Not financial, investment, legal, or any other professional advice. I am a private individual who buys and holds positions in companies I personally believe in. Everything I share is opinion, speculation, assumption, and personal narrative—not a recommendation that you do the same. I have confirmation bias. I entertain conspiracy theories. I sometimes consult astrology. None of that is hidden, and none of it makes my views more reliable. Markets can and do move against me. Past results, screenshots, and conviction are not predictors of future results. Thousands of people reading this does not turn my posts into advice, signals, or a service. I am not your fiduciary, advisor, or guru. You can lose money—potentially all of it—following ideas you see here or anywhere else. Do your own research, size your own risk, and make your own decisions. If you cannot afford the loss, do not take the position. Whether it be trying to predict the next Stanley Cup champs, how the Bears will do this Sunday or what Ryan Cohen's next move will be is purely for entertainment purposes. Thanks for your attention to this matter

Tokenized via a 251 G?

DGCL § 251(g) provides a streamlined way for a Delaware corporation to reorganize into a pure holding-company structure (a “HoldCo reorganization” or sometimes called a “HoldCo inversion”) without a stockholder vote. What It Does: It lets an existing Delaware corporation (“OpCo”) insert a new Delaware holding company above itself so that: ♥ Stockholders of OpCo automatically receive identical stock in the new HoldCo (same rights, preferences, etc.). ♥ OpCo (or its successor) becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of HoldCo. ♥ The directors, certificate of incorporation, and bylaws of HoldCo match those of OpCo (with only narrow permitted differences, such as name or registered agent). Economically, nothing changes for the stockholders; the ownership chain is simply inverted so the operating company sits underneath a pure holding company. Typical Mechanics OpCo forms a new wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary (the future HoldCo). HoldCo forms another wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary (Merger Sub). Merger Sub merges into OpCo under § 251(g), with OpCo surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of HoldCo. Each outstanding share of OpCo converts into an identical share of HoldCo. The classic public example is the 2015 Google → Alphabet reorganization, which was expressly done under § 251(g) so no shareholder vote was required. Existing Google shareholders became Alphabet shareholders and Google became a subsidiary. Key Statutory Conditions (DGCL § 251(g)) No stockholder vote is required (unless the certificate of incorporation expressly requires one) if all of the following are satisfied: OpCo and a single direct or indirect wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary are the only parties to the merger. Each share of OpCo converts into a share of HoldCo stock with identical rights, powers, and preferences. HoldCo and OpCo are both Delaware corporations; the other merger party is a Delaware corporation or LLC. Immediately after the merger, HoldCo’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws are identical to OpCo’s (with limited exceptions). As a result of the merger, OpCo becomes or remains a direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of HoldCo. The directors of OpCo become the directors of HoldCo. The organizational documents of the surviving entity contain provisions requiring that certain acts or transactions by the surviving entity (other than election/removal of directors) need the same stockholder approval that would have been required of OpCo’s stockholders. The board determines that stockholders do not recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A “holding company” for this purpose is defined as a Delaware corporation that was at all times a wholly-owned subsidiary of OpCo until the merger and whose stock is issued in the merger. Why Companies Use It: Liability separation and structural flexibility (e.g., easier to hold multiple businesses or “Other Bets”). Cleaner ownership chain for future transactions, spin-offs, or financings. No stockholder vote or appraisal rights (when the conditions are met), which avoids cost, delay, and uncertainty. It is a pure Delaware corporate-law tool. When properly structured it is usually intended to be tax-free at the stockholder level (commonly relying on IRC § 351 or other reorganization principles). It is distinct from cross-border “inversions” under IRC § 7874, which are heavily restricted. In short, § 251(g) is the standard Delaware mechanism for creating a HoldCo structure without putting the question to a stockholder vote.

544 calories in that little guy

I see Teddy.

A store within a store concept. @nintendo and @ebgamescan I bet ya we see a few of these open in Gamestop locations too. xitter.cf/Dapper_Tux/status/2111…

Remember who holds a USSC 10th Circuit ruling and appellate victory in their favor for dividends on a blockchain...

forget traffic jams -- just fly over them

hmmm -- any bets on whether tesla stock flies now? I would not wanna be short on this company