cola retweeted
🇺🇸 SK하이닉스 주식이 블록체인에서 3가지 토큰으로 존재한다?
SKHYon, SKHYx, SKHYB.
모두 SK하이닉스 주식에 연동된 토큰화 자산이지만, 발행사도 다르고 거래 조건도 다를 수 있음. 그런데 투자자 입장에서는 한 가지 의문이 생김.
"그래서 어떤 걸 거래해야 하는 거지?" @PancakeSwap은 바로 이 문제에 주목하고 있음.
🧵👇
An update on this post:
Today, one day after an AXIS team member became aware of this issue, the tokens allocated to the KOL I raised concerns about were reclaimed.
However, there are still unresolved issues… The first concerns the date of a wallet’s last transaction. Among the dozens of participants I spoke with, everyone who submitted a wallet that had been inactive for several weeks or longer said they did not receive the airdrop. I also entered with multiple accounts because I wanted to receive the airdrop… So I’m very familiar with the criteria used for Sybil filtering… But it seems those criteria weren’t applied to one particular person… (Of course, there may be exceptions.. But apart from the wallet I flagged, I have not seen a recipient wallet that had been inactive for 250 days and had five or fewer transactions in total across all chains..)
The announcement in the Korean community simply stated that multiple accounts had been identified and the tokens had been reclaimed. It did not explain the details. Because of that, I used an alternate account to explain some of the situation. (My main account is muted in the Telegram group, so I could not post from it, so I used my subaccount) They then kicked me out of the group.
What I am asking for is the Telegram IDs of all the winners. Their wallet addresses can already be checked on the block explorer.
However, the moderators say they cannot provide the winners’ list because only the team has it… So I need team’s help..
I am deeply disappointed with how @axisrobotics has handled this. I just wish they would offer an apology where one is due so we can move forward…
@chris_anm01
I have serious questions about how the AXIS Robotics Korean community airdrop was handled. Participants were initially told that everyone who submitted the form would receive an allocation, before the process changed to include Sybil screening. Several participants I have spoken to believe they were rejected because their wallets lacked transaction history. Yet when I asked the Korean moderator about the actual eligibility criteria, I did not receive a clear explanation.
Meanwhile, I found that 50 different addresses transferred a total of approximately 2,047.5353 AXIS into a single wallet within 68 seconds. My understanding is that the receiving wallet belongs to “집가고싶다,” a community member who is close to the Korean moderator. This raises a specific question that deserves an answer: if those 50 addresses received the airdrop despite having little or no prior activity, why did they qualify while other similarly inactive wallets were reportedly rejected? The team should confirm whether those addresses received allocations and explain how they were assessed.
The moderator’s response was that the team handled the distribution and that they did not know the details. Simply referring the matter to “the team” leaves the concern unresolved. Who made the eligibility decisions? What criteria and cutoff date were used? Did the Korean moderator submit recommendations, influence exclusions, or participate in exceptions? Were the same rules applied to everyone? These are reasonable questions about the fairness of the distribution. The team needs to provide a direct, verifiable explanation. Leaving the criteria undisclosed while concerns about preferential treatment go unanswered only makes the process harder to trust.
@axisrobotics please explain about this situation
basescan.org/address/0x11e26…
cola retweeted
I have serious questions about how the AXIS Robotics Korean community airdrop was handled. Participants were initially told that everyone who submitted the form would receive an allocation, before the process changed to include Sybil screening. Several participants I have spoken to believe they were rejected because their wallets lacked transaction history. Yet when I asked the Korean moderator about the actual eligibility criteria, I did not receive a clear explanation.
Meanwhile, I found that 50 different addresses transferred a total of approximately 2,047.5353 AXIS into a single wallet within 68 seconds. My understanding is that the receiving wallet belongs to “집가고싶다,” a community member who is close to the Korean moderator. This raises a specific question that deserves an answer: if those 50 addresses received the airdrop despite having little or no prior activity, why did they qualify while other similarly inactive wallets were reportedly rejected? The team should confirm whether those addresses received allocations and explain how they were assessed.
The moderator’s response was that the team handled the distribution and that they did not know the details. Simply referring the matter to “the team” leaves the concern unresolved. Who made the eligibility decisions? What criteria and cutoff date were used? Did the Korean moderator submit recommendations, influence exclusions, or participate in exceptions? Were the same rules applied to everyone? These are reasonable questions about the fairness of the distribution. The team needs to provide a direct, verifiable explanation. Leaving the criteria undisclosed while concerns about preferential treatment go unanswered only makes the process harder to trust.
@axisrobotics please explain about this situation
basescan.org/address/0x11e26…
This situation needs an explanation… People in the Korean community are struggling to understand what happened…
@chris_anm01
I have serious questions about how the AXIS Robotics Korean community airdrop was handled. Participants were initially told that everyone who submitted the form would receive an allocation, before the process changed to include Sybil screening. Several participants I have spoken to believe they were rejected because their wallets lacked transaction history. Yet when I asked the Korean moderator about the actual eligibility criteria, I did not receive a clear explanation.
Meanwhile, I found that 50 different addresses transferred a total of approximately 2,047.5353 AXIS into a single wallet within 68 seconds. My understanding is that the receiving wallet belongs to “집가고싶다,” a community member who is close to the Korean moderator. This raises a specific question that deserves an answer: if those 50 addresses received the airdrop despite having little or no prior activity, why did they qualify while other similarly inactive wallets were reportedly rejected? The team should confirm whether those addresses received allocations and explain how they were assessed.
The moderator’s response was that the team handled the distribution and that they did not know the details. Simply referring the matter to “the team” leaves the concern unresolved. Who made the eligibility decisions? What criteria and cutoff date were used? Did the Korean moderator submit recommendations, influence exclusions, or participate in exceptions? Were the same rules applied to everyone? These are reasonable questions about the fairness of the distribution. The team needs to provide a direct, verifiable explanation. Leaving the criteria undisclosed while concerns about preferential treatment go unanswered only makes the process harder to trust.
@axisrobotics please explain about this situation
basescan.org/address/0x11e26…
I have serious questions about how the AXIS Robotics Korean community airdrop was handled. Participants were initially told that everyone who submitted the form would receive an allocation, before the process changed to include Sybil screening. Several participants I have spoken to believe they were rejected because their wallets lacked transaction history. Yet when I asked the Korean moderator about the actual eligibility criteria, I did not receive a clear explanation.
Meanwhile, I found that 50 different addresses transferred a total of approximately 2,047.5353 AXIS into a single wallet within 68 seconds. My understanding is that the receiving wallet belongs to “집가고싶다,” a community member who is close to the Korean moderator. This raises a specific question that deserves an answer: if those 50 addresses received the airdrop despite having little or no prior activity, why did they qualify while other similarly inactive wallets were reportedly rejected? The team should confirm whether those addresses received allocations and explain how they were assessed.
The moderator’s response was that the team handled the distribution and that they did not know the details. Simply referring the matter to “the team” leaves the concern unresolved. Who made the eligibility decisions? What criteria and cutoff date were used? Did the Korean moderator submit recommendations, influence exclusions, or participate in exceptions? Were the same rules applied to everyone? These are reasonable questions about the fairness of the distribution. The team needs to provide a direct, verifiable explanation. Leaving the criteria undisclosed while concerns about preferential treatment go unanswered only makes the process harder to trust.
@axisrobotics please explain about this situation
basescan.org/address/0x11e26…
To be honest, I’m very close to the owner of that wallet… But wrong is wrong, regardless of our relationship.
This is the wallet address: 0x11e262946fB6133296B779CAc7Fe58F7C618f956
If you check it on BaseScan, you’ll see what I mean…
cola retweeted
🌕 @axisrobotics x 불개미 AMA 사전 야핑 짧먹 이벤트!
보니까 Axis 카이토 야핑이 진행중이드라고요?
그래서! AMA 전에 Axis 에 대한 간단 리서치 야핑이벤트를 진행합니다.
일정 : 10월 18일 오후 23시 30분 까지
참여방법
1. 해당 트윗 글 좋아요, 인용하여 Axis 간단 리서치
2. 이벤트리에 제출 : eventree.live/#event/ev_8438…
3. 하면 끝!
보상 : 1만원 상당의 Axis 토큰 x 100명 (ama 보상에서 빼옴)
가주아!!!
📌 불개미와 함께하는 @axisrobotics AMA!
이번 AMA에서는 Axis Robotics의 Co-Founder and CEO Chris Feng
과함께 로보틱스와 블록체인이 어떻게 만날 수 있을지!!! 알아볼 예정입니다.
✔️ 장소 : 불개미 트위터 스트리밍
🗓 일정 : 10월 19일 (월) 오후 9시 KST
✔️ AMA 참여방법 : t.me/fireant_crypto/44739
불개미 Crypto 채널 입장
불개미 트위터 팔로우
불개미 유튜브 구독
해당 트위터 리트윗 및 좋아요 댓글
Axis Robotics 한국 공지방 입장
Axis Robotics 한국 커뮤니티 입장
🔥 AMA 리워드 : Axis 토큰
1. 5만원 상당의 리워드 x 20명
2. 3만원 상당의 리워드 x 20명
3. 1만원 상당의 리워드 x 200명
* 총 240명이 Axis 토큰을 Get 할 수 있는 기회!
온도퍼프는 매주 상당한 규모의 리워드를 뿌리고 있고, 수수료도 굉장히 저렴한 편이기에 (특히 코생퍼럴 사용하면 30퍼 추가 수수료 할인) 저도 실제로 잘 사용하고 있는데요, 특히 다른 펍덱이랑 양빵 잡아두는 용도로 주로 사용합니다
포인트도 모이니까 1석2조네요 오홍홍~~
This quoted post is unavailable.
cola retweeted
4 hours till @papertrade_xyz launch
spend 5 mins on this and you'll get more $PAPER
spoiler: don't liquidate, and don't use 1000x
$PAPER is minted strictly on losses & liquidations, base rate: 100 $PAPER per $1 loss while LP < $2M
emission decays after, early execution = higher ROI
best way is just running long + short at the same time
you lose on one side (print $PAPER) and get most of the money back on the other side
you’re only really paying the haircut on the winning leg
Example:
- $100 each side at 100x
- Price moves 0.5-1%
- One side loses ~$50 and prints ~5k $PAPER
- Other side gives you back ~$42-43
- Net cost ~$7-8 for ~5000 $PAPER -> ~0.15-0.16 cents per $PAPER
Important Mechanics
- Asymmetric impact heavily cuts small moves and barely affects larger ones, optimal close is around 0.7-1.5% move
- Liquidation is very expensive, close manually before it
- High leverage (500-1000×) is fast but easy to get liquidated, 100-300× is more practical
- Profits can go into a FIFO queue if the LP is short, margin is always returned immediately
- $PAPER is non-transferable at launch (stake/unstake only)
TIPS:
- Aim to close around 1% move
- Don’t get liquidated (that’s expensive)
- 100-300x is usually better than full 1000x
- Stake the PAPER right away
- Watch OI so both sides actually open
early delta-neutral cycles closed around a 1% move + manual closes + staking = the most efficient way to farm $PAPER
see you at 14 UTC
papertrade launch timing and details
papertrade is expected to launch at 14:00 UTC on 10.10.2026, following the scheduled hyperevm network upgrade.
at this time trading through the frontend will be enabled.
deposits will pause for a short period of time at 13:45 UTC, fifteen minutes before, to ensure that trading has the utmost priority during launch. if you wish to participate in the launch you must predeposit.
launch congestion
papertrade will be congested at the start due to launch demand. expect temporarily long confirmation wait times, especially for smaller notional trades.
the frontend relayer plays an important role during launch, controlling how transactions are submitted to the hyperevm. some actions like staking distributions run separately in big blocks. the chain will always look as if only half of all possible gas is being used, this is optimal. using more than this would exponentially raise fees within minutes to unpayable prices.
oi limits
papertrade has individual atomic position limits of 10m. there is no limit on the number of 10m positions a user can have. papertrade also has floating oi headroom per market/side, which determines how much oi can be opened in a very short period. these are not designed to be triggered through normal trading usage and are set at 1bn per market/side for launch.
asym pnl fee parameters
papertrade inherits rollbit’s asymmetric fee pnl curve
the parameters are:
-baseRate: .1
-rateMultiplier: 15000
-rateExponent: 1
-referenceNotional: 100000*k (k=1m)
-positionMultiplier: 814.598 btc / 483.979 eth
-profit deadman: 0.2 basis points
a visualization of the pnl parameter curve is below
admin keys
the papertrade admins (2 of 3 multisigs consisting of @izebel_eth @blurr @UngusTrade ) perform three separate roles:
-guardian: pause opens and freeze individual/global markets. if a market is frozen any existing positions can still be closed against the paused bbo mid.
-owner: set impact curve and fee parameters. change configure relayers/keepers. list new markets and upgrade the contracts. all contract upgrades are gated by a 7 day timelock.
-markets: adjust the oi headroom per market/side. set the minimum margin and minimum position sizes.
read more about these features at: docs.papertrade.xyz
CP 티지이축하드립니다
업비트따리하다가 50만원손해봐서 이거꼭받아서멘징하고싶네요.. 제발부탁드립니다
@cluster_korea $CP @OpenProtocolFND
t.me/clusterprotocolkoreaAnn…
cola retweeted
Cluster Protocol is coming to Upbit.
Sep 8 at 14:30 KST/05:30 UTC.
500+ models through one endpoint. Compute on demand. Data you own.
Applications and agents settle per request in $CP.
신규 디지털 자산 클러스터프로토콜(CP) 거래지원 안내
✅ 지원 마켓: KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓
📅 거래지원 개시 시점 : 2026-09-08 14:30 KST 예정
🔗공지 바로가기:
upbit.com/service_center/not…
#Upbit #CP
@OpenProtocolFND
cola retweeted
Cluster Protocol is coming to Bithumb.
Spot trading opens September 8 at 15:30 KST/06:30 UTC.
One endpoint. Every model, every GPU, every dataset.
Settled in $CP on Base.
📢 New Listing
🚀 클러스터프로토콜(#CP) 원화 마켓 추가 안내
🚀 $CP/KRW will be listed on #Bithumb!
🔸 Details : feed.bithumb.com/notice/1654…
#Bithumb #CP @OpenProtocolFND
cola retweeted
⚽️ OKX 굿즈 이벤트 참여합니다!
저는 1번 OKX Boost 쪽으로 참여합니다! @star_okx
요즘 보고 있던 밈코가 있어서 OKX Web3 Wallet에서 직접 구매해보고, 실제로 Boost 거래량에 반영되는지도 확인해봤습니다.
제가 확인한 과정은 간단합니다
1️⃣ web3.okx.com 접속 @wallet
2️⃣ 기존 지갑을 OKX Wallet 쪽에 임포트
3️⃣ 코인 목록에서 유동성·거래량 기준으로 관심 토큰 확인
4️⃣ 우측 Buy 화면에서 수량 입력 후 구매
저는 보통 유동성 / 볼륨 / 차트 흐름 위주로 보는데, 최근엔 사이식이랑 ANTFUN 쪽 차트가 눈에 들어오더라고요.
다만 미리 봐둔 코인이 있어서 그대로 진행했습니다.
구매 후 Boost 페이지도 확인해봤습니다.
① 약 $300 매수
② 0.5x 구간으로 반영
③ Daily snapshot 기준 Daily Volume $149.6으로 확인
제가 구매한 밈코는 Boost 랭킹 토큰이 아니라서 추가 20% 부스터 대상은 아닐 수 있지만, OKX DEX를 통한 거래가 Boost Volume 계산에는 실제로 반영되는 것은 확인했습니다.
이미 OKX Wallet 자주 쓰시는 분들에겐 익숙한 과정이라 핵심만 짧게 정리했습니다. @ManCity
밈코는 변동성이 크니 매수 추천은 아니고, DYOR 필수입니다
⚽️HOPE xOKXx Manchester City VIP 굿즈 콘텐츠 이벤트
제가 진행하고 OKX Wallet이 후원하는 굿즈 이벤트! (경쟁률 낮습니다!)
원래 한달에 1m 이상 트레이딩 해야 받을 수 있는 거래소 월드컵 특집 vip 굿즈
맨체스터 시티의 한국 방문을 기념해, 맨체스터 시티 공식 후원사인 OKX Wallet과 함께 커뮤니티 콘텐츠 이벤트를 진행합니다! 🎉
참여해주신 분들 중 총 5분께 OKX VIP 한정 굿즈를 선물로 드립니다!
굿즈는 비치타월, 모자, 스탠리 텀블러, 손목밴드, 유니폼 등
VIP 굿즈로 구성되어 있어 퀄리티도 좋습니다 💙
📌 참여 방법
요약하면 이벤트 기간 동안 OKX Boost 또는 OKX xStocks를 주제로
이 글 인용해 X에 콘텐츠를 작성하고 구글폼 제출
1️⃣ OKX Boost
참여 방법 및 가이드
이용 튜토리얼
실제 참여 후기 및 인증
2️⃣ OKX xStocks
서비스 및 상품 소개
거래 후기 및 사용 경험
xStocks 관련 정보·교육 콘텐츠
(현재 xStocks Trading Competition도 진행 중!)
📅 이벤트 기간
2026년 8월 5일 ~ 8월 12일
🏷 필수 태그 3개
@wallet (핸들이 레어한 okx wallet 계정)
@ManCity
@star_okx (대표님 계정)
당첨 안내
1. 조회수가 가장 높은 콘텐츠 3명
2. 참여자 중 랜덤 추첨 2명
총 5분께 OKX VIP 한정 굿즈를 드립니다!
🔗구글폼
forms.gle/TubQMY6EoKJAgYM6A
코인 굿즈 중 퀄리티 갑은 역시 거래소 vip 굿즈
맨체스터 시티 팬과 OKX Wallet 사용자분들의 많은 참여 부탁드립니다! ⚽️💙
cola retweeted
[AMA] With peaq, Transform Robot(Physical AI) Narrative xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1qxvvkaZr…
