@emperorjournal_ members Siggy Architect at @ritualnet

Joined May 2019
The first LST Protocol by Ritual community is officially in the works. Right now, the gates are open to mint your Access Pass NFT. Only 200 spots available for this early phase. Will I add more? Who knows. lol. This NFT is your golden ticket to Ritual Staking. Secure yours while we wait for the Ritual testnet network updates. mint here: ritual-lst.vercel.app/ Drop a screenshot below once you've minted. Feedback is more than welcome! #BuildOnRitual
59
7
61
138
22,977
nuubs
nubs, what a day the memes, the art, the posts. you're way too creative and the timeline felt it. this is the energy took us a bit longer today. we went through every entry by hand to cut out farms and botted engagement. only real nubs make the list today's 5 legends. each gets a 1/1 nub + a gtd: 1. @BitGuntah 2. @lanlanmou 3. @exogeness 4. @IRY_HN 5. @xixie909 top 20 gtd and 10 lucky nubs are on the card. find yourself didn't make it? tasks just reset. new day, new spots thenubs.xyz/
10
so here's the thing. old-fashioned RWA is boring. but socialfi with RWA… yeah. you read that right. some of you will get rewarded for posting. some for holding. some for both. how? when? soon.
13
no owner, no upgrade, no pause switch, literally can't touch it post deploy. supply only shrinks, 4,001 seats, nothing new ever minted, $TMF burns on every resale. trust isn't required here, it's built out. @TheMutualFun
Each day, we will open new parts of the website to help everyone ease into the ecosystem. Today, all you have to do is bookmark the official link 👇 themutual.fun
1
20
Just applied for the @IdentityUnits drop whitelist. 787 NFTs created by an AI agent swarm. One agent creates, another reviews. Raffled across the next drops. identityunits.fun/claim IUC4F223
16
yourinuu retweeted
Giveaway ✨ 100$ - 2 Winners 50$ each 30 NFTs @KidStoryHood Like RT Drop EVM Wallet ☀️
1,629
1,465
6
1,389
26,424
yourinuu retweeted
FAMILY, CHECK YOUR PORTFOLIOS 👀 Your welcome bonus is waiting. Check your balance and see when it unlocks. A little something from us to get you started. revenue.family/#portfolio
54,942
83,482
1,220
92,583
1,669,007
yourinuu retweeted
There seems to be a lot of chatter in the Department today. Management has declined to comment on why. fomies.family
4,853
4,549
412
5,576
130,456
yourinuu retweeted
still thinking? 👀 the door won’t stay open forever. whitelist raffle closes soon. 🐜 fomoater.com
421
1,287
307
1,869
59,601
yourinuu retweeted
Gud luck. fomies.family
18,046
14,600
1,786
16,300
457,222
Introducing SNURPS by Catapult Trade 4,444 NFTs · Mint Date: September 30 catapult.trade/snurps code: 4444 72 hours to get in
15,511
18,705
7,702
21,413
954,339
gm ! are you ready for big week? whatever's coming, the ones who showed up during GTD race are going to be first to know @0xhazels #WEAREHAZELS
5
2
19
336
"not a collection, a culture" is bold, but Hazels backs it with five written rules nothing you learn belongs only to you. no one rises alone. counted in the open. ownership is access. fairness is not a promise, it is a ledger. @0xhazels @Rosaaa #WEAREHAZELS
got the creator banner from @CelineeXBT and reading through the Hazels vision docs right after actually made it land differently I build in Web3 myself, so I've seen the pattern @Rosaaa is pushing back against from the other side too, projects that stay generous with access right up until the audience they borrowed becomes valuable, then quietly tighten the door. what stands out about Hazels isn't that it promises to be different, it's that the rules were written before the value showed up instead of after, and that's usually the part projects skip "if the NFT is in your wallet, you are inside Hazels" reads simple, but it's actually a stricter standard than most collections hold themselves to. ownership as the access credential, not ownership plus a roadmap that changes once things get big full vision here if you want the long version, hazels.io/docs/overview/visi… grateful to be part of this early, studio.hazels.io/?ref=HZL-LR… #WEAREHAZELS
3
4
15
253
Dear beloved @ritualnet team, I’m here to raise my side as someone who has stayed loyal to Ritual and genuinely supported and used the product. I don’t usually raise concerns, especially when i know it might not benefit me personally. But when it comes to the friends, contributors, builders, and OGs i’ve met and known in the Ritual community, I feel like this is something worth speaking up about. As i understand it, the Ritual team is waiting for community feedback before releasing the official tokenomics on X. So i want to raise a few questions about the tokenomics shared yesterday. Some people were happy with it, while others were disappointed. "What was the basis for the 0.5% community allocation? Why is it this small?" "What about the Genesis 1000 role holders?" "How will the real contributors in the Ritual community be recognized?" "What about the PloPlo NFT holders?" These are some of the questions i keep hearing from people, and honestly, even I’m confused. Sometimes i want to defend Ritual on this topic, but it’s hard when you look at it from the perspective of the people who stayed, contributed, supported, built, educated others, and believed in Ritual for a long time. Of course, none of us were forced to contribute to Ritual. We chose to stay. We chose to work hard. We chose to support it. But i also believe in the idea of giving something back to the people who stayed with you from the lowest point to the highest. I’m not saying this because we are entitled to something in return. My point is simple: After months or even years of supporting Ritual, do we really think everyone should end up under the same 0.5% community allocation? I joined Ritual in April 2025 because i genuinely believed in what the team was building. I even invited some of my friends to join because i wanted more people to discover what I saw in Ritual. To me, it was never just another AI project trying to exist in Web3. And honestly, I’m very thankful to Ritual. I’ve said this many times, but if it wasn’t for Ritual, I probably wouldn’t have learned how to build, become a vibe coder, improve my communication, or learn how to stay loyal and genuinely support a project i believe in. That’s an experience i'll always carry with me. One thing that also disappointed me was seeing some predictions from top contributors create more negativity and FUD around the tokenomics. I understand that everyone is allowed to share their opinion, especially early contributors. But i personally hope that the people who have been here early can also help keep the community grounded instead of making people feel even worse about the situation. So if i'm given the chance to share my own opinion as a real supporter and community member, this is what I would personally suggest. I’ve been thinking about the 0.5% community allocation, and honestly, I think there’s room for Ritual to reconsider it. I’m not saying the community needs a massive percentage. Personally, I think 2–3% would be more meaningful. That would be around 200M–300M RITUAL out of a 10B total supply. Why 2–3%? Because this isn’t really about giving the community more “free tokens.” It’s about making sure the people who helped build, test, educate, moderate, create, and support the ecosystem early on have a meaningful stake in what comes next. Depending on how many contributors qualify and how the allocation is distributed, some long term contributors could still receive very little despite spending months or even years contributing to Ritual. I think 2–3% gives the team more room to properly reward those contributions without taking an unreasonable amount from the overall supply. And i also think the Ritual could benefit from it in several ways. 1. Stronger post mainnet retention If early contributors receive a meaningful allocation, they may have more reason to stay active after TGE instead of disappearing once the rewards are over. That’s based on my own experience in Web3. For Ritual, that could mean having a more durable contributor base after mainnet. 2. Better alignment Someone who holds a meaningful amount of RITUAL and has already contributed to the ecosystem becomes more aligned with the long term success of the network. Builders, contributors, node operators, early supporters, and others are no longer just reward recipients. They become stakeholders. 3. More organic ecosystem growth Ritual doesn’t have to fund every part of growth itself. A motivated community can continue creating dApps, building an agent, Frenrug users, Infernet node operators, contents, research, events, onboarding sessions, developer support, and more. A stronger community allocation could help multiply that work. 4. Better decentralization A wider distribution among real contributors means more tokens are held by people who are actually participating in the ecosystem. That could help create broader community ownership instead of concentrating too much supply in a smaller number of groups. 5. Stronger reputation around community incentives This matters for a network that wants developers and users to keep coming. If people see that meaningful early contribution can eventually lead to meaningful ownership, future contributors may be more willing to spend their time building on Ritual. Basically: contributors → meaningful ownership → continued contribution → stronger ecosystem → more value for Ritual And to everyone who still believes in Ritual, myself included: Don’t blindly follow every prediction you see. Do your own research. Look for the information yourself. Don’t rely on just one person to tell you what to think. If they could do it, you can do it too. And most importantly, wait for the official announcement. Again, I’m not here to spread FUD. I’m here to share my opinion as a real supporter and community member of Ritual. I believe we have the right to raise concerns and talk about what we think can be improved. Thank you to the Ritual team. I hope this reaches the right people and that the concerns from the community are heard before mainnet. I’m still one of the people who believes Ritual can succeed. I’ll be here until mainnet, building, learning, and continuing to support the project i chose to believe in. #LETSBUILDMOREINMAINNET @joshsimenhoff @niraj @akileshpotti @mongdiny7 @elifhilalumucu @0x_HalfMoonKid
45
24
4
109
4,182
Stonk Harvest gameplay is fully live. You can start playing on our site right now! For every 4500 $HARVEST you spend in seeds you can win up to 24300 in return. We have loaded the rewards CA so essentially all early players get guaranteed rewards. Grow your 1st plant now. 🌱
116
1,105
32
770
10,673
Hazels RWA ties ownership to physical products, IP commerce, and a real revenue pool Holders and Stakers both qualify, but stakers get greater weight ownership pays more the more committed you are. @0xhazels #WEAREHAZELS
lots NFT utility pages are vague on purpose, "holders get benefits" and nothing else. @0xhazels actually published a matrix, and it draws a hard line between two tiers Holder just means the NFT sits in your wallet. Active Staker means it's locked. that difference decides almost everything Drops, the free mint launchpad, is exclusive to Active Stakers only. holding without staking gets you zero access there, no exceptions written in Pulse works differently, Holders compete on a leaderboard, but Active Stakers who hit the requirements get guaranteed allocation, no competing through FCFS at all VIP meetups and the private Discord are open to both tiers, RWA revenue weighting favors stakers over plain holders one line in the doc closes the loophole a lot of projects leave open on purpose, being a creator, influencer, or partner does not replace NFT eligibility. wallet verification decides access, nothing else does full breakdown here, hazels.io/docs/utility/nft-u… #WEAREHAZELS
5
86
Every rig owns a wallet. What ends up in it isn't rock and it doesn't have to stay on Robinhood Chain. The seam runs to Bitcoin. Free mint, sealed until reveal → hoodminer.live
1,446
8,638
113
7,024
98,398
lots NFT utility pages are vague on purpose, "holders get benefits" and nothing else. @0xhazels actually published a matrix, and it draws a hard line between two tiers Holder just means the NFT sits in your wallet. Active Staker means it's locked. that difference decides almost everything Drops, the free mint launchpad, is exclusive to Active Stakers only. holding without staking gets you zero access there, no exceptions written in Pulse works differently, Holders compete on a leaderboard, but Active Stakers who hit the requirements get guaranteed allocation, no competing through FCFS at all VIP meetups and the private Discord are open to both tiers, RWA revenue weighting favors stakers over plain holders one line in the doc closes the loophole a lot of projects leave open on purpose, being a creator, influencer, or partner does not replace NFT eligibility. wallet verification decides access, nothing else does full breakdown here, hazels.io/docs/utility/nft-u… #WEAREHAZELS
got the creator banner from @CelineeXBT and reading through the Hazels vision docs right after actually made it land differently I build in Web3 myself, so I've seen the pattern @Rosaaa is pushing back against from the other side too, projects that stay generous with access right up until the audience they borrowed becomes valuable, then quietly tighten the door. what stands out about Hazels isn't that it promises to be different, it's that the rules were written before the value showed up instead of after, and that's usually the part projects skip "if the NFT is in your wallet, you are inside Hazels" reads simple, but it's actually a stricter standard than most collections hold themselves to. ownership as the access credential, not ownership plus a roadmap that changes once things get big full vision here if you want the long version, hazels.io/docs/overview/visi… grateful to be part of this early, studio.hazels.io/?ref=HZL-LR… #WEAREHAZELS
2
2
1
16
411
yourinuu retweeted
The portraits were only the beginning. Six racers. One finish line. Choose wisely. The track opens soon. snailies.xyz 🐌🏁
607
1,395
12
2,410
25,261
got the creator banner from @CelineeXBT and reading through the Hazels vision docs right after actually made it land differently I build in Web3 myself, so I've seen the pattern @Rosaaa is pushing back against from the other side too, projects that stay generous with access right up until the audience they borrowed becomes valuable, then quietly tighten the door. what stands out about Hazels isn't that it promises to be different, it's that the rules were written before the value showed up instead of after, and that's usually the part projects skip "if the NFT is in your wallet, you are inside Hazels" reads simple, but it's actually a stricter standard than most collections hold themselves to. ownership as the access credential, not ownership plus a roadmap that changes once things get big full vision here if you want the long version, hazels.io/docs/overview/visi… grateful to be part of this early, studio.hazels.io/?ref=HZL-LR… #WEAREHAZELS
6
1
1
19
957