then explain to me how the mugging wasn’t consensual. You consented to walking down the street. Or is there a different way to get mugged on the street💀.

It’s on you to show how it is consensual so please explain.

Wait till he hears about the 9th amendment.

Is an unwanted/unplanned pregnancy consensual? Let me help you out. Focus on the words “unplanned and unwanted”

You decided to walk home on Tuesday? You got mugged? “Can’t deal with the consequences of that decision, you best be very careful.” It’s almost like consenting to an action doesn’t mean you consent to the consequences.

And the hypothetical victim now requires a kidney because of the defendant’s decision to be reckless. “Can’t deal with the consequences of thar decision, you best be very careful” 😂😂😂

(2) It seems like you have a more libertarian bend than conservative so I suggest you read Judith Jarvis Thomson.

To your fibroid question size wise yeah they’re comparable in the early stages. Secondly I agree that life begins at conception and it doesn’t matter if it’s a life nobody can be compelled to use their organs to keep another person alive. That’s it.

I mean if we can’t even agree that the FBI can’t count the number of violent crimes that happen what’s the point of even continuing. Here are the attacks listed more obvious on DOJ website. justice.gov/crt/recent-cases… All that the NAF did was do stats on raw data 💀

I’ll rephrase. Does your “do what you want” extend to the woman being able to control what occupies the uterus? .

Okay I’ll give you the primary source then. Unless the fbi is now also a left wing source 💀 fbi.gov/file-repository/fbi-…

Does deciding who or what occupies or not in the woman’s control. That would be a hot take since that means also have to live with fibroids and other masses as well. Very hot take.